Educational Psychology Aspects of Learning with Chatbots without Artificial Intelligence: Suggestions for Designers
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36826206
PubMed Central
PMC9955713
DOI
10.3390/ejihpe13020022
PII: ejihpe13020022
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- HCI, chatbot, chatbot without AI, design through research, dialogue, dialogue systems, e-learning, information literacy,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Chatbots without artificial intelligence can play the role of practical and easy-to-implement learning objects in e-learning environments, allowing a reduction in social or psychological isolation. This research, with a sample of 79 students, explores the principles that need to be followed in designing this kind of chatbot in education in order to ensure an acceptable outcome for students. Research has shown that students interacting with a chatbot without artificial intelligence expect similar psychological and communicative responses to those of a live human, project the characteristics of the chatbot from the dialogue, and are taken aback when the chatbot does not understand or cannot help them sufficiently. The study is based on a design through research approach, in which students in information studies and library science interacted with a specific chatbot focused on information retrieval, and recorded their experiences and feelings in an online questionnaire. The study intends to find principles for the design of chatbots without artificial intelligence so that students feel comfortable interacting with them.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Nambiar D. The Impact of Online Learning during COVID-19: Students’ and Teachers’ Perspective. Int. J. Indian Psychol. 2020;8:783–793. doi: 10.25215/0802.094. DOI
Paudel P. Online Education: Benefits, Challenges and Strategies during and after COVID-19 in Higher Education. Int. J. Stud. Educ. 2021;3:70–85. doi: 10.46328/ijonse.32. DOI
Adnan M., Anwar K. Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Perspectives. Online Submiss. 2020;2:45–51. doi: 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309. DOI
Bao W. COVID-19 and Online Teaching in Higher Education: A Case Study of Peking University. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2020;2:113–115. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191. PubMed DOI PMC
Toader T., Safta M., Titirișcă C., Firtescu B. Effects of Digitalisation on Higher Education in a Sustainable Development Framework—Online Learning Challenges during the COVID-19 Pandemic; Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference; Hong, Kong, China. 9–13 June 2018; pp. 895–906. DOI
Castro M.D.B., Tumibay G.M. A Literature Review: Efficacy of Online Learning Courses for Higher Education Institution Using Meta-Analysis. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021;26:1367–1385. doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z. DOI
Duraku Z.H., Hoxha L. The Impact of COVID-19 on Education and on the Well-Being of Teachers, Parents, and Students: Challenges Related to Remote (Online) Learning and Opportunities for Advancing the Quality of Education. 2020. [(accessed on 1 January 2023)]. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zamira-Hyseni-Duraku-2/publication/341297812_The_impact_of_COVID-19_on_education_and_on_the_well-being_of_teachers_parents_and_students_Challenges_related_to_remote_online_learning_and_opportunities_for_advancing_the_quality_of_education/links/61082c46169a1a0103d425b9/The-impact-of-COVID-19-on-education-and-on-the-well-being-of-teachers-parents-and-students-Challenges-related-to-remote-online-learning-and-opportunities-for-advancing-the-quality-of-education.pdf.
Butnaru G.I., Haller A.-P., Dragolea L.-L., Anichiti A., Hârșan G.-D.T. Students’ Wellbeing during Transition from Onsite to Online Education: Are There Risks Arising from Social Isolation? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:9665. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189665. PubMed DOI PMC
Al-Maroof R., Al-Qaysi N., Salloum S.A., Al-Emran M. Blended Learning Acceptance: A Systematic Review of Information Systems Models. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 2021;27:891–926. doi: 10.1007/s10758-021-09519-0. DOI
Müller C., Mildenberger T. Facilitating Flexible Learning by Replacing Classroom Time with an Online Learning Environment: A Systematic Review of Blended Learning in Higher Education. Educ. Res. Rev. 2021;34:100394. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100394. DOI
Howell E. HyFlex Model of Higher Education: Understanding the Promise of Flexibility. Horiz. Int. J. Learn. 2022;30:173–181. doi: 10.1108/OTH-04-2022-0019. DOI
Ismail I.I., Abdelkarim A., Al-Hashel J.Y. Physicians’ Attitude towards Webinars and Online Education amid COVID-19 Pandemic: When Less Is More. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:0250241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250241. PubMed DOI PMC
Gegenfurtner A., Ebner C. Webinars in higher education and professional training: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Educ. Res. Rev. 2019;28:100293. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100293. DOI
Smutny P., Schreiberova P. Chatbots for Learning: A Review of Educational Chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Comput. Educ. 2020;151:103862. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862. DOI
Duncker D. Chatting with Chatbots: Sign Making in Text-Based Human-Computer Interaction. Sign Syst. Stud. 2020;48:79–100. doi: 10.12697/SSS.2020.48.1.05. DOI
Xu Y., Wang D., Collins P., Lee H., Warschauer M. Same Benefits, Different Communication Patterns: Comparing Children’s Reading with a Conversational Agent vs. a Human Partner. Comput. Educ. 2021;161:104059. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104059. DOI
Tamayo P.A., Herrero A., Martín J., Navarro C., Tránchez J.M. Design of a Chatbot as a Distance Learning Assistant. Open Prax. 2020;12:145–153. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1063. DOI
Vázquez-Cano E., Mengual-Andrés S., López-Meneses E. Chatbot to Improve Learning Punctuation in Spanish and to Enhance Open and Flexible Learning Environments. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2021;18:1–20. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00269-8. DOI
Abd-Alrazaq A.A., Alajlani M., Alalwan A.A., Bewick B.M., Gardner P., Househ M. An Overview of the Features of Chatbots in Mental Health: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2019;132:103978. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103978. PubMed DOI
Brandtzaeg P.B., Følstad A. Why People Use Chatbots; Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet Science; Thessaloniki, Greece. 22–24 November 2017; Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. pp. 377–392. DOI
Dale R. The Return of the Chatbots. Nat. Lang. Eng. 2016;22:811–817. doi: 10.1017/S1351324916000243. DOI
Jain M., Kumar P., Kota R., Patel S.N. Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots; Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference; Hong, Kong, China. 9–13 June 2018; pp. 895–906.
Reyes-Reina D., Vilaça L., Spolidorio S., Martins M. El desarrollo sociotécnico de un chatbot o ¿Cómo se construye una caja negra? Rev. Tecnol. Soc. 2019;16:23–40. doi: 10.3895/rts.v16n39.10213. DOI
Cheng Y., Jiang H. Customer–Brand Relationship in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Understanding the Role of Chatbot Marketing Efforts. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2021;31:252–264. doi: 10.1108/JPBM-05-2020-2907. DOI
Kushwaha A.K., Kar A.K. MarkBot–a Language Model-Driven Chatbot for Interactive Marketing in Post-Modern World. Inf. Syst. Front. 2021:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10184-y. DOI
Tsai W.S., Lun D., Carcioppolo N., Chuan C. Human versus Chatbot: Understanding the Role of Emotion in Health Marketing Communication for Vaccines. Psychol. Mark. 2021;38:2377–2392. doi: 10.1002/mar.21556. PubMed DOI PMC
Lim S.M., Shiau C.W.C., Cheng L.J., Lau Y. Chatbot-Delivered Psychotherapy for Adults With Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression. Behav. Ther. 2021;53:334–347. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.09.007. PubMed DOI
Clarizia F., De Santo M., Lombardi M., Santaniello D. E-Learning and Industry 4.0: A Chatbot for Training Employees; Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology; London, UK. 20–21 February 2020; Singapore: Springer; 2021. pp. 445–453. DOI
Khan S., Rabbani M.R. Artificial Intelligence and NLP-Based Chatbot for Islamic Banking and Finance. Int. J. Inf. Retr. Res. 2021;11:65–77. doi: 10.4018/IJIRR.2021070105. DOI
Kasthuri E., Balaji S. A Chatbot for Changing Lifestyle in Education; Proceedings of the 2021 Third International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV); Tirunelveli, India. 4–6 February 2022; New York, NY, USA: IEEE; 2021. pp. 1317–1322. DOI
Ji S., Yuan T. Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Online Learning: What Do Students and Tutors Say?; Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); Gammarth Tunisia. 28–31 March 2022; New York, NY, USA: IEEE; 2022. pp. 292–298. DOI
Ranjan R., López J.L., Lal K., Saxena S., Ranjan S. Adopting A New Hybrid Force Model: A Survey During Covid-19 In Indian Higher Education. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2021;16:169–185. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v16i16.23371. DOI
Lee Y.-C., Fu W.-T. Supporting Peer Assessment in Education with Conversational Agents; Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces: Companion; Los Angeles, CA, USA. 16–20 March 2019; pp. 7–8. DOI
Liu C.-C., Liao M.-G., Chang C.-H., Lin H.-M. An Analysis of Children’interaction with an AI Chatbot and Its Impact on Their Interest in Reading. Comput. Educ. 2022;189:104576. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104576. DOI
Gupta S., Chen Y. Supporting Inclusive Learning Using Chatbots? A Chatbot-Led Interview Study. [(accessed on 24 January 2023)];J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 2022 33:98–108. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol33/iss1/11.
Chen Y.-T.R., Kuo C.-L.P. Applying the Smartphone-Based Chatbot in Clinical Nursing Education. Nurse Educ. 2022;47:29. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001131. PubMed DOI
Leavitt C., Corbin M., Keith M., Schuetzler R., Anderson G., Kettles D. A Chatbot Tutor Can Lessen the Gender Confidence Gap in Information Systems Learning 2022; Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Maui, HI, USA. 3–8 January 2022; pp. 1002–1011.
Ouatu B.-I., Gifu D. Ludic, Co-design and Tools Supporting Smart Learning Ecosystems and Smart Education. Springer; Singapore: 2021. Chatbot, the Future of Learning? pp. 263–268. DOI
Neumann A.T., Arndt T., Köbis L., Meissner R., Martin A., de Lange P., Pengel N., Klamma R., Wollersheim H.-W. Chatbots as a Tool to Scale Mentoring Processes: Individually Supporting Self-Study in Higher Education. Front. Artif. Intell. 2021;4:668220. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.668220. PubMed DOI PMC
Wollny S., Schneider J., Di Mitri D., Weidlich J., Rittberger M., Drachsler H. Are We There yet? A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education. Front. Artif. Intell. 2021;4:654924. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.654924. PubMed DOI PMC
Co M., Yuen T.H.J., Cheung H.H. Using Clinical History Taking Chatbot Mobile App for Clinical Bedside Teachings—A Prospective Case Control Study. Heliyon. 2022;8:09751. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09751. PubMed DOI PMC
Procter M., Heller R., Lin F. Classifying Interaction Behaviors of Students and Conversational Agents through Dialog Analysis; Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems; Montreal, QC, Canada. 11–15 June 2018; Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018. pp. 373–379. DOI
Neto A.J.M., Fernandes M.A. Chatbot and Conversational Analysis to Promote Collaborative Learning in Distance Education; Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT); Maceió, Brazil. 15–18 July 2019; New York, NY, USA: IEEE; 2019. pp. 324–326. DOI
Kuhail M.A., Alturki N., Alramlawi S., Alhejori K. Interacting with Educational Chatbots: A Systematic Review. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023;28:973–1018. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3. DOI
Syahidah R., Hanum I., Adiba S. A Descriptive-Comparative Study between Offline and Online Information Literacy Programs at University Level Jakarta, Indonesia; Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Library and Information Science (ICLIS): Linking, Informing, Sharing; Taipei, Taiwan. 11–13 July 2019; Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University; 2019. [(accessed on 1 January 2023)]. pp. 131–142. Available online: https://eprints.uai.ac.id/1826/
Mokmin N.A.M., Ibrahim N.A. The Evaluation of Chatbot as a Tool for Health Literacy Education among Undergraduate Students. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021;26:6033–6049. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10542-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Essel H.B., Vlachopoulos D., Tachie-Menson A., Johnson E.E., Baah P.K. The Impact of a Virtual Teaching Assistant (Chatbot) on Students’ Learning in Ghanaian Higher Education. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2022;19:57. doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6. DOI
Topal A.D., Eren C.D., Geçer A.K. Chatbot Application in a 5th Grade Science Course. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021;26:6241–6265. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10627-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Gazulla E.D., Martins L., Fernández-Ferrer M. Designing Learning Technology Collaboratively: Analysis of a Chatbot Co-Design. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2022. online ahead of print . PubMed DOI PMC
Hew K.F., Huang W., Du J., Jia C. Using Chatbots to Support Student Goal Setting and Social Presence in Fully Online Activities: Learner Engagement and Perceptions. J. Comput. High. Educ. 2022. online ahead of print . PubMed DOI PMC
Sriwisathiyakun K., Dhamanitayakul C. Enhancing Digital Literacy with an Intelligent Conversational Agent for Senior Citizens in Thailand. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2022;27:6251–6271. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10862-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Kumar J.A. Educational Chatbots for Project-Based Learning: Investigating Learning Outcomes for a Team-Based Design Course. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2021;18:65. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00302-w. PubMed DOI PMC
Abbas N., Whitfield J., Atwell E., Bowman H., Pickard T., Walker A. Online Chat and Chatbots to Enhance Mature Student Engagement in Higher Education. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 2022;41:308–326. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2022.2066213. DOI
Huang W., Hew K.F., Fryer L.K. Chatbots for Language Learning—Are They Really Useful? A Systematic Review of Chatbot-supported Language Learning. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2022;38:237–257. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12610. DOI
Herrmann-Werner A., Loda T., Junne F., Zipfel S., Mamlouk A.M. “Hello, My Name Is Melinda”—Students’ Views on a Digital Assistant for Navigation in Digital Learning Environments; A Qualitative Interview Study. Front. Educ. 2021;5:541839. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.541839. DOI
Dube T.V., Jacobs L. Academic Library Services Extension during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Considerations in Higher Education Institutions in the Gauteng Province, South Africa. Libr. Manag. 2022. ahead-of-publish. DOI
Mayr M. Virtuelle Auskunftsdienste an Der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek. Bibl. Forsch. Prax. 2014;38:266–271. doi: 10.1515/bfp-2014-0037. DOI
Rodriguez S., Mune C. Uncoding Library Chatbots: Deploying a New Virtual Reference Tool at the San Jose State University Library. Ref. Serv. Rev. 2022;50:392–405. doi: 10.1108/RSR-05-2022-0020. DOI
Lin W., Chen H.-C., Yueh H.-P. Using Different Error Handling Strategies to Facilitate Older Users’ Interaction With Chatbots in Learning Information and Communication Technologies. Front. Psychol. 2021;12:785815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785815. PubMed DOI PMC
Silva G.R.S., Canedo E.D. Towards User-Centric Guidelines for Chatbot Conversational Design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2022:1–23. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2118244. DOI
Sifaki E., Petousi V. Contextualizing harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from discourse analysis of scientific publications. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2020;23:149–174. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2020.115206. DOI
Floridi L. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. OUP Oxford; Oxford, UK: 2014.
Floridi L. The Philosophy of Information. OUP Oxford; Oxford, UK: 2013.
FAO . E-Learning Methodologies and Good Practices. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2021. DOI
Kowsher, Tithi F.S., Alam M.A., Huda M.N., Moheuddin M.M., Rosul G. Doly: Bengali Chatbot for Bengali Education; Proceedings of the 2019 1st International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Robotics Technology (ICASERT); Dhaka, Bangladesh. 3–5 May 2019; New York, NY, USA: IEEE; 2019. pp. 1–6. DOI
Clarizia F., Colace F., Lombardi M., Pascale F., Santaniello D. Chatbot: An Education Support System for Student; Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cyberspace Safety and Security; Amalfi, Italy. 29–31 October 2018; Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018. pp. 291–302. DOI
Dewey J. Art as Experience. Perigee Trade; New York, NY, USA: 1934.
Sanji M., Behzadi H., Gomroki G. Chatbot: An Intelligent Tool for Libraries. Libr. Hi Tech News. 2022;39:17–20. doi: 10.1108/LHTN-01-2021-0002. DOI
Murphy E., Rodríguez-Manzanares M.A. Teachers’ Perspectives on Motivation in High-School Distance Education. [(accessed on 24 January 2023)];Int. J. E-Learn. Distance Educ. Rev. Int. Du E-Learn. Et La Form. À Distance. 2009 23:1–24. Available online: https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/602.
Happy S.L., Dasgupta A., Patnaik P., Routray A. Automated Alertness and Emotion Detection for Empathic Feedback during E-Learning; Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e); Washington, DC, USA. 18–20 December 2013; New York, NY, USA: IEEE; 2013. pp. 47–50. DOI
Gaetano S., Barricelli B., Gaetano S., Diliberto P. Chatbots and Conversational Interfaces: Three Domains of Use; Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Cultures of Participation in the Digital Age; Castiglione della Pescaia, Italy. 29 May 2018; [(accessed on 1 January 2023)]. pp. 62–70. Available online: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2101/paper8.pdf.
Sarid A. Systematic Thinking on Dialogical Education. Educ. Philos. Theory. 2012;44:926–941. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00757.x. DOI
Scagnetti G. A dialogical model for studio critiques in design education. Des. J. 2017;20:781–791. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1353024. DOI
Liebrecht C., van Hooijdonk C. Creating Humanlike Chatbots: What Chatbot Developers Could Learn from Webcare Employees in Adopting a Conversational Human Voice; Proceedings of the International Workshop on Chatbot Research and Design; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 23–24 November 2019; Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019. pp. 51–64. DOI
Mygland M.J., Schibbye M., Pappas I.O., Vassilakopoulou P. Affordances in Human-Chatbot Interaction: A Review of the Literature; Proceedings of the Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society; Galway, Ireland. 1–3 September 2021; Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2021. pp. 3–17. DOI
Thompson T. Choose Your Own Murder: Non-Linear Narratives Enhance Student Understanding in Forensic Science Education. Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg. 2020;2:82–85. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.009. PubMed DOI PMC
Vanichvasin P. Chatbot Development as a Digital Learning Tool to Increase Students’ Research Knowledge. Int. Educ. Stud. 2021;14:44. doi: 10.5539/ies.v14n2p44. DOI
Jin E., Eastin M.S. Birds of a Feather Flock Together: Matched Personality Effects of Product Recommendation Chatbots and Users. JRIM. 2022. ahead-of-print . DOI
Chew H.S.J. The Use of Artificial Intelligence–Based Conversational Agents (Chatbots) for Weight Loss: Scoping Review and Practical Recommendations. JMIR Med. Inf. 2022;10:e32578. doi: 10.2196/32578. PubMed DOI PMC
Wilkinson D., Alkan Ö., Liao Q.V., Mattetti M., Vejsbjerg I., Knijnenburg B.P., Daly E. Why or Why Not? The Effect of Justification Styles on Chatbot Recommendations. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2021;39:1–21. doi: 10.1145/3441715. DOI
Wilcox B., Wilcox S. Making It Real: Loebner-Winning Chatbot Design. Arbor. 2013;189:a086. doi: 10.3989/arbor.2013.764n6009. DOI
Stuij S.M., Drossaert C.H.C., Labrie N.H.M., Hulsman R.L., Kersten M.J., van Dulmen S., Smets E.M.A. Developing a Digital Training Tool to Support Oncologists in the Skill of Information-Provision: A User Centred Approach. BMC Med. Educ. 2020;20:135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1985-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Chaves A.P., Doerry E., Egbert J., Gerosa M. It’s How You Say It: Identifying Appropriate Register for Chatbot Language Design; Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction; Kyoto, Japan. 6–10 October 2019; Kyoto, Japan: ACM; 2019. pp. 102–109.