Brokerage is a central concept in the organization literature. It has been argued that individuals in broker positions-i.e., connecting otherwise disconnected parts within a firm's social network-can control the flow of information. It would imply their increased relevance in workplace gossip. This allegation, however, has not been addressed empirically yet. To fill this gap, we apply social network analysis techniques to relational data from six organizations in Hungary. First, we identify informal groups and individuals in broker positions. Then, we use this information to predict the likelihood with which positive or negative gossip is reported. We find more gossip when the sender and receiver are part of the same group and more positive gossip about in-group rather than out-group targets. Individuals in broker positions are more likely the senders and targets of negative gossip. Finally, even if both the brokers and the boss(es) are the targets of their colleagues' negative gossip, the combination of the two categories (bosses in broker positions) does not predict more negative gossip anymore. Results are discussed in relation to the theoretical accounts on brokerage that emphasize its power for information control but fail to recognize the pitfalls of being in such positions.

Computational Social Science Research Center for Educational and Network Studies Centre for Social Sciences Budapest Hungary

Department for the Study of Religions Centre for the Digital Research of Religion Masaryk University Brno Czechia

Department of Management and Engineering The Institute for Analytical Sociology Linköping University Norrköping Sweden

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Barclay P., Willer R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274, 749–753. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0209, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Barnes M., Kalberg K., Pan M., Leung P. (2016). When is brokerage negatively associated with economic benefits? Ethnic diversity, competition, and common-pool resources. Soc. Netw. 45, 55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.11.004 DOI

Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 DOI

Beersma B., Kleef G. A. V. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: gossip increases contributions to the group. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2, 642–649. doi: 10.1177/1948550611405073 DOI

Beersma B., Kleef G. A. V. (2012). Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42, 2640–2670. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00956.x DOI

Beersma B., Kleef G. A. V., Dijkstra M. T. M. (2019). “Antecedents and consequences of gossip in work groups,” in The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation. eds. Giardini F., Wittek R. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 417–434.

Behfar K. J., Cronin M. A., McCarthy K. (2019). Realizing the upside of venting: The role of the “challenger listener”. Acad. Manag. Discov. 6, 609–630. doi: 10.5465/amd.2018.0066 DOI

Ben-Shachar M. S., Lüdecke D., Makowski D. (2020). Effect size: estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. J. Open Source Softw. 5:2815. doi: 10.21105/joss.02815 DOI

Bergmann J. R. (1993). Discreet Indiscretions: The Social Organization of Gossip. Chicago, Illinois: Aldine.

Blondel V. D., Guillaume J.-L., Lambiotte R., Lefebvre E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008:P10008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 DOI

Boehm C. (2019). “Gossip and reputation in small-scale societies: a view from evolutionary anthropology” in The Oxford Handbook of gossip and Reputation. eds. Giardini F., Wittek R. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 253–274.

Bond C. F., Horn E. M., Kenny D. A. (1997). A model for triadic relations. Psychol. Methods 2, 79–94. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.1.79 DOI

Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Johnson J. C. (2013). Analyzing social Networks. London: Sage.

Bosson J. K., Johnson A. B., Niederhoffer K., Swann W. B., Jr. (2006). Interpersonal chemistry through negativity: bonding by sharing negative attitudes about others. Pers. Relatsh. 13, 135–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00109.x DOI

Brady D. L., Brown D. J., Liang L. H. (2017). Moving beyond assumptions of deviance: The reconceptualization and measurement of workplace gossip. J. Appl. Psychol. 102, 1–25. doi: 10.1037/apl0000164, PMID: PubMed DOI

Bruggeman J., Traag V. A., Uitermark J. (2012). Detecting communities through network data. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77, 1050–1063. doi: 10.1177/0003122412463574 DOI

Burt R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.

Burt R. S. (2001). “Bandwidth and echo: trust, information, and gossip in social networks” in Networks and Markets. eds. Rauch J. E., Casella A. (New York: Russell Sage Foundation; ), 30–74.

Burt R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 349–399. doi: 10.1086/421787 DOI

Burt R. S. (2007). Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Burt R. S. (2008). “Commérages et réputation,” in Management et réseaux sociaux: ressource pour l’action ou outil de gestion? eds. Lecoutre M., Lièvre P. (Paris: Hermès science publications; ), 27–42.

Burt R. S. (2010). Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Burt R. S., Knez M. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Ration. Soc. 7, 255–292. doi: 10.1177/1043463195007003003 DOI

Caivano O., Leduc K., Talwar V. (2020). When is gossiping wrong? The influence of valence and relationships on children’s moral evaluations of gossip. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 38, 219–238. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12319, PMID: PubMed DOI

Card N. A., Rodkin P. C., Garandeau C. F. (2010). A description and illustration of the triadic relations model: who perceives whom as bullying whom? Int. J. Behav. Dev. 34, 374–383. doi: 10.1177/0165025410371418 DOI

Carrim N. M. H. (2016). Shh … quiet! Here they come.’ Black employees as targets of office gossip. J. Psychol. Afr. 26, 180–185. doi: 10.1080/14330237.2016.1163912 DOI

Crothers L. M., Lipinski J., Minutolo M. C. (2009). Cliques, rumors, and gossip by the water cooler: female bullying in the workplace. Psychol.-Manag. J. 12, 97–110. doi: 10.1080/10887150902886423 DOI

Davis A., Vaillancourt T., Arnocky S., Doyel R. (2019). “Women’s gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: An evolutionary approach to sex and discrimination,” in The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation. eds. Giardini F., Wittek R. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 303–321.

Dores Cruz T. D., Balliet D., Sleebos E., Beersma B., Van Kleef G. A., Gallucci M. (2019a). Getting a grip on the grapevine: extension and factor structure of the motives to gossip questionnaire. Front. Psychol. 10:1190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01190, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Dores Cruz T. D., Beersma B., Dijkstra M. T. M., Bechtoldt M. N. (2019b). The bright and dark side of gossip for cooperation in groups. Front. Psychol. 10:1374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01374, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Dores Cruz T. D., Nieper A. S., Testori M., Martinescu E., Beersma B. (2021a). An integrative definition and framework to study gossip. Group Organ. Manag. 46, 252–285. doi: 10.1177/1059601121992887 DOI

Dores Cruz T. D., Thielmann I., Columbus S., Molho C., Wu J., Righetti F., et al. . (2021b). Gossip and reputation in everyday life. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 376:20200301. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0301, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Dunbar R. (1998). Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.

Dunbar R. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 8, 100–110. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100 DOI

Elias N., Scotson J. L. (1994). The Established and the Outsiders: A Sociological Enquiry into Community Problems. London: Sage.

Ellickson R. C. (1991). Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.

Ellwardt L., Labianca G., Wittek R. (2012a). Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work?: A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Soc. Netw. 34, 193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.11.003 DOI

Ellwardt L., Steglich C., Wittek R. (2012b). The co-evolution of gossip and friendship in workplace social networks. Soc. Netw. 34, 623–633. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.07.002 DOI

Ellwardt L., Wittek R., Wielers R. (2012c). Talking about the boss: effects of generalized and interpersonal trust on workplace gossip. Group Organ. Manag. 37, 521–549. doi: 10.1177/1059601112450607 DOI

Estévez J. L., Kisfalusi D., Takács K. (2022). More than one’s negative ties: The role of friends’ antipathies in high school gossip. Soc. Netw. 70, 77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2021.11.009 DOI

Fan Z., Grey C. (2020). Everyday secrecy: boundaries of confidential gossip. Cult. Organ. 27, 209–225. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2020.1799213 DOI

Farley S. D., Timme D. R., Hart J. W. (2010). On coffee talk and break-room chatter: perceptions of women who gossip in the workplace. J. Soc. Psychol. 150, 361–368. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365430, PMID: PubMed DOI

Feather N. T. (1998). Attitudes toward high achievers, self-esteem, and value priorities for Australian, American, and Canadian students. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 29, 749–759. doi: 10.1177/0022022198296005 DOI

Feinberg M., Willer R., Schultz M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychol. Sci. 25, 656–664. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510184, PMID: PubMed DOI

Foster E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 8, 78–99. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78 DOI

Foster E. K., Rosnow R. L. (2006). “Gossip and network relationships,” in Relating Difficulty: The Processes of Constructing and Managing Difficult Interaction. eds. Kirkpatrick D. C., Duck S., Foley M. K. (New York: Routledge; ), 161–180.

Freeman L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35–41. doi: 10.2307/3033543 DOI

Freeman L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1, 215–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 DOI

Gambetta D. (1994). Godfather’s gossip. Eur. J. Sociol. 35, 199–223. doi: 10.1017/S0003975600006846 DOI

Gawronski B., Walther E. (2008). The TAR effect: when the ones who dislike become the ones who are disliked. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 1276–1289. doi: 10.1177/0146167208318952, PMID: PubMed DOI

Giardini F., Balliet D., Power E. A., Számadó S., Takács K. (2022). Four puzzles of reputation-based cooperation. Hum. Nat. 33, 43–61. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09419-3, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Giardini F., Wittek R. (2019a). “Gossip, reputation, and sustainable cooperation: sociological foundations,” in The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 23–46.

Giardini F., Wittek R. (2019b). Silence is golden. Six reasons inhibiting the spread of third-party gossip. Front. Psychol. 10:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01120, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Gluckman M. (1963). Gossip and scandal. Curr. Anthropol. 4, 307–316. doi: 10.1086/200378 DOI

Gould R. V., Fernandez R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol. Methodol. 19, 89–126. doi: 10.2307/270949 DOI

Graffin S. D., Bundy J., Porac J. F., Wade J. B., Quinn D. P. (2013). Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Adm. Sci. Q. 58, 313–345. doi: 10.1177/0001839213497011 DOI

Grosser T. J., Lopez-Kidwell V., Labianca G. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group Organ. Manag. 35, 177–212. doi: 10.1177/1059601109360391 DOI

Halevy N., Halali E., Zlatev J. J. (2019). Brokerage and brokering: An integrative review and organizing framework for third party influence. Acad. Manag. Ann. 13, 215–239. doi: 10.5465/annals.2017.0024 DOI

Hallett T., Harger B., Eder D. (2009). Gossip at work: unsanctioned evaluative talk in formal school meetings. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 38, 584–618. doi: 10.1177/0891241609342117 DOI

Hannerz U. (1967). Gossip, networks and culture in a black American ghetto. Ethnos 32, 35–60. doi: 10.1080/00141844.1967.9980988 DOI

Hardy C. L., Van Vugt M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32, 1402–1413. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291006, PMID: PubMed DOI

Hartung F.-M., Krohn C., Pirschtat M. (2019). Better than its reputation? Gossip and the reasons why we and individuals with “dark” personalities talk about others. Front. Psychol. 10:1162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01162, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Hess N. H., Hagen E. H. (2019). “Gossip, reputation, and friendship in within-group competition: An evolutionary perspective” in The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation. eds. Giardini F., Wittek R. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 275–302.

Ingram G. P. D. (2014). From hitting to tattling to gossip: An evolutionary rationale for the development of indirect aggression. Evol. Psychol. 12, 343–363. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200205, PMID: PubMed DOI

Kniffin K. M., Wilson D. S. (2005). Utilities of gossip across organizational levels: multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams. Hum. Nat. 16, 278–292. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6, PMID: PubMed DOI

Kniffin K. M., Wilson D. S. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on workplace gossip: why and how gossip can serve groups. Group Organ. Manag. 35, 150–176. doi: 10.1177/1059601109360390 DOI

Kong M. (2018). Effect of perceived negative workplace gossip on employees’ behaviors. Front. Psychol. 9:1112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01112, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Krackhardt D. (1999). “The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations” in Networks in and Around Organizations Research in the Sociology of Organizations. eds. Andrews S. B., Knoke D. (Stamford, Connecticut: JAI Press; ), 183–210.

Kuo C.-C., Wu C.-Y., Lin C.-W. (2018). Supervisor workplace gossip and its impact on employees. J. Manag. Psychol. 33, 93–105. doi: 10.1108/JMP-04-2017-0159 DOI

Kurland N. B., Pelled L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Acad. Manag. Rev. 25, 428–438. doi: 10.2307/259023 DOI

Kwon S.-W., Rondi E., Levin D. Z., De Massis A., Brass D. J. (2020). Network brokerage: An integrative review and future research agenda. J. Manag. 46, 1092–1120. doi: 10.1177/0149206320914694 DOI

Lancichinetti A., Fortunato S. (2009). Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis. Phys. Rev. E 80:056117. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.056117 PubMed DOI

Landis B. (2016). Personality and social networks in organizations: A review and future directions. J. Organ. Behav. 37, S107–S121. doi: 10.1002/job.2004 DOI

Leaperand C., Holliday H. (1995). Gossip in same-gender and cross-gender friends’ conversations. Pers. Relatsh. 2, 237–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00089.x DOI

Lee S. H., Barnes C. M. (2021). An attributional process model of workplace gossip. J. Appl. Psychol. 106, 300–316. doi: 10.1037/apl0000504, PMID: PubMed DOI

Levin J., Arluke A. (1985). An exploratory analysis of sex differences in gossip. Sex Roles 12, 281–286. doi: 10.1007/BF00287594 DOI

Levine J. M., Smith E. R. (2013). “Group cognition: collective information search and distribution” in The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition. ed. Carlston D. E. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 616–633.

Lincoln J. R., Miller J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: a comparative analysis of relation networks. Adm. Sci. Q. 24, 181–199. doi: 10.2307/2392493 DOI

Lüdecke D., Waggoner P. D., Makowski D. (2019). Insight: A unified interface to access information from model objects in R. J. Open Source Softw. 4:1412. doi: 10.21105/joss.01412 DOI

Martinescu E., Jansen W., Beersma B. (2021). Negative gossip decreases targets’ organizational citizenship behavior by decreasing social inclusion. A multi-method approach. Group Organ. Manag. 46, 463–497. doi: 10.1177/1059601120986876, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

McAndrew F. T. (2014). The “sword of a woman”: gossip and female aggression. Aggress. Violent Behav. 19, 196–199. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.006 DOI

McAndrew F. T., Bell E. K., Garcia C. M. (2007). Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 37, 1562–1577. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00227.x DOI

Merry S. E. (1984). “Rethinking gossip and scandal” in Toward a General Theory of Social Control. ed. Black D. (Cambridge, Massachussets: Academic Press; ), 271–302.

Michelson G., Mouly S. (2000). Rumour and gossip in organisations: A conceptual study. Manag. Decis. 38, 339–346. doi: 10.1108/00251740010340508 DOI

Michelson G., Van Iterson A., Waddington K. (2010). Gossip in organizations: contexts, consequences, and controversies. Group Organ. Manag. 35, 371–390. doi: 10.1177/1059601109360389 DOI

Mills C. (2010). Experiencing gossip: The foundations for a theory of embedded organizational gossip. Group Organ. Manag. 35, 213–240. doi: 10.1177/1059601109360392 DOI

Newman M. E. J., Girvan M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69:026113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113, PMID: PubMed DOI

Nijstad B. A., De Dreu C. K. W. (2012). Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Res. Organ. Behav. 32, 87–111. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.004 DOI

Nowak M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560–1563. doi: 10.1126/science.1133755, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Opsahl T., Agneessens F., Skvoretz J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Netw. 32, 245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006 DOI

Peters K., Fonseca M. A. (2020). Truth, lies, and gossip. Psychol. Sci. 31, 702–714. doi: 10.1177/0956797620916708, PMID: PubMed DOI

Peters K., Jetten J., Radova D., Austin K. (2017). Gossiping about deviance: evidence that deviance spurs the gossip that builds bonds. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1610–1619. doi: 10.1177/0956797617716918, PMID: PubMed DOI

Piazza J., Bering J. M. (2008). Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.002 DOI

R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Robbins M. L., Karan A. (2020). Who gossips and how in everyday life? Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 11, 185–195. doi: 10.1177/1948550619837000 DOI

Sasovova Z., Mehra A., Borgatti S. P., Schippers M. C. (2010). Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Adm. Sci. Q. 55, 639–670. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.639 DOI

Shank D. B., Kashima Y., Peters K., Li Y., Robins G., Kirley M. (2019). Norm talk and human cooperation: can we talk ourselves into cooperation? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 117, 99–123. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000163, PMID: PubMed DOI

Simmel G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.

Snijders T. A. B., Bosker R. J. (2011). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.

Spoelma T. M., Hetrick A. L. (2021). More than idle talk: examining the effects of positive and negative team gossip. J. Organ. Behav. 42, 604–618. doi: 10.1002/job.2522 DOI

Stadtfeld C., Takács K., Vörös A. (2020). The emergence and stability of groups in social networks. Soc. Netw. 60, 129–145. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.10.008 DOI

Stovel K., Shaw L. (2012). Brokerage. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38, 139–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150054 DOI

Swartz T. B., Gill P. S., Muthukumarana S. (2015). A Bayesian approach for the analysis of triadic data in cognitive social structures. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C 64, 593–610. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12096 DOI

Számadó S., Balliet D., Giardini F., Power E. A., Takács K. (2021). The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 376:20200286. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0286, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Tan N., Yam K. C., Zhang P., Brown D. J. (2021). Are you gossiping about me? The costs and benefits of high workplace gossip prevalence. J. Bus. Psychol. 36, 417–434. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09683-7 DOI

Tasselli S., Kilduff M. (2017). When brokerage between friendship cliques endangers trust: A personality–network fit perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 61, 802–825. doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.0856 DOI

Tassiello V., Lombardi S., Costabile M. (2018). Are we truly wicked when gossiping at work? The role of valence, interpersonal closeness and social awareness. J. Bus. Res. 84, 141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.013 DOI

Turner M. M., Mazur M. A., Wendel N., Winslow R. (2003). Relational ruin or social glue? The joint effect of relationship type and gossip valence on liking, trust, and expertise. Commun. Monogr. 70, 129–141. doi: 10.1080/0363775032000133782 DOI

Umphress E. E., Labianca G., Brass D. J., Kass E., Scholten L. (2003). The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees’ perceptions of organizational justice. Organ. Sci. 14, 738–753. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.6.738.24865 DOI

Van Duijn M. A. J. (2011). “Modeling three-way social network data: A cross-nested random effects model for gossip in the workplace” in CLADAG 2011. Book of Abstracts. eds. Cerchiello P., Tarantola C. (Pavia: Pavia University Press; ).

Vedres B., Stark D. (2010). Structural folds: generative disruption in overlapping groups. Am. J. Sociol. 115, 1150–1190. doi: 10.1086/649497 DOI

Vörös A., Snijders T. A. B. (2017). Cluster analysis of multiplex networks: defining composite network measures. Soc. Netw. 49, 93–112. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.01.002 DOI

Wert S. R., Salovey P. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 8, 122–137. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.122 DOI

Wittek R., Wielers R. (1998). Gossip in organizations. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 4, 189–204. doi: 10.1023/A:1009636325582 DOI

Wu J., Balliet D., Van Lange P. A. M. (2016). Reputation management: why and how gossip enhances generosity. Evol. Hum. Behav. 37, 193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.11.001 DOI

Wu L.-Z., Birtch C. F. F. T., Zhang H. (2018). Perceptions of negative workplace gossip: A self-consistency theory framework. J. Manag. 44, 1873–1898. doi: 10.1177/0149206316632057 DOI

Wyckoff J. P., Asao K., Buss D. M. (2019). Gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: predicting information sharing from potential mate versus competitor mating strategies. Evol. Hum. Behav. 40, 96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.08.006 DOI

Xiao Z., Tsui A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 52, 1–31. doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.1.1 DOI

Xie J., Huang Q., Wang H., Shen M. (2019). Perish in gossip? Nonlinear effects of perceived negative workplace gossip on job performance. Pers. Rev. 49, 389–405. doi: 10.1108/PR-10-2018-0400 DOI

Yucel M., Sjobeck G. R., Glass R., Rottman J. (2021). Being in the know: social network analysis of gossip and friendship on a college campus. Hum. Nat. 32, 603–621. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09409-5 PubMed DOI

Zong B., Xu S., Zhang L., Qu J. (2021). Dealing with negative workplace gossip: From the perspective of face. Front. Psychol. 12:1991. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629376, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC