Accession Site Does Not Influence the Risk of Stroke after Diagnostic Coronary Angiography or Intervention: Results from a Large Prospective Registry

. 2021 ; 11 (3) : 122-130. [epub] 20211028

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid34710868

INTRODUCTION: Periprocedural stroke represents a rare but serious complication of cardiac catheterization. Pooled data from randomized trials evaluating the risk of stroke following cardiac catheterization via transradial versus transfemoral access showed no difference. On the other hand, a significant difference in stroke rates favoring transradial access was found in a recent meta-analysis of observational studies. Our aim was to determine if there is a difference in stroke risk after transradial versus transfemoral catheterization within a contemporary real-world registry. METHODS: Data from 14,139 patients included in a single-center prospective registry between 2009 and 2016 were used to determine the odds of periprocedural transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke for radial versus femoral catheterization via multivariate logistic regression with Firth's correction. RESULTS: A total of 10,931 patients underwent transradial and 3,208 underwent transfemoral catheterization. Periprocedural TIA/stroke occurred in 41 (0.29%) patients. Age was the only significant predictor of TIA/stroke in multivariate analysis, with each additional year representing an odds ratio (OR) = 1.09 (CI 1.05-1.13, p < 0.000). The choice of accession site had no impact on the risk of periprocedural TIA/stroke (OR = 0.81; CI 0.38-1.72, p = 0.577). CONCLUSION: Observational data from a large prospective registry indicate that accession site has no influence on the risk of periprocedural TIA/stroke after cardiac catheterization.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Patel VG, Brayton KM, Kumbhani DJ, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Meta-analysis of stroke after transradial versus transfemoral artery catheterization. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct;168((6)):5234–8. PubMed

Sirker A, Kwok CS, Kotronias R, Bagur R, Bertrand O, Butler R, et al. Influence of access site choice for cardiac catheterization on risk of adverse neurological events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:107–19. PubMed

Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9((14)):1419–34. PubMed

Kolkailah AA, Alreshq RS, Muhammed AM, Zahran ME, Anas El-Wegoud M, Nabhan AF. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4((4)):CD012318. PubMed PMC

Shoji S, Kohsaka S, Kumamaru H, Sawano M, Shiraishi Y, Ueda I, et al. Stroke after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of transradial intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11((12)):e006761. PubMed

Pristipino C, Trani C, Nazzaro MS, Berni A, Patti G, Patrizi R, et al. Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study. Heart. 2009 Mar 15;95((6)):476–82. PubMed

Ratib K, Mamas MA, Routledge HC, Ludman PF, Fraser D, Nolan J. Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165((3)):317–24. PubMed

Raposo L, Madeira S, Teles RC, Santos M, Gabriel HM, Gonçalves P, et al. Neurologic complications after transradial or transfemoral approach for diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization: a propensity score analysis of 16,710 cases from a single centre prospective registry–transradial approach and neurologic complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2015 Jul;86((1)):61–70. PubMed

Juliane J. The impact of different techniques used for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention on the occurrence of procedure-related ischemic cerebral complications [Internet] [cited 2020 Sep 29]. Available from: https://openarchive.ki.se/xmlui/handle/10616/45020.

Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified rankin scale: Implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38((3)):1091–6. PubMed

Dattani A, Au L, Tay KH, Davey P. Contrast-induced encephalopathy following coronary angiography with no radiological features: a case report and literature review. Cardiology. 2018;139((3)):197–201. PubMed

Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. [2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)] G Ital Cardiol. 2019;20((2)):1S–61S. PubMed

Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80((1)):27.

Coveney J. FIRTHLOGIT: Stata module to calculate bias reduction in logistic regression [Internet] Stat Softw Components. [cited 2020 Sep 29]. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456948.html.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61((4)):344–9. PubMed

Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Cohen DJ, Blaesing L, Burket MW, Basu A, et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J. 1999 Sep;138((3)):430–6. PubMed

Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Höltgen R, Tillmanns H. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2((11)):1047–54. PubMed

Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J, Mates M, Pesek J, Ostadal P, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar;63((10)):964–72. PubMed

Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, Safirstein J, et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11((9)):e000035. PubMed

Damluji AA, Nelson DW, Valgimigli M, Windecker S, Byrne RA, Cohen F, et al. Transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention: a collaboration of international cardiovascular societies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10((22)):2269–79. PubMed

Lin CF, Chang YH, Chi NF, Chen II, Liu HY, Chien LN. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients hospitalized for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and the risk of postdischarge ischemic stroke at 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year follow-ups. Heart Vessels. 2019 Jul;34((7)):1132–9. PubMed

Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, Nolan J, Ludwig J, Tubaro M, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2013 Mar;8((11)):1242–51. PubMed

Blake SR, Shahzad A, Aggarwal SK, Kumar A, Khan A, Stables RH. Radial versus femoral vascular access in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: are the results of femoral operators unfairly represented in observational research? Am Heart J. 2019 Apr;210:81–7. PubMed

Available from: https://figshare.com/s/b8d3b60762636fdd0c6d.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...