Factors influencing thrombectomy decision making for primary medium vessel occlusion stroke
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
33947769
DOI
10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017472
PII: neurintsurg-2021-017472
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- intervention, stroke, thrombectomy,
- MeSH
- Stroke * surgery MeSH
- Endovascular Procedures * MeSH
- Brain Ischemia * therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Decision Making MeSH
- Thrombectomy MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore the preference of stroke physicians to treat patients with primary medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) stroke with immediate endovascular treatment (EVT) in an international cross-sectional survey, as there is no clear guideline recommendation for EVT in these patients. METHODS: In the survey MeVO-Finding Rationales and Objectifying New Targets for IntervEntional Revascularization in Stroke (MeVO-FRONTIERS), participants were shown four cases of primary MeVOs (six scenarios per case) and asked whether they would treat those patients with EVT. Multivariable logistic regression with clustering by respondent was performed to assess factors influencing the decision to treat. Dominance analysis was performed to assess the influence of factors within the scenarios on decision making. RESULTS: Overall, 366 participants (56 women; 15%) from 44 countries provided 8784 answers to 24 scenarios. Most physicians (59.2%) would treat patients immediately with EVT. Younger patient age (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.24, 99% CI 1.19 to 1.30), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (IRR 1.69, 99% CI 1.57 to 1.82), and small core volume (IRR 1.35, 99% CI 1.24 to 1.46) were positively associated with the decision to treat with EVT. Interventionalists (IRR 1.26, 99% CI 1.01 to 1.56) were more likely to treat patients with MeVO immediately with EVT. In the dominance analysis, factors influencing the decision in favor of EVT were (in order of importance): baseline NIHSS, core volume, alteplase use, patients' age, and occlusion site. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians in this survey were interventionalists and would treat patients with MeVO stroke immediately with EVT. This finding supports the need for robust clinical evidence.
Clinical Neurosciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
Department of Neurosurgery Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan
Diagnostic Imaging University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Calgary Alberta Canada
Medical Imaging Fakultní nemocnice u sv Anny v Brně Brno Czech Republic
Neurological Sciences Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA
Neuroradiology University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Calgary Alberta Canada
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Universitatsspital Basel Basel Switzerland
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
References provided by Crossref.org