Association of Low- and No-Calorie Sweetened Beverages as a Replacement for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages With Body Weight and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, práce podpořená grantem, systematický přehled
Grantová podpora
CIHR - Canada
PubMed
35285920
PubMed Central
PMC9907347
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2092
PII: 2790045
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cukrem slazené nápoje * MeSH
- diabetes mellitus * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kardiovaskulární nemoci * prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nadváha MeSH
- obezita MeSH
- tělesná hmotnost MeSH
- voda MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- Názvy látek
- voda MeSH
IMPORTANCE: There are concerns that low- and no-calorie sweetened beverages (LNCSBs) do not have established benefits, with major dietary guidelines recommending the use of water and not LNCSBs to replace sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). Whether LNCSB as a substitute can yield similar improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors vs water in their intended substitution for SSBs is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of LNCSBs (using 3 prespecified substitutions of LNCSBs for SSBs, water for SSBs, and LNCSBs for water) with body weight and cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with and without diabetes. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through December 26, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with at least 2 weeks of interventions comparing LNCSBs, SSBs, and/or water were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted and risk of bias was assessed by 2 independent reviewers. A network meta-analysis was performed with data expressed as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was body weight. Secondary outcomes were other measures of adiposity, glycemic control, blood lipids, blood pressure, measures of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and uric acid. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs with 24 trial comparisons were included, involving 1733 adults (mean [SD] age, 33.1 [6.6] years; 1341 women [77.4%]) with overweight or obesity who were at risk for or had diabetes. Overall, LNCSBs were a substitute for SSBs in 12 RCTs (n = 601 participants), water was a substitute for SSBs in 3 RCTs (n = 429), and LNCSBs were a substitute for water in 9 RCTs (n = 974). Substitution of LNCSBs for SSBs was associated with reduced body weight (MD, -1.06 kg; 95% CI, -1.71 to -0.41 kg), body mass index (MD, -0.32; 95% CI, -0.58 to -0.07), percentage of body fat (MD, -0.60%; 95% CI, -1.03% to -0.18%), and intrahepatocellular lipid (SMD, -0.42; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.14). Substituting water for SSBs was not associated with any outcome. There was also no association found between substituting LNCSBs for water with any outcome except glycated hemoglobin A1c (MD, 0.21%; 95% CI, 0.02% to 0.40%) and systolic blood pressure (MD, -2.63 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.71 to -0.55 mm Hg). The certainty of the evidence was moderate (substitution of LNCSBs for SSBs) and low (substitutions of water for SSBs and LNCSBs for water) for body weight and was generally moderate for all other outcomes across all substitutions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that using LNCSBs as an intended substitute for SSBs was associated with small improvements in body weight and cardiometabolic risk factors without evidence of harm and had a similar direction of benefit as water substitution. The evidence supports the use of LNCSBs as an alternative replacement strategy for SSBs over the moderate term in adults with overweight or obesity who are at risk for or have diabetes.
Applied Human Nutrition Mount Saint Vincent University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
College of Pharmacy and Nutrition University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada
Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Department of Medicine Temerty Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
Department of Nutrition Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts
Department of Nutrition Sciences The University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham
Faculty of Medicine School of Medicine The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Diabetes Centre Prague Czech Republic
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute St Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine Washington DC
University of Osijek School of Medicine Osijek Croatia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Imamura F, O’Connor L, Ye Z, et al. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ. 2015;351:h3576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3576 PubMed DOI PMC
Jayalath VH, de Souza RJ, Ha V, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(4):914-921. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.107243 PubMed DOI
Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1084-1102. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.058362 PubMed DOI PMC
Xi B, Huang Y, Reilly KH, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of hypertension and CVD: a dose-response meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(5):709-717. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514004383 PubMed DOI
US Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. US Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services; 2015.
Health Canada . Canada's dietary guidelines for health professionals and policy makers. Accessed July 31, 2021. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.852216/publication.html
Toews I, Lohner S, Küllenberg de Gaudry D, Sommer H, Meerpohl JJ. Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2019;364:k4718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4718 PubMed DOI PMC
Azad MB, Abou-Setta AM, Chauhan BF, et al. Nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. CMAJ. 2017;189(28):E929-E939. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.161390 PubMed DOI PMC
Sylvetsky AC, Rother KI. Nonnutritive sweeteners in weight management and chronic disease: a review. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018;26(4):635-640. doi: 10.1002/oby.22139 PubMed DOI PMC
Hunter SR, Reister EJ, Cheon E, Mattes RD. Low calorie sweeteners differ in their physiological effects in humans. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2717. doi: 10.3390/nu11112717 PubMed DOI PMC
Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature. 2014;514(7521):181-186. doi: 10.1038/nature13793 PubMed DOI
Malik VS. Non-sugar sweeteners and health. BMJ. 2019;364:k5005. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5005 PubMed DOI
Sievenpiper JL, Khan TA, Ha V, Viguiliouk E, Auyeung R. The importance of study design in the assessment of nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health. CMAJ. 2017;189(46):E1424-E1425. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733381 PubMed DOI PMC
Mela DJ, McLaughlin J, Rogers PJ. Perspective: standards for research and reporting on low-energy (“artificial”) sweeteners. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(3):484-491. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz137 PubMed DOI PMC
Johnson RK, Lichtenstein AH, Anderson CAM, et al. ; American Heart Association Nutrition Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Stroke Council . Low-calorie sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138(9):e126-e140. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000569 PubMed DOI
Diabetes Canada . Diabetes Canada 2018 Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42(supp 1):S1-S326. PubMed
Diabetes UK. Evidence-based nutrition guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes. March 2018. Accessed July 31, 2021. https://diabetes-resources-production.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/resources-s3/2018-03/1373_Nutrition%20guidelines_0.pdf
American Diabetes Association . 5. Facilitating behavior change and well-being to improve health outcomes: PubMed DOI
Mann JI, De Leeuw I, Hermansen K, et al. ; Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the European Association . Evidence-based nutritional approaches to the treatment and prevention of diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2004;14(6):373-394. doi: 10.1016/S0939-4753(04)80028-0 PubMed DOI
Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, Murad MH, et al. ; GRADE Working Group . A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g5630. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5630 PubMed DOI
Higgins J, Thomas, J, eds.
Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777-784. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385 PubMed DOI
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. ; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group . The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928 PubMed DOI PMC
Chaimani A, Higgins JPT, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G. Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654 PubMed DOI PMC
Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29(7-8):932-944. doi: 10.1002/sim.3767 PubMed DOI
Jackson D, Barrett JK, Rice S, White IR, Higgins JPT. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects. Stat Med. 2014;33(21):3639-3654. doi: 10.1002/sim.6188 PubMed DOI PMC
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 PubMed DOI
Brignardello-Petersen R, Bonner A, Alexander PE, et al. ; GRADE Working Group . Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;93:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.005 PubMed DOI
Brignardello-Petersen R, Murad MH, Walter SD, et al. ; GRADE Working Group . GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networks. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;105:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.022 PubMed DOI
Brignardello-Petersen R, Mustafa RA, Siemieniuk RAC, et al. ; GRADE Working Group . GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;108:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.025 PubMed DOI
Bonnet F, Tavenard A, Esvan M, et al. Consumption of a carbonated beverage with high-intensity sweeteners has no effect on insulin sensitivity and secretion in nondiabetic adults. J Nutr. 2018;148(8):1293-1299. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy100 PubMed DOI
Bruun JM, Maersk M, Belza A, Astrup A, Richelsen B. Consumption of sucrose-sweetened soft drinks increases plasma levels of uric acid in overweight and obese subjects: a 6-month randomised controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(8):949-953. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.95 PubMed DOI
Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Steltz SK, Quinn NL, Robinson LM, Ludwig DS. Effects of sugar-sweetened, artificially sweetened, and unsweetened beverages on cardiometabolic risk factors, body composition, and sweet taste preference: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(15):e015668. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015668 PubMed DOI PMC
Campos V, Despland C, Brandejsky V, et al. Sugar- and artificially sweetened beverages and intrahepatic fat: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(12):2335-2339. doi: 10.1002/oby.21310 PubMed DOI
Engel S, Tholstrup T, Bruun JM, Astrup A, Richelsen B, Raben A. Effect of high milk and sugar-sweetened and non-caloric soft drink intake on insulin sensitivity after 6 months in overweight and obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72(3):358-366. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0006-9 PubMed DOI
Hernández-Cordero S, Barquera S, Rodríguez-Ramírez S, et al. Substituting water for sugar-sweetened beverages reduces circulating triglycerides and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in obese but not in overweight Mexican women in a randomized controlled trial. J Nutr. 2014;144(11):1742-1752. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.193490 PubMed DOI PMC
Higgins KA, Considine RV, Mattes RD. Aspartame consumption for 12 weeks does not affect glycemia, appetite, or body weight of healthy, lean adults in a randomized controlled trial. J Nutr. 2018;148(4):650-657. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy021 PubMed DOI
Higgins KA, Mattes RD. A randomized controlled trial contrasting the effects of 4 low-calorie sweeteners and sucrose on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(5):1288-1301. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy381 PubMed DOI
Madjd A, Taylor MA, Delavari A, Malekzadeh R, Macdonald IA, Farshchi HR. Effects on weight loss in adults of replacing diet beverages with water during a hypoenergetic diet: a randomized, 24-wk clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(6):1305-1312. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.109397 PubMed DOI
Madjd A, Taylor MA, Delavari A, Malekzadeh R, Macdonald IA, Farshchi HR. Beneficial effects of replacing diet beverages with water on type 2 diabetic obese women following a hypo-energetic diet: a randomized, 24-week clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(1):125-132. doi: 10.1111/dom.12793 PubMed DOI
Maersk M, Belza A, Stødkilde-Jørgensen H, et al. Sucrose-sweetened beverages increase fat storage in the liver, muscle, and visceral fat depot: a 6-mo randomized intervention study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(2):283-289. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.022533 PubMed DOI
Peters JC, Beck J, Cardel M, et al. The effects of water and non-nutritive sweetened beverages on weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized clinical trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(2):297-304. doi: 10.1002/oby.21327 PubMed DOI PMC
Reid M, Hammersley R, Hill AJ, Skidmore P. Long-term dietary compensation for added sugar: effects of supplementary sucrose drinks over a 4-week period. Br J Nutr. 2007;97(1):193-203. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507252705 PubMed DOI
Reid M, Hammersley R, Duffy M. Effects of sucrose drinks on macronutrient intake, body weight, and mood state in overweight women over 4 weeks. Appetite. 2010;55(1):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.001 PubMed DOI
Reid M, Hammersley R, Duffy M, Ballantyne C. Effects on obese women of the sugar sucrose added to the diet over 28 d: a quasi-randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(3):563-570. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513002687 PubMed DOI PMC
Tate DF, Turner-McGrievy G, Lyons E, et al. Replacing caloric beverages with water or diet beverages for weight loss in adults: main results of the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday (CHOICE) randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(3):555-563. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.026278 PubMed DOI PMC
Tordoff MG, Alleva AM. Effect of drinking soda sweetened with aspartame or high-fructose corn syrup on food intake and body weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51(6):963-969. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/51.6.963 PubMed DOI
Rogers PJ, Hogenkamp PS, de Graaf C, et al. Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? a systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40(3):381-394. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.177 PubMed DOI PMC
Rogers PJ, Appleton KM. The effects of low-calorie sweeteners on energy intake and body weight: a systematic review and meta-analyses of sustained intervention studies. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021;45(3):464-478. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00704-2 PubMed DOI
Miller PE, Perez V. Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(3):765-777. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.082826 PubMed DOI PMC
Laviada-Molina H, Molina-Segui F, Pérez-Gaxiola G, et al. Effects of nonnutritive sweeteners on body weight and BMI in diverse clinical contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2020;21(7):e13020. doi: 10.1111/obr.13020 PubMed DOI
Sievenpiper JL, de Souza RJ, Mirrahimi A, et al. Effect of fructose on body weight in controlled feeding trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(4):291-304. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00007 PubMed DOI
Chiavaroli L, de Souza RJ, Ha V, et al. Effect of fructose on established lipid targets: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(9):e001700. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001700 PubMed DOI PMC
David Wang D, Sievenpiper JL, de Souza RJ, et al. Effect of fructose on postprandial triglycerides: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Atherosclerosis. 2014;232(1):125-133. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.10.019 PubMed DOI
Choo VL, Viguiliouk E, Blanco Mejia S, et al. Food sources of fructose-containing sugars and glycaemic control: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled intervention studies. BMJ. 2018;363:k4644. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4644 PubMed DOI PMC
Wang DD, Sievenpiper JL, de Souza RJ, et al. The effects of fructose intake on serum uric acid vary among controlled dietary trials. J Nutr. 2012;142(5):916-923. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.151951 PubMed DOI PMC
Chiu S, Sievenpiper JL, de Souza RJ, et al. Effect of fructose on markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(4):416-423. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.8 PubMed DOI PMC
Kirkpatrick SI, Raffoul A, Lee KM, Jones AC. Top dietary sources of energy, sodium, sugars, and saturated fats among Canadians: insights from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019;44(6):650-658. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0532 PubMed DOI
Malik VS, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: an update of the evidence. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1840. doi: 10.3390/nu11081840 PubMed DOI PMC
Popkin BM, Hawkes C. Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(2):174-186. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00419-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Catenacci VA, Pan Z, Thomas JG, et al. Low/no calorie sweetened beverage consumption in the National Weight Control Registry. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(10):2244-2251. doi: 10.1002/oby.20834 PubMed DOI PMC
de Ruyter JC, Olthof MR, Seidell JC, Katan MB. A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(15):1397-1406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203034 PubMed DOI
Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Chomitz VR, et al. A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(15):1407-1416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203388 PubMed DOI PMC
The artificial sweetener erythritol and cardiovascular event risk