CT analysis of femoral malrotation after intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33881592
DOI
10.1007/s00402-021-03902-3
PII: 10.1007/s00402-021-03902-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Intramedullary nailing, Malrotation, Rotational error, Trochanteric fracture,
- MeSH
- femur diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- fraktury femuru * diagnostické zobrazování etiologie chirurgie MeSH
- fraktury kyčle * komplikace diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- intramedulární fixace fraktury * škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- kostní hřeby škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: Functional results after internal fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures may be negatively affected by healing in a non-physiological position. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and severity of femoral malrotation after nailing of trochanteric fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective study focused on a CT analysis of malrotation after intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures (AO 31A1-3) in 101 patients. We recorded the type of fracture, method of anesthesia, scheduled surgery vs. acute surgery, and the surgeon's experience as possible risk factors for limb malrotation after trochanteric fracture surgeries. RESULTS: The average extent of malrotation was 9° of internal rotation ranging from 29° of external to 48°of internal rotation. In 35% of patients, we observed a rotation greater than 15°, and in 15 patients (15%), the rotation was greater than 25°. The risk of significant internal malrotation was significantly higher than external malrotation (37 vs. 4 patients). None of the factors observed proved to be statistically significant. The effect of general anesthesia and the type of intertrochanteric fracture came closest to having a significant effect on rotational error. CONCLUSION: Improper reduction of a trochanteric fracture is a common problem that can lead to femur malrotation. In our study, a rotational error greater than 15° occurred in 35% of the patients, but none of the monitored factors represented a statistically significant risk for this complication.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Galanopoulos IP, Mavrogenis AF, Megaloikonomos PD et al (2018) Similar function and complications for patients with short versus long hip nailing for unstable pertrochanteric fractures. SICOT J 4:23. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2018023 PubMed DOI PMC
Georgiannos D, Lampridis V, Bisbinas I (2014) Complications following treatment of trochanteric fractures with the Gamma3 nail: is the latest version of gamma nail superior to its predecessor? Surg Res Pract 2014:143598. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/143598 PubMed DOI PMC
Mavrogenis A, Panagopoulos G, Megaloikonomos P, Igoumenou V, Galanopoulos I, Vottis C, Karampinas P, Koulouvaris P, Kontogeorgakos V, Vlamis J, Papagelopoulos P (2016) Complications after hip nailing for fractures. Orthopedics 39:e108-116. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151222-11 PubMed DOI
Skála-Rosenbaum J, Bartoníček J, Bartoška R (2010) Is distal locking necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture? Int Orthop 34:1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0874-2 PubMed DOI
Krappinger D, Wolf B, Dammerer D, Thaler M, Schwendinger P, Lindtner RA (2019) Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(6):769–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03131-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Zhang W, Antony Xavier RP, Decruz J, Chen YD, Park DH (2021) Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141(4):569–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03399-2 PubMed DOI
Luque Pérez R, Checa Betegón P, Galán-Olleros M, Arvinius C, Valle-Cruz J, Marco F (2020) Nailing unstable pertrochanteric fractures: does size matters? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03668-0 PubMed DOI
Braten M, Terjesen T, Rossvoll I (1993) Torsional deformity after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Measurement of anteversion angles in 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:799–803. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376444 PubMed DOI
Hüfner T, Citak M, Suero EM, Miller B, Kendoff D, Krettek C, Citak M (2011) Femoral malrotation after unreamed intramedullary nailing: an evaluation of influencing operative factors. J Orthop Trauma 25:224–227. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47e3b PubMed DOI
Jaarsma RL, Avan K (2004) Rotational malalignment after fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B8.15663 PubMed DOI
Marchand LS, Jacobson LG, Stuart AR, Haller JM, Higgins TF, Rothberg DL (2020) Assessing femoral rotation: a survey comparison of techniques. J Orthop Trauma 34:e96–e101. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001648 PubMed DOI
Ramme AJ, Egol J, Chang G, Davidovitch RI, Konda S (2017) Evaluation of malrotation following intramedullary nailing in a femoral shaft fracture model: can a 3D c-arm improve accuracy? Injury 48:1603–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.041 PubMed DOI
Sathy A, Barnwell JC, Shahrestani SN, Moore D (2017) Reliable Method for avoiding malrotation deformity after intramedullary nailing of comminuted femur fractures: clinical validation of a previously described technique. J Orthop Trauma 31:e121–e126. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000767 PubMed DOI
Vaidya R, Dimovski R, Cizmic Z, Vaidya A, Gheraibeh P, Hudson I (2018) Use of inherent anteversion of an intramedullary nail to avoid malrotation in comminuted femur fractures: a prospective case-control study. J Orthop Trauma 32:623–628. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001314 PubMed DOI
Yoon RS, Gageb MJ, Galosa DK, Doneganc DJ, Liporacea FA (2017) Trochanteric entry femoral nails yield better femoral version and lower revision rates—a large cohort multivariate regression analysis. Injury 48:1165–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.017 PubMed DOI
Annappa R, Mittal H, Kamath S, Rai S, Suresh P, Mohammed N (2018) Rotational malalignment after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures. J Clin Diagnostic Res 12:RC05–RC08. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/34130.12357
Kim TY, Lee YB, Chang JD, Lee SS, Yoo JH, Chung KJ, Hwang JH (2015) Torsional malalignment, how much significant in the trochanteric fractures? Injury 6:2196–2200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.015 DOI
Ramanoudjame M, Guillon P, Dauzac C, Meunier C, Carcopino JM (2010) CT evaluation of torsional malalignment after intertrochanteric fracture fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 6:844–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.05.007 DOI
Reikerås O, Bjerkreim I, Kolbenstvedt A (1983) Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand 54:18–23. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678308992864 PubMed DOI
Yoon RS, Koerner JD, Patel NM, Sirkin MS, Reilly MC, Liporace FA (2013) Impact of specialty and level of training on CT measurement of femoral version: an interobserver agreement analysis. J Orthop Trauma 14:277–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-013-0263-x DOI
Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N (2004) Femur–LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin Orthop Rel Res 426:252–257. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000141935.86481.ba DOI
Citak M, Suero EM, O’Loughlin PF, Arvani M, Hüfner T, Krettek C, Citak M (2011) Femoral malrotation following intramedullary nailing in bilateral femoral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:823–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1245-6 PubMed DOI
Krettek C, Miclau T, Grün O, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H (1998) Intraoperative control of axes, rotation, and length in femoral and tibial fractures. Technical note. Injury 29(Suppl 3):C29–C39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)95006-9 PubMed DOI
Tornetta P III, Ritz G, Kantor A (1995) Femoral torsion after interlocked nailing of unstable femoral fractures. J Trauma 38:213–219. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199502000-00011 PubMed DOI
Wilharm A, Gras F, Rausch S, Linder R, Marintschev I, Hofmann GO, Mückley T (2011) Navigation in femoral-shaft fractures—from lab tests to clinical routine. Injury 42:1346–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.023 PubMed DOI
Stübig T, Hawi N, Min W, Krettek C, Arvani M, Citak M (2012) Accuracy of measurement of femoral anteversion in femoral shaft fractures using a computer imaging software: a cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:613–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1450-y PubMed DOI
Kong M, Li B, Tian Y (2016) Laryngeal mask airway without muscle relaxant in femoral head replacement in elderly patients. Exp Ther Med 11:65–68. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2844 PubMed DOI
Parvizi J, Rasouli MR (2015) General compared with neuraxial anesthesia for total hip and knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 3:318. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.10.36 PubMed DOI PMC
Dwivedi AK, Bhatnagar R (2016) Antropometric study of angle of femoral torsion in Maharashtrian population. Med J DY Patil Univ 9:200–203. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.177664 DOI