OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the host- and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh. DESIGN: In vivo animal experiment. SETTING: KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies. POPULATION: Fourteen parous female Mule sheep. METHODS: P4HB scaffolds were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of sheep. The comparative PP mesh data were obtained from an identical study protocol performed previously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gross necropsy, host response and biomechanical evaluation of explants, and the in vivo P4HB scaffold degradation were evaluated at 60- and 180-days post-implantation. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM). RESULTS: Gross necropsy revealed no implant-related adverse events using P4HB scaffolds. The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants increased at 180-days (12.498 ± 2.66 N/mm SEM [p =0.019]) as compared to 60-days (4.585 ± 1.57 N/mm) post-implantation, while P4HB degraded gradually. P4HB scaffolds exhibited excellent tissue integration with dense connective tissue and a moderate initial host response. P4HB scaffolds induced a significantly higher M2/M1 ratio (1.70 ± 0.67 SD, score 0-4), as compared to PP mesh(0.99 ± 0.78 SD, score 0-4) at 180-days. CONCLUSIONS: P4HB scaffold facilitated a gradual load transfer to vaginal tissue over time. The fully absorbable P4HB scaffold, in comparison to PP mesh, has a favorable host response with comparable load-bearing capacity. If these results are also observed at longer follow-up in-vivo, a clinical study using P4HB for vaginal POP surgery may be warranted to demonstrate efficacy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP.

3rd Faculty of Medicine Institute for the Care of Mother and Child Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Centre for Surgical Technologies Biomedical Sciences Group KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Center for Reproductive Medicine Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Institute of Mechanical Systems ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology EMPA Dübendorf Switzerland

See more in PubMed

Lakeman MM, van der Vaart CH, Laan E, Roovers JPW. The effect of prolapse surgery on vaginal sensibility. J Sex Med. 2011;8(4):1239–45. PubMed

Weber MA, Lakeman MM, Laan E, Roovers JPW. The effects of vaginal prolapse surgery using synthetic mesh on vaginal wall sensibility, vaginal vasocongestion, and sexual function: a prospective single‐center study. J Sex Med. 2014;11(7):1848–55. PubMed

Liang R, Abramowitch S, Knight K, Palcsey S, Nolfi A, Feola A, et al. Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness. BJOG. 2013;120(2):233–43. PubMed PMC

Hympanova L, Rynkevic R, Roman S, Mori da Cunha M, Mazza E, Zundel M, et al. Assessment of electrospun and ultra‐lightweight polypropylene meshes in the sheep model for vaginal surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(1):190–8. PubMed

Birch C, Fynes MM. The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(5):527–35. PubMed

Barone WR, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD. Textile properties of synthetic prolapse mesh in response to uniaxial loading. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):326.e1–e9. PubMed PMC

Kelly M, Macdougall K, Olabisi O, McGuire N. In vivo response to polypropylene following implantation in animal models: a review of biocompatibility. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(2):171–80. PubMed PMC

Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(5):501.e1–e7. PubMed PMC

Reinier M, Groep G. Final opinion on the use of meshes in urogynecological surgery. Brussels, Belgium: SCENIHR‐European Commission; 2016.

Diedrich CM, Roovers JP, Smit TH, Guler Z. Fully absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate implants exhibit more favorable cell‐matrix interactions than polypropylene. Mater Sci Eng C, Mater Biol Appl. 2021;120: 111702. PubMed

O'Shaughnessy D, Grande D, El‐Neemany D, Sajjan S, Pillalamarri N, Shalom D, et al. Evaluation of the histological and biomechanical properties of poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold for pelvic organ prolapse, compared with polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model. Int Urogynecol J. 2021. 10.1007/s00192-021-04851-6 PubMed DOI

Huisman GW, Skraly F, Martin DP, Peoples OP. Biological systems for manufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers containing 4‐hydroxyacids. Google Patents; 2001.

Nelson T, Kaufman E, Kline J, Sokoloff L. The extraneural distribution of γ‐hydroxybutyrate. J Neurochem. 1981;37(5):1345–8. PubMed

Martin DP, Williams SF. Medical applications of poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate: a strong flexible absorbable biomaterial. Biochem Eng J. 2003;16(2):97–105.

Martin DP, Badhwar A, Shah DV, Rizk S, Eldridge SN, Gagne DH, et al. Characterization of poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate mesh for hernia repair applications. J Surg Res. 2013;184(2):766–73. PubMed

Couri BM, Lenis AT, Borazjani A, Paraiso MFR, Damaser MS. Animal models of female pelvic organ prolapse: lessons learned. Exp Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2012;7(3):249–60. PubMed PMC

Young N, Rosamilia A, Arkwright J, Lee J, Davies‐Tuck M, Melendez J, et al. Vaginal wall weakness in parous ewes: a potential preclinical model of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(7):999–1004. PubMed

Ozog Y, Konstantinovic ML, Werbrouck E, De Ridder D, Edoardo M, Deprest J. Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(9):1099–108. PubMed

Hympanova L, Rynkevic R, Wach RA, Olejnik AK, Dankers PY, Arts B, et al. Experimental reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect with electrospun polycaprolactone‐ureidopyrimidinone mesh conserves compliance yet may have insufficient strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;88:431–41. PubMed

Deeken CR, Matthews BD. Characterization of the mechanical strength, resorption properties, and histologic characteristics of a fully absorbable material (Poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate‐PHASIX Mesh) in a porcine model of hernia repair. ISRN Surg. 2013;2013: 238067. PubMed PMC

Roman S, Urbankova I, Callewaert G, Lesage F, Hillary C, Osman NI, et al. Evaluating alternative materials for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of the in vivo response to meshes implanted in rabbits. J Urol. 2016;196(1):261–9. PubMed

Hympanova L, Mori da Cunha M, Rynkevic R, Zundel M, Gallego MR, Vange J, et al. Physiologic musculofascial compliance following reinforcement with electrospun polycaprolactone‐ureidopyrimidinone mesh in a rat model. J Mech Behav Biom Mat. 2017;74:349‐57. PubMed

Hjort H, Mathisen T, Alves A, Clermont G, Boutrand J. Three‐year results from a preclinical implantation study of a long‐term resorbable surgical mesh with time‐dependent mechanical characteristics. Hernia. 2012;16(2):191–7. PubMed PMC

Liang R, Knight K, Abramowitch S, Moalli PA. Exploring the basic science of prolapse meshes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(5):413. PubMed PMC

Nolfi AL, Brown BN, Liang R, Palcsey SL, Bonidie MJ, Abramowitch SD, et al. Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):206.e1–e8. PubMed PMC

Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1357–64. PubMed

De Tayrac R, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Chauveaud‐Lambling A, Fernandez H. Long‐term anatomical and functional assessment of trans‐vaginal cystocele repair using a tension‐free polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17(5):483–8. PubMed

Ramanah R, Mairot J, Clement M‐C, Parratte B, Maillet R, Riethmuller D. Evaluating the porcine dermis graft InteXen® in three‐compartment transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(9):1151–6. PubMed

Armitage S, Seman EI, Keirse MJ. Use of surgisis for treatment of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012: 376251. PubMed PMC

Williams SF, Martin DP, Moses AC. The history of GalaFLEX P4HB Scaffold. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(suppl 2):S33–42. PubMed PMC

Utsunomia C, Ren Q, Zinn M. Poly(4‐Hydroxybutyrate): current state and perspectives. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:257. PubMed PMC

Feola A, Abramowitch S, Jallah Z, Stein S, Barone W, Palcsey S, et al. Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high‐stiffness prolapse mesh. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2013;120(2):224–32. PubMed PMC

Feola A, Endo M, Urbankova I, Vlacil J, Deprest T, Bettin S, et al. Host reaction to vaginally inserted collagen containing polypropylene implants in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):474.e1–e8. PubMed

Cima LG. Polymer substrates for controlled biological interactions. J Cell Biochem. 1994;56(2):155–61. PubMed

Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, Zhang L, Kukla KA, Wolf MT, et al. Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(3):978–87. PubMed PMC

Hachim D, LoPresti ST, Yates CC, Brown BN. Shifts in macrophage phenotype at the biomaterial interface via IL‐4 eluting coatings are associated with improved implant integration. Biomaterials. 2017;112:95–107. PubMed PMC

Vashaghian M, Ruiz‐Zapata AM, Kerkhof MH, Zandieh‐Doulabi B, Werner A, Roovers JP, et al. Toward a new generation of pelvic floor implants with electrospun nanofibrous matrices: a feasibility study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(3):565–73. PubMed

Wynn TA, Ramalingam TR. Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat Med. 2012;18(7):1028. PubMed PMC

Burden N, Chapman K, Sewell F, Robinson V. Pioneering better science through the 3Rs: an introduction to the national centre for the replacement, refinement, and reduction of animals in research (NC3Rs). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015;54(2):198–208. PubMed PMC