Palatal surface development from 6 years of age to early adulthood: data modelling using 3D geometric morphometrics
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36627532
DOI
10.1007/s00784-023-04857-y
PII: 10.1007/s00784-023-04857-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Central European population, Geometric morphometrics, Healthy palatal development, Modelled palatal growth, Palatal variability, Sexual dimorphism,
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- obličej * MeSH
- patro * MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The study followed the modelling of postnatal growth of a healthy palate of the Central European (Czech) population sample based on transverse data on sex and age from 6 to 19 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digitised 3D models of 212 healthy palatal surfaces were evaluated using 3D geometric morphometrics and superimpositions. The individuals were grouped based on age (preschool, younger and older school age, younger and older adolescents, young adults) and sex (♂ n = 101, ♀ n = 111). RESULTS: Female palatal development was non-linear and was interrupted between the 10-12 years and then proceeded intensively until the age of 15 when it ceased. In contrast, male-modelled growth was consistent throughout the follow-up and continued linearly until at least 19 years of age. The palate did not widen further with increasing age, and primarily palatal vaulting and heightening were found. The characteristics and distribution of areas with extensive modelled growth changes were comparable in females and males, as confirmed by the location of principal components (PC1 and PC2) within modal space and growth trajectories. The extent of sexual dimorphism increased from 15 years of age due to pubertal spurt combined with earlier completion of palatal development in females. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed modelled healthy palatal development from 6 years of age to early adulthood, which might be utilised as reference standards for the Central European population sample. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The comparison of normal reference subjects with patients with cranio-maxillo-facial dysmorphologies represents the first step in diagnosing and establishing effective therapy.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bush JO, Jiang R (2012) Palatogenesis: morphogenetic and molecular mechanisms of secondary palate development. Development 139:231–243. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.067082 PubMed DOI PMC
Meng L, Torensma R (2009) Palatogenesis and cleft palate. J Dent Res 88:22–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034508327868 PubMed DOI
Cakan DG, Ulkur F, Taner TU (2012) The genetic basis of facial skeletal characteristics and its relation with orthodontics. Eur J Dent 6:340–345 PubMed DOI PMC
Melsen B (1975) Palatal growth studied on human autopsy material. A histologic microradiographic study. Am J Orthod 68:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90158-x PubMed DOI
Latham RA (1971) The development, structure and growth pattern of the human mid-palatal suture. J Anat 108:31–41 PubMed PMC
Sillman JH (1964) Dimensional changes of the dental arches: longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 50:824–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(64)90040-5 DOI
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A (1997) Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(97)80022-4 PubMed DOI
Knott VB (1972) Longitudinal study of dental arch widths at four stages of dentition. Angle Orthod 42:387–394. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1972)042<0387:LSODAW>2.0.CO;2 PubMed DOI
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A (1998) Arch length changes from 6 weeks to 45 years. Angle Orthod 68:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0069:ALCFWT>2.3.CO;2 PubMed DOI
Burdi AR, Silvey RG (1969) Sexual differences in closure of the human palatal shelves. Cleft Palate J 6:1–7 PubMed
Fraser FC (1970) The genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate. Am J Hum Genet 22:336–352 PubMed PMC
Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůžek J (2010) Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. HOMO 61:16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.004 PubMed DOI
Santos C, Caldas IM (2012) Palatal rugae pattern in a Portuguese population: a preliminary analysis. J Forensic Sci 57:786–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02016.x PubMed DOI
Chovalopoulou M-E, Valakos ED, Manolis SK (2013) Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of the palate and cranial base. Anthropol Anz 70:407–425. https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-5548/2013/0363 PubMed DOI
Diewert VM (1983) A morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth and changes in spatial relations during secondary palatal development in human embryos and fetuses. Am J Anat 167:495–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001670407 PubMed DOI
Schoen C, Aschrafi A, Thonissen M et al (2017) MicroRNAs in palatogenesis and cleft palate. Front Physiol 8:165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00165 PubMed DOI PMC
Smahel Z, Trefný P, Formánek P et al (2003) Three-dimensional morphology of the palate in subjects with isolated cleft palate at the stage of permanent dentition. Cleft palate-craniofacial J Off Publ Am Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Assoc 40:577–584. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_2003_040_0577_tmotpi_2.0.co_2 DOI
Ciusa V, Dimaggio FR, Sforza C, Ferrario VF (2007) Three-dimensional palatal development between 3 and 6 years. Angle Orthod 77:602–606. https://doi.org/10.2319/053106-221 PubMed DOI
Hutton TJ, Buxton BF, Hammond P (2001) Dense surface models of the human face. IEEE Comput Soc, pp 153–160
Cramon-Taubadel von N, Frazier CB, Mirazón Lahr M (2007) The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications. Am J Phys Anthropol 134:24–35 DOI
Dupej J, Krajíček V, Velemínská J, Pelikán J (2014) Statistical mesh shape analysis with nonlandmark nonrigid registration. J WSCG 20:2–3
Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM (2005) How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput Stat Data Anal 49:974–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.015 DOI
Dadáková M, Caganova V, Dupej J et al (2016) Three-dimensional evaluation of facial morphology in pre-school cleft patients following neonatal cheiloplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 44:1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.023 PubMed DOI
Björk A, Skieller V (1974) Growth in width of the maxilla studied by the implant method. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 8:26–33. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317409084367 PubMed DOI
Primozic J, Perinetti G, Zhurov A et al (2012) Assessment of facial asymmetry in growing subjects with a three-dimensional laser scanning system. Orthod Craniofac Res 15:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2012.01550.x PubMed DOI
Lammert A, Proctor M, Narayanan S (2013) Morphological variation in the adult hard palate and posterior pharyngeal wall. J Speech Lang Hear Res 56:521–530. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0059) PubMed DOI
Kim S-J, Donovan DM, Blanchard SB et al (2008) The relationship between acute otitis media and the anatomic form of the hard palate. Pediatr Dent 30:9–14 PubMed
Bejdová S, Krajicek V, Peterka M et al (2012) Variability in palatal shape and size in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate assessed using dense surface model construction and 3D geometric morphometrics. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2011.04.013 PubMed DOI
Rusková H, Bejdova S, Peterka M et al (2014) 3-D shape analysis of palatal surface in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:e140–e147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.07.011 PubMed DOI
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Schmitz JH (1998) Facial volume changes during normal human growth and development. Anat Rec 250:480–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199804)250:4<480::AID-AR12>3.0.CO;2-K PubMed DOI
Jelínek R, Peterka M, Dostál M (1983) Rozštěp rtu a patra v obraze experimentu. Univerzita Karlova, Praha
Savoldi F, Wong KK, Yeung AWK et al (2022) Midpalatal suture maturation staging using cone beam computed tomography in patients aged between 9 to 21 years. Sci Rep 12:4318. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08293-y PubMed DOI PMC
Persson M, Thilander B (1977) Palatal suture closure in man from 15 to 35 years of age. Am J Orthod 72:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90123-3 PubMed DOI
Šmahel Z (2001) Principy, teorie a metody auxologie. Karolinum
Langford RJ, Sgouros S, Natarajan K et al (2003) Maxillary volume growth in childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1591–1597. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000057971.87632.37 PubMed DOI
Ursi WJ, Trotman CA, McNamara JAJ, Behrents RG (1993) Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth. Angle Orthod 63:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1993)063<0047:SDINCG>2.0.CO;2 PubMed DOI