Psychophysiological responses to treadwall and indoor wall climbing in adult female climbers
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
33514833
PubMed Central
PMC7846593
DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-82184-6
PII: 10.1038/s41598-021-82184-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- horolezectví fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- psychofyziologie normy statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- síla ruky fyziologie MeSH
- sportovní výkon fyziologie MeSH
- spotřeba kyslíku fyziologie MeSH
- srdeční frekvence fyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The purpose of the study was to compare the psychophysiological response of climbers of a range of abilities (lower grade to advanced) when ascending identical climbing routes on a climbing wall and a rotating treadwall. Twenty-two female climbers (31.2 ± 9.4 years; 60.5 ± 6.5 kg; 168.6 ± 5.7 cm) completed two identical 18 m climbing trials (graded 4 on the French Sport scale) separated by 1 week, one on the treadwall (climbing low to the ground) and the other on the indoor wall (climbing in height). Indirect calorimetry, venous blood samples and video-analysis were used to assess energy cost, hormonal response and time-load characteristics. Energy costs were higher during indoor wall climbing comparing to those on the treadwall by 16% (P < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.48). No interaction of climbing ability and climbing condition were found. However, there was an interaction for climbing ability and post-climbing catecholamine concentration (P < 0.01, [Formula: see text] = 0.28). Advanced climbers' catecholamine response increased by 238% and 166% with respect to pre-climb values on the treadwall and indoor wall, respectively; while lower grade climbers pre-climb concentrations were elevated by 281% and 376% on the treadwall and indoor wall, respectively. The video analysis showed no differences in any time-motion variables between treadwall and indoor wall climbing. The study demonstrated a greater metabolic response for indoor wall climbing, however, the exact mechanisms are not yet fully understood.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Orth D, Davids K, Seifert L. Coordination in climbing: effect of skill, practice and constraints manipulation. Sports Med. 2016;46:255–268. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0417-5. PubMed DOI
Pijpers JR, Oudejans RRD, Bakker FC, Beek PJ. The role of anxiety in perceiving and realizing affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 2006;18:131–161. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco1803_1. DOI
Draper N, Jones GA, Fryer S, Hodgson CI, Blackwell G. Physiological and psychological responses to lead and top rope climbing for intermediate rock climbers. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2010;10:13–20. doi: 10.1080/17461390903108125. DOI
de Geus B, O'Driscoll SV, Meeusen R. Influence of climbing style on physiological responses during indoor rock climbing on routes with the same difficulty. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006;98:489–496. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0287-5. PubMed DOI
Baláš J, et al. The effect of potential fall distance on hormonal response in rock climbing. J. Sports Sci. 2017;35:989–994. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1206667. PubMed DOI
Draper N, Jones GA, Fryer S, Hodgson C, Blackwell G. Effect of an on-sight lead on the physiological and psychological responses to rock climbing. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2008;7:492–498. PubMed PMC
Fryer S, Dickson T, Draper N, Blackwell G, Hillier S. A psychophysiological comparison of on-sight lead and top rope ascents in advanced rock climbers. Scan. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2013;23:645–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01432.x. PubMed DOI
Hodgson CI, et al. Perceived anxiety and plasma cortisol concentrations following rock climbing with differing safety rope protocols. Br. J. Sports Med. 2009;43:531–535. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.046011. PubMed DOI
España-Romero V, et al. Climbing time to exhaustion is a determinant of climbing performance in high-level sport climbers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009;107:517–525. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1155-x. PubMed DOI
Fryer S, Giles D, Palomino IG, Puerta AD, España-Romero V. Hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory predictors of sport rock climbing performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018;32:3534–3541. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001860. PubMed DOI
Booth J, Marino F, Hill C, Gwinn T. Energy cost of sport rock climbing in elite performers. Br. J. Sports Med. 1999;33:14–18. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.1.14. PubMed DOI PMC
Limonta E, et al. Cardiovascular and metabolic responses during indoor climbing and laboratory cycling exercise in advanced and elite climbers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018;118:371–379. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3779-6. PubMed DOI
Aras D, Akalan C. The effect of anxiety about falling on selected physiological parameters with different rope protocols in sport rock climbing. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2014;54:1–8. PubMed
Dickson T, Fryer S, Blackwell G, Draper N, Stoner L. Effect of style of ascent on the psychophysiological demands of rock climbing in elite level climbers. Sports Technol. 2012;5:111–119. doi: 10.1080/19346182.2012.686504. DOI
Draper N, et al. Comparative grading scales, statistical analyses, climber descriptors and ability grouping: international rock climbing research association position statement. Sports Technol. 2016;8:88–94. doi: 10.1080/19346182.2015.1107081. DOI
España-Romero V, et al. Physiological responses in rock climbing with repeated ascents over a 10-week period. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012;112:821–828. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2022-0. PubMed DOI
Baláš J, et al. The relationship between climbing ability and physiological responses to rock climbing. Sci. World J. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/678387. PubMed DOI PMC
Donath L, Roesner K, Schöffl V, Gabriel HHW. Work-relief ratios and imbalances of load application in sport climbing: Another link to overuse-induced injuries? Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2013;23:406–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01399.x. PubMed DOI
Cox RH, Martens MP, Russell WD. Measuring anxiety in athletics: the revised competitive state anxiety inventory-2. J. Sport Exercise Psychol. 2003;25:519–533. doi: 10.1123/jsep.25.4.519. DOI
Cheng WNK, Hardy L, Markland D. Toward a three-dimensional conceptualization of performance anxiety: rationale and initial measurement development. Psychol. Sport Exercise. 2009;10:271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.08.001. DOI
Mermier CM, Robergs RA, McMinn SM, Heyward VH. Energy expenditure and physiological responses during indoor rock climbing. Br. J. Sports Med. 1997;31:224–228. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.3.224. PubMed DOI PMC
Bertuzzi R, Franchini E, Kokubun E, Peduti Dal Molin Kiss MA. Energy system contributions in indoor rock climbing. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007;101:293–300. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0501-0. PubMed DOI
Baláš J, et al. The effect of climbing ability and slope inclination on vertical foot loading using a novel force sensor instrumentation system. J. Hum. Kinet. 2014;44:75–81. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0112. PubMed DOI PMC
Rosponi A, Schena F, Leonardi A, Tosi P. Influence of ascent speed on rock climbing economy. Sport Sci. Health. 2012;7:71–80. doi: 10.1007/s11332-012-0115-8. DOI
Sheel AW. Physiology of sport rock climbing. Br. J. Sports Med. 2004;38:355–359. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.008169. PubMed DOI PMC
Fuss FK, Niegl G. Instrumented climbing holds and performance analysis in sport climbing. Sports Technol. 2008;1:301–313. doi: 10.1080/19346182.2008.9648487. DOI