Worldwide survey on implantation of and outcomes for conduction system pacing with His bundle and left bundle branch area pacing leads
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
UL1 TR001085
NCATS NIH HHS - United States
UL1 TR003142
NCATS NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
36607529
PubMed Central
PMC9817436
DOI
10.1007/s10840-022-01417-4
PII: 10.1007/s10840-022-01417-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Conduction system pacing, His bundle pacing, Left bundle branch area pacing,
- MeSH
- bradykardie * terapie MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- Hisův svazek * MeSH
- kardiostimulace umělá MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci převodního systému srdečního MeSH
- převodní systém srdeční MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Adoption and outcomes for conduction system pacing (CSP), which includes His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), in real-world settings are incompletely understood. We sought to describe real-world adoption of CSP lead implantation and subsequent outcomes. METHODS: We performed an online cross-sectional survey on the implantation and outcomes associated with CSP, between November 15, 2020, and February 15, 2021. We described survey responses and reported HBP and LBBAP outcomes for bradycardia pacing and cardiac resynchronization CRT indications, separately. RESULTS: The analysis cohort included 140 institutions, located on 5 continents, who contributed data to the worldwide survey on CSP. Of these, 127 institutions (90.7%) reported experience implanting CSP leads. CSP and overall device implantation volumes were reported by 84 institutions. In 2019, the median proportion of device implants with CSP, HBP, and/or LBBAP leads attempted were 4.4% (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9-12.5%; range, 0.4-100%), 3.3% (IQR, 1.3-7.1%; range, 0.2-87.0%), and 2.5% (IQR, 0.5-24.0%; range, 0.1-55.6%), respectively. For bradycardia pacing indications, HBP leads, as compared to LBBAP leads, had higher reported implant threshold (median [IQR]: 1.5 V [1.3-2.0 V] vs 0.8 V [0.6-1.0 V], p = 0.0008) and lower ventricular sensing (median [IQR]: 4.0 mV [3.0-5.0 mV] vs. 10.0 mV [7.0-12.0 mV], p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, CSP lead implantation has been broadly adopted but has yet to become the default approach at most surveyed institutions. As the indications and data for CSP continue to evolve, strategies to educate and promote CSP lead implantation at institutions without CSP lead implantation experience would be necessary.
1st Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Jiangsu Provincial Hospital Nanjing China
Ankara City Hospital Ankara Turkey
ARNAS Civico Hospital Palermo Italy
Aston University Birmingham UK
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese Siena Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Ferrara Cona Italy
Baylor University Medical Center Dallas USA
Beacon Hospital Dublin Ireland
Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland
Caen University Hospital Caen France
Cardioangiologic Centre Bethanien Frankfurt Germany
Cardiocenter 3Rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas en RED en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares Madrid Spain
Children's National Hospital Washington D C USA
China Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan
Columbia University New York NY USA
Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta USA
Ente Ecclesiastico Ospedale Miulli Acquaviva Delle Fonti BA Italy
Fujita Health University Toyoake Japan
Geisinger Heart Institute Danville USA
Hippokration General Hospital Athens Greece
Holy Family Hospital New Delhi India
Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro Vigo Spain
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon Madrid Spain
Hospital HM Monteprincipe Madrid Spain
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia USA
Hospital Salud Integral Managua Nicaragua
Hospital Universitari 1 Politècnic La Fe Valencia Spain
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor Madrid Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío Seville Spain
IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Segrate Italy
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan
Kobari General Hospital Noda Japan
Krannert Institute of Cardiology Indiana University Avon IN USA
Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Karad India
Kumamoto University Hospital Kumamoto Japan
Kyorin University School of Medicine Mitaka Japan
Kyoto Katsura Hospital Kyoto Japan
Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia USA
Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute Brown University Providence USA
Marche Polytechnic University Ancona Italy
Medical College University of Rzeszów Rzeszów Poland
Monash Health Melbourne Australia
Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan
National Medical Research Center VA Almazov Saint Petersburg Russia
New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital New York NY USA
Ochsner Medical Center New Orleans USA
Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center Kallithea Greece
Ospedale Luigi Sacco Milan Italy
Poznań University of Medical Sciences Poznań Poland
Princess of Wales Hospital Bridgend UK
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham UK
Royal Brompton Hospital London UK
Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Trust Cambridge UK
Rush University Medical Center Chicago USA
San Raffaele Scientific Institute Segrate Italy
Santa Maria Della Misericordia General Hospital Perugia Italy
School of Mdeicine Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland
School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin Madison USA
School of Medicine China Medical University Taichung Taiwan
Shanghai General Hospital Shanghai China
SOS Cardio Cardiology Hospital Center Florianópolis Brazil
Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket Canada
Sree Chitra Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology Thiruvananthapuram India
St Joseph's Heart Rhythm Center Rzeszów Poland
Steward St Elizabeth's Medical Center Boston USA
The John Paul 2 Hospital Krakow Poland
The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
UMass Memorial Health Cancer Center Worcester USA
Universitätsklinikum Ulm Ulm Germany
University Hospital Coventry Conventry UK
University Hospital Freiburg Freiburg Germany
University Hospital Germans Trias 1 Pujol Barcelona Spain
University Hospital Ghent Ghent Belgium
University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
University Hospital October 12 Madrid Spain
University Hospital of Poitiers Poitiers France
University Hospital of Rennes Rennes France
University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson USA
University of Arkansas Medical Sciences Little Rock USA
University of Calgary Calgary Canada
University of California San Diego Health System San Diego USA
University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha USA
University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill USA
University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh USA
University of Siena Siena Italy
University of Tours Tours France
University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City USA
West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu China
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Deshmukh P, Casavant DA, Romanyshyn M, Anderson K. Permanent, Direct His-Bundle Pacing. Circulation. 2000;101(8):869–877. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.8.869. PubMed DOI
Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, Xiao F, Zhou X, Ellenbogen KA. A Novel Pacing Strategy With Low and Stable Output: Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Immediately Beyond the Conduction Block. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(12):1736.e1–1736.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.013. PubMed DOI
Abdelrahman M, Subzposh FA, Beer D, Durr B, Naperkowski A, Sun H, … Vijayaraman P. Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018;71(20):2319–2330. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. PubMed
Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Herweg B, Wilson D, Singh R, Naperkowski A, … Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm, 2018;15(3):413–420. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.014. PubMed
Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Naperkowski A, Oren JW, Storm RH, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(2):305–312. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.021. PubMed DOI
Arnold AD, Shun-Shin MJ, Keene D, Howard JP, Sohaib SMA, Wright IJ, … Whinnett ZI. His Resynchronization Versus Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block. J Am College Cardiol, 2018;72(24):3112–3122. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.073. PubMed PMC
Upadhyay GA, Vijayaraman P, Nayak HM, Verma N, Dandamudi G, Sharma PS, … Investigators H-S. His Corrective Pacing or Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019;74(1):157–159. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.026. PubMed
Salden FCWM, Luermans JGLM, Westra SW, Weijs B, Engels EB, Heckman LIB, … Vernooy K. Short-Term Hemodynamic and Electrophysiological Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization by Left Ventricular Septal Pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020;75(4):347–359. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.040. PubMed
Huang W, Wu S, Vijayaraman P, Su L, Chen X, Cai B, … Tung R. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol, 2020;6(7):849–858. 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.011. PubMed
Vijayaraman P, Ponnusamy S, Cano Ó, Sharma PS, Naperkowski A, Subsposh FA, … Jastrzebski M. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol, 2020. 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.015. PubMed
Barakat AF, Inashvili A, Alkukhun L, Shalaby AA, Wang NC, Bhonsale A, … Kancharla K. Use Trends and Adverse Reports of SelectSecure 3830 Lead Implantations in the United States: Implications for His Bundle Pacing. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2020;13(7). 10.1161/circep.120.008577. PubMed
Beer D, Dandamudi G, Mandrola JM, Friedman PA, Vijayaraman P. His-bundle pacing: impact of social media. EP Europace. 2019;21(10):1445–1450. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz169. PubMed DOI
Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen S-A, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, … Skanes A. Worldwide Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety of Catheter Ablation for Human Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation, 2005;111(9):1100–1105. 10.1161/01.cir.0000157153.30978.67. PubMed
Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen S-A, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, … Biganzoli E. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2009;3(1):32–8. 10.1161/circep.109.859116. PubMed
List of Programs by Specialty. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), n.d.. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from https://apps.acgme-i.org/ads/Public/Reports/Report/1.
Padala SK, Ellenbogen KA. Left bundle branch pacing is the best approach to physiological pacing. Heart Rhythm O2. 2020;1(1):59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.03.002. PubMed DOI PMC
Medtronic SelectSecure Lead Model 3830. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Premarket Approval (PMA), n.d.. Retrieved July 20, 2021, from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?ID=422107.
Abbott Agilis HisPro Steerable Catheter With Electrodes. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. 510(k) Premarket Notification, n.d.. Retrieved July 20, 2021, from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K200721.
Ravi V, Baba ME, Sharma PS. His bundle pacing: Tips and tricks. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(1):26–34. doi: 10.1111/pace.14108. PubMed DOI
Left bundle branch area pacing via persistent superior vena cava: A case report