Feasibility and Optimal Time Point of [68Ga]Gallium-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery After Systemic Therapy for Primary Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Implications for Patient Selection and Extent of Surgery

. 2022 Jun ; 40 () : 117-124. [epub] 20220505

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid35638090
Odkazy

PubMed 35638090
PubMed Central PMC9142741
DOI 10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.003
PII: S2666-1683(22)00078-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted molecular imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) has significantly improved the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCA). OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and compare the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET images taken at baseline, before the initiation of systemic treatment and preoperative images, using histopathology after cytoreductive surgery as reference. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified 20 patients in our prospectively maintained database with primary oligometastatic PCA who underwent cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and superextended pelvic lymph node dissection after systemic therapy, who had baseline and preoperative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging available. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We performed a region-based analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of imaging, using pathology as a reference. Regions were predefined as prostate, internal iliac left/right, obturator left/right, external iliac left/right, common iliac left/right, and presacral. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and diagnostic effectiveness were, respectively, 95.65%, 78.22%, 98.39%, 57.89%, and 83.00% for baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET, compared to 56.52%, 98.05%, 88.30%, 89.66%, and 88.50% for preoperative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET. On a receiver operating characteristic analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.92) was significantly better than that of preoperative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET after systemic therapy with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.85, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline imaging, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET has significantly better diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and NPV than images obtained preoperatively, in systemically pretreated patients. If a patient is suitable for local treatment and complete resection of the residual tumor is intended, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET images taken prior to systemic therapy are significantly more accurate in selecting the relevant lymph nodes for resection. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging used early, before hormonal therapy or chemotherapy, provides more accurate information about the spread of the disease, than if used immediately before surgery but after hormonal therapy or chemotherapy. Early use of PSMA-PET has the potential to improve therapy also at later stages of the disease.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Kopp J., Kopp D., Bernhardt E., et al. (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT based primary staging and histological correlation after extended pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2020;38:3085–3090. PubMed

Grubmüller B., Baltzer P., Hartenbach S., et al. PSMA ligand PET/MRI for primary prostate cancer: staging performance and clinical impact. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:6300–6307. PubMed

Roach P.J., Francis R., Emmett L., et al. The Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT on management intent in prostate cancer: results of an Australian prospective multicenter study. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:82–88. PubMed

Grubmüller B., Baltzer P., D’Andrea D., et al. (68)Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy—diagnostic performance and impact on therapeutic decision-making. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:235–242. PubMed PMC

Fendler W.P., Weber M., Iravani A., et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:7448–7454. PubMed

Grubmüller B., Rasul S., Baltzer P., et al. Response assessment using [(68) Ga]Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate. 2020;80:74–82. PubMed

Hope T.A., Eiber M., Armstrong W.R., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:1635–1642. PubMed PMC

Hofman M.S., Lawrentschuk N., Francis R.J., et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet (London, England) 2020;395:1208–1216. PubMed

Cornford P., Bellmunt J., Bolla M., et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71:630–642. PubMed

Calais J., Czernin J., Cao M., et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT mapping of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in 270 patients with a PSA level of less than 1.0 ng/ml: impact on salvage radiotherapy planning. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:230–237. PubMed PMC

Abufaraj M., Grubmüller B., Zeitlinger M., et al. Prospective evaluation of the performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) for lymph node staging in patients undergoing superextended salvage lymph node dissection after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2169–2177. PubMed PMC

Maurer T., Gschwend J.E., Rauscher I., et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)Gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195:1436–1443. PubMed

Morris M.J., Carroll C., Probst S., et al. A prospective phase 2/3 multicenter study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in patients with prostate cancer: examination of diagnostic accuracy (OSPREY) J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15_suppl):TPS5092.

Heidenreich A., Fossati N., Pfister D., et al. Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer and skeletal metastases. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1:46–53. PubMed

Heidenreich A., Pfister D., Porres D. Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and low volume skeletal metastases: results of a feasibility and case-control study. J Urol. 2015;193:832–838. PubMed

Vargas H.A., Hotker A.M., Goldman D.A., et al. Updated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1606–1612. PubMed PMC

Eisenhauer E.A., Therasse P., Bogaerts J., et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. PubMed

Harisinghani M.G., Barentsz J., Hahn P.F., et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2491–2499. PubMed

Hovels A.M., Heesakkers R.A., Adang E.M., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:387–395. PubMed

Giesel F.L., Knorr K., Spohn F., et al. Detection efficacy of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:362–368. PubMed PMC

Hoffmann M.A., Buchholz H.-G., Wieler H.J., et al. The positivity rate of 68Gallium-PSMA-11 ligand PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2019;10:6124–6137. PubMed PMC

Schwenck J., Olthof S.-C., Pfannenberg C., et al. Intention-to-treat analysis of (68)Ga-PSMA and (11)C-choline PET/CT versus CT for prostate cancer recurrence after surgery. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1359–1365. PubMed

Parker C.C., James N.D., Brawley C.D., et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392:2353–2366. PubMed PMC

Attard G., Murphy L., Clarke N.W., et al. Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of primary results from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet. 2022;399:447–460. PubMed PMC

Phillips R., Shi W.Y., Deek M., et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:650–659. PubMed PMC

Ost P., Reynders D., Decaestecker K., et al. Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence: a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:446–453. PubMed

Parikh N.R., Huiza C., Patel J.S., et al. Systemic and tumor-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: study protocol for a phase II trial for veterans with de novo oligometastatic disease. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:291. PubMed PMC

De Bruycker A., Spiessens A., Dirix P., et al. PEACE V—Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): a study protocol for a randomized controlled phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:406. PubMed PMC

Chalouhy C., Gurram S., Ghavamian R. Current controversies on the role of lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2019;37:219–226. PubMed

Nejnovějších 20 citací...

Zobrazit více v
Medvik | PubMed

The current role of precision surgery in oligometastatic prostate cancer

. 2022 Dec ; 7 (6) : 100597. [epub] 20221006

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace