Inflammatory blood parameters as prognostic factors for surgical site infection after primary hip or knee arthroplasty: a systematic review protocol
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
34548343
PubMed Central
PMC8458324
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046027
PII: bmjopen-2020-046027
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- adult orthopaedics, hip, infection control, knee,
- MeSH
- Surgical Wound Infection diagnosis epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip * adverse effects MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Systematic Reviews as Topic MeSH
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee * adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a potential complication of surgical procedure. SSI after implant surgery is a disaster both for patients and surgeons. Although predictive tools for SSI are available, none of them estimate early infection based on inflammatory blood parameters. The inflammatory process can be measured using several parameters including interleukin-6, C reactive protein, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, white cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate or procalcitonin. This systematic review aims to determine whether inflammatory blood parameters could be used as significant predictive factors for SSI after primary hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies and cohort studies, published in English, will be searched in the following electronic bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science. Studies performed in adult patients of all ages who underwent knee or hip arthroplasty, studies containing data on the risk/prognostic factors for preknee or postknee or hip arthroplasty SSI and studies with a minimum follow-up of 30 days after surgery will be included. A standardised form will be used to extract data from the included studies comprising study characteristics, participant characteristics, details of the intervention, study methodology and outcomes. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy tool, second version, and Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies checklist will be used to assess risk of bias. Heterogeneity will be assessed using Cochran χ² statistic and I2 statistics where applicable. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance will be used to report findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required. The findings will be disseminated at national and international scientific sessions, also to be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020147925.
See more in PubMed
Namias N, Harvill S, Ball S, et al. . Cost and morbidity associated with antibiotic prophylaxis in the ICU. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:225–30. 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00287-7 PubMed DOI
Leaper DJ, van Goor H, Reilly J, et al. . Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burden. Int Wound J 2004;1:247–73. 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2004.00067.x PubMed DOI PMC
de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, et al. . Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:387–97. 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010 PubMed DOI
Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, et al. . CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–8. 10.2307/30148464 PubMed DOI
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. . Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97–132. PubMed
Korol E, Johnston K, Waser N, et al. . A systematic review of risk factors associated with surgical site infections among surgical patients. PLoS One 2013;8:e83743. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083743 PubMed DOI PMC
Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. . Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:195–283. 10.2146/ajhp120568 PubMed DOI
Acs NSQIP surgical risk calculator. Available: https://riskcalculator.facs.org/RiskCalculator/index.jsp [Accessed 16 Sep 2019].
Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, et al. . Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National nosocomial infections surveillance system. Am J Med 1991;91:152S–7. 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-z PubMed DOI
Germolec DR, Frawley RP, Evans E. Markers of inflammation. Methods Mol Biol 2010;598:53–73. 10.1007/978-1-60761-401-2_5 PubMed DOI
Bhat T, Teli S, Rijal J, et al. . Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and cardiovascular diseases: a review. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2013;11:55–9. 10.1586/erc.12.159 PubMed DOI
Lowsby R, Gomes C, Jarman I, et al. . Neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio as an early indicator of blood stream infection in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2015;32:531–4. 10.1136/emermed-2014-204071 PubMed DOI
Daryapeyma A, Aarstad HJ, Wahlgren C-M, et al. . Perioperative cytokine response to infection associated with elective arterial surgery. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2014;48:116–22. 10.1177/1538574413512376 PubMed DOI
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1. 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 PubMed DOI PMC
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. . New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the musculoskeletal infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2992–4. 10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, et al. . Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56:e1–25. 10.1093/cid/cis803 PubMed DOI
Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1450–2. 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135 PubMed DOI
Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. . The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:1309–14. 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078 PubMed DOI
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PubMed DOI PMC
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. . Grade guidelines: 1. introduction-grade evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:383–94. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 PubMed DOI
Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529–36. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 PubMed DOI
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. . Stard 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015;351:h5527. 10.1136/bmj.h5527 PubMed DOI PMC
Lee YS, Koo K-H, Kim HJ, et al. . Synovial fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017;99:2077–84. 10.2106/JBJS.17.00123 PubMed DOI
Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, et al. . Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2102–9. 10.2106/JBJS.I.01199 PubMed DOI
Li B, Chen F, Liu Y, et al. . Synovial fluid α-defensin as a biomarker for peri-prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Infect 2017;18:702–10. 10.1089/sur.2017.006 PubMed DOI
Yoon J-R, Yang S-H, Shin Y-S. Diagnostic accuracy of interleukin-6 and procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2018;42:1213–26. 10.1007/s00264-017-3744-3 PubMed DOI