OBJECTIVES: The young population requires early rehabilitation of their hearing loss for normal cognitive, auditive hence social development. All of which, in turn, may have an impact on quality of life (QoL). This study aims to evaluate QoL between two different bone conduction (BC) hearing devices: a noninvasive adhesive hearing aid (Adhear [ADH]) vs. an active transcutaneous implant (Bonebridge [BB]). METHODS: This study composed of 12 BB and 15 ADH users. Pure tone as well as speech in noise and quiet measurements were evaluated and compared to the Assessment in QoL questionnaire (AQoL-6d). RESULTS: Freefield results showed significant improvements for both devices compared to the unaided condition (p < .0001). Emphasis needs to be drawn on the different unaided level of conductive hearing loss as well as the indication range for both evaluated device groups: the ADH subjects exhibited a mean BC value of 9.50 ± 7.96 dB HL (the indication range up to 25 dB) and the BB subjects a mean of 23.33 ± 25.66 dB HL (the indication range up to 45 dB). Speech perception in quiet and in noise was significantly improved (p < .05; p < .001, respectively). QoL was significantly improved for both treatments (p < .05) but was not different among the devices, and the values were similar to their normal hearing, age, and sex-matched control group. High correlations were found between QoL utility scores and improved PTA4 in the aided condition (r 2 = .8839 and .7810 for BB and ADH, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results show that both devices offer significant beneficial audiological rehabilitations with significantly increased QoL. However, the underlying condition and the unaided degree of hearing loss, hence the required higher stimulation must be the deciding factor when opting for a hearing device, and this should be independent of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c.

Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic

Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Chen Y, Wong LLN. Speech perception in mandarin‐speaking children with cochlear implants: a systematic review. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(suppl 2):S7‐S16. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1300694 PubMed DOI

Blamey PJ, Sarant JZ, Paatsch LE, et al. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44(2):264‐285. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/022) PubMed DOI

Blamey PJ, Barry JG, Jacq P. Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44(1):73‐79. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/007) PubMed DOI

Schorr EA, Roth FP, Fox NA. Quality of life for children with cochlear implants: perceived benefits and problems and the perception of single words and emotional sounds. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52(1):141‐152. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0213) PubMed DOI

Ching TYC, Dillon H, Button L, et al. Age at intervention for permanent hearing loss and 5‐year language outcomes. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3). doi:10.1542/peds.2016-4274 PubMed DOI PMC

Ching TYC, Dillon H, Leigh G, Cupples L. Learning from the longitudinal outcomes of children with hearing impairment (LOCHI) study: summary of 5‐year findings and implications. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(suppl 2):S105‐S111. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1385865 PubMed DOI PMC

Cupples L, Ching TY, Button L, et al. Spoken language and everyday functioning in 5‐year‐old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(Suppl 2):S55‐S69. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1370140 PubMed DOI PMC

Wong CL, Ching TYC, Cupples L, et al. Psychosocial development in 5‐year‐old children with hearing loss using hearing aids or Cochlear implants. Trends Hear. 2017;21:2331216517710373. doi:10.1177/2331216517710373 PubMed DOI PMC

Moeller MP, Hoover B, Putman C, et al. Vocalizations of infants with hearing loss compared with infants with normal hearing: part I—phonetic development. Ear Hear. 2007;28(5):605‐627. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812564ab PubMed DOI

Fellinger J, Holzinger D, Sattel H, Laucht M. Mental health and quality of life in deaf pupils. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;17(7):414‐423. doi:10.1007/s00787-008-0683-y PubMed DOI

Kant A, Adhyaru M. Home auditory training program (HAP) for cochlear implantees and hearing impaired children using hearing aids‐an outcome of a three‐year research project. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;61(1):54‐58. doi:10.1007/s12070-009-0035-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Barker DH, Quittner AL, Fink NE, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA, Niparko JK. Predicting behavior problems in deaf and hearing children: the influences of language, attention, and parent‐child communication. Dev Psychopathol. 2009;21(2):373‐392. doi:10.1017/s0954579409000212 PubMed DOI PMC

Rance G, Barker EJ. Speech and language outcomes in children with auditory neuropathy/dys‐synchrony managed with either cochlear implants or hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2009;48(6):313‐320. doi:10.1080/14992020802665959 PubMed DOI

Stevenson J, McCann D, Watkin P, Worsfold S, Kennedy C. The relationship between language development and behaviour problems in children with hearing loss. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010;51(1):77‐83. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02124.x PubMed DOI

Benenson JF, Apostoleris NH, Parnass J. Age and sex differences in dyadic and group interaction. Dev Psychol. 1997;33(3):538‐543. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.33.3.538 PubMed DOI

Hyde M, Punch R. The modes of communication used by children with cochlear implants and the role of sign in their lives. Am Ann Deaf. 2011;155(5):535‐549. doi:10.1353/aad.2011.0006 PubMed DOI

Punch R, Hyde M. Social participation of children and adolescents with cochlear implants: a qualitative analysis of parent, teacher, and child interviews. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011;16(4):474‐493. doi:10.1093/deafed/enr001 PubMed DOI

Suarez M. Promoting social competence in deaf students: the effect of an intervention program. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2000;5(4):323‐333. doi:10.1093/deafed/5.4.323 PubMed DOI

Magele A, Schoerg P, Stanek B, Gradl B, Sprinzl GM. Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0221484. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221484 PubMed DOI PMC

Sprinzl GM, Schoerg P, Ploder M, Edlinger SH, Magele A. Surgical experience and early Audiological outcomes with new active transcutaneous bone conduction implant. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42(8):1208‐1215. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003230 PubMed DOI

Urik M, Hosnova D, Slapak I, et al. First experiences with a new adhesive bone conduction hearing device in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;126:109614. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109614 PubMed DOI

Dahm V, Traxler S, Liepins R, et al. Performance with an adhesive bone conduction device in active transcutaneous bone conduction implant users. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42(4):510‐516. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003045 PubMed DOI

Dahm V, Baumgartner WD, Liepins R, Arnoldner C, Riss D. First results with a new, pressure‐free, adhesive bone conduction hearing aid. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(6):748‐754. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001829 PubMed DOI

Dahm V, Auinger AB, Liepins R, Baumgartner WD, Riss D, Arnoldner C. A randomized cross‐over trial comparing a pressure‐free, adhesive to a conventional bone conduction hearing device. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(5):571‐577. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002184 PubMed DOI

Hawthorne G, Osborne R. Population norms and meaningful differences for the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) measure. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29(2):136‐142. doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.tb00063.x PubMed DOI

Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health‐related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(3):209‐224. doi:10.1023/a:1008815005736 PubMed DOI

Canale A, Boggio V, Albera A, et al. A new bone conduction hearing aid to predict hearing outcome with an active implanted device. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(8):2165‐2170. doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05450-4 PubMed DOI

Pantelemon C, Necula V, Berghe AS, et al. Neurodevelopmental aspects and cortical auditory maturation in children with Cochlear implants. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(7). doi:10.3390/medicina56070344 PubMed DOI PMC

Weiss R, Loth A, Leinung M, et al. A new adhesive bone conduction hearing system as a treatment option for transient hearing loss after middle ear surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(3):751‐759. doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05769-y PubMed DOI

Skarzynski PH, Ratuszniak A, Osinska K, et al. A comparative study of a novel adhesive bone conduction device and conventional treatment options for conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(7):858‐864. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002323 PubMed DOI PMC

Osborne MS, Child‐Hymas A, McDermott AL. Longitudinal study of use of the pressure free, adhesive bone conducting hearing system in children at a tertiary Centre. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;138:110307. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110307 PubMed DOI

Osborne MS, Child‐Hymas A, Gill J, Lloyd MS, McDermott AL. First pediatric experience with a novel, adhesive adapter retained, bone conduction hearing aid system. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(9):1199‐1207. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002363 PubMed DOI

Muzzi E, Gambacorta V, Lapenna R, et al. Audiological performance of ADHEAR Systems in simulated conductive hearing loss: a case series with a review of the existing literature. Audiol Res. 2021;11(4):537‐546. doi:10.3390/audiolres11040048 PubMed DOI PMC

Moteki H, Kitoh R, Usami SI. The availability of an adhesive bone conduction hearing device: a preliminary report of a single‐center experience. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020;140(4):319‐326. doi:10.1080/00016489.2019.1708969 PubMed DOI

Liu YJ, Yang JS, Chen PW, et al. Evaluation of adhesive bone conduction hearing aid in pediatric patients with unilateral congenital aural atresia. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021;56(9):936‐942. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20201013-00800 PubMed DOI

Liu Y, Zhao C, Yang J, et al. Audiological and subjective benefit with a new adhesive bone conduction hearing aid in children with congenital unilateral microtia and atresia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(9):4289‐4301. doi:10.1007/s00405-021-07168-8 PubMed DOI

Hirth D, Weiss R, Stover T, Kramer S. Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction with the ADHEAR hearing system in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(8):2781‐2788. doi:10.1007/s00405-020-06364-2 PubMed DOI

Favoreel A, Heuninck E, Mansbach AL. Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction of children with the ADHEAR audio processor and adhesive adapter. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;129:109729. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109729 PubMed DOI

Dobrev I, Farahmandi TS, Huber AM, Roosli C. Experimentelle Evaluation des Adhear, eines neuen transkutanen Knochenleitungshorgerats [Experimental evaluation of the Adhear, a novel transcutaneous bone conduction hearing aid]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2021;100(10):811‐817. doi:10.1055/a-1308-3888 PubMed DOI

Almuhawas F, Alzhrani F, Saleh S, Alsanosi A, Yousef M. Auditory performance and subjective satisfaction with the ADHEAR system. Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(1):1‐10. doi:10.1159/000507775 PubMed DOI

Zernotti ME, Alvarado E, Zernotti M, Claveria N, Di Gregorio MF. One‐year follow‐up in children with conductive hearing loss using ADHEAR. Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(6):435‐444. doi:10.1159/000514087 PubMed DOI

Mayr T, Magele A, Schoerg P, Sprinzl GM. Simultaneous bilateral bone bridge implantation in a two‐year‐old child with atresia of the external auditory canal: a case report. J Biotechnol Biomed. 2022;5:180‐186.

Polat F. Factors affecting psychosocial adjustment of deaf students. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2003;8(3):325‐339. doi:10.1093/deafed/eng018 PubMed DOI

Hoffman MF, Quittner AL, Cejas I. Comparisons of social competence in young children with and without hearing loss: a dynamic systems framework. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015;20(2):115‐124. doi:10.1093/deafed/enu040 PubMed DOI PMC

Sprinzl GM, Wolf‐Magele A. The Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016;41(2):131‐143. doi:10.1111/coa.12484 PubMed DOI

Sikolova S, Urik M, Hosnova D, et al. Two Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant generations: audiological benefit and quality of hearing in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(7):3387‐3398. doi:10.1007/s00405-021-07068-x PubMed DOI PMC