Gender Differences in 3-Month Outcomes of Erenumab Treatment-Study on Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Erenumab in Men
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
34975732
PubMed Central
PMC8717149
DOI
10.3389/fneur.2021.774341
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- erenumab, gender, men, migraine, migraine treatment, real-world evidence,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Objective: We reported gender-specific data on the efficacy and safety of erenumab, a monoclonal antibody antagonizing the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. Methods: Our pooled patient-level analysis of real-world data included patients treated with erenumab and followed up for 12 weeks. We considered the following outcomes at weeks 9-12 of treatment compared with baseline: 0-29%, 30-49%, 50-75%, and ≥75% responder rates, according to the decrease in monthly headache days (MHDs), rate of treatment stopping, change in MHDs, monthly migraine days (MMDs), monthly days of acute medication and triptan use, and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score from baseline to weeks 9-12. Outcomes were compared between men and women by the chi-squared test or t-test, as appropriate. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to identify factors influencing the efficacy outcomes. Results: We included 1,410 patients from 16 centers, of which 256 (18.2%) were men. Men were older than women and had a lower number of MHDs at baseline. At weeks 9-12, compared with baseline, 46 (18.0%) men had a ≥75% response, 75 (29.3%) had a 50-74% response, 35 (13.7%) had a 30-49% response, and 86 (33.6%) had a 0-29% response, while 14 (5.5%) stopped the treatment. The corresponding numbers for women were 220 (19.1%), 314 (27.2%), 139 (12.0%), 402 (34.8%), and 79 (6.8%). No gender difference was found in any of the outcomes. The ANCOVA showed that gender did not influence the efficacy of outcomes. Conclusion: We found that erenumab is equally safe and effective in men compared with women after 12 weeks.
Department of Neurology Alfred Health Melbourne VIC Australia
Department of Neurology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
Department of Neurology F Renzetti Hospital Chieti Italy
Department of Neurology G Mazzini Hospital Teramo Italy
Department of Neurology S Pio da Pietrelcina Hospital Chieti Italy
Department of Neurology West German Headache Center University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
Headache and Neurosonology Unit Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico Rome Italy
Headache and Pain Unit Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Rome Italy
Headache Centre Division of Neurology and Stroke Unit A Cardarelli Hospital Naples Italy
Headache Centre Ospedale S Antonio Abate ASST Valle Olona Gallarate Italy
San Raffaele University Rome Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Collaborators GBDH. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:954–76. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3 PubMed DOI PMC
Vetvik KG, MacGregor EA. Sex differences in the epidemiology, clinical features, and pathophysiology of migraine. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:76–87. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30293-9 PubMed DOI
Borsook D, Erpelding N, Lebel A, Linnman C, Veggeberg R, Grant PE, et al. . Sex and the migraine brain. Neurobiol Dis. (2014) 68:200–14. 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.03.008 PubMed DOI PMC
Edvinsson L. CGRP antibodies as prophylaxis in migraine. Cell. (2018) 175:1719. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.049 PubMed DOI
Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies - successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. (2018) 14:338–50. 10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1 PubMed DOI
Tiseo C, Ornello R, Pistoia F, Sacco S. How to integrate monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor in daily clinical practice. J Headache Pain. (2019) 20:49. 10.1186/s10194-019-1000-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallstrom Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F, et al. . A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:2123–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848 PubMed DOI
Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, Brandes JL, Dolezil D, Silberstein S, et al. . Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:425–34. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-2 PubMed DOI
Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD, et al. . Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. (2018) 392:2280–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0 PubMed DOI
Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, Reuter U, Terwindt G, Mitsikostas DD, et al. . European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. (2019) 20:6. 10.1186/s10194-018-0955-y PubMed DOI PMC
Cheng S, Jenkins B, Limberg N, Hutton E. Erenumab in chronic migraine: an australian experience. Headache. (2020) 60:2555–62. 10.1111/head.13968 PubMed DOI
De Matteis E, Ornello R, Sacco S. Real-world data, clinical practice so far. In: Monoclonal Antibodies in Headache. European Headache Federation. Springer: (2020).
Lambru G, Hill B, Murphy M, Tylova I, Andreou AP. A prospective real-world analysis of erenumab in refractory chronic migraine. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:61. 10.1186/s10194-020-01127-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Ornello R, Casalena A, Frattale I, Gabriele A, Affaitati G, Giamberardino MA, et al. . Real-life data on the efficacy and safety of erenumab in the Abruzzo region, central Italy. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:32. 10.1186/s10194-020-01102-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Pensato U, Favoni V, Pascazio A, Benini M, Asioli GM, Merli E, et al. . Erenumab efficacy in highly resistant chronic migraine: a real-life study. Neurol Sci. (2020) 41(Suppl. 2):457–9. 10.1007/s10072-020-04658-1 PubMed DOI
Raffaelli B, Kalantzis R, Mecklenburg J, Overeem LH, Neeb L, Gendolla A, et al. . Erenumab in chronic migraine patients who previously failed five first-line oral prophylactics and onabotulinumtoxina: a dual-center retrospective observational study. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:417. 10.3389/fneur.2020.00417 PubMed DOI PMC
Ranieri A, Alfieri G, Napolitano M, Servillo G, Candelaresi P, Di Iorio W, et al. . One year experience with erenumab: real-life data in 30 consecutive patients. Neurol Sci. (2020) 41(Suppl. 2):505–6. 10.1007/s10072-020-04677-y PubMed DOI
Russo A, Silvestro M, Scotto di Clemente F, Trojsi F, Bisecco A, Bonavita S, et al. . Multidimensional assessment of the effects of erenumab in chronic migraine patients with previous unsuccessful preventive treatments: a comprehensive real-world experience. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:69. 10.1186/s10194-020-01143-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Scheffler A, Messel O, Wurthmann S, Nsaka M, Kleinschnitz C, Glas M, et al. . Erenumab in highly therapy-refractory migraine patients: first German real-world evidence. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:84. 10.1186/s10194-020-01151-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Valle ED, Di Falco M, Mancioli A, Corbetta S, La Spina I. Efficacy and safety of erenumab in the real-life setting of S. Antonio Abate Hospital's Headache Center (Gallarate). Neurol Sci. (2020) 41:465. 10.1007/s10072-020-04752-4 PubMed DOI
Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Cevoli S, Colombo B, et al. . Erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine: erenumab in Real Life in Italy (EARLY), the first Italian multicenter, prospective real-life study. Headache. (2021) 61:363–72. 10.1111/head.14032 PubMed DOI
Talbot J, Stuckey R, Crawford L, Weatherby S, Mullin S. Improvements in pain, medication use and quality of life in onabotulinumtoxinA-resistant chronic migraine patients following erenumab treatment - real world outcomes. J Headache Pain. (2021) 22:5. 10.1186/s10194-020-01214-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Labastida-Ramirez A, Rubio-Beltran E, Villalon CM, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Gender aspects of CGRP in migraine. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:435–44. 10.1177/0333102417739584 PubMed DOI PMC
Scher AI, Wang SJ, Katsarava Z, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Adams AM, et al. . Epidemiology of migraine in men: results from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:296–305. 10.1177/0333102418786266 PubMed DOI
Warfvinge K, Krause DN, Maddahi A, Edvinsson JCA, Edvinsson L, Haanes KA. Estrogen receptors alpha, beta and GPER in the CNS and trigeminal system - molecular and functional aspects. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:131. 10.1186/s10194-020-01197-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Gupta S, Villalon CM, Mehrotra S, de Vries R, Garrelds IM, Saxena PR, et al. . Female sex hormones and rat dural vasodilatation to CGRP, periarterial electrical stimulation and capsaicin. Headache. (2007) 47:225–35. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00526.x PubMed DOI
de Vries Lentsch S, Rubio-Beltran E, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Changing levels of sex hormones and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) during a woman's life: implications for the efficacy and safety of novel antimigraine medications. Maturitas. (2021) 145:73–7. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.12.012 PubMed DOI
Ashina M, Terwindt GM, Al-Karagholi MA, de Boer I, Lee MJ, Hay DL, et al. . Migraine: disease characterisation, biomarkers, and precision medicine. Lancet. (2021) 397:1496–504. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32162-0 PubMed DOI