Achieving ethically responsible decisions is crucial for the success of biodiversity conservation projects. We adapted the ethical matrix, decision tree, and Bateson's cube to assist in the ethical analysis of complex conservation scenarios by structuring these tools so that they can implement the different value dimensions (environmental, social, and animal welfare) involved in conservation ethics. We then applied them to a case study relative to the decision-making process regarding whether or not to continue collecting biomaterial on the oldest of the two remaining northern white rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum cottoni), a functionally extinct subspecies of the white rhinoceros. We used the ethical matrix to gather ethical pros and cons and as a starting point for a participatory approach to ethical decision-making. We used decision trees to compare the different options at stake on the basis of a set of ethical desiderata. We used Bateson's cube to establish a threshold of ethical acceptability and model the results of a simple survey. The application of these tools proved to be pivotal in structuring the decision-making process and in helping reach a shared, reasoned, and transparent decision on the best option from an ethical point of view among those available.

Que se logren decisiones éticamente responsables es crucial para el éxito de los proyectos de conservación de la biodiversidad. Adaptamos la matriz ética, el árbol de decisión y el cubo de Bateson para apoyar con el análisis ético de escenarios de conservación compleja mediante la estructuración de estas herramientas de tal manera que puedan ejecutar las diferentes dimensiones de valor (ambiental, social y bienestar animal) involucradas en la ética de la conservación. Después aplicamos las herramientas a un estudio de caso relacionado con el proceso de toma de decisiones respecto a si se debe seguir o no recolectando material biológico del rinoceronte blanco del norte (Ceratotherium simum cottoni) más viejo (una subespecie funcionalmente extinta) de los dos que existen. Usamos la matriz ética como un punto de partida para una estrategia participativa para la toma ética de decisiones y para recopilar los pros y contras éticos. Usamos el árbol de decisión para comparar las diferentes opciones en juego con base en un conjunto de deseos éticos. Usamos el cubo de Bateson para establecer un umbral de aceptación ética y modelar los resultados de una encuesta simple. La aplicación de estas herramientas demostró ser central en la estructuración del proceso de toma de decisiones y en el apoyo para lograr una decisión compartida, razonada y transparente sobre la mejor opción a partir de un punto de vista ético entre aquellos disponibles.

Avantea Laboratory of Reproductive Technologies Cremona Italy

Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science University of Padua Legnaro Italy

Department of Reproduction Management Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Berlin Germany

Department of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universität Berlin Germany

Ethics Laboratory for Veterinary Medicine Conservation and Animal Welfare Padua University Padua Italy

Kenya Wildlife Service Nairobi Kenya

Ol Pejeta Wildlife Conservancy Nanyuki Kenya

Wildlife Research and Training Institute Karagita Kenya

ZOO Dvůr Králové Králové nad Labem Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Bateson, P. (1986). When to experiment on animals. New Scientist, 30-32.

Bateson, P. (2005). Ethics and behavioral biology. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35, 211-233.

Beauchamp, T. L. (2010). Standing on principles. Oxford University Press.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1985). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.

Biasetti, P., & de Mori, B. (2020). Towards a conservation ethics. Iride, 33, 471-486.

Biasetti, P., & de Mori, B. (2021). The ethical matrix as a tool for decision-making process in conservation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 584636.

Biasetti, P., Ferrante, L., Bonelli, M., Manenti, R., Scaccin, D., & de Mori, B. (2021). Value-conflicts in the conservation of a native species: A case study based on the endangered whiteclawed crayfish in Europe. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, 32, 389-406.

Biasetti, P., Hildebrandt, T. B., Göritz, F., Hermes, R., Holtze, S., Galli, C., Lazzari, G., Colleoni, S., Pollastri, I., Spiriti, M. M., Stejskal, J., Seet, S., Zwilling, J., Ngulu, S., Mutisya, S., Kariuki, L., Lokolool, I., Omondo, P., Ndeereh, D., & de Mori, B. (2022). Ethical analysis of the application of assisted reproduction technologies in biodiversity conservation and the case of white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) ovum pick-up procedures. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 831675.

Biorescue. (2021). The role of Najin in the Biorescue project: An ethical assessment. https://www.izw-berlin.de/files/biorescue/FINAL_Report_Najin_October_2021.pdf

Bracke, M. B. M., & Hopster, H. (2006). Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics, 19, 77-89.

Canessa, S., Converse, S. J., West, M., Clemann, N., Gillespie, G., McFadden, M., Silla, A. J., Parris, K. M., & McCarthy, M. A. (2016). Planning for ex situ conservation in the face of uncertainty. Conservation Biology, 30, 599-609.

Catalano, A. S., Lyons-White, J., Mills, M. M., & Knight, A. T. (2019). Learning from published project failures in conservation. Biological Conservation, 238, 108223.

Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Diaz, S., Gomez-Baggethune, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G. W., Martin-Lopez, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascualo, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., & Turner, N. (2016). Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 1462-1465.

Chan, K. M. A., Pringle, R. M., Ranganathan, J., Boggs, C. L., Chan, Y. L., Ehrlich, P. R., Haff, P. K., Heller, N. E., Al-Khafaji, K., & Macmynowski, D. P. (2007). When agendas collide: Human welfare and biological conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 59-68.

Cromsigt, J., & Beest, M. T. (2014). Restoration of a megaherbivore: Landscape-level impacts of white rhinoceros in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Journal of Ecology, 102, 566-575.

De Mori, B., Spiriti, M. M., Pollastri, I., Normando, S., Biasetti, P., Florio, D., Andreucci, F., Colleoni, S., Galli, C., Göritz, F., Hermes, R., Holtze, S., Lazzari, G., Seet, S., Zwilling, J., Stejskal, J., Mutisya, S., Ndeereh, D., Ngulu, S., & Hildebrandt, T. B. (2021). An Ethical Assessment Tool (ETHAS) to evaluate the application of assisted reproductive technologies in mammals’ conservation: The case of the northern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum cottoni). Animals, 11(2), 312.

Driscoll, J. W., & Bateson, P. (1988). Animal in behavioural research. Animal Behavior, 36, 1569-1574.

Emslie, R. (2020). Ceratotherium simum cottoni. IUCN Red List Threat Species.

Fassbender, M., Hildebrandt, T. B., Paris, M. C. J., Colenbrander, B., & Jewgenow, K. (2007). High-resolution ultrasonography of xenografted domestic cat ovarian cortex. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 53, 1023-1034.

Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.

Gamborg, C., Palmer, C., & Sandøe, P. (2012). Ethics of wildlife management and conservation: What should we try to protect? Nature Education Knowledge, 3, 10.

Greggor, A. L., Vicino, G. A., Swaisgood, R. R., Fidgett, A., Brenner, D., Kinney, M. E., Farabaugh, S., Masada, B., & Lamberski, N. (2018). Animal welfare in conservation breeding: Applications and challenges. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5, 323.

Hampton, J. O., Warburton, B., & Sandøe, P. (2018). Compassionate versus consequentialist conservation. Conservation Biology, 33, 751-759.

Hermes, R., Göritz, F., Portas, T. J., Bryant, B. R., Kelly, J. M., Maclellan, L. J., Keeley, T., Schwarzenberger, F., Walzer, C., Schnorrenberg, A., Spindler, R. E., Saragusty, J., Kaandorp, S., & Hildebrandt, T. B. (2009). Ovarian superstimulation, transrectal ultrasound-guided oocyte recovery, and IVF in rhinoceros. Theriogenology, 72, 959-968.

Hermes, R., Hildebrandt, T. B., & Göritz, F. (2018). Cryopreservation in rhinoceros-Setting a new benchmark for sperm cryosurvival. PLoS ONE, 13, 1-12.

Hermes, R., Hildebrandt, T. B., Walzer, C., Göritz, F., Patton, M. L., Silinski, S., Anderson, M. J., Reid, C. E., Wirbelt, G., Tomasova, K., & Schwarzenberger, F. (2006). The effect of long non-reproductive periods on the genital health in captive female white rhinoceroses. Theriogenology, 65, 1492-1515.

Hickling, G. (1994). Animal welfare and vertebrate pest management: Compromise or conflict? In R. M. Baker, D. J. Mellor, & A. M. Nichol (Eds.), Animal welfare in the twenty-first century: Ethical, educational and scientific challenges (pp. 345-359). ANZCAART.

Hildebrandt, T. B., Hermes, R., Colleoni, S., Diecke, S., Holtze, S., Renfree, M. B., Stejskal, J., Hayashi, K., Drukker, M., Loi, P., Göritz, F., Lazzari, G., & Galli, C. (2018). Embryos and embryonic stem cells from the white rhinoceros. Nature Communication, 9, 2589.

Hildebrandt, T. B., Hermes, R., Göritz, F., Appeltant, R., Colleoni, S., de Mori, B., Diecke, S., Drukker, M., Galli, C., Hayashi, K., Lazzari, G., Loi, P., Payne, J., Renfree, M., Seet, S., Stejskal, J., Swegen, A., Williams, S. A., Zainuddin, Z. Z., & Holtze, S. (2021a). The ART of bringing extinction to a freeze-History and future of species conservation, exemplified by rhinos. Theriogenology, 169, 76-88.

Hildebrandt, T. B., Holtze, S., Biasetti, P., Colleoni, S., de Mori, B., Diecke, S., Göritz, F., Hayashi, K., Hayashi, M., Hermes, R., Kariuki, L., Lazzari, G., Mijele, D., Mutisya, S., Ndeereh, D., Ngulu, S., Seet, S., Zwilling, J., Zywitza, V., & Galli, C. (2021b). Conservation research in times of COVID-19-The rescue of the northern white rhino. Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research, 3, 1-22.

Johnson, P. J., Adams, V. M., Armstrong, D. P., Baker, S. E., Biggs, D., Boitani, L., Cotterill, A., Dale, E., O'Donnell, H., Douglas, D. J. T., Droge, E., Ewen, J. G., Feber, R. E., Genovesi, P., Hambler, C., Harmsen, B. J., Harrington, L. A., Hinks, A., Hughes, J., & Dickman, A. (2019). Consequences matter: Compassion in conservation means caring for individuals, populations and species. Animals, 9, 1115.

Kaiser, M., & Forsberg, E. M. (2001). Assessing fisheries-Using an ethical matrix in a participatory process. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14, 191-200.

Kaiser, M., Millar, K., Thorstensen, E., & Tomkins, S. (2007). Developing the ethical matrix as a decision support framework: GM fish as a case study. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20, 65-80.

Maguire, L. A. (1991). Risk analysis for conservation biologists. Conservation Biology, 5, 123-125.

Maguire, L. A., Seal, U. S., & Brussard, P. F. (1987). Managing critically endangered species: The Sumatran rhino as a case study. In M. Soulé (Ed.), Viable population for conservation (pp. 345-359). Cambridge University Press.

McMahon, C. R., Harcourt, R., Bateson, P., & Hindell, M. A. (2012). Animal welfare and decision making in wildlife research. Biological Conservation, 153, 254-256.

McShane, T. O., Hirsch, P. D., Trung, T. C., Songorwa, A., King, A., Monteferri, B., Mutekanga, D., Van Thang, H., Dammert, J. L., Pulgar-Vidal, M., Welch-Devine, M., Brosius, P., Coppolillo, P., & O'Connor, S. (2011). Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation, 144, 966-972.

Mepham, B. (1996). Food ethics. Routledge.

Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical matrix manual. LEI.

Minteer, B. A., & Collins, J. P. (2005a). Why we need an “Ecological ethics”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 332.

Minteer, B. A., & Collins, J. P. (2005b). Ecological ethics: Building a new tool kit for ecologists and biodiversity managers. Conservation Biology, 19, 1803-1812.

Owen-Smih, R. N. (1988). Megaherbivores. In The influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge University Press.

Pearson, R. G. (2016). Reasons to conserve nature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 31, 366-371.

Pennington, P. M., & Durrant, B. S. (2019). Assisted reproductive technologies in captive rhinoceroses. Mammals Review, 49, 1-15.

Redpath, S. M., Young, J., Evely, A., Adams, W. M., Sutherland, W. J., Whitehouse, A., Amar, A., Lambert, R. A., Linnell, J. D. C., Watt, A., & Gutierrez, R. J. (2013). Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28, 100-109.

Regan, H. M., Ben-Haim, Y., Langford, B., Wilson, W. G., Lundberg, P., Andelman, S. J., & Burgman, M. A. (2005). Robust decision-making under severe uncertainty for conservation management. Ecological Applications, 15, 1471-1477.

Saragusty, J., Diecke, S., Drukker, M., Durrant, B., Ben-Nun, I. B., Galli, C., Göritz, F., Hayashi, K., Hermes, R., Holtze, S., Johnson, S., Lazzari, G., Loi, P., Loring, J. F., Okita, K., Renfree, M. B., Seet, S., Voracek, T., Sejskal, J., & Hildebrandt, T. B. (2016). Rewinding the process of mammalian extinction. Zoo Biology, 35, 280-292.

Shoreman-Ouimet, E., & Kopnina, H. (2015). Reconciling ecological and social justice to promote biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 184, 320-326.

Waldram, M. S., Bond, W. J., & Stock, W. D. (2008). Ecological engineering by a mega-grazer: White rhino impacts on a South African savanna. Ecosystems, 11, 101-112.

In vitro fertilization program in white rhinoceros