Perinatal and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome in late preterm fetal compromise: the TRUFFLE 2 randomised trial protocol
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic
Document type Clinical Trial Protocol, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
G9533539
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
Department of Health - United Kingdom
PubMed
35428631
PubMed Central
PMC9014041
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055543
PII: bmjopen-2021-055543
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- fetal medicine, maternal medicine, ultrasonography,
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Fetal Weight MeSH
- Cardiotocography MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Premature Birth * MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MeSH
- Fetal Growth Retardation MeSH
- Heart Rate, Fetal physiology MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Prenatal * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Clinical Trial Protocol MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Following the detection of fetal growth restriction, there is no consensus about the criteria that should trigger delivery in the late preterm period. The consequences of inappropriate early or late delivery are potentially important yet practice varies widely around the world, with abnormal findings from fetal heart rate monitoring invariably leading to delivery. Indices derived from fetal cerebral Doppler examination may guide such decisions although there are few studies in this area. We propose a randomised, controlled trial to establish the optimum method of timing delivery between 32 weeks and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. We hypothesise that delivery on evidence of cerebral blood flow redistribution reduces a composite of perinatal poor outcome, death and short-term hypoxia-related morbidity, with no worsening of neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women with non-anomalous singleton pregnancies 32+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation in whom the estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference is <10th percentile or has decreased by 50 percentiles since 18-32 weeks will be included for observational data collection. Participants will be randomised if cerebral blood flow redistribution is identified, based on umbilical to middle cerebral artery pulsatility index ratio values. Computerised cardiotocography (cCTG) must show normal fetal heart rate short term variation (≥4.5 msec) and absence of decelerations at randomisation. Randomisation will be 1:1 to immediate delivery or delayed delivery (based on cCTG abnormalities or other worsening fetal condition). The primary outcome is poor condition at birth and/or fetal or neonatal death and/or major neonatal morbidity, the secondary non-inferiority outcome is 2-year infant general health and neurodevelopmental outcome based on the Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised questionnaire. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Study Coordination Centre has obtained approval from London-Riverside Research Ethics Committee (REC) and Health Regulatory Authority (HRA). Publication will be in line with NIHR Open Access policy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Main sponsor: Imperial College London, Reference: 19QC5491. Funders: NIHR HTA, Reference: 127 976. Study coordination centre: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS with Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical & Life Sciences, Cardiff University. IRAS Project ID: 266 400. REC reference: 20/LO/0031. ISRCTN registry: 76 016 200.
Centre for Trials Research Cardiff University Cardiff UK
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Obstetrics Amsterdam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Noord Holland Netherlands
Department of Obstetrics and Fetomaternal Medicine Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Charles University Praha Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger Norway
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Università degli Studi di Brescia Brescia Italy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Nottingham City hospital Nottingham UK
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Oost Limburg Genk Belgium
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Lund Skanes universitetssjukhus Lund Skåne Sweden
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Parma Parma Italy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Vittore Buzzi Hospital University of Milan Milan Italy
Department of Obstetrics Charite Humboldt University of Berlin Berlin Germany
Department of Obstetrics University Medical Center Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Women's and Children's Health Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Policlinico Casilino Roma Italy
Division of Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health University College London London UK
Fetal medicine Unit Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK
Fetal Medicine Unit St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
High Risk Pregnancy Unit University Hospital Careggi Firenze Italy
Institute for Care of Mother and Child Prague Czech Republic
Klinik für Geburtsmedizin Universitätsklinikum Jena Jena Germany
Medicine and Surgery University of Parma Parma Italy
Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St George's University of London London UK
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics Gynecology and Perinatology Moscow Russia
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Faculty of Medicine Lunds Universitet Lund Sweden
Obstetrics And Gynaecology Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust Harlow UK
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
St Olav's Hospital Trondheim Norway
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Vivantes Network for Health Clinicum Neukoelln Clinic for Obstetric Medicine Berlin Germany
See more in PubMed
Baschat AA. Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;49:53–65. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009 PubMed DOI
Malhotra A, Ditchfield M, Fahey MC, et al. . Detection and assessment of brain injury in the growth-restricted fetus and neonate. Pediatr Res 2017;82:184–93. 10.1038/pr.2017.37 PubMed DOI
NICE . Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies. Guidance, 2019. PubMed
RCOG . Small-for-gestational-age fetus, investigation and management (green-top guideline no. 31), 2013. PubMed
Meher S, Hernandez-Andrade E, Basheer SN, et al. . Impact of cerebral redistribution on neurodevelopmental outcome in small-for-gestational-age or growth-restricted babies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:398–404. 10.1002/uog.14818 PubMed DOI
Khalil A, Morales-Roselló J, Townsend R, et al. . Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:74–80. 10.1002/uog.15729 PubMed DOI
Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Gallo DM, et al. . Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery doppler at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:82–92. 10.1002/uog.14842 PubMed DOI
Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, et al. . Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the pregnancy outcome prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2015;386:2089–97. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00131-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. . Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:333–9. 10.1002/uog.15884 PubMed DOI
Bond DM, Gordon A, Hyett J, et al. . Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD009433. 10.1002/14651858.CD009433.pub2 PubMed DOI PMC
Boers KE, Vijgen SMC, Bijlenga D. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2011;342:35. 10.1136/bmj.c7087 PubMed DOI PMC
Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, et al. . Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the growth restriction intervention trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:513–20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16809-8 PubMed DOI
Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, et al. . 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015;385:2162–72. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62049-3 PubMed DOI
Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223:B2–17. 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.010 PubMed DOI
Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. . ISUOG practice guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;56:298–312. 10.1002/uog.22134 PubMed DOI
Mylrea-Foley B, Bhide A, Mullins E, et al. . Building consensus: thresholds for delivery in TRUFFLE-2 randomized intervention study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;56:285–7. 10.1002/uog.22124 PubMed DOI
Stampalija T, Thornton J, Marlow N, et al. . Fetal cerebral doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020;56:173–81. 10.1002/uog.22125 PubMed DOI
Johnson S, Bountziouka V, Brocklehurst P, et al. . Standardisation of the parent report of children's abilities-revised (PARCA-R): a norm-referenced assessment of cognitive and language development at age 2 years. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2019;3:705–12. 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30189-0 PubMed DOI
Chappell LC, Brocklehurst P, Green ME, et al. . Planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (Phoenix): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;394:1181–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31963-4 PubMed DOI PMC
Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, et al. . The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the study of hypertension in pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy 2001;20:ix–xiv. 10.3109/10641950109152635 PubMed DOI
NICE . Developmental follow-up of children and young people born preterm. Quality standards, 2018.
Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, et al. . International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the fetal growth longitudinal study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Lancet 2014;384:869–79. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2 PubMed DOI
Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G. The world health organization fetal growth charts : a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLos Med 2017. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002220 PubMed DOI PMC