Drug Survival of IL-12/23, IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors for Psoriasis Treatment: A Retrospective Multi-Country, Multicentric Cohort Study

. 2021 Jul ; 22 (4) : 567-579. [epub] 20210330

Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33786754
Odkazy

PubMed 33786754
DOI 10.1007/s40257-021-00598-4
PII: 10.1007/s40257-021-00598-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Drug survival analysis of biologic agents in psoriasis is of extreme importance, as it allows not only the evaluation of objective clinical outcomes (such as effectiveness and safety) but also of factors that are associated with patients' adherence to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the drug survival of the most recent biologic agents approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis-ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab-and to identify clinical predictors that can influence the drug survival of these drugs. METHODS: This retrospective multicentric cohort study from 16 dermatology centers in Portugal, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Canada, and the United States included patients that started IL-12/23, IL-17 (IL-17A and IL-17R) and IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2019. Survival analysis was performed using a Kaplan-Meier estimator, to obtain descriptive survival curves, and proportional hazard Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 3312 treatment courses (total patients: 3145) were included in the study; 1118 (33.8%) with an IL-12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab), 1678 (50.7%) with an IL-17 inhibitor [911 (27.5%) on secukinumab, 651 (19.7%) on ixekizumab, 116 (3.5%) on brodalumab], and 516 (15.5%) with an IL-23 inhibitor [398 (12.0%) on guselkumab, 118 (3.5%) on risankizumab]. At 18 months, the cumulative probability of survival was 96.4% for risankizumab, 91.1% for guselkumab, 86.3% for brodalumab, 86.1% for ustekinumab, 82.0% for ixekizumab, and 79.9% for secukinumab. Using ustekinumab as reference, drug survival of guselkumab was higher (HR 0.609; 95% CI 0.418-0.887) and that of secukinumab was lower (HR 1.490; 95% CI 1.257-1.766). In the final multivariable model, secukinumab, female sex, higher BMI, and prior exposure to biologic agents significantly increased the risk of drug discontinuation, whereas risankizumab was protective. CONCLUSION: In this multinational cohort with 8439 patient-years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of drug survival for all drugs was >79% at 18 months. Prescribed biologic, female sex, higher BMI, and previous exposure to biologic agents were predictors of drug discontinuation. Drug survival of guselkumab and risankizumab was higher than that of ustekinumab, and secukinumab was lower.

Center for Health Technology and Services Research Porto Portugal

Clínica Médica Belém Lisbon Portugal

Department of Dermatology Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto Porto Portugal

Department of Dermatology Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital Badalona Spain

Department of Dermatology Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain

Department of Dermatology Lausanne University Hospital CHUV University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

Department of Dermatology University of Pisa Pisa Italy

Department of Dermatovenereology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Dermatology Department Hospital Universitario de la Princesa Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa Madrid Spain

Dermatology Unit Department of Medicine University of Padua 35128 Padua Italy

Division of Dermatology Department of Medicine University of Toronto Probity Medical Research Waterloo Ontario Canada

Dr Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy

Hospital CUF Descobertas Lisbon Portugal

Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar University of Porto Porto Portugal

Lynde Institute for Dermatology Markham Ontario Canada

McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Hamilton Ontario Canada

Section of Dermatology and Venereology Department of Medicine University of Verona 37126 Verona Italy

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Largo Agostino Gemelli 8 00168 Rome Italy

Komentář v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Langley RGB, Krueger GG, Griffiths CEM. Psoriasis: Epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:ii18–23 (discussion ii24–5).

Rendon A, Schäkel K. Psoriasis pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1475. DOI

Hu Y, Chen Z, Gong Y, Shi Y. A review of switching biologic agents in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Clin Drug Investig. 2018;38:191–9. DOI

Costanzo A, Malara G, Pelucchi C, Fatiga F, Barbera G, Franchi A, et al. Effectiveness end points in real-world studies on biological therapies in psoriasis: systematic review with focus on drug survival. Dermatology. 2018;234:1–12. DOI

van den Reek JMPA, Kievit W, de Jong EMGJ. Comment on “Drug survival analysis is not a good method for assessing the safety or effectiveness of systemic therapies in psoriasis.” Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108:695–6. DOI

van den Reek JMPA, Kievit W, Gniadecki R, Goeman JJ, Zweegers J, van de Kerkhof PCM, et al. Drug survival studies in dermatology: principles, purposes, and pitfalls. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:1–5. DOI

Pogácsás L, Borsi A, Takács P, Remenyik É, Kemény L, Kárpáti S, et al. Long-term drug survival and predictor analysis of the whole psoriatic patient population on biological therapy in Hungary. J Dermatol Treat. 2017;28:635–41. DOI

Mason KJ, Barker JNWN, Smith CH, Hampton PJ, Lunt M, McElhone K, et al. Comparison of drug discontinuation, effectiveness, and safety between clinical trial eligible and ineligible patients in BADBIR. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154:581–8. DOI

Augustin M, Jullien D, Martin A, Peralta C. Real-world evidence of secukinumab in psoriasis treatment – a meta-analysis of 43 studies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:1174–85. DOI

Mourad A, Straube S, Armijo-Olivo S, Gniadecki R. Factors predicting persistence of biologic drugs in psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:450–8. DOI

Yiu ZZN, Mason KJ, Hampton PJ, Reynolds NJ, Smith CH, Lunt M, et al. Drug survival of adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab in patients with psoriasis: a prospective cohort study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR). Br J Dermatol. 2020;183:294–302. DOI

Egeberg A, Bryld LE, Skov L. Drug survival of secukinumab and ixekizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81:173–8. DOI

Shalom G, Cohen AD, Feldhamer I, Comaneshter D, Freud T, Pavlovsky L. Drug survival in patients with psoriasis is associated with the availability of biologic medications. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:1524–8. DOI

Egeberg A, Ottosen MB, Gniadecki R, Broesby-Olsen S, Dam TN, Bryld LE, et al. Safety, efficacy and drug survival of biologics and biosimilars for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178:509–19. DOI

Menter A, Papp KA, Gooderham M, Pariser DM, Augustin M, Kerdel FA, et al. Drug survival of biologic therapy in a large, disease-based registry of patients with psoriasis: results from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:1148–58. DOI

Lin P-T, Wang S-H, Chi C-C. Drug survival of biologics in treating psoriasis: a meta-analysis of real-world evidence. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16068. DOI

Warren RB, Blauvelt A, Poulin Y, Beeck S, Kelly M, Wu T, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab vs. secukinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis (IMMerge): results from a phase III, randomized, open‐label, efficacy–assessor‐blinded clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19341

Reich K, Armstrong AW, Langley RG, Flavin S, Randazzo B, Li S, et al. Guselkumab versus secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (ECLIPSE): results from a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:831–9. DOI

López-Sánchez C, Puig L. Guselkumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Immunotherapy. 2020;12:355–71. DOI

Mehta H, Mashiko S, Angsana J, Rubio M, Hsieh YM, Maari C, et al. Differential changes in inflammatory mononuclear phagocyte and T cell profiles within psoriatic skin during treatment with guselkumab versus secukinumab. J Invest Dermatol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2021.01.005 . PubMed DOI

Nedoszytko B, Lange M, Sokolowska-Wojdylo M, Renke J, Trzonkowski P, Sobjanek M, et al. The role of regulatory T cells and genes involved in their differentiation in pathogenesis of selected inflammatory and neoplastic skin diseases. Part II: The Treg role in skin diseases pathogenesis. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2017;34:405–17.

Laws PM, Downs AM, Parslew R, Dever B, Smith CH, Barker JN, et al. Practical experience of ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriasis: Experience from a multicentre, retrospective case cohort study across the U.K. and Ireland. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:189–95.

Lunder T, Zorko MS, Kolar NK, Suhodolcan AB, Marovt M, Leskovec NK, et al. Drug survival of biological therapy is showing class effect: updated results from Slovenian National Registry of psoriasis. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58:631–41. DOI

Graier T, Salmhofer W, Jonak C, Weger W, Kölli C, Gruber B, et al. Biologic drug survival rates in the era of anti-Il-17 antibodies: a time period-adjusted registry analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19701 . PubMed DOI

Torres T, Balato A, Conrad C, Conti A, Dapavo P, Ferreira P, et al. Secukinumab drug survival in patients with psoriasis: a multicenter, real-world, retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81:273–5. DOI

van der Schoot LS, van den Reek JMPA, Groenewoud JMM, Otero ME, Njoo MD, Ossenkoppele PM, et al. Female patients are less satisfied with biological treatment for psoriasis and experience more side-effects than male patients: results from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:1913–20. DOI

Carrascosa JM, Vilavella M, Garcia-Doval I, Carretero G, Vanaclocha F, Daudén E, et al. Body mass index in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Spain and its impact as an independent risk factor for therapy withdrawal: results of the Biobadaderm Registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:907–14. DOI

Schwensen JFB, Nielsen VW, Nissen CV, Sand C, Gniadecki R, Thomsen SF. Effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in 50 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who had previously been treated with other biologics: a retrospective real-world evidence study. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17092 . DOI

Mease PJ, Kellner H, Morita A, Kivitz AJ, Papp KA, Aslanyan S, et al. OP0307 Efficacy and safety of risankizumab, a selective il-23p19 inhibitor, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis over 24 weeks: results from a phase 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:200–1.

Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB, Boehncke WH, Dong B, Wang Y, Zhuang Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2018;391:2213–24. DOI

Mease PJ, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, Kollmeier AP, Hsia EC, Xu XL, et al. Guselkumab in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (DISCOVER-2): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1126–36. DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...