BACKGROUND: An analysis of the regional distribution of health resources is one of the tools for evaluating equal geographic access to health care. The usual analytical approach to an assessment of regional differences is to evaluate each health resource separately. This is a sensible approach, because there may be systematic reasons for any differences, for example, higher salaries in urban areas. However, a separate evaluation of the regional distribution of health resource capacities may be misleading. We should evaluate all health resource capacities as a whole and consider the substitutability of resources. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to measure regional inequalities in the Czech Republic with the help of alternative approaches to the evaluation of regional inequalities in the case of several substitutable health resources. METHODS: Five alternative evaluation methods (models) are described and applied: the separate evaluation, expert model, market model, common weights model, and production frontier model. RESULTS: The regional distribution of physicians and nurses in the Czech Republic in 2017 was evaluated. In spite of many regulations at the national and regional levels, we have found inequalities in regional resource distribution. The models that consider all health resources and the possibility of a resource substitution show lower inequalities between regional health resource capacities. CONCLUSION: Both researchers and policy-makers should always consider the possibility of resource substitutions in the assessment of regional inequalities.

Faculty of Informatics and Statistics Prague University of Economics and Business 4 Winston Churchill Sq 13067 Prague 3 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Rice N, Smith PC. Ethics and geographical equity in health care. J Med Ethics. 2001;27:256–261. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.4.256. PubMed DOI PMC

De Looper M, Lafortune G. Measuring disparities in health status and in access and use of health care in OECD Countries. OECD Health Working Papers. No. 43. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2009.

Yu Q, Yin W, Huang D, Sun K, Chen Z, Guo H, Wu D. Trend and equity of general practitioners’ allocation in China based on data from 2012–2017. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19:20. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00561-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Munga MA, Maestad O. Measuring inequalities in the distribution of health workers: the case of Tanzania. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-4. PubMed DOI PMC

OECD. Geographic variations in health care: what do we know and what can be done to improve health system performance? OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2014.

Peiró S, Maynard A. Variations in health care delivery within the European Union. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(Suppl 1):1–2. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku223. PubMed DOI

Wiseman V, Lagarde M, Batura N, Lin S, Irava W, Roberts G. Measuring inequalities in the distribution of the Fiji health workforce. Int J Equity Health. 2017;15:115. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0575-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Wanless D. Securing our future health: taking a long-term view. A final report. London: HM Treasury; 2002.

Laurant M, Reeves D, Hermens R, Braspenning J, Grol R, Sibbald B. Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub2. PubMed DOI

Fulton BD, Scheffler RM, Sparkes SP, Auh EY, Vujicic M, Soucat A. Health workforce skill mix and task shifting in low income countries: a review of recent evidence. Hum Resour Health. 2011;9:1. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-9-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Buchan J, Dal Poz MR. Skill mix in the health care workforce: reviewing the evidence World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(7):575–580. PubMed PMC

Martınez-Gonzalez NA, Tandjung R, Djalali S, Huber-Geismann F, Markun S, Rosemann T. Effects of physician-nurse substitution on clinical parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):89181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089181. PubMed DOI PMC

Nelson S, Turnbull J, Bainbridge L, Caulfield T, Hudon G, Kendel D, Mowat D, Nasmith L, Postl B, Shamian J, Sketris I. Optimizing scopes of practice: new models for a new health care system. Ottawa: Canadian Academy of Health Sciences; 2014.

Arnaudo F, Lago F, Viego V. Assessing equity in the provision of primary healthcare centers in Buenos Aires province (Argentina): a stochastic frontier analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15:425–433. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0303-9. PubMed DOI

Dlouhý M. Health care regulation: impact on the supply of outpatient services in the Czech Republic. Prague Econ Papers. 2005;14(3):267–276. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.266. DOI

Dlouhý M. Inequalities in geographic distribution of doctors and hospital beds in 13 European countries. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research 2017. Brno: Masaryk University in Brno. 2017;254–259.

Hara K, Otsubo T, Kunisawa S, Imanaka Y. Examining sufficiency and equity in the geographic distribution of physicians in Japan: a longitudinal study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:013922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013922. PubMed DOI PMC

Gravelle H, Sutton M. Trends in geographical inequalities in provision of general practitioners in England and Wales. Lancet. 1998;352:1910. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60402-3. PubMed DOI

Madianos MG, Zacharakis C, Tsitsa C, Stefanis C. The mental health care delivery system in Greece: regional variation and socioeconomic correlates. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 1999;2:169–176. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-176X(199912)2:4<169::AID-MHP65>3.0.CO;2-T. PubMed DOI

Johnston G, Wilkinson D. Increasingly inequitable distribution of general practitioners in Australia, 1986–96. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(1):66–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00553.x. PubMed DOI

Pedersen PB, Lilleeng S. Resource distribution in mental health services: changes in geographic location and use of personnel in Norwegian mental health services 1979–1994. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2000;3:45–53. doi: 10.1002/1099-176X(200003)3:1<45::AID-MHP71>3.0.CO;2-1. PubMed DOI

European Food Safety Authority Guidance on expert knowledge elicitation in food and feed safety risk assessment. EFSA J. 2014;12(6):3734.

Oakley JE, O’Hagan A. SHELF: the Sheffield Elicitation Framework (version 4). School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield; 2019. http://tonyohagan.co.uk/shelf.

Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK. Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the inefficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2:429–444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8. DOI

Cooper WW, Seiford LW, Zhu J. Handbook of data envelopment analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004.

Dlouhý M. Measuring geographic inequalities: dealing with multiple health resources by data envelopment analysis. Front Public Health. 2018;6:3. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00053. PubMed DOI PMC

Anand S. Measuring health workforce inequalities: methods and application to China and India. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

De Maio F. Income inequality measures. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:849–852. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.052969. PubMed DOI PMC

Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. The relationship of income inequality to mortality: does the choice of indicator matter? Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(7):1121–1127. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00044-0. PubMed DOI

Alexa J, Rečka L, Votápková J, van Ginneken E, Spranger A, Wittenbecher F. Czech Republic: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2015;17(1):1–165. PubMed

Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic. Health care workers by occupation (full-time equivalents) 2010–2017. Prague. https://reporting.uzis.cz/cr/index.php?pg=statisticke-vystupy. Accessed 6 April 2021.