Inverted repeats in the monkeypox virus genome are hot spots for mutation
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36400742
PubMed Central
PMC10100261
DOI
10.1002/jmv.28322
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- APOBEC, evolution, inverted repeats, monkeypox, mutation,
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- virus opičích neštovic * genetika MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The current monkeypox virus (MPXV) strain differs from the strain arising in 2018 by 50+ single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and is mutating much faster than expected. The cytidine deaminase apolipoprotein B messenger RNA editing enzyme, catalytic subunit B (APOBEC3) was hypothesized to be driving this increased mutation. APOBEC has recently been identified to preferentially mutate cruciform DNA secondary structures formed by inverted repeats (IRs). IRs were recently identified as hot spots for mutation in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and we aimed to identify whether IRs were also hot spots for mutation within MPXV genomes. We found that MPXV genomes were replete with IR sequences. Of the 50+ SNPs identified in the 2022 outbreak strain, 63.9% of these were found to have arisen within IR regions in the 2018 reference strain (MT903344.1). Notably, IR sequences found in the 2018 reference strain were significantly lost over time, with an average of 32.5% of these sequences being conserved in the 2022 MPXV genomes. This evidence was highly indicative that mutations were arising within IRs. This data provides further support to the hypothesis that APOBEC may be driving MPXV mutation and highlights the necessity for greater surveillance of IRs of MPXV genomes to detect new mutations.
Faculty of Chemistry Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic
School of Pharmacy University of East Anglia Norwich Research Park Norwich UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Outbreak Cases and Data. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/index.html
Isidro J, Borges V, Pinto M, et al. Phylogenomic characterization and signs of microevolution in the 2022 multi‐country outbreak of monkeypox virus. Nature Med. 2022;28:1569‐1572. PubMed PMC
Cullen BR. Role and mechanism of action of the APOBEC3 family of antiretroviral resistance factors. J Virol. 2006;80(3):1067‐1076. PubMed PMC
Lu S, Wang G, Bacolla A, Zhao J, Spitser S, Vasquez KM. Short inverted repeats are hotspots for genetic instability: relevance to cancer genomes. Cell Rep. 2015;10(10):1674‐1680. PubMed PMC
Wang G, Seidman MM, Glazer PM. Mutagenesis in mammalian cells induced by triple helix formation and transcription‐coupled repair. Science. 1996;271(5250):802‐805. PubMed
De Magis A, Manzo SG, Russo M, et al. DNA damage and genome instability by G‐quadruplex ligands are mediated by R loops in human cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(3):816‐825. PubMed PMC
Wang Y, Yang J, Wild AT, et al. G‐quadruplex DNA drives genomic instability and represents a targetable molecular abnormality in ATRX‐deficient malignant glioma. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):943. PubMed PMC
Voineagu I, Narayanan V, Lobachev KS, Lobachev KS, Mirkin SM. Replication stalling at unstable inverted repeats: interplay between DNA hairpins and fork stabilizing proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(29):9936‐9941. PubMed PMC
Lin CT, Lin W‐H, Lyu YL, Whang‐Peng J. Inverted repeats as genetic elements for promoting DNA inverted duplication: implications in gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(17):3529‐3538. PubMed PMC
Bissler JJ. DNA inverted repeats and human disease. Front Biosci. 1998;3:d408‐d418. PubMed
Goswami P, Bartas M, Lexa M, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 hot‐spot mutations are significantly enriched within inverted repeats and CpG island loci. Brief. Bioinform. 2021;22(2):1338‐1345. PubMed PMC
Ponomarev GV, Fatykhov B, Nazarov VA, et al. APOBEC mutagenesis is low in most types of non‐B DNA structures. iScience. 2022;25(7):104535. PubMed PMC
Brázda V, Kolomazník J, Lýsek J, et al. G4Hunter web application: a web server for G‐quadruplex prediction. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(18):3493‐3495. PubMed PMC
Brázda V, Kolomazník J, Lýsek J, Hároníková L, Coufal J, Št'astný J. Palindrome analyser ‐ A new web‐based server for predicting and evaluating inverted repeats in nucleotide sequences. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;478(4):1739‐1745. PubMed
Bohálová N, Cantara A, Bartas M, et al. Analyses of viral genomes for G‐quadruplex forming sequences reveal their correlation with the type of infection. Biochimie. 2021;186:13‐27. PubMed
Yicong Dai, Xucong Teng, Hu Difei, et al. A peculiar evolutionary feature of monkeypox virus. bioRxiv. 2022.6.18.496696 10.1101/2022.06.18.496696 DOI
Bohálová N, Dobrovolná M, Brázda V, Bidula S. Conservation and over‐representation of G‐quadruplex sequences in regulatory regions of mitochondrial DNA across distinct taxonomic sub‐groups. Biochimie. 2022;194:28‐34. PubMed
Kremer M, Suezer Y, Martinez‐Fernandez Y, Münk C, Sutter G, Schnierle BS. Vaccinia virus replication is not affected by APOBEC3 family members. Virol J. 2006;3:86. PubMed PMC
Mulder LCF, Harari A, Simon V. Cytidine deamination induced HIV‐1 drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(14):5501‐5506. PubMed PMC