Reliability assessment of ultrasound muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results of a multicenter international web-based study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36733934
PubMed Central
PMC9886677
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2022.1090468
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- muscle echogenicity, musculoskeletal ultrasound, reliability, rheumatic diseases, sarcopenia,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the inter/intra-reliability of ultrasound (US) muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Forty-two rheumatologists and 2 radiologists from 13 countries were asked to assess US muscle echogenicity of quadriceps muscle in 80 static images and 20 clips from 64 patients with different rheumatic diseases and 8 healthy subjects. Two visual scales were evaluated, a visual semi-quantitative scale (0-3) and a continuous quantitative measurement ("VAS echogenicity," 0-100). The same assessment was repeated to calculate intra-observer reliability. US muscle echogenicity was also calculated by an independent research assistant using a software for the analysis of scientific images (ImageJ). Inter and intra reliabilities were assessed by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and correlations through Kendall's Tau and Pearson's Rho coefficients. RESULTS: The semi-quantitative scale showed a moderate inter-reliability [PABAK = 0.58 (0.57-0.59)] and a substantial intra-reliability [PABAK = 0.71 (0.68-0.73)]. The lowest inter and intra-reliability results were obtained for the intermediate grades (i.e., grade 1 and 2) of the semi-quantitative scale. "VAS echogenicity" showed a high reliability both in the inter-observer [ICC = 0.80 (0.75-0.85)] and intra-observer [ICC = 0.88 (0.88-0.89)] evaluations. A substantial association was found between the participants assessment of the semi-quantitative scale and "VAS echogenicity" [ICC = 0.52 (0.50-0.54)]. The correlation between these two visual scales and ImageJ analysis was high (tau = 0.76 and rho = 0.89, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this large, multicenter study highlighted the overall good inter and intra-reliability of the US assessment of muscle echogenicity in patients with different rheumatic diseases.
CEMIC Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Médicas Norberto Quirno Buenos Aires Argentina
Centre for Experimental Medicine Queen's University Belfast Belfast United Kingdom
Department of Internal Medicine Ospedale Madonna del Soccorso San Benedetto del Tronto Marche Italy
Department of Paediatric and Adult Rheumatology University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia
Department of Radiology A O Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord Pesaro Italy
Department of Radiology Ospedali Riuniti Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona Italy
Department of Rheumatology Centro Hospitalar de Leiria Leiria Portugal
Department of Rheumatology Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra Coimbra Portugal
Department of Rheumatology Colentina Clinical Hospital Bucharest Romania
Department of Rheumatology Hokkaido Medical Center for Rheumatic Diseases Sapporo Japan
Department of Rheumatology Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj Napoca Romania
Department of Rheumatology Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust Liverpool United Kingdom
Department of Rheumatology University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova Craiova Romania
Division of Rheumatology Fundación Hospital San Pedro Pasto Colombia
Epidemiology Unit Italian Society of Rheumatology Milan Italy
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo SP Brazil
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina
Hospital Provincial Rheumatology Rosario Argentina
IPS Servicio Integral de Reumatología e Inmunología Doctor Orlando Villota Pasto Colombia
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom
Local Health Unit Orosei NU Italy
Local Health Unit Samugheo OR Italy
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa ON Canada
Rheumatology Unit Department of Emergency and Organ Transplants University of Bari Bari Italy
Rheumatology Unit Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica Buenos Aires Argentina
Rheumatology Unit IRCCS Policlinico S Orsola Malpighi Bologna Italy
Rheumatology Unit University Clinic AOU Cagliari Monserrato CA Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Cruz-Jentoft A, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Writing group for the European working group on sarcopenia in older people 2 (EWGSOP2), and the extended group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. (2019) 48:16–31. 10.1093/ageing/afy169 PubMed DOI PMC
Chen L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Chou M, Iijima K, et al. Asian working group for sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2020) 21:300–7.e2. 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012 PubMed DOI
Cesari M, Landi F, Vellas B, Bernabei R, Marzetti E. Sarcopenia and physical frailty: two sides of the same coin. Front Aging Neurosci. (2014) 6:192. 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00192 PubMed DOI PMC
Shin A, Choi S, Han M, Ha Y, Lee Y, Lee E, et al. Association between sarcopenia defined as low lean mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comorbidities of rheumatoid arthritis: results of a nationwide cross-sectional health examination. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2022) 57:152090. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152090 PubMed DOI
Therakomen V, Petchlorlian A, Lakananurak N. Prevalence and risk factors of primary sarcopenia in community-dwelling outpatient elderly: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:19551. 10.1038/s41598-020-75250-y PubMed DOI PMC
An H, Tizaoui K, Terrazzino S, Cargnin S, Lee K, Nam S, et al. Sarcopenia in autoimmune and rheumatic diseases: a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:5678. 10.3390/ijms21165678 PubMed DOI PMC
Salaffi F, Di Matteo A, Farah S, Di Carlo M. Inflammaging and frailty in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases: how to address and score the issue. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2022) 21. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1007/s12016-022-08943-z PubMed DOI PMC
Tagliafico A, Bignotti B, Torri L, Rossi F. Sarcopenia: how to measure, when and why. Radiol Med. (2022) 127:228–37. 10.1007/s11547-022-01450-3 PubMed DOI PMC
Ticinesi A, Meschi T, Narici M, Lauretani F, Maggio M. Muscle ultrasound and sarcopenia in older individuals: a clinical perspective. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2017) 18:290–300. 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.013 PubMed DOI
Salaffi F, Carotti M, Di Matteo A, Ceccarelli L, Farah S, Villota-Eraso C, et al. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic tools for sarcopenia in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs). Radiol Med. (2022) 127:1277–91. 10.1007/s11547-022-01560-y PubMed DOI PMC
Reeves N, Maganaris C, Narici M. Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2004) 91:116–8. 10.1007/s00421-003-0961-9 PubMed DOI
Thomaes T, Thomis M, Onkelinx S, Coudyzer W, Cornelissen V, Vanhees L, et al. Reliability and validity of the ultrasound technique to measure the rectus femoris muscle diameter in older CAD-patients. BMC Med Imaging. (2012) 12:7. 10.1186/1471-2342-12-7 PubMed DOI PMC
Abe T, Loenneke J, Young K, Thiebaud R, Nahar V, Hollaway K, et al. Validity of ultrasound prediction equations for total and regional muscularity in middle-aged and older men and women. Ultrasound Med Biol. (2015) 41:557–64. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.007 PubMed DOI
Martin D, Medri M, Chow R, Oxorn V, Leekam R, Agur AM, et al. Comparing human skeletal muscle architectural parameters of cadavers with in vivo ultrasonographic measurements. J Anat. (2001) 199:429–34. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19940429.x PubMed DOI PMC
Kellis E, Galanis N, Natsis K, Kapetanos G. Validity of architectural properties of the hamstring muscles: correlation of ultrasound findings with cadaveric dissection. J Biomech. (2009) 42:2549–54. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.011 PubMed DOI
Perkisas S, Bastijns S, Baudry S, Bauer J, Beaudart C, Beckwée D, et al. Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: 2020 SARCUS update. Eur Geriatr Med. (2021) 12:45–59. 10.1007/s41999-020-00433-9 PubMed DOI
Albano D, Messina C, Vitale J, Sconfienza L. Imaging of sarcopenia: old evidence and new insights. Eur Radiol. (2020) 30:2199–208. PubMed
Chianca V, Albano D, Messina C, Gitto S, Ruffo G, Guarino S, et al. Sarcopenia: imaging assessment and clinical application. Abdom Radiol. (2021) 23:1–12. 10.1007/s00261-021-03294-3 PubMed DOI PMC
Perkisas S, Baudry S, Bauer J, Beckwée D, De Cock A, Hobbelen H, et al. Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: towards standardized measurements. Eur Geriatr Med. (2018) 9:739–57. 10.1007/s41999-018-0104-9 PubMed DOI
Albayda J, van Alfen N. Diagnostic value of muscle ultrasound for myopathies and myositis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. (2020) 22:82. 10.1007/s11926-020-00947-y PubMed DOI PMC
Giovannini S, Brau F, Forino R, Berti A, D’Ignazio F, Loreti C, et al. Sarcopenia: diagnosis and management, state of the art and contribution of ultrasound. J Clin Med. (2021) 10:5552. 10.3390/jcm10235552 PubMed DOI PMC
Yoshida T, Kumon Y, Takamatsu N, Nozaki T, Inoue M, Nodera H, et al. Ultrasound assessment of sarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. (2021) 13:roab049. 10.1093/mr/roab049 PubMed DOI
Sari A, Esme M, Aycicek G, Armagan B, Kilic L, Ertenli A, et al. Evaluating skeletal muscle mass with ultrasound in patients with systemic sclerosis. Nutrition. (2021) 84:110999. 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110999 PubMed DOI
Kaya A, Kara M, Tiftik T, Tezcan M, Ozel S, Ersöz M, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the muscle architecture in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. (2013) 32:1155–60. PubMed
Smerilli G, Castell S, Cipolletta E, Farah S, Carotti M, Salaffi F, et al. Ultrasound measurement of muscle thickness at the proximal forearm in a rheumatologic setting. Clin Exp Rheumatol. (2020) 38:985–8. PubMed
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Romero-Yuste S, Chamizo Carmona E, Nolla J. Sarcopenia, immune-mediated rheumatic diseases, and nutritional interventions. Aging Clin Exp Res. (2021) 33:2929–39. 10.1007/s40520-021-01800-7 PubMed DOI PMC
Di Matteo A, Smerilli G, Cipolletta E, Wakefield R, De Angelis R, Risa A, et al. Muscle involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: multimodal ultrasound assessment and relationship with physical performance. Rheumatology. (2022) 25:keac196. 10.1093/rheumatology/keac196 PubMed DOI
Di Matteo A, Cipolletta E, Destro Castaniti G, Smerilli G, Airoldi C, Aydin S, et al. Reliability assessment of the definition of ultrasound enthesitis in SpA: results of a large, multicentre, international web-based study. Rheumatology. (2022) 16:keac162. PubMed
Smerilli G, Cipolletta E, Tanimura S, Di Battista J, Di Carlo M, Carotti M, et al. Ultrasound measurement of muscle thickness at the anterior thigh level in rheumatology setting: a reliability study. Clin Rheumatol. (2020) 40:1055–60. PubMed
Schneider C, Rasband W, Eliceiri K. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. (2012) 9:671–5. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 PubMed DOI PMC
Landis J, Koch G. An application of hierarchcal k-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. (1977) 33:363–74. 10.2307/2529786 PubMed DOI
Heckmatt J, Leeman S, Dubowitz V. Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of muscle disease. J Pediatr. (1982) 101:656–60. 10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80286-2 PubMed DOI
Buckinx F, Landi F, Cesari M, Fielding R, Visser M, Engelke K, et al. Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. (2018) 9:269–78. 10.1002/jcsm.12268 PubMed DOI PMC
Wijntjes J, van Alfen N. Muscle ultrasound: present state and future opportunities. Muscle Nerve. (2021) 63:455–66. 10.1002/mus.27081 PubMed DOI PMC
Casey P, Alasmar M, McLaughlin J, Ang Y, McPhee J, Heire P, et al. The current use of ultrasound to measure skeletal muscle and its ability to predict clinical outcomes: a systematic review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. (2022) 13:2298–309. 10.1002/jcsm.13041 PubMed DOI PMC
Paramalingam S, Morgan K, Becce F, Diederichsen L, Ikeda K, Mandl P, et al. Conventional ultrasound and elastography as imaging outcome tools in autoimmune myositis: a systematic review by the OMERACT ultrasound group. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2021) 51:661–76. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.11.001 PubMed DOI
Pillen S, van Alfen N. Skeletal muscle ultrasound. Neurol Res. (2011) 33:1016–24. 10.1179/1743132811Y.0000000010 PubMed DOI