Urban or Rural GP? In the Czech Republic It Is not just Distances That Matter
Language English Country Czech Republic Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
33855954
DOI
10.14712/18059694.2021.3
PII: am_2021064010015
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- efficiency, general practice, regional typology, rural health, workforce,
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Urban Health Services economics MeSH
- Professional Practice Location * MeSH
- General Practice economics MeSH
- Rural Health Services economics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
This article proposes a combined mixed methods approach to categorising GP practices. It looks not only at location but also at differences in the nature of the work that rural GPs perform. A data analysis was conducted of the largest health insurance company in the Czech Republic (5.9 million patients, 60% of the population, 100% coverage within the Czech Republic). We performed two data analyses, one for 2014-2015 and one for 2016, and divided GP practices into urban, intermediate, and rural groups (taking into account the OECD methodology). We compared groups in terms of the total annual cost in CZK per adult registered insurance holders. The total volume of data indicated the financial costs of €1.52 billion and €2.57 billion respectively. Both analysis showed differences between all groups of practises which confirmed the assumption that the work of the GP is influenced by regionality. A multidisciplinary hospital is the main factor that fundamentally affects the way a GP's work in that area. The proposed principle of categorising general practices combines geographical and cost characteristics. This requires knowledge of the cost data of healthcare payer and on the basic demographic knowledge of the area. We suggest this principe may be transferrable and particularly suitable for categorising general practice.
References provided by Crossref.org