Psychophysiological responses to treadwall and indoor wall climbing in adult female climbers
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
33514833
PubMed Central
PMC7846593
DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-82184-6
PII: 10.1038/s41598-021-82184-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Mountaineering physiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Psychophysiology standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Hand Strength physiology MeSH
- Athletic Performance physiology MeSH
- Oxygen Consumption physiology MeSH
- Heart Rate physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
The purpose of the study was to compare the psychophysiological response of climbers of a range of abilities (lower grade to advanced) when ascending identical climbing routes on a climbing wall and a rotating treadwall. Twenty-two female climbers (31.2 ± 9.4 years; 60.5 ± 6.5 kg; 168.6 ± 5.7 cm) completed two identical 18 m climbing trials (graded 4 on the French Sport scale) separated by 1 week, one on the treadwall (climbing low to the ground) and the other on the indoor wall (climbing in height). Indirect calorimetry, venous blood samples and video-analysis were used to assess energy cost, hormonal response and time-load characteristics. Energy costs were higher during indoor wall climbing comparing to those on the treadwall by 16% (P < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.48). No interaction of climbing ability and climbing condition were found. However, there was an interaction for climbing ability and post-climbing catecholamine concentration (P < 0.01, [Formula: see text] = 0.28). Advanced climbers' catecholamine response increased by 238% and 166% with respect to pre-climb values on the treadwall and indoor wall, respectively; while lower grade climbers pre-climb concentrations were elevated by 281% and 376% on the treadwall and indoor wall, respectively. The video analysis showed no differences in any time-motion variables between treadwall and indoor wall climbing. The study demonstrated a greater metabolic response for indoor wall climbing, however, the exact mechanisms are not yet fully understood.
See more in PubMed
Orth D, Davids K, Seifert L. Coordination in climbing: effect of skill, practice and constraints manipulation. Sports Med. 2016;46:255–268. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0417-5. PubMed DOI
Pijpers JR, Oudejans RRD, Bakker FC, Beek PJ. The role of anxiety in perceiving and realizing affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 2006;18:131–161. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco1803_1. DOI
Draper N, Jones GA, Fryer S, Hodgson CI, Blackwell G. Physiological and psychological responses to lead and top rope climbing for intermediate rock climbers. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2010;10:13–20. doi: 10.1080/17461390903108125. DOI
de Geus B, O'Driscoll SV, Meeusen R. Influence of climbing style on physiological responses during indoor rock climbing on routes with the same difficulty. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006;98:489–496. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0287-5. PubMed DOI
Baláš J, et al. The effect of potential fall distance on hormonal response in rock climbing. J. Sports Sci. 2017;35:989–994. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1206667. PubMed DOI
Draper N, Jones GA, Fryer S, Hodgson C, Blackwell G. Effect of an on-sight lead on the physiological and psychological responses to rock climbing. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2008;7:492–498. PubMed PMC
Fryer S, Dickson T, Draper N, Blackwell G, Hillier S. A psychophysiological comparison of on-sight lead and top rope ascents in advanced rock climbers. Scan. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2013;23:645–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01432.x. PubMed DOI
Hodgson CI, et al. Perceived anxiety and plasma cortisol concentrations following rock climbing with differing safety rope protocols. Br. J. Sports Med. 2009;43:531–535. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.046011. PubMed DOI
España-Romero V, et al. Climbing time to exhaustion is a determinant of climbing performance in high-level sport climbers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009;107:517–525. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1155-x. PubMed DOI
Fryer S, Giles D, Palomino IG, Puerta AD, España-Romero V. Hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory predictors of sport rock climbing performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018;32:3534–3541. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001860. PubMed DOI
Booth J, Marino F, Hill C, Gwinn T. Energy cost of sport rock climbing in elite performers. Br. J. Sports Med. 1999;33:14–18. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.1.14. PubMed DOI PMC
Limonta E, et al. Cardiovascular and metabolic responses during indoor climbing and laboratory cycling exercise in advanced and elite climbers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018;118:371–379. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3779-6. PubMed DOI
Aras D, Akalan C. The effect of anxiety about falling on selected physiological parameters with different rope protocols in sport rock climbing. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2014;54:1–8. PubMed
Dickson T, Fryer S, Blackwell G, Draper N, Stoner L. Effect of style of ascent on the psychophysiological demands of rock climbing in elite level climbers. Sports Technol. 2012;5:111–119. doi: 10.1080/19346182.2012.686504. DOI
Draper N, et al. Comparative grading scales, statistical analyses, climber descriptors and ability grouping: international rock climbing research association position statement. Sports Technol. 2016;8:88–94. doi: 10.1080/19346182.2015.1107081. DOI
España-Romero V, et al. Physiological responses in rock climbing with repeated ascents over a 10-week period. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012;112:821–828. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2022-0. PubMed DOI
Baláš J, et al. The relationship between climbing ability and physiological responses to rock climbing. Sci. World J. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/678387. PubMed DOI PMC
Donath L, Roesner K, Schöffl V, Gabriel HHW. Work-relief ratios and imbalances of load application in sport climbing: Another link to overuse-induced injuries? Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2013;23:406–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01399.x. PubMed DOI
Cox RH, Martens MP, Russell WD. Measuring anxiety in athletics: the revised competitive state anxiety inventory-2. J. Sport Exercise Psychol. 2003;25:519–533. doi: 10.1123/jsep.25.4.519. DOI
Cheng WNK, Hardy L, Markland D. Toward a three-dimensional conceptualization of performance anxiety: rationale and initial measurement development. Psychol. Sport Exercise. 2009;10:271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.08.001. DOI
Mermier CM, Robergs RA, McMinn SM, Heyward VH. Energy expenditure and physiological responses during indoor rock climbing. Br. J. Sports Med. 1997;31:224–228. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.3.224. PubMed DOI PMC
Bertuzzi R, Franchini E, Kokubun E, Peduti Dal Molin Kiss MA. Energy system contributions in indoor rock climbing. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007;101:293–300. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0501-0. PubMed DOI
Baláš J, et al. The effect of climbing ability and slope inclination on vertical foot loading using a novel force sensor instrumentation system. J. Hum. Kinet. 2014;44:75–81. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0112. PubMed DOI PMC
Rosponi A, Schena F, Leonardi A, Tosi P. Influence of ascent speed on rock climbing economy. Sport Sci. Health. 2012;7:71–80. doi: 10.1007/s11332-012-0115-8. DOI
Sheel AW. Physiology of sport rock climbing. Br. J. Sports Med. 2004;38:355–359. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.008169. PubMed DOI PMC
Fuss FK, Niegl G. Instrumented climbing holds and performance analysis in sport climbing. Sports Technol. 2008;1:301–313. doi: 10.1080/19346182.2008.9648487. DOI