Hemopatch® is effective and safe to use: real-world data from a prospective European registry study
Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, pozorovací studie
PubMed
35986865
PubMed Central
PMC9481486
DOI
10.1007/s13304-022-01353-y
PII: 10.1007/s13304-022-01353-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Hemopatch®, Hemostasis, Minimally invasive procedures, Sealing,
- MeSH
- hemostatika * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- hemostáza chirurgická metody MeSH
- krvácení při operaci MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- obory chirurgické * MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- skot MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- skot MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- hemostatika * MeSH
Surgical procedures are often impeded by bleeding and/or leakage of body fluids. These complications cannot always be resolved by conventional surgical techniques. Hemopatch® is a hemostatic patch that also functions as a sealant. Here we document the effectiveness and safety of Hemopatch® for routine procedures of multiple surgical disciplines. To this end, we performed a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, observational registry study. Patients were eligible if they had received Hemopatch® during an open or minimally invasive procedure in one of these specialties: hepatobiliary, cardiovascular, urological, neurological/spinal, general, or lung surgery. Patients were excluded if they had a known hypersensitivity to bovine proteins or brilliant blue, intraoperative pulsatile or severe bleeding and/or infection at the target application site (TAS). The primary endpoint for intraoperative effectiveness was hemostasis assessed as the percentage of patients achieving hemostasis within 2 min and the percentage of patients achieving hemostasis without re-bleeding at the time of surgical closure. The registry enrolled 621 patients at 23 study sites in six European countries. Six hundred twenty patients had completed follow-up information. Hemostasis within 2 min was achieved at 463 (74.5%) of all 621 TASs. Hemostasis without re-bleeding was observed at 620 (99.8%) TASs. Adverse events were reported in 64 patients (10.3%). This Hemopatch® registry shows that Hemopatch® efficiently establishes hemostasis and sealing in a variety of surgical specialties, including minimally invasive procedures. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the safety of Hemopatch® across all the specialties included in the registry. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03392662.
Clinic for Urology Vivantes Auguste Viktoria Klinikum Berlin Germany
Clinic for Vascular Surgery Samodzielny Public Hospital Szczecin Poland
Department of Pediatric Surgery Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio Seville Spain
Department of Surgery Hospital La Paz Madrid Spain
Division of General and Transplant Surgery University of Pisa Pisa Italy
General Surgery Unit Azienda Ospedaliera per l'Emergenza Cannizzaro Catania Italy
Neurosurgical Clinic University Hospital Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, de Keizer B, Merten H, Groenewegen PP, van der Wal G, Wagner C. The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies. Patient Saf Surg. 2011;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-13. PubMed DOI PMC
Bracey A, Shander A, Aronson S, Boucher BA, Calcaterra D, Chu MWA, Culbertson R, Jabr K, Kehlet H, Lattouf O, Malaisrie SC, Mazer CD, Oberhoffer MM, Ozawa S, Price T, Rosengart T, Spiess BD, Turchetti G. The use of topical hemostatic agents in cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(1):353–360. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.096. PubMed DOI
Lewis KM, Ikeme S, Olubunmi T, Kuntze CE. Clinical effectiveness and versatility of a sealing hemostatic patch (HEMOPATCH) in multiple surgical specialties. Expert Rev Med Dev. 2018;15(5):367–376. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1464909. PubMed DOI
Light RU, Prentice HR. Surgical investigation of a new absorbable sponge derived from gelatin for use in hemostasis. J Neurosurg. 1945;2(5):435–455. doi: 10.3171/jns.1945.2.5.0435. DOI
Lewis KM, Kuntze CE, Gulle H. Control of bleeding in surgical procedures: critical appraisal of HEMOPATCH (Sealing Hemostat) Med Devices (Auckl) 2015;22(9):1–10. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S90591. PubMed DOI PMC
Fingerhut A, Uranues S, Ettorre GM, Felli E, Colasanti M, Scerrino G, Melfa GI, Raspanti C, Gulotta G, Meyer A, Oberhoffer M, Schmoeckel M, Weltert LP, Vignolini G, Salvi M, Masieri L, Vittori G, Siena G, Minervini A, Serni S, Carini M. European initial hands-on experience with HEMOPATCH, a novel sealing hemostatic patch: application in general, gastrointestinal, biliopancreatic, cardiac, and urologic surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2014;25:29–35. PubMed
Imkamp F, Tolkach Y, Wolters M, Jutzi S, Kramer M, Herrmann T. Initial experiences with the Hemopatch(R) as a hemostatic agent in zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy. World J Urol. 2015;33(10):1527–1534. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1404-4. PubMed DOI
Ruggiero R, Docimo L, Tolone S, De Palma M, Musella M, Pezzolla A, Gubitosi A, Parmeggiani D, Pirozzi R, Gili S, Parisi S, D'Alessandro A, Docimo G. Effectiveness of an advanced hemostatic pad combined with harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery. A prospective study. Int J Surg (Lond, Engl) 2016;28(Suppl 1):S17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.044. PubMed DOI
Prasad M, Mukerji N. Case report of a novel technique for repair of the vertebral artery during cranial surgery. Neurol Therapy. 2019;8(2):505–509. doi: 10.1007/s40120-019-0142-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Schebesch KM, Brawanski A. Clinical experience with Hemopatch(R) as a dural sealant in cranial neurosurgery. Cureus. 2019;11(2):e4013. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4013. PubMed DOI PMC
Hupe MC, Büttner M, Tabrizi PF, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk MA, Imkamp F. Hemopatch(®) as a hemostatic agent is safe in partial nephrectomy: a large, single-surgeon retrospective evaluation. Adv Ther. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01584-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Weltert L, D'Aleo S, Chirichilli I, Falco M, Turani F, Bellisario A, De Paulis R. Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of HEMOPATCH Topical Sealant in Cardiac Surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct;XXIX:sti29:756. PubMed
Di Cesare T, Scarinci A, Cavaniglia D, Brun S, Cilurso F, Cosenza G, Grillo M, Costigliola L, Di Gioia G, Perfetto D, Buonanno GM, Travaglino A, Liverani A. Efficacy of Hemopatch® in reducing postoperative bleeding after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Prospective and multicenter study. Integr Clin Med. 2018;2(4):1–3. doi: 10.15761/ICM.1000133. DOI
Nowak S, Schroeder HWS, Fleck S. Hemopatch((R)) as a new dural sealant: a clinical observation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;176:133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.12.009. PubMed DOI
Pisapia A, Crolla E, Saracco M, Saglioccolo A, Dolce P, Molino C. The effectiveness of Hemopatch™ in preventing postoperative distal pancreatectomy fistulas. Expert Rev Med Dev. 2019;16(3):253–256. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1582328. PubMed DOI
Ulrich F, Ettorre GM, Weltert L, Oberhoffer M, Kreuwel H, De Santis R, Kuntze E. Intra-operative use of Hemopatch(R): interim results of a nationwide European survey of surgeons. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:19–28. PubMed
Olthof PB, Rassam F, van Gulik TM. The use of a NHS-PEG coated, collagen-based sealant in a patient undergoing Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;47:7–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.03.038. PubMed DOI PMC
Uranues S, Fingerhut A, Belyaev O, Zerbi A, Boggi U, Hoffmann MW, Reim D, Esposito A, Primavesi F, Kornprat P, Coppola R, Fragulidis GP, Serradilla-Martin M, Alimoglu O, Peri A, Diaconescu B. Clinical impact of stump closure reinforced with hemopatch on the prevention of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg Open. 2021;2(1):e033. doi: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000033. PubMed DOI PMC
Ho Y-F, Hu F-C, Lee P-I. The advantages and challenges of using real-world data for patient care. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13(1):4–7. doi: 10.1111/cts.12683. PubMed DOI PMC
Lewis KM, Li Q, Jones DS, Corrales JD, Du H, Spiess PE, Lo Menzo E, DeAnda A., Jr Development and validation of an intraoperative bleeding severity scale for use in clinical studies of hemostatic agents. Surgery. 2017;161(3):771–781. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.022. PubMed DOI
HEMOPATCH® . Sealing Hemostat-instructions for use BE-30–03–130. Zurich: Baxter Healthcare SA; 2018.
Genyk Y, Kato T, Pomposelli JJ, Wright JK, Jr, Sher LS, Tetens V, Chapman WC. Fibrin sealant patch (TachoSil) vs oxidized regenerated cellulose patch (Surgicel Original) for the secondary treatment of local bleeding in patients undergoing hepatic resection: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(3):261–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.007. PubMed DOI
Maisano F, Kjaergård HK, Bauernschmitt R, Pavie A, Rábago G, Laskar M, Marstein JP, Falk V. TachoSil surgical patch versus conventional haemostatic fleece material for control of bleeding in cardiovascular surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36(4):708–714. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.04.057. PubMed DOI
Siemer S, Lahme S, Altziebler S, Machtens S, Strohmaier W, Wechsel HW, Goebell P, Schmeller N, Oberneder R, Stolzenburg JU, Becker H, Lüftenegger W, Tetens V, Van Poppel H. Efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study. Eur Urol. 2007;52(4):1156–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.027. PubMed DOI
Ramirez MG, Serradilla M, Ramirez MA. Cost-benefit analysis: hemopatch® vs standard of care in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula in a observational study. Am J Biomed Sci Res. 2019;1(1):11–19. doi: 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.01.000504. DOI
Anderson PA, Savage JW, Vaccaro AR, Radcliff K, Arnold PM, Lawrence BD, Shamji MF. Prevention of surgical site infection in spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(3s):S114–S123. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw066. PubMed DOI
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03392662