Birds are strongly motivated to recognize various predators to secure survival and reproductive success. Thus, predator recognition provides a useful tool for the investigation of the process of discrimination and categorization in non-trained animals. The most important role in this process is usually attributed to the prominent unique features shared by all members within the wider category of predators (sharp teeth or beaks, claws, talons and conspicuous eyes). However, birds are also able to discriminate between particular predator species according to their species-specific features (based mainly on colouration). We manipulated general raptor salient features (hooked beak, talons with claws and eyes with supraorbital ridges) and/or species-specific plumage colouration on the dummy of a Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) to investigate their importance in the recognition process of the red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) during nest defence. We showed that the presence of general raptor salient features is necessary for the recognition of a predator. The kestrel dummy with natural species-specific colouration with altered raptor salient features was treated by shrikes as a harmless bird. Nevertheless, pronounced changes in colouration also prevented successful recognition of the dummy as a kestrel, even when raptor salient features of a raptor were present.

Faculty of Science Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem Pasteurova 3544 1 40096 Ústí nad Labem Czech Republic

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Branišovská 1760 37005 České Budějovice Czech Republic

Faculty of Sciences Charles University Albertov 6 Praha 2 12800 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Allen C, Bekoff M (1999) Species of mind: the philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. MIT Press, Cambridge

Aust U, Huber L (2002) Target-defining features in a “people-present/people-absent” discrimination task by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 30:165–176 DOI

Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt G (2002) The cognitive animal: empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition, First Edition. A Bradford Book

Beránková J, Veselý P, Sýkorová J, Fuchs R (2014) The role of key features in predator recognition by untrained birds. Anim Cogn 17:963–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0728-1 PubMed DOI

Beránková J, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2015) The role of body size in predator recognition by untrained birds. Behav Process 120:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.015 DOI

Bolles RC, Beecher MD (1988) Evolution and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

Burley N, Coopersmith CB (1987) Bill color preferences of Zebra Finches. Ethology 76:133–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1987.tb00679.x DOI

Caro TM (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Cook RG, Wright AA, Drachman EE (2013) Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons. Behav Process 93:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.11.006 DOI

Curio E (1975) The functional organization of anti-predator behaviour in the pied flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception. Anim Behav 23:1–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(75)90056-1 PubMed DOI

D’Orazio KA, Neudorf DLH (2008) Nest defense by Carolina Wrens. Wilson J Ornithol 120:467–472. https://doi.org/10.1676/06-149.1 DOI

Davies NB, Welbergen JA (2008) Cuckoo–hawk mimicry? An experimental test. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 275:1817–1822. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0331 DOI

Fuchs R, Veselý P, Nácarová J (2019) Predator recognition in birds: the use of key features. Briefs in animal sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12404-5 DOI

Gill S, Neudorf DL, Sealy SG (1997) Host responses to cowbirds near the nest: cues for recognition. Anim Behav 53:1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0362 PubMed DOI

Jitsumori M, Delius JD (2001) Object recognition and object categorization in animals. In: Matsuzawa T (ed.) Primate origins of human cognition and behavior. Springer Japan, pp 269–293

Krätzig H (1940) Untersuchungen zur Lebensweise des Moorschneehuhns (Lagopus l. lagopus L.) während der Jugendentwicklung. J Ornithol 88:139–165 DOI

Lorenz K (1939) Vergleichende verhaltensforschung. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Zoologischer Anzeiger, Supplementband, 1269–102

Lyon BE, Gilbert GS (2013) Rarely parasitized and unparasitized species mob and alarm call to cuckoos: implications for sparrowhawk mimicry by brood parasitic cuckoos. Wilson J Ornithol 125:627–630. https://doi.org/10.1676/12-162.1 DOI

Montgomerie RD, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Quart Rev Biol 63:167–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/415838 DOI

Němec M, Fuchs R (2014) Nest defense of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio against five corvid species. Acta Ethol 17:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-013-0175-z DOI

Němec M, Syrová M, Dokoupilová L, Veselý P, Šmilauer P, Landová E, Lišková S, Fuchs R (2015) Surface texture and priming play important roles in predator recognition by the red-backed shrike in field experiments. Anim Cogn 18(259–268):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0796-2 DOI

Nice MM, Ter Pelkwyk J (1941) Enemy recognition by the song sparrow. Auk 58:195–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/4079104 DOI

Onnebrink H, Curio E (1991) Brood defense and age of young: a test of the vulnerability hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:61–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/4600584 DOI

Pincemy G, Dobson FS, Jouventin P (2009) Experiments on colour ornaments and mate choice in king penguins. Anim Behav 78:1247–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.041 DOI

Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, et al (2012) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–103

R Development Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/

Riegert J, Fuchs R (2011) Fidelity to roost sites and diet composition of wintering male urban common kestrels Falco tinnunculus. Acta Ornithol 46:183–189. https://doi.org/10.3161/000164511X625955 DOI

Scaife M (1976) The response to eye-like shapes by birds. I. The effect of context: a predator and a strange bird. Anim Behav 24:195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80115-7 DOI

Schleidt W, Shalter MD, Moura-Neto H (2011) The hawk/goose story: the classical ethological experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, revisited. J Comp Psychol 125:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022068 PubMed DOI

Smith JM, Graves HB (1978) Some factors influencing mobbing behaviour in barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Behav Biol 23:355–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91379-2 DOI

StatSoft, Inc. (2011) Electronic Statistics Textbook, WEB: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/ . StatSoft, Tulsa, OK

Strnad M, Němec M, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2012) Red-backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) adjust the mobbing intensity, but not mobbing frequency, by assessing the potential threat to themselves from different predators. Ornis Fennica 89:206–215

Strnadová I, Němec M, Strnad M, Veselý P, Fuchs R (2018) The nest defence by the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio)—support for the vulnerability hypothesis. J Avian Biol 49:e01726. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01726 DOI

Suzuki T, Ueda K (2013) Mobbing calls of Japanese tits signal predator type: field observations of natural predator encounters. Wilson J Ornithol 125:412–415. https://doi.org/10.1676/12-128.1 DOI

Syrová M, Němec M, Veselý P, Landová E, Fuchs R (2016) Facing a clever predator demands clever responses—red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs eurasian magpies (Pica pica). PLoS ONE 11(7):e0159432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159432 PubMed DOI PMC

Tinbergen N (1948) Social releasers and the experimental method required for their study. Wilson Bull 60:6–51

Trnka A, Prokop P (2012) The effectiveness of hawk mimicry in protecting cuckoos from aggressive hosts. Anim Behav 83:263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.036 DOI

Trnka A, Prokop P, Grim T (2012) Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites? PLoS ONE 7:e37445. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037445 PubMed DOI PMC

Tryjanowski P, Goławski A (2004) Sex differences in nest defence by the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio: effects of offspring age, brood size, and stage of breeding season. J Ethol 22:13–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-003-0096-9 DOI

Tryjanowski P, Karg MK, Karg J (2003) Diet composition and prey choice by the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio in western Poland. Belg J Zool 133:157–162

Tvardíková K, Fuchs R (2012) Tits recognize the potential dangers of predators and harmless birds in feeder experiments. J Ethol 30:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-011-0310-0 DOI

Veselý P, Buršíková M, Fuchs R (2016) Birds at the winter feeder do not recognize an artificially coloured predator. Ethology 122:937–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12565 DOI

Wacker DV, Coverdill AJ, Bauer CM, Wingfiled JC (2010) Male territorial aggression and androgen modulation in high latitude populations of the Sooty, Passerella iliaca siuosa, and Red Fox Sparrow, Passerella iliaca zaboria. J Ornithol 151:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0428-9 DOI

Watve M, Thakar J, Kale A, Puntambekar S, Shaikh I, Vaze K, Jog M, Paranjape S (2002) Bee-eaters (Merops orientalis) respond to what a predator can see. Anim Cogn 5:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-002-0155-6 PubMed DOI

Welbergen JA, Davies NB (2008) Reed warblers discriminate cuckoos from sparrowhawks with graded alarm signals that attract mates and neighbours. Anim Behav 76:811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.020 DOI

Welbergen JA, Davies NB (2011) A parasite in wolf’s clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol 22:574–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr008 DOI

Strange features are no better than no features: predator recognition by untrained birds

Red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo-hawk mimicry