Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of colonic neoplastic lesions ≤ 30 mm-a single-center experience
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
33860350
PubMed Central
PMC8847190
DOI
10.1007/s00464-021-08492-0
PII: 10.1007/s00464-021-08492-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Colorectal cancer, Endoscopic full-thickness resection, Endoscopic submucosal dissection,
- MeSH
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection * adverse effects methods MeSH
- Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal MeSH
- Colorectal Neoplasms * surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local surgery MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Endoscopic full-thickness resection (FTR) is a novel technique of endoscopic treatment of colorectal neoplastic lesions not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy or mucosal resection. FTR appears to be a reasonable alternative to technically demanding endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions ≤ 30 mm. However, comparison between FTR and ESD has not been published yet and their mutual positioning in the treatment algorithm is still unclear. The purpose of the analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of FTR in the treatment of colorectal lesions ≤ 30 mm by comparing prospectively followed FTR cohort to retrospective ESD cohort in the setting of single tertiary endoscopy center. Primary outcomes were technical success rate, R0 resection and curative resection rate, and complication rate. A total of 52 patients in FTR and 50 patients in ESD group were treated between 2015 and 2018. Technical success rate was significantly higher in FTR group (92 vs. 74%, P = 0.01) as well as R0 resection rate (85 vs. 62%, P = 0.01) and curative resection rate (75 vs. 56%, P = 0.01). Complications occurred more frequently in ESD group (40 vs. 13%, P = 0.002), mainly due to high incidence of electrocoagulation syndrome (24 vs. 0%). Total procedure time was substantially shorter in FTR group (26.4 ± 11.0 min vs. estimated 90-240 min). Local residual neoplastic lesions were detected numerically more often in FTR group (12 vs. 5%, P = 0.12). No patient died during follow-up. Compared to ESD, FTR proved significantly higher technical success rate, higher R0 and curative resection rate, and shorter procedure time. In the FTR group, there were significantly less complications but higher incidence of local residual neoplasia. Further research including randomized trials is needed to compare both resection techniques.
See more in PubMed
Schmidt A, Meier B, Caca K. Endoscopic full-thickness resection: current status. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(31):9273–9285. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9273. PubMed DOI PMC
Valli PV, Mertens J, Bauerfeind P. Safe and successful resection of difficult GI lesions using a novel single-step full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):289–299. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5676-9. PubMed DOI
Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B, Meining A, Richter-Schrag HJ, Messmann H, Neuhaus H, Albers D, Birk M, Thimme R, et al. Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut. 2018;67(7):1280–1289. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313677. PubMed DOI
van der Spek B, Haasnoot K, Meischl C, Heine D. Endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colorectum: a single-center case series evaluating indication, efficacy and safety. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6(10):E1227–E1234. doi: 10.1055/a-0672-1138. PubMed DOI PMC
Andrisani G, Soriani P, Manno M, Pizzicannella M, Pugliese F, Mutignani M, Naspetti R, Petruzziello L, Iacopini F, Grossi C, et al. Colo-rectal endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) with the over-the-scope device (FTRD®): A multicenter Italian experience. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;51(3):375–381. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.09.030. PubMed DOI
Wannhoff A, Meier B, Caca K (2018) Safety and efficacy of the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) in the colorectum: a pooled analysis of published results. In: UEG Week. Vienna, Austria
Falt P, Fojtík P, Hucl T, Drastich P, Martinek J, Tacheci I, Suchanek Š, Lukáš M, Bortlík M, Neumann F, et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of the colorectal lesions—a Czech multicenter experience. Endoscopy. 2019;51:S1–S273.
Ichkhanian Y, Vosoughi K, Diehl DL, Grimm IS, James TW, Templeton AW, Hajifathalian K, Tokar JL, Samarasena JB, Chehade NEH, et al. A large multicenter cohort on the use of full-thickness resection device for difficult colonic lesions. Surg Endosc. 2020;35:1296–1306. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07504-9. PubMed DOI
Meier B, Stritzke B, Kuellmer A, Zervoulakos P, Huebner GH, Repp M, Walter B, Meining A, Gutberlet K, Wiedbrauck T, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in the Colorectum: Results From the German Colonic FTRD Registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(12):1998–2006. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000795. PubMed DOI
Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, Mandolesi D, Farioli A, Cucchetti A, Frazzoni L, Bhandari P, Bellisario C, Bazzoli F, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(1):74–86. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.024. PubMed DOI
Sauer M, Hildenbrand R, Oyama T, Sido B, Yahagi N, Dumoulin FL. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: a European single-center series of 182 cases. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4(8):E895–900. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111204. PubMed DOI PMC
Barret M, Lepilliez V, Coumaros D, Chaussade S, Leblanc S, Ponchon T, Fumex F, Chabrun E, Bauret P, Cellier C, et al. The expansion of endoscopic submucosal dissection in France: a prospective nationwide survey. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(1):45–53. doi: 10.1177/2050640616644392. PubMed DOI PMC
Urban O, Falt P, Fojtik P, Andelova R. Comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of flat neoplastic lesions in the rectum. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;72(3):193–198. doi: 10.14735/amgh2018193. DOI
The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(6 Suppl):S3–43. PubMed
Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG, Kaltenbach TR, Sano Y, Ponchon T, Saunders BP, Rex DK, Soetikno RM. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78(4):625–632. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.185. PubMed DOI
Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, Hosobe S, Kusaka H, Kobayashi T, Himori M, Yagyuu A. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994;47(10):880–885. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.10.880. PubMed DOI PMC
Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49(3):270–297. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102569. PubMed DOI
Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Repici A, Vieth M, De Ceglie A, Amato A, Berr F, Bhandari P, Bialek A, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47(9):829–854. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392882. PubMed DOI
Epidemiologie kolorektálního karcinomu v České republice [http://www.kolorektum.cz/index.php?pg=pro-odborniky--epidemiologie-kolorektalniho-karcinomu--epidemiologie-kolorektalniho-karcinomu-v-cr]
Falt P, Hucl T, Fojtik P, Drastich P, Martínek J, Andělová R, Voška L, Špičák J, Urban O. Endoskopická transmurální resekce v terapii lokálních reziduálních neoplázií - analýza souboru 19 pacientů. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;72(3):206–211. doi: 10.14735/amgh2018206. DOI
von Helden A, Hildenbrand R, Sido B, Dumoulin FL. Endoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device for treatment of recurrent / residual colorectal neoplasia: a single-center case series. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1043-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Kuroki Y, Hoteya S, Mitani T, Yamashita S, Kikuchi D, Fujimoto A, Matsui A, Nakamura M, Nishida N, Iizuka T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual/locally recurrent lesions after endoscopic therapy for colorectal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25(11):1747–1753. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06331.x. PubMed DOI
Fuccio L, Repici A, Hassan C, Ponchon T, Bhandari P, Jover R, Triantafyllou K, Mandolesi D, Frazzoni L, Bellisario C, et al. Why attempt en bloc resection of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas? A systematic review of the prevalence of superficial submucosal invasive cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut. 2018;67(8):1464–1474. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315103. PubMed DOI
Urban O, Fojtík P, Falt P, Kliment M (2015) Short-term results of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. In: UEGW 2015. Barcelona, Spain
von Renteln D, Vassiliou MC, Rothstein RI. Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic clips and over-the-scope clips for closure of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomies. Endoscopy. 2009;41(12):1056–1061. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215241. PubMed DOI
Richter-Schrag HJ, Walker C, Thimme R, Fischer A. Full thickness resection device (FTRD): Experience and outcome for benign neoplasms of the rectum and colon. Chirurg. 2016;87(4):316–325. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0091-z. PubMed DOI
Aepli P, Criblez D, Baumeler S, Borovicka J, Frei R. Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) of colorectal neoplasms with the Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRD): Clinical experience from two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018;6(3):463–470. doi: 10.1177/2050640617728001. PubMed DOI PMC
Yoshida N, Yagi N, Inada Y, Kugai M, Yanagisawa A, Naito Y. Prevention and management of complications of and training for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:287173. doi: 10.1155/2013/287173. PubMed DOI PMC
Schmidbaur S, Wannhoff A, Walter B, Meier B, Schafer C, Meining A, Caca K. Risk of appendicitis after endoscopic full-thickness resection of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy. 2020;53(4):424–428. PubMed
Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H, Nas H, Thompson CC. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4(10):E1030–E1044. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-114774. PubMed DOI PMC
Arezzo A, Passera R, Marchese N, Galloro G, Manta R, Cirocchi R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(1):18–29. doi: 10.1177/2050640615585470. PubMed DOI PMC