Feasibility and Optimal Time Point of [68Ga]Gallium-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery After Systemic Therapy for Primary Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Implications for Patient Selection and Extent of Surgery
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
35638090
PubMed Central
PMC9142741
DOI
10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.003
PII: S2666-1683(22)00078-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cytoreductive surgery, Hormone therapy, Prostate cancer, Prostate-specific membrane antigen, Radical prostatectomy,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted molecular imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) has significantly improved the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCA). OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and compare the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET images taken at baseline, before the initiation of systemic treatment and preoperative images, using histopathology after cytoreductive surgery as reference. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We identified 20 patients in our prospectively maintained database with primary oligometastatic PCA who underwent cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and superextended pelvic lymph node dissection after systemic therapy, who had baseline and preoperative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging available. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We performed a region-based analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of imaging, using pathology as a reference. Regions were predefined as prostate, internal iliac left/right, obturator left/right, external iliac left/right, common iliac left/right, and presacral. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and diagnostic effectiveness were, respectively, 95.65%, 78.22%, 98.39%, 57.89%, and 83.00% for baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET, compared to 56.52%, 98.05%, 88.30%, 89.66%, and 88.50% for preoperative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET. On a receiver operating characteristic analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.92) was significantly better than that of preoperative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET after systemic therapy with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.85, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline imaging, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET has significantly better diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and NPV than images obtained preoperatively, in systemically pretreated patients. If a patient is suitable for local treatment and complete resection of the residual tumor is intended, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET images taken prior to systemic therapy are significantly more accurate in selecting the relevant lymph nodes for resection. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging used early, before hormonal therapy or chemotherapy, provides more accurate information about the spread of the disease, than if used immediately before surgery but after hormonal therapy or chemotherapy. Early use of PSMA-PET has the potential to improve therapy also at later stages of the disease.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics Vienna Austria
Working Group for Diagnostic Imaging in Urology Vienna Austria
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kopp J., Kopp D., Bernhardt E., et al. (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT based primary staging and histological correlation after extended pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2020;38:3085–3090. PubMed
Grubmüller B., Baltzer P., Hartenbach S., et al. PSMA ligand PET/MRI for primary prostate cancer: staging performance and clinical impact. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:6300–6307. PubMed
Roach P.J., Francis R., Emmett L., et al. The Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT on management intent in prostate cancer: results of an Australian prospective multicenter study. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:82–88. PubMed
Grubmüller B., Baltzer P., D’Andrea D., et al. (68)Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy—diagnostic performance and impact on therapeutic decision-making. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:235–242. PubMed PMC
Fendler W.P., Weber M., Iravani A., et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:7448–7454. PubMed
Grubmüller B., Rasul S., Baltzer P., et al. Response assessment using [(68) Ga]Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate. 2020;80:74–82. PubMed
Hope T.A., Eiber M., Armstrong W.R., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:1635–1642. PubMed PMC
Hofman M.S., Lawrentschuk N., Francis R.J., et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet (London, England) 2020;395:1208–1216. PubMed
Cornford P., Bellmunt J., Bolla M., et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71:630–642. PubMed
Calais J., Czernin J., Cao M., et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT mapping of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in 270 patients with a PSA level of less than 1.0 ng/ml: impact on salvage radiotherapy planning. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:230–237. PubMed PMC
Abufaraj M., Grubmüller B., Zeitlinger M., et al. Prospective evaluation of the performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) for lymph node staging in patients undergoing superextended salvage lymph node dissection after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2169–2177. PubMed PMC
Maurer T., Gschwend J.E., Rauscher I., et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)Gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195:1436–1443. PubMed
Morris M.J., Carroll C., Probst S., et al. A prospective phase 2/3 multicenter study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in patients with prostate cancer: examination of diagnostic accuracy (OSPREY) J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15_suppl):TPS5092.
Heidenreich A., Fossati N., Pfister D., et al. Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer and skeletal metastases. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1:46–53. PubMed
Heidenreich A., Pfister D., Porres D. Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and low volume skeletal metastases: results of a feasibility and case-control study. J Urol. 2015;193:832–838. PubMed
Vargas H.A., Hotker A.M., Goldman D.A., et al. Updated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1606–1612. PubMed PMC
Eisenhauer E.A., Therasse P., Bogaerts J., et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. PubMed
Harisinghani M.G., Barentsz J., Hahn P.F., et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2491–2499. PubMed
Hovels A.M., Heesakkers R.A., Adang E.M., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:387–395. PubMed
Giesel F.L., Knorr K., Spohn F., et al. Detection efficacy of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:362–368. PubMed PMC
Hoffmann M.A., Buchholz H.-G., Wieler H.J., et al. The positivity rate of 68Gallium-PSMA-11 ligand PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2019;10:6124–6137. PubMed PMC
Schwenck J., Olthof S.-C., Pfannenberg C., et al. Intention-to-treat analysis of (68)Ga-PSMA and (11)C-choline PET/CT versus CT for prostate cancer recurrence after surgery. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1359–1365. PubMed
Parker C.C., James N.D., Brawley C.D., et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392:2353–2366. PubMed PMC
Attard G., Murphy L., Clarke N.W., et al. Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of primary results from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet. 2022;399:447–460. PubMed PMC
Phillips R., Shi W.Y., Deek M., et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:650–659. PubMed PMC
Ost P., Reynders D., Decaestecker K., et al. Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence: a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:446–453. PubMed
Parikh N.R., Huiza C., Patel J.S., et al. Systemic and tumor-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: study protocol for a phase II trial for veterans with de novo oligometastatic disease. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:291. PubMed PMC
De Bruycker A., Spiessens A., Dirix P., et al. PEACE V—Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): a study protocol for a randomized controlled phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:406. PubMed PMC
Chalouhy C., Gurram S., Ghavamian R. Current controversies on the role of lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2019;37:219–226. PubMed