Colorectal anastomosis dehiscence: a call for more detailed morphological classification
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Poland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
33786122
PubMed Central
PMC7991942
DOI
10.5114/wiitm.2020.97367
PII: 41349
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- anastomotic leak, low anterior resection, rectal cancer,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: A proactive approach is recommended in colorectal anastomosis leak treatment, and early diagnosis is very important. Early postoperative endoscopy would allow rapid diagnosis of anastomotic pathologies and consequent prompt intervention according to anastomotic disruption morphology. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of close endoscopic follow-up of all patients (including asymptomatic ones) in improving diagnosis of acute leak (AL) and reducing its complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 124 patients who had undergone rectum resection for rectal cancer with stapled anastomosis. Endoscopy was performed between the 7th and 10th postoperative day and 1 month postoperatively. For defect morphology assessment, a classification system was created based on four levels of severity. Photographic findings were evaluated by an independent, experienced gastroenterologist. RESULTS: Postoperative endoscopy revealed 28 (22.6%) patients with acute leakage. Initial endoscopy confirmed AL in 18 patients. Six (31.6%) patients were asymptomatic and 13 (68.4%) were symptomatic. The second endoscopy revealed another 9 (32.1%) leaks (4 (44.5%) asymptomatic and 5 (55.5%) symptomatic). Sixteen (57.1%) patients had grade A leakages, 7 (25.0%) had grade B leakages, and 5 (17.9%) had grade C leakages. Furthermore, 22 of 27 (81%) defects were located posterior and posterior-laterally. Fifteen (55.5%) defects were smaller than 1/3 the circumference, 7 (25.9%) affected 1/3-1/2 of the circumference, and 5 (18.5%) affected more than 1/2 of the circumference. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of early endoscopy in postoperative management allows rapid diagnosis of AL and allows faster intervention, even in leaks that are clinically silent.
Department of General Surgery Regional Health Ltd Hospital Děčín Děčín Czech Republic
Department of Surgery Hospital Nový Jičin Nový Jičin Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Hain E, Maggiori L, Manceau C, et al. Oncological impact of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic mesorectal excision. Br J Surg. 2017;104:288–95. PubMed
McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, et al. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015;102:462–79. PubMed
Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51. PubMed
Cong ZJ, Hu LH, Bian ZQ, et al. Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75519. PubMed PMC
Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC, et al. Anastomotic leak following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: true incidence and diagnostic challenges. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:576–81. PubMed
Huiberts AA, Dijksman LM, Boer SA, et al. Contrast medium at the site of the anastomosis is crucial in detecting anastomotic leakage with CT imaging after colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:843–8. PubMed
Rink AD, Kienle P, Aigner F, et al. How to reduce anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery-report from German expert meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01864-5. [Epub ahead of print] 2020. PubMed DOI
Kornmann VN, van Ramshorst B, Smits AB, et al. Beware of false-negative CT scan for anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:445–51. PubMed
Dekker JW, Liefers GJ, de Mol van Otterloo JC, et al. Predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage in left-sided colorectal surgery using a colon leakage score. J Surg Res. 2011;166:27–34. PubMed
Rojas-Machado SA, Romero-Simó M, Arroyo A, et al. Prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery based on a new prognostic index PROCOLE (prognostic colorectal leakage) developed from the meta-analysis of observational studies of risk factors. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:197–210. PubMed
Vallance A, Wexner S, Berho M, et al. A collaborative review of the current concepts and challenges of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:O1–12. PubMed
Borly L, Ellebæk MB, Qvist N. Leakage after surgery for rectum cancer: inconsistency in reporting to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Surg Res Pract. 2015;2015:376540. PubMed PMC
Bakker N, Deelder JD, Richir MC, et al. Risk of anastomotic leakage with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within an enhanced recovery program. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:776–82. PubMed
Tanaka J, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, et al. Analysis of anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery: a case-control study. Ann Med Surg. 2015;4:183–6. PubMed PMC
Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:569–76. PubMed
Matsuda K, Hotta T, Takifuji K, et al. Clinical characteristics of anastomotic leakage after an anterior resection for rectal cancer by assessing of the international classification on anastomotic leakage. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400:207–12. PubMed
Wang S, Zhang Z, Liu M, et al. Efficacy of transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:92. PubMed PMC
Shigeta K, Okabayashi K, Baba H, et al. A meta-analysis of the use of a transanal drainage tube to prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection by double-stapling technique for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:543–50. PubMed
Caulfield H, Hyman NH. Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:177–82. PubMed
Hu X, Cheng YA. Clinical parameters-based model predicts anastomotic leakage after a laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a large study with data from China. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1003. PubMed PMC
Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukena TS, et al. Anastomotic leak and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection. Results from a large cross-sectional study. Ann Surg. 2017;266:870–7. PubMed
Espín E, Ciga MA, Pera M, et al. Oncological outcome following anastomotic leak in rectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102:416–22. PubMed
Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, et al. Preoperative risk factor for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Disease. 2014;16:662–71. PubMed
Guel-Klein E, Biebl M, Knoll B, et al. Anastomotic leak after transanal total mesorectal excision: grading of severity and management aimed at preservation of the anastomosis. Colorectal Disease. 2019;21:894–902. PubMed
Yang SY, Han J, Han YD, et al. Intraoperative colonoscopy for the assessment and prevention of anastomotic leakage in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:709–14. PubMed
Ikeda T, Kumashiro R, Oki E, et al. Evaluation of techniques to prevent colorectal anastomotic leakage. J Surg Res. 2015;194:450–7. PubMed
Hain E, Maggiori L, Manceau G, et al. Persistent asymptomatic anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: can diverting stoma be reversed safely at 6 months? Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:369–76. PubMed