Validation of a Brief Dietary Questionnaire for Use in Clinical Practice: Mini-EAT (Eating Assessment Tool)
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
36583423
PubMed Central
PMC9973598
DOI
10.1161/jaha.121.025064
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Healthy Eating Index 2015, cardiovascular disease prevention, dietary questionnaire, dietary survey, food frequency questionnaire, preventive cardiology, rapid dietary screener,
- MeSH
- Diet * MeSH
- Fruit MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Vegetables * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Background There is a scarcity of validated rapid dietary screening tools for patient use in the clinical setting to improve health and reduce cardiovascular risk. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2015 measures compliance with the 2015 to 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans but requires completion of an extensive diet assessment to compute, which is time consuming and impractical. The authors hypothesize that a 19-item dietary survey assessing consumption of common food groups known to affect health will be correlated with the HEI-2015 assessed by a validated food frequency questionnaire and can be further reduced without affecting validity. Methods and Results A 19-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT) of common food groups was created through literature review and expert consensus. A cross-sectional survey was then conducted in adult participants from a preventive cardiology clinic or cardiac rehabilitation and in healthy volunteers (n=661, mean age, 36 years; 76% women). Participants completed an online 156-item food frequency questionnaire, which was used to calculate the HEI score using standard methods. The association between each EAT question and HEI group was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Linear regression models were subsequently used to identify univariable and multivariable predictors for HEI score for further reduction in the number of items. The final 9-item model of Mini-EAT was validated by 5-fold cross validation. The 19-item EAT had a strong correlation with the HEI score (r=0.73) and was subsequently reduced to the 9 items independently predictive of the HEI score: fruits, vegetables, whole grains, refined grains, fish or seafood, legumes/nuts/seeds, low-fat dairy, high-fat dairy, and sweets consumption, without affecting the predictive ability of the tool (r=0.71). Conclusions Mini-EAT is a 9-item validated brief dietary screener that correlates well with a comprehensive food frequency questionnaire. Future studies to test the Mini-EAT's validity in diverse populations and for development of clinical decision support systems to capture changes over time are needed.
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Mayo Clinic Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Rochester MN
Mayo Clinic Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics Jacksonville FL
See more in PubMed
Barnard ND, Alwarith J, Rembert E, Brandon L, Nguyen M, Goergen A, Horne T, do Nascimento GF, Lakkadi K, Tura A, et al. A mediterranean diet and low‐fat vegan diet to improve body weight and cardiometabolic risk factors: a randomized, cross‐over trial. J Am Coll Nutr. 2022;41:127–139. PubMed
Siervo M, Lara J, Chowdhury S, Ashor A, Oggioni C, Mathers JC. Effects of the Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Nutr. 2015;113:1–15. PubMed
Djekic D, Shi L, Brolin H, Carlsson F, Särnqvist C, Savolainen O, Cao Y, Bäckhed F, Tremaroli V, Landberg R, et al. Effects of a vegetarian diet on cardiometabolic risk factors, gut microbiota, and plasma metabolome in subjects with ischemic heart disease: a randomized, crossover study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e016518. PubMed PMC
Micha R, Peñalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D. Association between dietary factors and mortality from heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes in the United States. JAMA. 2017;317:912–924. PubMed PMC
Grossman DC, Bibbins‐Domingo K, Curry SJ, Barry MJ, Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, Epling JW Jr, Kemper AR, Krist AH, Kurth AE, et al. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without cardiovascular risk factors: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2017;318:167–174. PubMed
Patnode CD, Evans CV, Senger CA, Redmond N, Lin JS. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without known cardiovascular disease risk factors: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2017;318:175–193. PubMed
Lv N, Azar KM, Rosas LG, Wulfovich S, Xiao L, Ma J. Behavioral lifestyle interventions for moderate and severe obesity: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2017;100:180–193. PubMed PMC
Vadiveloo M, Lichtenstein AH, Anderson C, Aspry K, Foraker R, Griggs S, Hayman LL, Johnston E, Stone NJ, Thorndike AN. Rapid diet assessment screening tools for cardiovascular disease risk reduction across healthcare settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13:e000094. PubMed
Schröder H, Fitó M, Estruch R, Martínez‐González MA, Corella D, Salas‐Salvadó J, Lamuela‐Raventós R, Ros E, Salaverría I, Fiol M, et al. A short screener is valid for assessing Mediterranean diet adherence among older Spanish men and women. J Nutr. 2011;141:1140–1145. PubMed
Johnston CS, Bliss C, Knurick JR, Scholtz C. Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants [shortened version] scores are associated with Healthy Eating Index‐2010 scores and other indices of diet quality in healthy adult omnivores and vegetarians. Nutr J. 2018;17:89. PubMed PMC
Rifas‐Shiman SL, Willett WC, Lobb R, Kotch J, Dart C, Gillman MW. PrimeScreen, a brief dietary screening tool: reproducibility and comparability with both a longer food frequency questionnaire and biomarkers. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:249–254. PubMed
Reedy J, Lerman JL, Krebs‐Smith SM, Kirkpatrick SI, Pannucci TE, Wilson MM, Subar AF, Kahle LL, Tooze JA. Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index‐2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118:1622–1633. PubMed PMC
McCullough ML, Willett WC. Evaluating adherence to recommended diets in adults: the Alternate Healthy Eating Index. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:152–157. PubMed
Chiuve SE, Fung TT, Rimm EB, Hu FB, McCullough ML, Wang M, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Alternative dietary indices both strongly predict risk of chronic disease. J Nutr. 2012;142:1009–1018. PubMed PMC
Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G. Diet quality as assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score, and health outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of cohort studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:780–800.e5. PubMed
Apovian CM, Murphy MC, Cullum‐Dugan D, Lin PH, Gilbert KM, Coffman G, Jenkins M, Bakun P, Tucker KL, Moore TJ. Validation of a web‐based dietary questionnaire designed for the DASH (dietary approaches to stop hypertension) diet: the DASH online questionnaire. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:615–622. PubMed PMC
Snetselaar LG, de Jesus JM, DeSilva DM, Stoody EE. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025: understanding the Scientific Process, Guidelines, and Key Recommendations. Nutrition Today. 2021;56:287–295. PubMed PMC
Lloyd‐Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L, Greenlund K, Daniels S, Nichol G, Tomaselli GF, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121:586–613. PubMed
Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Vadiveloo M, Hu FB, Kris‐Etherton PM, Rebholz CM, Sacks FM, Thorndike AN, Van Horn L, Wylie‐Rosett J. 2021 dietary guidance to improve cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144:e472–e487. PubMed
Wang DD, Li Y, Bhupathiraju SN, Rosner BA, Sun Q, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies of US men and women and a meta‐analysis of 26 cohort studies. Circulation. 2021;143:1642–1654. PubMed PMC
Amba V, Murphy G, Etemadi A, Wang S, Abnet CC, Hashemian M. Nut and peanut butter consumption and mortality in the National Institutes of Health‐AARP diet and health study. Nutrients. 2019;11:1508. PubMed PMC
Ivey KL, Nguyen XT, Quaden RM, Ho YL, Cho K, Gaziano JM, Djoussé L. Association of nut consumption with risk of stroke and cardiovascular disease: the Million Veteran Program. Nutrients. 2021;13:3031. PubMed PMC
van den Brandt PA, Schouten LJ. Relationship of tree nut, peanut and peanut butter intake with total and cause‐specific mortality: a cohort study and meta‐analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1038–1049. PubMed
Hauk L. DGAC makes food‐based recommendations in the 2015–2020 dietary guidelines for Americans. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93:525. PubMed
Krebs‐Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, Wilson MM, Reedy J. Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI‐2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118:1591–1602. PubMed PMC