Promoting regional coherence and cohesion amidst multiple assistive technology initiatives in Africa
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Jihoafrická republika Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
35280968
PubMed Central
PMC8905435
DOI
10.4102/ajod.v11i0.937
PII: AJOD-11-937
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Africa, coherence, assistive products, assistive technology, cohesion,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Appropriate provision of assistive technology services (ATS) and products are a global health issue and essential for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The Sixth African Network for Evidence-to-Action on Disability (AfriNEAD) conference included a workshop on collaboration, cohesion and coherence in ATS delivery in Africa. OBJECTIVE: This article aimed to summarise the workshop proceedings and to provide some recommendations on how coherence and cohesion can be facilitated in assistive technology services in Africa. METHOD: A round table and small group discussions on assistive technology were facilitated in the virtual space of the AfriNEAD conference. Organisations and role players in ATS and products in Africa participated as keynote speakers, round table members and in small group discussions. RESULTS: There was consensus amongst participants that cohesive collaboration must be facilitated. They further agreed that users must be central to future action. There are local, national and regional initiatives, but none of these have grown into an African assistive technology platform. World Health Organization (WHO) Africa can bring partners together and facilitate creation, officialisation and operationalising of a continental assistive technology platform, through building on the existing initiatives. The AfriNEAD disability research country working groups can act as in-country coordinating bodies for ATS and afford a possibility of a structured approach to assistive technology research. CONCLUSION: It is time to break away from Western institutionalised biomedical ways of providing ATS in Africa. Africans must develop coherent, cohesive ATS driven by empowered users who build on Africa's strengths and addresses the continents' unique needs.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
African Union , 2016, Africa health strategy 2016–2030, African Union, viewed 04 April 2021, from https://au.int › documents › africa-health-strategy-2016.
Allsop, M.J., Namisango, E. & Powell, R.A., 2018, ‘A survey of mobile phone use in the provision of palliative care services in the African region and priorities for future development’, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 25(4), 230–240. 10.1177/1357633X18767187 PubMed DOI
Bostian, L on behalf of the Global Disability Innovation Hub , 2020, Lessons learned from assistive technology country capacity assessments, 2019-2020, viewed 04 July 2021, from https://at2030.org/static/at2030_core/outputs/CCA_Lessons_Learned_-_AT_2030_template_final_OCT_2020.pdf.
Chersich, M.F., Gray, G., Fairlie, L., Eichbaum, Q., Mayhew, S., Allwood, B. et al. , 2020, ‘COVID-19 in Africa: Care and protection for frontline healthcare workers’, Globalization and Health 16, 1–6. 10.1186/s12992-020-00574-3 PubMed DOI PMC
Chisale, S.S., 2020, ‘Politics of the body, fear and ubuntu: Proposing an African women’s theology of disability’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 76(3), a5871. 10.4102/hts.v76i3.5871 DOI
Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) , 2020, Final report: Assistive technology country capacity assessment in seven African countries using WHO assistive technology assessment-capacity tool, viewed 04 April 2021, from https://www.at2030.org/static/at2030_core/outputs/Final_Draft_CCA_in_7_African_Countries_web_16eOgiE.pdf.
De Witte, L., Carter, L., Rimmer, M. & Ertmer, F., 2019, ‘Models of assistive technology service delivery in low resource settings: A literature review of different approaches and their quality and impact’, in Layton N. & Borg J. (eds.), Global perspectives on assistive technology: Proceedings of the GReAT Consultation 2019, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 22–23 August 2019.
Edusei, A. & Mji, G., 2019, ‘An introduction to a special issue on the role of assistive technology in social inclusion of persons with disabilities in Africa: Outcome of the fifth African Network for Evidence-to-Action in Disability conference’, African Journal of Disability 8(1), 1–4. 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.681 PubMed DOI PMC
Khasnabis, C., Holloway, C. & MacLachlan, M., 2020, ‘The digital and assistive technologies for ageing initiative: Learning from the GATE initiative’, The Lancet 1(3), E94–95. 10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30049-0 PubMed DOI
Khasnabis, C., Mirza, Z. & MacLachlan, M., 2015, ‘Opening the GATE to inclusion for people with disabilities’, Lancet 386(10010), 2229–2230. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01093-4 PubMed DOI
Layton, N., Bell, D., Buning, M.E., Chen, S.C., Contepomi, S., Delgado Ramos, V. et al. , 2020, ‘Opening the GATE: Systems thinking from the global assistive technology alliance’, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 15(5), 484–490. 10.1080/17483107.2020.1738565 PubMed DOI
Layton, N., Harper, K., Martinez, K., Berrick, N. & Naseri, C., 2021, ‘Co-creating an assistive technology peer-support community: Learnings from AT Chat’, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 16. 10.1080/17483107.2021.1897694 PubMed DOI
MacLachlan, M., Carr, S.C. & McAuliffe, E., 2010, The Aid triangle: Recognizing the human dynamics of dominance, justice and identity, Zed Books, London.
MacLachlan, M., Mannan, H. & McAuliffe, E., 2011, ‘Staff skills not staff types for community-based rehabilitation’, Lancet 11(377), 1988–1999. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61925-3 PubMed DOI
Mash, B., Ray, S., Essuman, A. & Burgueño, E., 2019, ‘Community-orientated primary care: A scoping review of different models, and their effectiveness and feasibility in sub-Saharan Africa’, BMJ Global Health 4(Suppl 8), e001489. 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001489 PubMed DOI PMC
Mashau, T.D., 2019, ‘Foreigners go home! Re-imagining ubuntology and the agency of faith communities in addressing the migration crisis in the City of Tshwane’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 75(4), a5595. 10.4102/hts.v75i4.5595 DOI
Matter, R. & Eide, AH., 2019, ‘Access to assistive technology in two Southern African countries’, BMC Health Services Research 18, 792 10.1186/s12913-018-3605-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Matter, R., Harniss, M., Oderud, T., Borg, J. & Eide, A.H., 2017, ‘Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: A scoping review’, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 12(2), 105–114. 10.1080/17483107.2016.1188170 PubMed DOI
McKinney, E.L., McKinney, V. & Swartz, L., 2020, ‘COVID-19, disability and the context of healthcare triage in South Africa: Notes in a time of pandemic’, African Journal of Disability 9(0), a766. 10.4102/ajod.v9i0.766 PubMed DOI PMC
Meekosha, H., 2008, ‘Contextualizing disability: Developing southern/global theory’, Keynote paper given to 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference, Lancaster University, 2–4 September 2008, Lancaster, Lancashire, England.
Mji, G., 2019, ‘The heavy price paid by the Bomvana in questioning the Western modernity script of civilisation’, in Mji G. (ed.), The walk without limbs: Searching for indigenous health knowledge in a rural context in South Africa, pp. 187–217, AOSIS, Cape Town.
Ohajunwa, C. & Mji, G., 2021, ‘Expressing social justice within indigenous research: A reflection on process and affirmation’, AlterNative: An International Journal ofcIndigenous Peoples 17(2), 183–190. 10.1177/11771801211001567 DOI
Sebola, M.P., 2019, ‘Refugees and immigrants in Africa: Where is an African Ubuntu?’, Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review 7(1), a285. 10.4102/apsdpr.v7i1.285 DOI
Swartz, L., 2014, ‘Five challenges for disability related research in sub-Saharan Africa’, African Journal of Disability 3(2), Art.#149, 6 pages. 10.4102/ajod.v3i2.149 PubMed DOI PMC
Tebbutt, E., Brodmann, R., Borg, J., MacLachlan, M., Khasnabis, C. & Horvath, R., 2016, ‘Assistive products and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)’, Global Health 12, 79. 10.1186/s12992-016-0220-6 PubMed DOI PMC
United Nations , 2006, United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, United Nations, viewed 10 July 2021, from https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.
Van Niekerk, K., Dada, S. & Tönsing, K., 2019, ‘Influences on selection of assistive technology for young children in South Africa: Perspectives from rehabilitation professionals’, Disability and Rehabilitation 41(8), 912–925. 10.1080/09638288.2017.1416500 PubMed DOI
Visagie, S., Chiwaula, M., Kahonde, C., Matter, R., Kayange, G. & Harniss, M., 2019, ‘Perspectives on a mobile application that maps assistive technology resources in Africa’, African Journal of Disability 8(1), 1–9. 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.567 PubMed DOI PMC
Visagie, S., Eide, A.H., Mannan, H., Schneider, M., Swartz, L., Mji, G. et al. , 2017, ‘A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings’, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 12(7), 705–712. 10.1080/17483107.2016.1244293 PubMed DOI
Visagie, S., Mlambo, T., Van der Veen, J., Nhunzvi, C., Tigere, D. & Scheffler, E., 2015, ‘Is any wheelchair better than no wheelchair? A Zimbabwean perspective’, African Journal of Disability 4(1), Art. #201, 10 pages. 10.4102/ajod.v4i1.201 PubMed DOI PMC
Visagie, S., Scheffler, E., Seymour, N. & Mji, G., 2020, ‘Assistive technology service delivery in South Africa’, South African Health Review 120, 119–127.
World Health Organization (WHO) , 2010, A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health, WHO, Geneva.
WHO , 2011, World Bank: World report on disability, WHO, Geneva.
WHO , 2015, Global cooperation on assistive health technology, viewed 05 February 2021, from http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/phi_gate/en/.
WHO , 2017a, Global priority research agenda for improving access to high-quality affordable assistive technology, Licence: CC BYNC-SA 3.0 IGO, World Health Organization, Geneva.
WHO , 2017b, Priority assistive product list, viewed 05 February 2021, from http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/global_survey-apl/en/.
WHO , 2018, Training in priority assistive products: Report from the first pilot, viewed 11 July 2021, from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/assistive-technology-2/tap/tap1stpilot-report-accessible.pdf?sfvrsn=fc4ecd4_2.
WHO , 2019, TAP PNG pilot report FINAL, viewed 04 July 2021, from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/assistive-technology-2/tap/tap-pngpilot-report.pdf?sfvrsn=902e5acc_2.
WHO , 2021a, Assistive product specifications and how to use them, WHO, Geneva.
WHO , 2021b, A manual for public procurement of assistive products, accessories, spare parts and related services, World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Geneva.