Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone As Second-line Therapy for Lenalidomide-refractory Multiple Myeloma
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36204691
PubMed Central
PMC9529060
DOI
10.1097/hs9.0000000000000786
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
This phase 2 trial investigated reinduction with carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (KPd) and continuous pomalidomide/dexamethasone in patients at first progression during lenalidomide maintenance. The second objective was to evaluate high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM/ASCT) at first progression. Patients were eligible who had progressive disease according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Treatment consisted of 8 cycles carfilzomib (20/36 mg/m2), pomalidomide (4 mg) and dexamethasone. Patients without prior transplant received HDM/ASCT. Pomalidomide 4 mg w/o dexamethasone was given until progression. One hundred twelve patients were registered of whom 86 (77%) completed 8 cycles of KPd. Thirty-five (85%) eligible patients received HDM/ASCT. The median time to discontinuation of pomalidomide w/o dexamethasone was 17 months. Best response was 37% ≥ complete response, 75% ≥ very good partial response, 92% ≥ partial response, respectively. At a follow-up of 40 months median PFS was 26 and 32 months for patients who received KPd plus HDM/ASCT and 17 months for patients on KPd (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-1.00, P = 0.051). PFS was better after longer duration of prior lenalidomide (HR 3.56, 95% CI 1.42-8.96, P = 0.035). Median overall survival (OS) was 67 months. KPd-emerging grade 3 and 4 adverse events included hematologic (41%), cardiovascular (6%), respiratory (3%), infections (17%), and neuropathy (2%). KPd followed by continuous pomalidomide is an effective and safe triple drug regimen in second-line for patients previously exposed to bortezomib and/or refractory to lenalidomide.
Department of Hematology Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Cancer Center The Netherlands
Department of Hematology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands
Department of Hematology Haga Hospital The Hague The Netherlands
Department of Hematology La Sapienza Rome Italy
Department of Hematology Ostrava Poruba FNO Czech Republic
Department of Hematology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
Department of Hematology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University The Netherlands
Department of Hematology University of Maastricht Medical Center The Netherlands
Department of Hematology Wilhelminen Hospital Vienna Austria
Division of Hematology Città della Salute e della Scienza Università di Torino Italy
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands
Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit University of Udine Italy
Hematology Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital Tilburg The Netherlands
Hematology University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Hematology University of Torino Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Terpos E, et al. . Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. HemaSphere. 2021;5:e528. PubMed PMC
Richardson PG, Oriol A, Beksac M, et al. . Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:781–794. PubMed
Palumbo A, Chanan-Khan A, Weisel K, et al. . Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:754–766. PubMed
Dimopoulos M, Quach H, Mateos MV, et al. . Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2020;396:186–197. PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Dytfeld D, Grosicki S, et al. . Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1811–1822. PubMed
Attal M, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, et al. . Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394:2096–2107. PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Boccadoro M, et al. . Daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone alone in previously treated multiple myeloma (APOLLO): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:801–812. PubMed
Cavo M, Gay F, Beksac M, et al. . Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e456–e468. PubMed
Shah JJ, Stadtmauer EA, Abonour R, et al. . Carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory myeloma. Blood. 2015;126:2284–2290. PubMed PMC
Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, et al. . Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1311–1320. PubMed PMC
Stadtmauer EA, Pasquini MC, Blackwell B, et al. . Autologous transplantation, consolidation, and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: results of the BMT CTN 0702 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:589–597. PubMed PMC
Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. . International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20:1467–1473. PubMed
Kumar SK, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, et al. . Natural history of relapsed myeloma, refractory to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors: a multicenter IMWG study. Leukemia. 2017;31:2443–2448. PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, et al. . Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1319–1331. PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Palumbo A, et al. . Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:27–38. PubMed
San Miguel JF, Weisel KC, Song KW, et al. . Impact of prior treatment and depth of response on survival in MM-003, a randomized phase 3 study comparing pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015;100:1334–1339. PubMed PMC
Mateos MV, Spencer A, Nooka AK, et al. . Daratumumab-based regimens are highly effective and well tolerated in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of patient age: subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CASTOR and POLLUX studies. Haematologica. 2020;105:468–477. PubMed PMC
Garderet L, Kuhnowski F, Berge B, et al. . Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132:2555–2563. PubMed
Moreau P, Dimopoulos MA, Yong K, et al. . Isatuximab plus carfilzomib/dexamethasone versus carfilzomib/dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: IKEMA Phase III study design. Future Oncol. 2020;16:4347–4358. PubMed
Dimopoulos M, Weisel K, Moreau P, et al. . Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): outcomes by prior treatment at first relapse. Leukemia. 2021;35:1722–1731. PubMed PMC
Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Siegel D, et al. . Carfilzomib and pomalidomide in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma with baseline risk factors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2247–2256. PubMed