Endovascular Device Choice and Tools for Recanalization of Medium Vessel Occlusions: Insights From the MeVO FRONTIERS International Survey
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
34603187
PubMed Central
PMC8480153
DOI
10.3389/fneur.2021.735899
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- MeVO, acute ischemic stroke, aspiration thrombectomy, endovascular thrombectomy, endovascular treatment (EVT), medium vessel occlusions, neurointervention, stroke,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) can be technically challenging. Devices and tools are rapidly evolving. We aimed to gain insight into preferences and global perspectives on the usage of endovascular tools in treating MeVOs. Methods: We conducted an international survey with seven scenarios of patients presenting A3, M2/3, M3, M3/4, or P2/3 occlusions. Respondents were asked for their preferred first-line endovascular approach, and whether they felt that the appropriate endovascular tools were available to them. Answers were analyzed by occlusion location and geographical region of practice, using multinomial/binary logistic regression. Results: A total of 263 neurointerventionists provided 1836 responses. The first-line preferences of physicians were evenly distributed among stent-retrievers, combined approaches, and aspiration only (33.2, 29.8, and 26.8%, respectively). A3 occlusions were more often treated with stent-retrievers (RR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36), while intra-arterial thrombolysis was more often preferred in M3 (RR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.53-3.98) and M3/4 occlusions (RR 7.71, 95% CI: 4.16-14.28) compared to M2/3 occlusions. Respondents who thought appropriate tools are currently not available more often chose stent retrievers alone (RR 2.07; 95% CI: 1.01-4.24) or intra-arterial thrombolysis (RR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.26-8.42). Physicians who stated that they do not have access to optimal tools opted more often not to treat at all (RR 3.41, 95% CI: 1.11-10.49). Stent-retrievers alone were chosen more often and contact aspiration alone less often as a first-line approach in Europe (RR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.38-3.24; and RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.70, respectively) compared to the United States and Canada. Conclusions: In EVT for MeVO strokes, neurointerventionalists choose a targeted vessel specific first-line approach depending on the occlusion location, region of practice, and availability of the appropriate tools.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging Foothills Medical Center University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada
Department of Neurological Sciences Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL United States
Department of Neuroradiology Toronto Western Hospital Toronto ON Canada
Department of Neuroradiology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Neuroradiology Vancouver General Hospital Toronto ON Canada
Department of Neurosurgery Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kobe Japan
Department of Radiology University Hospital of Basel Basel Switzerland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ospel JM, Menon BK, Demchuk AM, Almekhlafi MA, Kashani N, Mayank A, et al. . Clinical course of acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion with and without intravenous alteplase treatment. Stroke. (2020) 51:3232–40. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030227 PubMed DOI
McTaggart RA, Ospel JM, Psychogios MN, Puri AS, Maegerlein C, Lane KM, et al. . Optimization of endovascular therapy in the neuroangiography suite to achieve fast and complete (expanded treatment in cerebral ischemia 2c-3) reperfusion. Stroke. (2020) 51:1961–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026736 PubMed DOI
Ospel JM, Goyal M. A review of endovascular treatment for medium vessel occlusion stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. (2021) 13:623–30. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017321 PubMed DOI
Saver JL, Chapot R, Agid R, Hassan A, Jadhav AP, Liebeskind DS, et al. . Thrombectomy for distal, medium vessel occlusions: a consensus statement on present knowledge and promising directions. Stroke. (2020) 51:2872–84. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028956 PubMed DOI
Romano DG, Frauenfelder G, Napoletano R, Botto A, Locatelli G, Panza MP, et al. . ADAPT with new catalyst 5 reperfusion catheter for distal M2 ischemic stroke: preliminary experience. World Neurosurg. (2020) 135:e650–6. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.098 PubMed DOI
Altenbernd J, Kuhnt O, Hennigs S, Hilker R, Loehr C. Frontline ADAPT therapy to treat patients with symptomatic M2 and M3 occlusions in acute ischemic stroke: Initial experience with the Penumbra ACE and 3MAX reperfusion system. J Neurointerv Surg. (2018) 10:435–40. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013233 PubMed DOI PMC
Navia P, Larrea J-A, Pardo E, Arce A, Martínez-Zabaleta M, Díez-González N, et al. . Initial experience using the 3MAX cerebral reperfusion catheter in the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke of distal arteries. J Neurointerv Surg. (2016) 8:787–90. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011798 PubMed DOI
Crockett MT, Phillips TJ, Chiu AHY. Dual suction Headway27 microcatheter thrombectomy for the treatment of distal intracranial arterial occlusion strokes: Initial experience with the micro-ADAPT technique. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:714–8. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014385 PubMed DOI
Vargas J, Spiotta AM, Fargen K, Turner RD, Chaudry I, Turk A. Experience with a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) for thrombectomy in distal cerebral artery occlusions causing acute ischemic stroke. World Neurosurg. (2017) 99:31–6. 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.035 PubMed DOI
Pérez-Garciá C, Moreu M, Rosati S, Simal P, Egido JA, Gomez-Escalonilla C, et al. . Mechanical thrombectomy in medium vessel occlusions: blind exchange with mini-pinning technique versus mini stent retriever alone. Stroke. (2020) 51:3224–31. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030815 PubMed DOI
Haussen DC, Al-Bayati AR, Eby B, Ravindran K, Rodrigues GM, Frankel MR, et al. . Blind exchange with mini-pinning technique for distal occlusion thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. (2020) 12:392–5. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015205 PubMed DOI
de Castro Afonso LH, Borghini Pazuello G, Seizem Nakiri G, Monsignore LM, Antunes Dias F, Pontes-Neto OM, et al. . Thrombectomy for M2 occlusions and the role of the dominant branch. Interv Neuroradiol. (2019) 25:697–704. 10.1177/1591019919847693 PubMed DOI PMC
Grossberg JA, Rebello LC, Haussen DC, Bouslama M, Bowen M, Barreira CM, et al. . Beyond large vessel occlusion strokes: distal occlusion thrombectomy. Stroke. (2018) 49:1662–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020567 PubMed DOI
Phan K, Maingard J, Kok HK, Dmytriw AA, Goyal S, Chandra R, et al. . Contact aspiration versus stent-retriever thrombectomy for distal middle cerebral artery occlusions in acute ischemic stroke: meta-analysis. Neurointervention. (2018) 13:100–9. 10.5469/neuroint.2018.00997 PubMed DOI PMC
Atchaneeyasakul K, Malik AM, Yavagal DR, Haussen DC, Jadhav AP, Bouslama M, et al. . Thrombectomy outcomes in acute ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery M2 occlusion with stent retriever versus aspiration: a multicenter experience. Interv Neurol. (2020) 8:180–6. 10.1159/000500198 PubMed DOI PMC
Pfaff J, Herweh C, Pham M, Schieber S, Ringleb PA, Bendszus M, et al. . Mechanical thrombectomy of distal occlusions in the anterior cerebral artery: recanalization rates, periprocedural complications, and clinical outcome. Am J Neuroradiol. (2016) 37:673–8. 10.3174/ajnr.A4594 PubMed DOI PMC
Rikhtegar R, Mosimann PJ, Weber R, Wallocha M, Yamac E, Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M, et al. . Effectiveness of very low profile thrombectomy device in primary distal medium vessel occlusion, as rescue therapy after incomplete proximal recanalization or following iatrogenic thromboembolic events. J Neurointerv Surg. (2021) 1–6. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017035 PubMed DOI PMC
Bhogal P, Bücke P, Aguilar Pérez M, Ganslandt O, Bäzner H, Henkes H. Mechanical thrombectomy for M2 occlusions: a single-centre experience. Interv Neurol. (2017) 6:117–25. 10.1159/000458161 PubMed DOI PMC
Menon BK, Hill MD, Davalos A, Roos YBWEM, Campbell BCV, Dippel DWJ, et al. . Efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions: meta-analysis of data from the HERMES Collaboration. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:1065–9. 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307109.258 PubMed DOI
Umansky F, Juarez SM, Dujovny M, Ausman JI, Diaz FG, Gomes F, et al. . Microsurgical anatomy of the proximal segments of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg. (1984) 61:458–67. 10.3171/jns.1984.61.3.0458 PubMed DOI
Ospel JM, Volny O, Jayaraman M, McTaggart R, Goyal M. Optimizing fast first pass complete reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke—the BADDASS approach (BAlloon guiDe with large bore Distal Access catheter with dual aspiration with Stent-retriever as Standard approach). Expert Rev Med Devices. (2019) 16:955–63. 10.1080/17434440.2019.1684263 PubMed DOI
Perlmutter D, Rhoton AL. Microsurgical anatomy of the distal anterior cerebral artery. J Neurosurg. (1978) 49:204–28. 10.3171/jns.1978.49.2.0204 PubMed DOI
Hofmeister J, Kulcsar Z, Bernava G, Pellaton A, Yilmaz H, Erceg G, et al. . The Catch Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in distal intracranial occlusions. J Neuroradiol. (2018) 45:305–9. 10.1016/j.neurad.2018.01.051 PubMed DOI
Almekhlafi M, Ospel JM, Saposnik G, Kashani N, Demchuk A, Hill MD, et al. . Endovascular treatment decisions in patients with M2 segment MCA occlusions. Am J Neuroradiol. (2020) 41:280–5. 10.3174/ajnr.A6397 PubMed DOI PMC