Outcomes of Mini-Invasive Arthroscopic Arthrolysis Combined with Locking Screw and/or Intramedullary Nail Extraction after Osteosynthesis of the Proximal Humerus Fracture
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_049/0008441
European Union
PubMed
35054056
PubMed Central
PMC8778013
DOI
10.3390/jcm11020362
PII: jcm11020362
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Constant–Murley shoulder score, arthrolysis, arthroscopy, extraction, intramedullary nail, post-operative dysfunction, proximal humerus fracture, screw, shoulder,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Data on the effectiveness of arthroscopic arthrolysis and extraction of osteosynthetic material after osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus in patients with persisting problems are rare and insufficient. In this study, we performed arthroscopic arthrolysis and extraction of fixation screws, and, where protruding, extraction of the nail in 34 patients with problems persisting 12 months after osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus using an intramedullary nail. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed using the Constant-Murley shoulder score and forward flexion difference between the treated arm and the contralateral one. A median increase of 16 points in CMS score and 30 degrees reduction in the arm forward flexion difference was recorded 12 months after the arthroscopy. The improvement was significantly higher in the patient group with intramedullary nail extraction (however, this group had worse pre-operative values and the screw was only extracted where likely to cause problems). The median time to heal was 11 weeks; no serious peri- or post-procedural complications occurred. Mini-invasive arthroscopic arthrolysis combined with extraction of osteosynthetic material proved to be a safe and effective method for treatment of patients after osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus using an intramedullary nail with persisting pain and/or mobility limitation.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Klug A., Gramlich Y., Wincheringer D., Schmidt-Horlohé K., Hoffmann R. Trends in surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in adults: A nationwide study of records in Germany from 2007 to 2016. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2019;139:1713–1721. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03252-1. PubMed DOI
Konrad G., Audigé L., Lambert S., Hertel R., Südkamp N.P. Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2012;470:602–609. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2056-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Shi X., Liu H., Xing R., Mei W., Zhang L., Ding L., Huang Z., Wang P. Effect of intramedullary nail and locking plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: An update systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2019;14:285. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1345-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Dilisio M.F., Nowinski R.J., Hatzidakis A.M., Fehringer E.V. Intramedullary nailing of the proximal humerus: Evolution, technique, and results. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2016;25:e130–e138. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.016. PubMed DOI
Jost B., Spross C., Grehn H., Gerber C. Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: Analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2013;22:542–549. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.06.008. PubMed DOI
Cigolotti A., Biz C., Lerjefors E., de Iudicibus G., Belluzzi E., Ruggieri P. Medium- to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of isolated and combined subscapularis tears repaired arthroscopically. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020;17:1351–1364. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.97714. PubMed DOI PMC
Liu C.H., Yeh W.L., Tsai P.J., Fan K.F., Cheng H.W., Chen J.M. A novel implant removal technique by endoscopy. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2018;13:74. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0783-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Petrera M., Patella V., Patella S., Theodoropoulos J. A meta-analysis of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Off. J. ESSKA. 2010;18:1742–1747. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1093-5. PubMed DOI
Kim K.C., Rhee K.J., Shin H.D., Kim Y.M. Arthroscopic removal of an intramedullary nail in the humerus. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Off. J. ESSKA. 2007;15:922–926. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0229-0. PubMed DOI
Maroun C., Aliani D., Hass A., Werthel J.D., Vidil A., Valenti P. Shoulder arthroscopy combined to hardware removal in proximal humeral fractures: A series of 58 cases with a mean follow-up of 2 years. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. Orthop. Traumatol. Orthop. Traumatol. 2017;27:317–321. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1938-4. PubMed DOI
Jaeger M., Leung F., Li W., Trafton P. AO Surgery Reference: Nailing (Straight Nail); Extraarticular 2-Part, Surgical Neck, Impaction. [(accessed on 20 December 2021)]. Available online: https://surgeryreference.aofoundation.org/orthopedic-trauma/adult-trauma/proximal-humerus/extraarticular-2-part-surgical-neck-impaction/nailing-straight-nail#determination-of-entry-point-and-opening-of-the-canal fig 1.2.3.4.
Kloub M., Holub K., Urban J., Látal P., Peml M., Křivohlávek M. Intramedullary nailing of displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Injury. 2019;50:1978–1985. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.029. PubMed DOI
AO/OTA AO/OTA Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium—2018. [(accessed on 20 December 2021)]. Available online: https://classification.aoeducation.org/?_ga=2.153667836.572291093.1640888057-1166149626.1640888057.
Constant C.R., Gerber C., Emery R.J., Søjbjerg J.O., Gohlke F., Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: Modifications and guidelines for its use. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2008;17:355–361. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022. PubMed DOI
Bhatia D.N. Arthroscopic Removal of Proximal Humerus Plates in Chronic Post-traumatic Shoulder Stiffness. Arthrosc. Tech. 2017;6:e375–e381. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.10.014. PubMed DOI PMC
Voleti P.B., Camp C.L., Sinatro A.L., Dines J.S. Arthroscopic Removal of Symptomatic Proximal Humerus Locking Plates With Bone-Void Filler Augmentation. Arthrosc. Tech. 2016;5:e343–e346. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.01.009. PubMed DOI PMC
Dines J.S., Hettrich C.M., Kelly B.T., Savoie F.H., 3rd, Lorich D.G. Arthroscopic removal of proximal humerus locking plates. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Off. J. ESSKA. 2010;18:409–411. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0991-x. PubMed DOI
Voigt C., Geisler A., Lill H. Arthroscopic locking plate removal after proximal humeral fractures. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2010;130:391–395. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0882-0. PubMed DOI
Katthagen J.C., Hennecke D., Jensen G., Ellwein A., Voigt C., Lill H. Arthroscopy after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures: Implant removal, capsular release, and intra-articular findings. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. Off. Publ. Arthrosc. Assoc. North Am. Int. Arthrosc. Assoc. 2014;30:1061–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.092. PubMed DOI
Katthagen J.C., Jensen G., Hennecke D., Lill H., Voigt C. Arthroscopic implant removal after fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. Technique and initial results in comparison to open implant removal. Der Unf. 2012;115:47–54. PubMed
Maqdes A., Levy B., Klouche S., Hardy P. The feasibility and results of an arthroscopic removal of humeral locking plates and glenohumeral arthrolysis after proximal humeral fractures. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Off. J. ESSKA. 2014;22:456–461. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2437-8. PubMed DOI
Choi C.H., Kim S.G., Lee J.J., Kwack B.H. Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results according to Glenosphere Position in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Short-term Follow-up Study. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 2017;9:83–90. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.1.83. PubMed DOI PMC
Lee W., Choi C.H., Choi Y.R., Lim K.H., Chun Y.M. Clavicle hook plate fixation for distal-third clavicle fracture (Neer type II): Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between Neer types IIA and IIB. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2017;26:1210–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.046. PubMed DOI
Lee H.J., Jeong J.Y., Kim C.K., Kim Y.S. Surgical treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon with rotator cuff tear: A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical results of tenotomy and tenodesis. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2016;25:1107–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.006. PubMed DOI
Day M., Westermann R., Duchman K., Gao Y., Pugely A., Bollier M., Wolf B. Comparison of Short-term Complications After Rotator Cuff Repair: Open Versus Arthroscopic. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. Off. Publ. Arthrosc. Assoc. North Am. Int. Arthrosc. Assoc. 2018;34:1130–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.027. PubMed DOI
Extremity compartment syndrome: A review with a focus on non-invasive methods of diagnosis