Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Biologics: 56-Week Data from the Randomized Controlled Phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 Study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33913086
PubMed Central
PMC8217417
DOI
10.1007/s40744-021-00305-z
PII: 10.1007/s40744-021-00305-z
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Janus kinase inhibitors, Psoriatic arthritis, Upadacitinib,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor under investigation in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study assessed the 56-week efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with PsA and an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic therapy. METHODS: In the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study, patients were randomized to 56 weeks of blinded treatment with oral upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily, or placebo switched to upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily at week 24. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving 20/50/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20/50/70), 75/90/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/90/100), and minimal disease activity. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 641 patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug, 479 (74.7%) completed 56 weeks of treatment. Improvements in the proportion of patients achieving ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100, and minimal disease activity were maintained with both doses of upadacitinib through 56 weeks. Week 56 results for patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib at week 24 were similar to those for patients originally randomized to the upadacitinib groups. The exposure-adjusted event rate for serious infections was 2.6 and 6.1 events/100 patient-years in the upadacitinib 15 and 30 mg groups, respectively. Herpes zoster occurred more frequently with upadacitinib 30 versus 15 mg; most cases were non-serious. CONCLUSION: In patients with PsA who had an inadequate response or intolerance to biologic therapy, the efficacy of upadacitinib was maintained over 56 weeks with no new significant safety signals observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03104374.
AbbVie Inc North Chicago IL USA
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology Faculty of Pharmacy Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology Centre for Therapeutic Innovation University of Bath Bath UK
Department of Rheumatology Providence St Joseph Health and University of Washington Seattle WA USA
Medical Plus s r o Uherske Hradiste Czech Republic
Papp Clinical Research and Probity Medical Research Waterloo ON Canada
School of Medicine Pontificial Catholic University Porto Alegre Brazil
Seattle Rheumatology Associates Swedish Medical Center 601 Broadway Seattle 98122 WA USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2095–2096. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505557. PubMed DOI
Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, de Wit M, McInnes I, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:700–712. PubMed PMC
Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A, Gladman DD, Deal C, Deodhar A, et al. Special article: 2018 American college of rheumatology/national psoriasis foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71:2–29. doi: 10.1002/acr.23789. PubMed DOI PMC
Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, Soriano ER, Laura Acosta-Felquer M, Armstrong AW, et al. Group for research and assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:1060–1071. PubMed
Nash P, Ohson K, Walsh J, Delev N, Nguyen D, Teng L, et al. Early and sustained efficacy with apremilast monotherapy in biological-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis: a phase IIIB, randomised controlled trial (ACTIVE) Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:690–698. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211568. PubMed DOI PMC
Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Hall S, Chinoy H, Kivitz AJ, et al. Efficacy of subcutaneous secukinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis stratified by prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use: results from the randomized placebo-controlled FUTURE 2 study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43:1713–1717. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160275. PubMed DOI
Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF, Behrens F, Blanco R, Kaszuba A, et al. Tofacitinib for psoriatic arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1525–1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615977. PubMed DOI
Ritchlin C, Rahman P, Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Puig L, Li S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, ustekinumab, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis despite conventional non-biological and biological anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: 6-month and 1-year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised PSUMMIT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:990–999. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204655. PubMed DOI PMC
Mease PJ, Fleischmann R, Deodhar AA, Wollenhaupt J, Khraishi M, Kielar D, et al. Effect of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a phase 3 double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study (RAPID-PsA) Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:48–55. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203696. PubMed DOI PMC
Parmentier JM, Voss J, Graff C, Schwartz A, Argiriadi M, Friedman M, et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494) BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s41927-018-0031-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Genovese MC, Lertratanakul A, Anderson JK, Papp KA, Tillett W, Van den Bosch F, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-PsA-2): a double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(Suppl 1):139. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1229. DOI
Mease P, Lertratanakul A, Anderson JK, Papp KA, Bosch F, Tsuji S, et al. Upadacitinib for psoriatic arthritis refractory to biologics: SELECT-PsA 2. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;80:312–20. PubMed PMC
Mease P, Kavanaugh A, Gladman D, Gossec L, Fitzgerald O, Soriano E, et al. Characterization of remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with upadacitinib: post-hoc analysis from two phase 3 Trials. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(Suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/characterization-of-remission-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-treated-with-upadacitinib-post-hoc-analysis-from-two-phase-3-trials/.
Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2665–2673. doi: 10.1002/art.21972. PubMed DOI
Coates L, Fransen J, Helliwell P. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:48–53. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.102053. PubMed DOI
Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis—oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157:238–244. doi: 10.1159/000250839. PubMed DOI
Langley R, Feldman S, Nyirady J, van de Kerkhof P, Papavassilis C. The 5-point investigator's global assessment (IGA) scale: a modified tool for evaluating plaque psoriasis severity in clinical trials. J Dermatolog Treat. 2015;26:23–31. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2013.865009. PubMed DOI
Challa DNV, Crowson CS, Davis JM., 3rd The patient global assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: identification of underlying latent factors. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4:201–208. doi: 10.1007/s40744-017-0063-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Healy P, Helliwell P. Measuring clinical enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: assessment of existing measures and development of an instrument specific to psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:686–691. doi: 10.1002/art.23568. PubMed DOI
Helliwell P, Firth J, Ibrahim G, Melsom R, Shah I, Turner D. Development of an assessment tool for dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:1745–1750. PubMed
Fries J, Spitz P, Young D. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol. 1982;9:789–793. PubMed
Chandran V, Bhella S, Schentag C, Gladman D. Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue scale is valid in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:936–939. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.065763. PubMed DOI PMC
Ware J, Kosinski M, Dewey J. How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln: Quality Metric; 2000.
Armstrong A, Banderas B, Foley C, Stokes J, Sundaram M, Shields A. Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-assessment of psoriasis symptoms (SAPS)–clinical trial and the SAPS–real world patient-reported outcomes. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28:505–514. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1290206. PubMed DOI
Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:2286–2291. PubMed
Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Mejias E, Cannon GW, Weisman MH, Taylor T, et al. Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. A Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:2013–20. PubMed
Mease PJ, Woolley JM, Bitman B, Wang BC, Globe DR, Singh A. Minimally important difference of Health Assessment Questionnaire in psoriatic arthritis: relating thresholds of improvement in functional ability to patient-rated importance and satisfaction. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2461–2465. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110546. PubMed DOI
Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, Kivitz A, Bessette L, Li Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2503–2512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2. PubMed DOI
Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song IH, Mysler E, Bessette L, Peterfy C, et al. Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1788–1800. doi: 10.1002/art.41032. PubMed DOI
Fleischmann RM, Genovese MC, Enejosa JV, Mysler E, Bessette L, Peterfy C, et al. Safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib or adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 48 weeks with switch to alternate therapy in patients with insufficient response. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:1454–1462. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215764. PubMed DOI PMC
Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Combe B, Hall S, Rubbert-Roth A, Zhang Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2513–2524. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4. PubMed DOI
Smolen JS, Pangan AL, Emery P, Rigby W, Tanaka Y, Vargas JI, et al. Upadacitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate (SELECT-MONOTHERAPY): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393:2303–2311. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30419-2. PubMed DOI
van Vollenhoven R, Takeuchi T, Pangan AL, Friedman A, Mohamed MF, Chen S, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy in methotrexate-naive patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (SELECT-EARLY): a randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, multi-center, multi-country trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:1607–1620. doi: 10.1002/art.41384. PubMed DOI PMC
McInnes IB, Anderson JK, Magrey M, Merola JF, Liu Y, Kishimoto M, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib versus placebo and adalimumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-PsA-1): a double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(Suppl 1):12. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.6727. DOI
Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity's roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science. 2011;331:1565–1570. doi: 10.1126/science.1203486. PubMed DOI
Cameron MC, Lee E, Hibler BP, Barker CA, Mori S, Cordova M, et al. Basal cell carcinoma: epidemiology; pathophysiology; clinical and histological subtypes; and disease associations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:303–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.060. PubMed DOI
Gross RL, Schwartzman-Morris JS, Krathen M, Reed G, Chang H, Saunders KC, et al. A comparison of the malignancy incidence among patients with psoriatic arthritis and patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a large US cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1472–1481. doi: 10.1002/art.38385. PubMed DOI PMC
Nash P, Coates LC, Kivitz AJ, Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Covarrubias-Cobos JA, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: interim analysis of OPAL balance, an open-label, long-term extension study. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7:553–580. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00209-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Smolen JS, Genovese MC, Takeuchi T, Hyslop DL, Macias WL, Rooney T, et al. Safety profile of baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with over 2 years median time in treatment. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:7–18. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171361. PubMed DOI
Wollenhaupt J, Lee EB, Curtis JR, Silverfield J, Terry K, Soma K, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for up to 9.5 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: final results of a global, open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:89. PubMed PMC
Olivera PA, Lasa JS, Bonovas S, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases or other immune-mediated diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(1554–73):e12. PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03104374