Assessment of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Regurgitation by Doppler-Derived Echo Indices: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Quantification
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
17-28265A
Ministry of Health
PubMed
35011893
PubMed Central
PMC8745471
DOI
10.3390/jcm11010152
PII: jcm11010152
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- aortic regurgitation, echocardiography, magnetic resonance, quantification, vena contracta,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Reliable quantification of aortic regurgitation (AR) severity is essential for clinical management. We aimed to compare quantitative and indirect echo-Doppler indices to quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters in asymptomatic chronic severe AR. Methods and Results: We evaluated 104 consecutive patients using echocardiography and CMR. A comprehensive 2D, 3D, and Doppler echocardiography was performed. The CMR was used to quantify regurgitation fraction (RF) and volume (RV) using the phase-contrast velocity mapping technique. Concordant grading of AR severity with both techniques was observed in 77 (74%) patients. Correlation between RV and RF as assessed by echocardiography and CMR was relatively good (rs = 0.50 for RV, rs = 0.40 for RF, p < 0.0001). The best correlation between indirect echo-Doppler and CMR parameters was found for diastolic flow reversal (DFR) velocity in descending aorta (rs = 0.62 for RV, rs = 0.50 for RF, p < 0.0001) and 3D vena contracta area (VCA) (rs = 0.48 for RV, rs = 0.38 for RF, p < 0.0001). Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the largest area under curve (AUC) to predict severe AR by CMR RV was observed for DFR velocity (AUC = 0.79). DFR velocity of 19.5 cm/s provided 78% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The AUC for 3D VCA to predict severe AR by CMR RV was 0.73, with optimal cut-off of 26 mm2 (sensitivity 80% and specificity 66%). Conclusions: Out of the indirect echo-Doppler indices of AR severity, DFR velocity in descending aorta and 3D vena contracta area showed the best correlation with CMR-derived RV and RF in patients with chronic severe AR.
Department of Cardiology Royal Vinohrady University Hospital 10034 Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine General University Hospital 12808 Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery General University Hospital 12808 Prague Czech Republic
Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Aalst Clinic Cardiovascular Centre Aalst 9300 Aalst Belgium
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Rigolin V.H., Bonow R.O. Hemodynamic Characteristics and Progression to Heart Failure in Regurgitant Lesions. Heart Fail. Clin. 2006;2:453–460. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2006.09.009. PubMed DOI
Tornos M., Olona M., Permanyer-Miralda G., Herrejon M., Camprecios M., Evangelista A., del Castillo H.G., Candell J., Soler-Soler J. Clinical outcome of severe asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation: A long-term prospective follow-up study. Am. Heart J. 1995;130:333–339. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90450-6. PubMed DOI
Chaliki H.P., Mohty D., Avierinos J.F., Scott C.G., Schaff H.V., Tajik A.J., Enriquez-Sarano M. Outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and markedly reduced left ventricular function. Circulation. 2002;106:2687–2693. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000038498.59829.38. PubMed DOI
Turina J., Milincic J., Seifert B., Turina M. Valve replacement in chronic aortic regurgitation. True predictors of survival after extended follow-up. Circulation. 1998;98:100–107. PubMed
Baumgartner H., Falk V., Bax J.J., De Bonis M., Hamm C., Holm P.J., Iung B., Lancellotti P., Lansac E., Rodriguez Muñoz D., et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:2739–2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391. PubMed DOI
Lancellotti P., Tribouilloy C.H., Hagendorff A. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2013;14:611–644. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet105. PubMed DOI
Sato H., Ohta T., Hiroe K., Okada S., Shimizu K., Murakami R., Tanabe K. Severity of aortic regurgitation assessed by area of vena contracta: A clinical two-dimensional and three-dimensional colour. Doppler imaging study. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound. 2015;59:13–24. doi: 10.1186/s12947-015-0016-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Ewe S.H., Delgado V., van der Geest R., Westenberg J.J., Haeck M.L., Witkowski T.G., Auger D., Marsan N.A., Holman E.R., de Roos A., et al. Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Echocardiography for Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation and Validation by Three-Dimensional Three-Directional Velocity-Encoded Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Am. J. Cardiol. 2013;112:560–566. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.025. PubMed DOI
Grothues F., Smith G.C., Moon J., Bellenger N.G., Collins P., Klein H.U., Pennell D. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2002;90:29–34. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02381-0. PubMed DOI
Lee J.C., Branch K.R., Hamilton-Craig C., Krieger E.V. Evaluation of aortic regurgitation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A systemic review. Heart. 2017;104:103–110. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310819. PubMed DOI
Søndergaard L., Lindvig K., Hildebrandt P., Thomsen C., Ståhlberg F., Joen T., Henriksen O. Quantification of aortic regurgitation by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am. Heart J. 1993;125:1081–1090. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90117-R. PubMed DOI
Myerson S.G., d’Arcy J., Mohiaddin R., Greenwood J.P., Karamitsos T.D., Francis J.M., Banning A.P., Christiansen J.P., Neubauer S. Aortic regurgitation quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Association with clinical outcome. Circulation. 2012;126:1452–1460. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.083600. PubMed DOI
Gabriel R.S., Renapurkar R., Bolen M.A., Verhaert D., Leiber M., Flamm S.D., Griffin B.P., Desai M.Y. Comparison of Severity of Aortic Regurgitation by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography. Am. J. Cardiol. 2011;108:1014–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.034. PubMed DOI
Kutty S., Whitehead K.K., Natarajan S., Harris M.A., Wernovsky G., Fogel M.A. Qualitative Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Regurgitation with Quantitative Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: A Comparative Study. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2009;30:971–977. doi: 10.1007/s00246-009-9490-6. PubMed DOI
Lang R.M., Badano L.P., Mor-Avi V., Afilalo J., Armstrong A., Ernande L., Flachskampf F.A., Foster E., Goldstein S.A., Kuznetsova T., et al. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1–39. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003. PubMed DOI
Zoghbi W.A., Adams D., Bonow R.O., Enriquez-Sarano M., Foster E., Grayburn P.A., Hahn R.T., Han Y., Hung J., Lang R.M., et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation A report from the American society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2017;30:303–371. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007. PubMed DOI
Fang L., Hsiung M.C., Miller A.P., Nanda N.C., Yin W.H., Young M.S., Velayudhan D.E. Assessment of aortic regurgitation by live three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic measurements of vena contracta area: Usefulness and validation. Echocardiography. 2005;22:775–781. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.00171.x. PubMed DOI
Kočková R., Línková H., Hlubocká Z., Pravečková A., Polednová A., Súkupová L., Bláha M., Malý J., Honsová E., Sedmera D., et al. New Imaging Markers of Clinical Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Regurgitation. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:1654. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101654. PubMed DOI PMC
Chatzimavroudis G.P., Walker P.G., Oshinski J.N., Franch R.H., Pettigrew R.I., Yoganathan A.P. Slice location dependence of aortic regurgitation measurements with MR phase contrast velocity mapping. Magn. Reason. Med. 1997;37:545–551. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910370412. PubMed DOI
Detaint D., Messika-Zeitoun D., Maalouf J., Tribouilloy C., Mahoney D.W., Tajik A.J., Enriquez-Sarano M. Quantitative Echocardiographic Determinants of Clinical Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Aortic Regurgitation: A Prospective Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2008;1:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.10.008. PubMed DOI
Cawley P.J., Hamilton-Craig C., Owens D.S., Krieger E.V., Strugnell W.E., Mitsumori L., D’Jang C.L., Schwaegler R.G., Nguyen K.Q., Nguyen B., et al. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2013;6:48–57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.975623. PubMed DOI
Gelfand E.V., Hughes S., Hauser T.H., Yeon S.B., Goepfert L., Kissinger K.V., Rofsky N.M., Manning W.J. Severity of Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation as Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Optimizing Correlation with Doppler Echocardiography. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2006;8:503–507. doi: 10.1080/10976640600604856. PubMed DOI
Lewis J.F., Kuo L.C., Nelson J.G., Limacher M.C., Quinones M.A. Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: Clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation. 1984;70:425–431. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.70.3.425. PubMed DOI
Chaturvedi A., Hamilton-Craig C., Cawley P.J., Mitsumori L.M., Otto C.M., Maki J.H. Quantitating aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Significant variations due to slice location and breath holding. Eur. Radiol. 2016;26:3180–3189. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4120-6. PubMed DOI
Nayak K.S., Nielsen J.-F., Bernstein M.A., Markl M., Gatehouse P.D., Botnar R.M., Saloner D., Lorenz C.H., Wen H., Hu B.S., et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2015;17:71. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0172-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Messika-Zeitoun D., Detaint D., Leye M., Tribouilloy C., Michelena H.I., Pislaru S., Brochet E., Iung B., Vahanian A., Enriquez-Sarano M. Comparison of Semiquantitative and Quantitative Assessment of Severity of Aortic Regurgitation: Clinical Implications. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2011;24:1246–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.08.009. PubMed DOI
Bolen M.A., Popovic Z.B., Rajiah P. Cardiac MR assessment of aortic regurgitation: Holodiastolic flow reversal in the de-scending aorta helps stratify severity. Radiology. 2011;260:98–104. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102064. PubMed DOI
Evangelista A., Tornos P., Sambola A., Permanyer-Miralda G., Soler-Soler J. Long-Term Vasodilator Therapy in Patients with Severe Aortic Regurgitation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1342–1349. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050666. PubMed DOI
Kammerlander A.A., Wiesinger M., Duca F., Aschauer S., Binder C., Tufaro C.Z., Nitsche C., Badre-Eslam R., Schönbauer R., Bartko P., et al. Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Aortic Regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2019;12:1474–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.036. PubMed DOI
Zeng X., Levine R.A., Hua L., Morris E.L., Kang Y., Flaherty M., Morgan N.V., Hung J. Diagnostic value of vena contracta area in the quantification of mitral regurgitation severity by colour Doppler 3D echocardiography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2011;4:506–513. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.961649. PubMed DOI PMC
Abudiab M.M., Chao C.J., Liu S., Naqvi T.Z. Quantitation of valve regurgitation severity by three-dimensional vena contracta area is superior to flow convergence method of quantification on transoesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2017;34:992–1001. doi: 10.1111/echo.13549. PubMed DOI