Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survival: External validation of current predictive scoring systems focusing on influenza A etiology
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, validační studie
PubMed
33534922
DOI
10.1111/aor.13932
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- acute respiratory distress syndrome, external validation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, influenza, scoring system,
- MeSH
- analýza přežití MeSH
- APACHE MeSH
- chřipka lidská mortalita terapie virologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mimotělní membránová oxygenace * MeSH
- mortalita v nemocnicích MeSH
- posouzení stavu pacienta * MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- syndrom dechové tísně mortalita terapie virologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
Despite increasing clinical experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), its optimal indications remain unclear. Here, we externally evaluated all currently available ECMO survival-predicting scoring systems and the APACHE II score in subjects undergoing veno-venous ECMO (VV ECMO) support due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with influenza (IVA) and non-influenza (n-IVA) etiologies. Our aim was to find the best scoring system for influenza A ARDS ECMO success prediction. Retrospective data were analyzed to assess the abilities of the PRESERVE, RESP, PRESET, ECMOnet, Roch, and APACHE II scores to predict patient outcome. Patients treated with veno-venous ECMO support for ARDS were divided into two groups: IVA and n-IVA etiologies. Parameters collected within 24 hours before ECMO initiation were used to calculate PRESERVE, RESP, PRESET, ECMOnet, Roch, and APACHE II scores. Compared to the IVA group, the n-IVA group exhibited significantly higher ICU, 28-day, and 6-month mortality (P = .043, .034, and .047, respectively). Regarding ECMO support success predictions, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.62 for PRESERVE, 0.44 for RESP, 0.57 for PRESET, and 0.67 for ECMOnet, and 0.62 for Roch calculated for all subjects according to the original papers. In the IVA group, APACHE II had the best predictive value for ICU, hospital, 28-day, and 6-month mortality (AUC values of 0.73, 0.73, 0.70, and 0.73, respectively). In the n-IVA group, APACHE II was the best predictor of survival in the ICU and hospital (AUC 0.54 and 0.57, respectively). From all possible ECMO survival scoring systems, the APACHE II score had the best predictive value for VV ECMO subjects with ARDS caused by influenza A-related pneumonia with a cut-off value of about 32 points.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Pham T, Combes A, Rozé H, Chevret S, Mercat A, Roch A, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pandemic influenza A (H1N1)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a cohort study and propensity-matched analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:276-85.
Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1351-63.
Combes A, Brodie D, Bartlett R, Brochard L, Brower R, Conrad S, et al. Position paper for the organization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for acute respiratory failure in adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:488-96.
Schmidt M, Bréchot N, Combes A. Ten situations in which ECMO is unlikely to be successful. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:750-2.
Schwarz MI, Albert RK. “Imitators” of the ARDS: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Chest. 2004;125:1530-5.
Davies A, Jones D, Balley M, Beca J, Bellomo R, Blackwell N, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 2009;302:1888-95.
Noah MA, Peek GJ, Finney SJ, Griffiths MJ, Harrison DA, Grieve R, et al. Referral to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center and mortality among patients with severe 2009 influenza A (H1N1). JAMA 2011;306:1659-68.
Makdisi G, Wang IW. Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) review of life-saving technology. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:E166-76.
Fan E, Gattinoni L, Combes A, Schmidt M, Peek G, Brodie D, et al. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure: a clinical review from an international group of experts. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:712-24.
Lyu L, Yao J, Gao G, Long C, Hei F, Ji B, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of hyperbilirubinemia in adult cardiac patients supported by veno-arterial ECMO. Artif Organs. 2018;42:148-54.
Steiger T, Foltan M, Philipp A, Mueller T, Gruber M, Bredthauer A, et al. Accumulations of von Willebrand factor within ECMO oxygenators: potential indicator of coagulation abnormalities in critically ill patients? Artif Organs. 2019;43:1065-76.
Schmidt M, Zogheib E, Rozé H, Repesse X, Lebreton G, Luyt CE, et al. The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1704-13.
Schmidt M, Bailey M, Sheldrake J, Hodgson C, Aubron C, Rycus PT, et al. Predicting survival after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:1374-82.
Hilder M, Herbstreit F, Adamzik M, Beiderlinden M, Bürschen M, Peters J, et al. Comparison of mortality prediction models in acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and development of a novel prediction score: the PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy-Score (PRESET-Score). Crit Care. 2017;21:301.
Pappalardo F, Pieri M, Greco T, Patroniti N, Pesenti A, Arcadipane A, et al. Predicting mortality risk in patients undergoing venovenous ECMO for ARDS due to influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia: the ECMOnet score. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:275-81.
Roch A, Hraiech S, Masson E, Grisoli D, Forel JM, Boucekine M, et al. The outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and brought to a referral center. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:74-83.
Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1965-75.
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. ELSO guidelines general v1.4. Ann Arbor, MI; 2017 [cited 2019 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.elso.org/Resources/Guidelines.aspx.
ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526-33.
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-45.
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1958;53:457-81.
Harrington DP, Fleming TR. A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data. Biometrika. 1982;69:553-66.
Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77.
Schmidt M, Pham T, Arcadipane A, Agerstrand C, Ohshimo S, Pellegrino V, et al. Mechanical ventilation management during ECMO for ARDS: an international multicenter prospective cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:1002-13. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201806-1094OC.
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818-29.
Herold S, Becker C, Ridge KM, Budinger GRS. Influenza virus-induced lung injury: pathogenesis and implications for treatment. Eur Resp J. 2015;45:1463-78.
Luyt CE, Combes A, Becquemin MH, Beigelman-Aubry C, Hatem S, Brun AL, et al. Long-term outcomes of pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1)-associated severe ARDS. Chest. 2012;142:583-92.
Long-Term Outcomes of Extracorporeal Life Support in Respiratory Failure