INTRODUCTION: A deeper understanding of personality specifics in military personnel may increase the efficacy of health care professionals in this field. Changes in modern warfare require army officers to make decisions in complicated situations with increasing levels of autonomy. Character is traditionally regarded as a key quality in these dynamics. However, it remains unclear which character strengths are conducive to effective leadership in the military. The present study aims at mapping Czech Army cadets' and professional soldiers' perceptions of the character strengths of those officers, who they consider the best they served under. The study also examined how these perceptions vary across soldiers at different stages of their careers and how much they overlap with the same soldiers' ratings of their own strengths. In addition, a regression analysis, to outline combinations of strengths for various aspects of character-based leadership, was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Respondents (N = 199) were recruited from three different subpopulations of the Czech Army-serving members of two reconnaissance units (N = 38), and 1st (N = 81) and 5th (N = 80) year cadets at the University of Defense. They rated the character strengths of chosen officers and themselves on the Character Strengths Leadership Inventory and the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths Revised. This study was approved by the units' commanding officer and the representatives of the University of Defense. RESULTS: Subordinates rated honesty, leadership, perspective, teamwork, fairness, creativity, love of learning, and zest highest in their chosen officers. These officers' mean profiles strongly correlated in all the three groups (rs = .82-.86). The mean correlation between officers' and respondents' self-reported strengths was not strong (rs = .18). Multiple regression models of the perception of an officer's success, success of their team, them as a leadership example, and them as having a good character, most frequently, involved fairness, honesty, kindness, and social intelligence, while forgiveness was negatively associated with these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study achieved its aims. First, it suggests the officers' character strengths that tend to be most valued by their subordinates among Czech Army cadets and soldiers serving in reconnaissance units. Second, the strong overlap of best officers' character profiles in all groups suggests that this perception may remain stable throughout a soldier's career. Third, the relationship between chosen officers' and respondents' self-reported strengths was negligible, suggesting that the perception of officer's strengths may not be an individual's projection. Fourth, regression models of character-based leadership proposed a combination of character strengths that may contribute to the officer's perceived efficacy. Compared to other studies, the sample included both cadets and military professionals with a proportional number of females being included. These results imply that health care practitioners working with military clients may benefit from the acknowledgment of their specific character strengths, most notably honesty and fairness, while providing care to this population.

Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Charles University Celetná 20 110 00 Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Military Leadership University of Defense Kounicova 65 662 10 Brno Czech Republic

University of Defense Army of the Czech Republic Kounicova 65 662 10 Brno Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Coll  JE, Weiss  EL, Yarvis  JS: No one leaves unchanged: insights for civilian mental health care professionals into the military experience and culture. Soc Work Health Care  2011; 50: 487–500.doi: 10.1080/00981389.2010.528727. PubMed DOI

Metz  S: Armed Conflict in the 21st Century: The Information Revolution and Post-Modern Warfare. U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, 2000.

Gebicke  S, Magid  S: Lessons from Around the World: Benchmarking Performance in Defense. McKinsey on Government. McKinsey and Company, 2010.

McGrath  JJ: The Other End of the Spear: The Tooth-to-Tail Ratio (T3R) in Modern Military Operations: The Long War Series Occasional Paper 23. Combat Studies Institute Press, 2007.

Stehlík  P: Já, voják v Afghánistánu: Vzpomínky českých veteránů. CPress, 2017.

Webb  B, Mann  JD: Among Heroes: A U.S. Navy SEAL’s True Story of Friendship, Heroism, and the Ultimate Sacrifice. New American Library, 2016.

Michelson  BM: Character Development of U.S. Army leaders: A Laissez Faire Approach. U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, 2013.

U.S. Army Values : Army values. Available at http://www.army.mil/values/; accessed May 2, 2022.

Australian Defence Doctrine Publication : Foundations of Australian military doctrine. Canberra, Australia, 2012. Available at http://www.navedu.navy.mi.th/stg/databasestory/data/laukniyom/workjob/bigcountry-workjob/Australia/ADDP-D-FOUNDATIONS-OF-AUSTRALIAN-MILITARY-DOCTRINE.pdf; accessed May  4, 2022.

Royal Military Academy Sandhurst Publication . The Army Leadership Code – An Introductory Guide. 1st ed., 2015. Available at https://www.army.mod.uk/media/2698/ac72021_the_army_leadership_code_an_introductory_guide.pdf; accessed May 5, 2022.

Aristotle : Ēthika Nikomacheia [Nicomachean Ethics]. Hackett Publishing Company, 1985.

Confucius : Lúnyǔ [The Analects of Confucius]. W. W. Norton, 1997.

Sun  Tzu: Sūzǐ Bīngfǎ [The Art of War]. Clarendon Press, 1964.

Street  RL  Jr., Makoul  G, Arora  NK, Epstein  RM: How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns  2009; 74(3): 295–301.doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. PubMed DOI

Muramatsu  RS: A mounting need for military cultural competency in civilian behavioral health providers. Mil Med  2013; 178(2): iv. PubMed

Martínez-Martí  ML, Theirs  CI, Pascual  D, Corradi  G: Character strengths predict an increase in mental health and subjective well-being over a one-month period during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Front Psychol  2020; 11: 584–67.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584567. PubMed DOI PMC

Park  N: Congressional Medal of Honor recipients: a positive psychology perspective. Paper presented at 113th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association; 2005; Washington, DC.

Matthews  MD, Eid  J, Kelly  D, Bailey  JKS, & Peterson  C: Character strengths and virtues of developing military leaders: an international comparison. Mil Psychol  2006; 18(1): 57–68.doi: 10.1207/s15327876mp1803s_5. DOI

Molen  RJV: Character strengths and emotions in military leaders. University of Michigan, Bachelor’s Thesis, Ann Arbor, MI, 2010.

Matthews  MD: Character strengths and post-adversity growth in combat leaders. Poster presented at 119th Annual Meeting of the Conference of the American Psychological Association; August 7, 2011; Washington, DC.

Chopik  WJ, Kelley  WL, Vie  LL  et al.: Development of character strengths across the deployment cycle among U.S. Army soldiers. J Personal  2020; 89(1): 23–34.doi: 10.1111/jopy.12564. PubMed DOI

Gayton  SD, Kehoe  EJ: Character strengths and hardiness of Australian Army Special Forces applicants. Mil Med  2015; 180(8): 857–62.doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00527. PubMed DOI

Gayton  SD, Kehoe  EJ: A prospective study of character strengths as predictors of selection into the Australian Army Special Forces. Mil Med  2015; 180(2): 151–7.doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00181. PubMed DOI

Gayton  SD, Kehoe  EJ: The character strengths of Special Forces personnel: insights for civilian health care practitioners. Mil Med  2016; 181(9): 996–1001.doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00440. PubMed DOI

Gayton  SD, Kehoe  EJ: Character strengths of junior Australian Army officers. Mil Med  2018; 184(5–6): 147–53.doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy251. PubMed DOI

Boe  O, Bang  H, Nilsen  FA: Experienced military officer’s perception of important character strengths: an educational tool. In: Proceedings of 2nd Global Conference on Psychology Researches. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 190, pp 339–45. Edited by Bozkurt  T, Demirok  MS, Elsevier Science BV, 2015.

Boe  O, Bang  H, Nilsen  FA: Selecting the most relevant character strengths for Norwegian Army officers: an educational tool. Procedia – Soc Behav Sci  2015; 197, 801–9.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.188. DOI

Boe  O, Davidson  SE, Nilsen  FA, Bang  H: A study of observed character strengths in military cadets during a Combat Fatigue Course. In: 9th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. ICERI2016 Proceedings, pp 6068–6077. Edited by Gómez Chova  L, López Martínez  A, Candel Torres  I, Seville, IATED, 2016.

Boe  O, Nilsen  FA, Kristiansen  O, Krogdahl  P, Bang  H: Measuring important character strengths in Norwegian Special Forces officers. In: 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. EDULEARN17 Proceedings, pp 1623–1631. Edited by Gómez Chova  L, López Martínez  A, Candel Torres  I, IATED, 2017.

Boe  O, Bang  H: The big 12: the most important character strengths for military officers. Athens J Soc Sci  2017; 4(2): 161–74.

Cosentino  AC, Castro Solano  A: Character strengths: a study of Argentinean soldiers. The Span J Psychol  2012; 15(1): 199–215.doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37310. PubMed DOI

Obe  JA, Walker  DI, Thoma  S: Soldiers of Character. Research Report. Birmingham, University of Birmingham, 2018.

Peterson  C, Seligman  MEP: Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press, 2004.

Braun  DE, Prusaczyk  WK, Goforth  HW, Pratt  NC: Personality Profiles of U.S. Navy Sea-Air-Land (SEAL) Personnel. Naval Health Research, 1994.

Hartmann  E, Sunde  T, Kristensen  W, Martinussen  M: Psychological measures as predictors of training performance. J Pers Assess  2003; 80(1): 87–98.doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_17. PubMed DOI

Mikulka  Z: Etická výchova v Armádě České republiky. University of Defense, Dissertation Thesis, Brno, 2017.

Wright  TA, Quick  JC: The role of character in ethical leadership research. Leadersh Q  2011; 22(5): 975–8.doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.015. DOI

Hannah  ST, Avolio  BJ: The locus of leader character. Leadersh Q  2011; 22(5): 979–83.doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.016. DOI

Bang  H, Boe  O, Eilertsen  DE, Nilsen  FA: OBSCIF – A reliable and valid observational instrument for measuring character strengths. In: 11th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. ICERI2018 Proceedings, pp 5465–73. Edited by Gómez Chova  L, López Martínez  A, Candel Torres  I, IATED, 2018.

Hannah  ST, Jennings  PL: Leader ethos and big-C character. Organ Dyn  2013; 42(1): 8–16.doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.12.002. DOI

McGrath  RE: The VIA assessment suite for adults: development and initial evaluation. Technical Report. Cincinnati, OH, VIA Institute on Character, 2017.

Heřman  O: Character-based leadership in the land forces of the Army of the Czech Republic. Charles University, Diploma Thesis, Prague, 2020.

Procházka  J, Vaculík  M, Smutný  P: Czech Leadership Questionnaire: the development of a Czech questionnaire of transformational and transactional leadership. In: Hradec Economic Days 2016, pp 848–54. Edited by Jedlička  P, Hradec  Králové, University of Hradec Králové, 2016.

Giordano  GN, Lindstrom  M: Trust and health: testing the reverse causality hypothesis. J Epidemiol Community Health  2016; 70(1): 10–6.doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205822. PubMed DOI PMC

Rhodes  R, Strain  J: Trust and transforming medical institutions. Camb Q Healthc Ethics  2009; 9: 205–17.doi: 10.1017/S096318010090207X. PubMed DOI

Hoge  CW, Castro  CA, Messer  SC, McGurk  D, Cotting  DI, Koffman  RL: Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New Eng J Med  2004; 351: 13–22.doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040603. PubMed DOI

Maguen  S, Cohen  G, Cohen  BE, Lawhon  D, Marmar  CR, Seal  KH: The role of psychologists in the care of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans in primary care settings. Professional Psychol Res Pract  2010; 41:135–42.doi: 10.1037/a0018835. DOI

Mayer  RC, Davis  JH, Schoorman  FD: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manage Rev  1995; 20: 709–34.doi: 10.2307/258792. DOI