Implants Survival Rate in Regenerated Sites with Innovative Graft Biomaterials: 1 Year Follow-Up
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Switzerland Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
34576516
PubMed Central
PMC8472708
DOI
10.3390/ma14185292
PII: ma14185292
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- alveolar socket preservation, bone grafts, dental implants, dental implants survival rate, guided bone regeneration, peri-implant bone loss,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
In thirteen different dental clinics in Singapore, Spain, Czech Republic and Italy, 504 patients were selected, and 483 dental implants were placed in maxillary sites after alveolar socket preservation (ASP) procedures with an autologous demineralized tooth extracted as graft material from an innovative Tooth Transformer device was obtained. All procedures used were reported in n°638 Ethical Committee surgical protocol of University of Chieti and approved. After 4 months, at dental implant placing, bone biopsies were performed to evaluate the histologic outcomes, and 12 months after implant loading, global implant survival rate, failure percentage and peri-implant bone loss were detected. After ASP, only 27 post-operative complications were observed and after 4 months, bone biopsy histomorphometric analysis showed a high percentage of bone volume (BV) 43.58 (±12.09), and vital new bone (NB) 32.38 (±17.15) with an absence of inflammation or necrosis areas. Twelve months after loading, only 10 dental implants failed (2.3%), with a 98.2% overall implant survival rate, nine cases showed mucositis (1.8%) and eight showed peri-implantitis (1.6%). At mesial sites, 0.43 mm (±0.83) of bone loss around the implants was detected and 0.23 mm (±0.38) at the distal sites with an average value of 0.37 mm (±0.68) (p > 0.568). Several studies with a longer follow-up will be necessary to confirm the preliminary data observed. However, clinical results seem to suggest that the post-extraction socket preservation procedure using innovative demineralized autologous tooth-derived biomaterial may be a predictable procedure to produce new vital bone able to support dental implant rehabilitation of maxilla edentulous sites.
Department of Biomedical Surgical Dental Science University of Milan 20161 Milan Italy
Department of Medical Sciences and Diagnostic Integrated University of Genoa 16121 Genova Italy
Department School of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano Bicocca 20100 Milan Italy
Independent Researcher 00010 Rome Italy
Independent Researcher 20100 Milan Italy
Independent Researcher 24068 Seriate Italy
Independent Researcher 28006 Madrid Spain
Independent Researcher 34121 Trieste Italy
Independent Researcher 48001 Bilbao Spain
See more in PubMed
Emami E., de Souza R.F., Kabawat M., Feine J.S. The Impact of Edentulism on Oral and General Health. Int. J. Dent. 2013;2013:498305. doi: 10.1155/2013/498305. PubMed DOI PMC
Hong D.G.K., Oh J.H. Recent advances in dental implants. Maxillofac. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017;39:33. doi: 10.1186/s40902-017-0132-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Buser D., Sennerby L., De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol. 2000. 2017;73:7–21. doi: 10.1111/prd.12185. PubMed DOI
Pjetursson B.E., Thoma D., Jung R., Zwahlen M., Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implantsupported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2012;23:22–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x. PubMed DOI
Esposito M., Grusovin M.G., Polyzos I.P., Felice P., Worthington H.V. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: Immediate, immediatedelayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2010;3:189–205. PubMed
Hansson S., Halldin A. Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology. J. Dent. Biomech. 2012;3:1758736012456543. doi: 10.1177/1758736012456543. PubMed DOI PMC
Lang N.P., Pun L., Lau K.Y., Wong M.C. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2012;23:39–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x. PubMed DOI
Albrektsson T., Donos N., Working G. Implant survival and complications: The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin. Implant. Res. 2012;23:63–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02557.x. PubMed DOI
Schropp L., Wenzel A. Timing of single implant placement and long-term observation of marginal bone levels. Eur. J Oral Implantol. 2016;9:S107–S122. PubMed
Araújo M.G., Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: An experimental study in the dog. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2009;20:545–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.x. PubMed DOI
Crespi R., Capparè P., Polizzi E.M., Gherlone E.F. Tissue remodeling after bone expansion in grafted and ungrafted sockets. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2014;29:699–704. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3535. PubMed DOI
Chappuis V., Araújo M.G., Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol. 2000. 2017;73:73–83. doi: 10.1111/prd.12167. PubMed DOI
Zhao L., Wei Y., Xu T., Zhang B., Hu W., Chung K.H. Changes in alveolar process dimensions following extraction of molars with advanced periodontal disease: A clinical pilot study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2019;30:324–335. doi: 10.1111/clr.13418. PubMed DOI
Bittner N., Planzos L., Volchonok A., Tarnow D., Schulze-Späte U. Evaluation of Horizontal and Vertical Buccal Ridge Dimensional Changes After Immediate Implant Placement and Immediate Temporization with and without Bone Augmentation Procedures: Short-Term, 1-Year Results. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2020;40:83–93. doi: 10.11607/prd.4152. PubMed DOI
Borges T., Fernandes D., Almeida B., Pereira M., Martins D., Azevedo L., Marques T. Correlation between alveolar bone morphology and volumetric dimensional changes in immediate maxillary implant placement: A 1-year prospective cohort study. J. Periodontol. 2020;91:1167–1176. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0606. PubMed DOI
Bauer T.W., Muschler C.F. Bone graft materials: An overview of the basic science. Clin. Orthop. 2000;371:10–27. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00003. PubMed DOI
Von Arx T., Hardt N., Walkmann B. The time technique:a new technique for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1996;11:387–394. PubMed
Tomasi C., Donati M., Cecchinato D., Szathvary I., Corrà E., Lindhe J. Effect of socket grafting with deproteinized bone mineral: An RCT on dimensional alterations after 6 months. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2018;29:435–442. doi: 10.1111/clr.13141. PubMed DOI
Mastrangelo F., Quaresima R., Grilli A., Tettamanti L., Vinci R., Sammartino G., Tetè S., Gherlone E. A comparison of bovine bone and hydroxyapatite scaffolds during initial bone regeneration: An in vitro evaluation. Implant. Dent. 2013;22:613–622. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182a69858. PubMed DOI
Di Raimondo R., Sanz-Esporrín J., Sanz-Martin I., Plá R., Luengo F., Vignoletti F., Nuñez J., Sanz M. Hard and soft tissue changes after guided bone regeneration using two different barrier membranes: An experimental in vivo investigation. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021;25:2213–2227. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03537-5. PubMed DOI
Manavella V., Romano F., Corano L., Bignardi C., Aimetti M. Three-Dimensional Volumetric Changes in Severely Resorbed Alveolar Sockets after Ridge Augmentation with Bovine-Derived Xenograft and Resorbable Barrier: A Preliminary Study on CBCT Imaging. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2018;33:373–382. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5684. PubMed DOI
Mastrangelo F., Gastaldi G., Vinci R., Troiano G., Tettamanti L., Gherlone E., Lo Muzio L. Immediate Postextractive Implants With and Without Bone Graft: 3-year Follow-up Results From a Multicenter Controlled Randomized Trial. Implant. Dent. 2018;27:638–645. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000816. PubMed DOI
Botilde G., Colin P.E., González-Martín O., Lecloux G., Rompen E., Lambert F. Hard and soft tissue analysis of alveolar ridge preservation in esthetic zone using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a saddle connective tissue graft: A long-term prospective case series. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2020;22:387–396. doi: 10.1111/cid.12899. PubMed DOI
Zizzari V.L., Zara S., Tetè G., Vinci R., Gherlone E., Cataldi A. Biologic and clinical aspects of integration of different bone substitutes in oral surgery: A literature review. Oral Surg. Orla Med. Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2016;122:392–402. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.04.010. PubMed DOI
Jung R.E., Zembic A., Pjetursson B.E., Zwahlen M., Thoma D.S. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2012;23:2–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x. PubMed DOI
Compton S.M., Clark D., Chan S., Kuc I., Wubie B.A., Levin L. Dental implants in the elderly population: A long term follow-up. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2017;32:164–170. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5305. PubMed DOI
Howe M.S., Keys W., Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: A systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2019;84:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.008. PubMed DOI
Nassani M.Z. What is the survival rate of dental implants placed at sites of failed implants? Evid. Based Dent. 2019;20:95–96. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0047-0. PubMed DOI
Alghamdi H.S., Jansen J.A. The development and future of dental implants. Dent. Mater. J. 2020;39:167–172. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-140. PubMed DOI
Oh S.L., Shiau H.J., Reynolds M.A. Survival of dental implants at sites after implant failure: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;123:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.007. PubMed DOI
Manz M. Factors Associated With Radiographic Vertical Bone Loss Around Implants Placed in a Clinical Study. Ann. Periodontol. 2000;5:137–151. doi: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.137. PubMed DOI
Apostolopoulos P., Darby I. Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed after a ridge preservation procedure. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2016;26:461–468. doi: 10.1111/clr.12820. PubMed DOI
Maiorana C., Poli P.P., Deflorian M., Testori T., Mandelli F., Nagursky H., Vinci R. Alveolar socket preservation with demineralised bovine bone mineral and a collagen matrix. J. Periodontal Implant. Sci. 2017;47:194–210. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.194. PubMed DOI PMC
Crespi R., Toti P., Covani U., Crespi G., Brevi B., Menchini G.B. fabris Bone assessment in grafted and ungrafted pocket after dental implant placement: A 10 year follow up study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2020;35:576–584. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7969. PubMed DOI
Minetti E., Palermo A., Contessi M., Gambardella U., Schmitz J.H., Giacometti E., Celko M., Trisi P. Autologous tooth graft for maxillary sinus augmentation: A multicenter clinical study. Int. J. Growth Factors Stem. Cells Dent. 2019;2:45–51. doi: 10.4103/GFSC.GFSC_13_19. DOI
Minetti E., Berardini M., Trisi P. A new tooth processing apparatous allowing to obtain dentin grafts for bone augmentation: The tooth transformer. Open Dent. J. 2019;13:6–14. doi: 10.2174/1874210601913010006. DOI
Minetti E., Palermo A., Ferrante F., Schmitz J., Ho H.K.H., Haan SNg D., Giacometti E., Gambardella U., Contessi M., Celko M., et al. Autologous tooth graft after endodontical treated used for socket preservation: A multicenter clinical study. Appl. Sci. 2019;9:5396. doi: 10.3390/app9245396. DOI
Minetti E., Giacometti E., Gambardella U., Contessi M., Celko M., Marenzi G., Mastrangelo F. Alevolar socket preservation with different autologous graft materials: Preliminary results of a multicenter pilot study in human. Materials. 2020;13:1153. doi: 10.3390/ma13051153. PubMed DOI PMC
Berglundh T., Armitage G., Araujo M.G., Avila-Ortiz G., Blanco J., Camargo P.M., Chen S., Cochran D., Derks J., Figuero E., et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018;45:S286–S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957. PubMed DOI
Minetti E., Casasco A., Casasco M., Corbella S., Giacometti E., Ho H.K.L., Palermo A., Savadori P., Taschieri S. Bone Regeneration in Implantology: Tooth as a Graft. 2021 EDRA ed. Edra Publishing US; Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA: