Assessments of regional differences in the accessibility and capacity of health services often rely on indicators based on data from the permanent residents of a given region. However, a patient does not always use health services in their place of residence. The objective of this article is to evaluate the influence of spatial healthcare accessibility on regional differences in the provision and take-up of health services, using outpatient diabetology in Czechia as a case study. The analysis is grounded in monitoring the differences in the patient's place of residence and the location of the healthcare provided. Anonymized individual data of the largest Czech health insurance company for 2019 are used (366,537 patients, 2,481,129 medical procedures). The data are aggregated at the district level (LAU 1). It has been identified that regions where patients travel outside their area of residence to access more than half of their healthcare needs are mostly in local/regional centres. Moreover, these patients increase the number of medical services provided in local/regional centres, often by more than 20%, which has been reflected in greater healthcare capacity in these centres. To assess regional differences, it is important to take the spatial healthcare accessibility into account and also consider why patients travel for healthcare. Reasons could be the insufficient local capacity, varied quality of health services or individual factors. In such cases, healthcare actors (health insurance companies, local government etc.) should respond to the situation and take appropriate action to reduce these dissimilarities.

Department of Demography and Geodemography Faculty of Science Charles University 116 36 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Victoor A., Delnoij D.M.J., Friele R.D., Rademakers J.J.D.J.M. Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: A scoping review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2012;12:272. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-272. PubMed DOI PMC

Fotaki M., Roland M., Boyd A., McDonald R., Scheaff R., Smith L. What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 2008;13:178–184. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007163. PubMed DOI

Salisbury C.J. How do people choose their doctor? Br. Med. J. 1989;299:608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6699.608. PubMed DOI PMC

Inche Zainal Abidin S., Sutan R., Shamsuddin K. Prevalence and determinants of appropriate health seeking behaviour among known diabetics: Results from a community-based survey. Adv. Epidemiol. 2014;2014:793286. doi: 10.1155/2014/793286. DOI

Batbaatar E., Dorjdagva J., Luvsannyam A., Savino M.M., Amenta P. Determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review. Perspect. Public Health. 2017;137:89–101. doi: 10.1177/1757913916634136. PubMed DOI

McGrail M.R., Humphreys J.S. Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care services: Utilising dynamic catchment sizes. Appl. Geogr. 2014;54:182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.08.005. DOI

Levesque J., Harris M.F., Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: Conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int. J. Equity Health. 2013;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18. PubMed DOI PMC

Hoffstedt C., Fredriksson M., Lenhoff H., Winbald U. When do people choose to be informed? Predictors of information-seeking in the choice of primary care provider in Sweden. Health Econ. Policy Low. 2020;15:210–224. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000373. PubMed DOI

Victoor A., Delnoij D., Friele R.D., Rademakers J. Why patients may not exercise their choice when referred for hospital care. An exploratory study based on interviews with patients. Health Expect. 2016;19:667–678. doi: 10.1111/hex.12224. PubMed DOI PMC

Cheraghi-Sohi S., Hole A.R., Mead N., McDonald R., Whalley D., Bower P., Roland M. What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients’ Priorities. Ann. Fam. Med. 2008;6:107–115. doi: 10.1370/afm.816. PubMed DOI PMC

Farrokhi P., Hashjin A.A., Bagherzadeh R., Zarei E. Predictors of Patient Satisfaction; Quality Dimensions and Demographic Characteristics. Tehran Univ. Med. Sci. 2020 doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-32162/v1. DOI

Milky G., Thomas J. Shared decision making, satisfaction with care and medication adherence among patients with diabetes. Patient Educ. Couns. 2020;103:661–669. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.008. PubMed DOI

Allin S., Grignon M., Le Grand J. Subjective unmet need and utilization of health care services in Canada: What are the equity implications? Soc. Sci. Med. 2010;70:465–472. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.027. PubMed DOI

Lin H.-C., Xirasagar S., Laditka J.N. Patient perceptions of service quality in group versus solo practice clinics. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2004;16:437–445. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh072. PubMed DOI

Defelice L.C., Bradford W.D. Relative inefficiencies in production between solo and group practice physicians. Health Econ. 1997;6:455–465. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199709)6:5<455::AID-HEC290>3.0.CO;2-S. PubMed DOI

Šídlo L., Burcin B. Diabetici v Česku v období 2010–2017 se zaměřením na pacienty v péči diabetologických ambulancí. Demografie. 2020;62:51–61.

International Diabetes Federation IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th Edition. 2019. [(accessed on 1 September 2020)]. Available online: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/

Venkat Narayan K.M. The Diabetes Pandemic: Looking for the Silver Lining. Clin. Diabetes. 2005;23:51–52. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.23.2.51. DOI

Ginter E., Simko V. Diabetes type 2 pandemic in 21st century. Bratisl. Lek. Listy. 2010;111:134–137. PubMed

Field K.S., Briggs D.J. Socio-economic and locational determinants of accessibility and utilization of primary health-care. Health Soc. Care Community. 2001;9:294–308. doi: 10.1046/j.0966-0410.2001.00303.x. PubMed DOI

Wong J.J., Hood K.K., Breland J.Y. Correlates of health care use among White and minority men and women with diabetes: An NHANES study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019;150:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.001. PubMed DOI

Asao K., McEwen L.N., Crosson J.C., Waitzfelder B., Herman W.H. Revisit frequency and its association with quality of care among diabetic patients: Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) J. Diabetes Its Complicat. 2014;28:811–818. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.06.006. PubMed DOI PMC

Yang D.H., Goerge R., Mullner R. Comparing GIS-based methods of measuring spatial accessibility to health services. J. Med. Syst. 2006;30:23–32. doi: 10.1007/s10916-006-7400-5. PubMed DOI

Luo W. Using a GIS-based floating catchment method to assess areas with shortage of physicians. Health Place. 2004;10:1–11. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8292(02)00067-9. PubMed DOI

Guagliardo M.F. Spatial accessibility of primary care: Concepts, methods and challenges. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2004;3:3. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-3-3. PubMed DOI PMC

General Health Insurance Company of the Czech Republic (GHIC) Data for the Project No. TL01000382. GHIC CR; Prague, Czech Republic: 2020.

Šídlo L., Novák M., Štych P., Burcin B. Metodika Hodnocení Dostupnosti Zdravotní Péče. Metodologická Studie, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká Fakulta; Prague, Czech Republic: 2016.

Šídlo L., Novák M. Čerpání Zdravotních Ambulantních Služeb v Česku. Ambulantní Diabetologie. Nakladatelství P3K; Prague, Czech Republic: 2020.

Šídlo L., Novák M. Poskytování Zdravotních Ambulantních Služeb v Česku. Ambulantní Diabetologie. Nakladatelství P3K; Prague, Czech Republic: 2020.

Šídlo L., Šprocha B. Changes in the population age structure of the Czech districts in 1989–2019. Demografie. 2020;62:228–240.

Bourke L., Humphreys J.S., Wakerman J., Taylor J. Understanding rural and remote health: A framework for analysis in Australia. Health Place. 2012;18:496–503. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.02.009. PubMed DOI

Ono T., Schoenstein M., Buchan J. OECD Health Working Papers 69. OECD Publishing; Paris, France: 2014. Geographic Imbalances in Doctor Supply and Policy Responses; p. 65. DOI

Šídlo L., Bělobrádek J., Maláková K. General medical practitioners in Czechia: Development trends and regional differences. Geografie. 2021;126:169–194. doi: 10.37040/geografie2021126020169. DOI

Papp M., Kőrösi L., Sándor J., Nagy C., Juhász A., Ádány R. Workforce crisis in primary healthcare worldwide: Hungarian example in a longitudinal follow-up study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024957. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024957. PubMed DOI PMC

Weinhold I., Gurtner S. Understanding shortages of sufficient health care in rural areas. Health Policy. 2014;118:201–214. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.018. PubMed DOI

Maláková K. A Geodemographic View of the Accessibility of Selected Outpatient Services in Czechia. Int. J. Public Health. 2022;67:1604067. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604067. PubMed DOI PMC

Frändberg L., Vilhelmson B. More or less travel: Personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort. J. Transp. Geogr. 2011;19:1235–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.06.004. DOI

White M.J. A Model of Residential Location Choice and Commuting by Men and Women Workers. J. Reg. Sci. 1977;17:41–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1977.tb00471.x. PubMed DOI

Fanning Madden J. Why Women Work Closer to Home. Urban Stud. 1981;18:181–194. doi: 10.1080/00420988120080341. DOI

Gustafson P. Work-related travel, gender and family obligations. Work Employ. Soc. 2006;20:513–530. doi: 10.1177/0950017006066999. DOI

Levin L. How May Public Transport Influence the Practice of Everyday Life among Younger and Older People and How May Their Practices Influence Public Transport? Soc. Sci. 2019;8:96. doi: 10.3390/socsci8030096. DOI

Hjorthol R.J., Levin L., Sirén A. Mobility in different generations of older persons: The development of daily travel in different cohorts in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. J. Transp. Geogr. 2010;18:624–633. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.011. DOI

Bělobrádek J., Šídlo L., Javorská K., Halata D. Urban or Rural GP? In the Czech Republic It Is not just Distances That Matter. Acta Med. (Hradec Kral.) 2021;64:15–21. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2021.3. PubMed DOI

Goins R.T., Williams K.A., Carter M.W., Spencer S.M., Solovieva T. Perceived barriers to health care access among rural older adults: A qualitative study. J. Rural Health. 2005;21:206–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00084.x. PubMed DOI

Ouředníček M. Suburbanizace Prahy. Sociol. Cas. 2003;39:235–253.

Ouředníček M., Pospíšilová L., Špačková P. Trvale a obvykle bydlící obyvatelstvo: Praktické užití statistických dat. Geogr. Rozhl. 2013;23:30–31.

Travisi C.M., Camagni R., Nijkamp P. Impacts of urban sprawl and commuting: A modelling study for Italy. J. Transp. Geogr. 2010;18:382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.08.008. DOI

Moynihan R., Sanders S., Michaleff Z.A., Scott A.M., Clark J., To E.J., Jones M., Kitchener E., Fox M., Johansson M., et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e045343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045343. PubMed DOI PMC

Kim J., You M., Shon C. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on unmet healthcare needs in Seoul, South Korea: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e045845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045845. PubMed DOI PMC

Adam S., Zahra S.A., Chor C.Y.T., Khare Y., Harky A. COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on service provision: A cardiology prospect. Acta Cardiol. 2021;76:830–837. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1787636. PubMed DOI

General Health Insurance Company of the Czech Republic (GHIC) Yearbooks of GHIC. Source Tables for the Yearbook, Table T5.14. [(accessed on 14 February 2022)]. Available online: https://www.vzp.cz/o-nas/dokumenty/rocenky.

Riera R., Bagattini A.M., Pacheco R.L., Pachito D.V., Roitberg F., Ilbawi A. Delays and Disruptions in Cancer Health Care Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review. JCO Glob. Oncol. 2021;7:311–323. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00639. PubMed DOI PMC

Bolarinwa O.A., Ahinkorah B.O., Seidu A.-A., Ameyaw E.K., Saeed B.Q., Hagan J.E., Jr., Nwagbara U.I. Mapping Evidence of Impacts of COVID-19 Outbreak on Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Scoping Review. Healthcare. 2021;9:436. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040436. PubMed DOI PMC

A holistic model of health inequalities for health policy and state administration: a case study in the regions of the Czech Republic