Predictive validity of the prognosis on admission aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage scale for the outcome of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

. 2023 Apr 25 ; 13 (1) : 6721. [epub] 20230425

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37185953
Odkazy

PubMed 37185953
PubMed Central PMC10130082
DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-33798-5
PII: 10.1038/s41598-023-33798-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

This multicentre prospective cohort study aimed to compare the accuracy of the PAASH, WFNS, and Hunt and Hess (H&H) scales in predicting the outcomes of adult patients with aneurysmal SAH presented to three central hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam, from August 2019 to June 2021. Of 415 eligible patients, 32.0% had a 90-day poor outcome, defined as an mRS score of 4 (moderately severe disability) to 6 (death). The PAASH, WFNS and H&H scales all have good discriminatory abilities for predicting the 90-day poor outcome. There were significant differences in the 90-day mean mRS scores between grades I and II (p = 0.001) and grades II and III (p = 0.001) of the PAASH scale, between grades IV and V (p = 0.026) of the WFNS scale, and between grades IV and V (p < 0.001) of the H&H scale. In contrast to a WFNS grade of IV-V and an H&H grade of IV-V, a PAASH grade of III-V was an independent predictor of the 90-day poor outcome. Because of the more clearly significant difference between the outcomes of the adjacent grades and the more strong effect size for predicting poor outcomes, the PAASH scale was preferable to the WFNS and H&H scales.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Lawton MT, Vates GE. Subarachnoid hemorrhage. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:257–266. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1605827. PubMed DOI

Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2017;389:655–666. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30668-7. PubMed DOI

Hop JW, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 1997;28:660–664. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.3.660. PubMed DOI

Stegmayr B, Eriksson M, Asplund K. Declining mortality from subarachnoid hemorrhage: Changes in incidence and case fatality from 1985 through 2000. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2004;35:2059–2063. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000138451.07853.b6. PubMed DOI

Mackey J, et al. Stable incidence but declining case-fatality rates of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a population. Neurology. 2016;87:2192–2197. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003353. PubMed DOI PMC

Huang J, van Gelder JM. The probability of sudden death from rupture of intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1101–1105. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200211000-00001. PubMed DOI

Lindbohm JV, Kaprio J, Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Korja M. Risk factors of sudden death from subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2017;48:2399–2404. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.018118. PubMed DOI

Abulhasan YB, Alabdulraheem N, Simoneau G, Angle MR, Teitelbaum J. Mortality after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: Causality and validation of a prediction model. World Neurosurg. 2018;112:e799–e811. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.160. PubMed DOI

Vergouwen MD, Jong-Tjien-Fa AV, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Time trends in causes of death after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A hospital-based study. Neurology. 2016;86:59–63. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002239. PubMed DOI

Roos YB, et al. Complications and outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: A prospective hospital based cohort study in the Netherlands. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2000;68:337–341. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.3.337. PubMed DOI PMC

Molyneux AJ, et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): Long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:427–433. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70080-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Wermer MJ, Greebe P, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Long-term mortality and vascular event risk after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2009;80:1399–1401. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.157586. PubMed DOI

Nieuwkamp DJ, et al. Excess mortality and cardiovascular events in patients surviving subarachnoid hemorrhage: A nationwide study in Sweden. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2011;42:902–907. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.602722. PubMed DOI

Korja M, et al. Cause-specific mortality of 1-year survivors of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2013;80:481–486. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fb5. PubMed DOI PMC

Koroknay-Pál P, et al. Long-term excess mortality in pediatric patients with cerebral aneurysms. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2012;43:2091–2096. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.650077. PubMed DOI

Connolly ES, Jr, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2012;43:1711–1737. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839. PubMed DOI

Schatlo B, et al. Incidence and outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: The Swiss study on subarachnoid hemorrhage (Swiss SOS) Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2021;52:344–347. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.029538. PubMed DOI

Mayer SA, et al. Global and domain-specific cognitive impairment and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2002;59:1750–1758. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000035748.91128.c2. PubMed DOI

Suarez JI. Diagnosis and management of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.) 2015;21:1263–1287. doi: 10.1212/con.0000000000000217. PubMed DOI

Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 1968;28:14–20. doi: 10.3171/jns.1968.28.1.0014. PubMed DOI

The World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) Committee Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. J. Neurosurg. 1988;68:985–986. PubMed

Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: A systematic review. Neurocrit. Care. 2005;2:110–118. doi: 10.1385/ncc:2:2:110. PubMed DOI

Lindsay KW, Teasdale GM, Knill-Jones RP. Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Neurosurg. 1983;58:57–62. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.1.0057. PubMed DOI

Degen LA, Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Interobserver variability of grading scales for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2011;42:1546–1549. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.601211. PubMed DOI

Oshiro EM, Walter KA, Piantadosi S, Witham TF, Tamargo RJ. A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: A comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a clinical series. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:140–147. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199707000-00029. PubMed DOI

Hirai S, Ono J, Yamaura A. Clinical grading and outcome after early surgery in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1996;39:441–446. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199609000-00002. PubMed DOI

Proust F, Hannequin D, Langlois O, Freger P, Creissard P. Causes of morbidity and mortality after ruptured aneurysm surgery in a series of 230 patients. The importance of control angiography. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 1995;26:1553–1557. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.9.1553. PubMed DOI

Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:959–968. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199805000-00001. PubMed DOI

Takagi K, et al. How should a subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale be determined? A combinatorial approach based solely on the Glasgow Coma Scale. J. Neurosurg. 1999;90:680–687. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.4.0680. PubMed DOI

van Heuven AW, Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Validation of a prognostic subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale derived directly from the Glasgow Coma Scale. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2008;39:1347–1348. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.107.498345. PubMed DOI

Luong CQ, et al. Clinical characteristics and factors relating to poor outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Vietnam: A multicenter prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0256150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256150. PubMed DOI PMC

van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 1988;19:604–607. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604. PubMed DOI

Juvela S. Risk factors for impaired outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Arch. Neurol. 1995;52:1193–1200. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540360071018. PubMed DOI

Prasad K, Menon GR. Comparison of the three strategies of verbal scoring of the Glasgow Coma Scale in patients with stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. (Basel, Switzerland) 1998;8:79–85. doi: 10.1159/000015822. PubMed DOI

Luong CQ, et al. Effectiveness of combined external ventricular drainage with intraventricular fibrinolysis for the treatment of intraventricular haemorrhage with acute obstructive hydrocephalus. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra. 2019;9:77–89. doi: 10.1159/000501530. PubMed DOI PMC

Gaberel T, et al. FIVHeMA: Intraventricular fibrinolysis versus external ventricular drainage alone in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial. Neurochirurgie. 2019;65:14–19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2018.11.004. PubMed DOI

Suarez JI, et al. Common Data elements for unruptured intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage clinical research: A national institute for neurological disorders and stroke and national library of medicine project. Neurocrit. Care. 2019;30:4–19. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00723-6. PubMed DOI

Moons KG, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 2015;162:W1–73. doi: 10.7326/m14-0698. PubMed DOI

Øie LR, et al. Incidence and case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted to hospital between 2008 and 2014 in Norway. Acta Neurochir. 2020;162:2251–2259. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04463-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Do SN, et al. Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Viet Nam: Multicentre prospective cohort study. Bull. World Health Organ. 2021;99:50–61. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.269837. PubMed DOI PMC

Dengler NF, Sommerfeld J, Diesing D, Vajkoczy P, Wolf S. Prediction of cerebral infarction and patient outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Comparison of new and established radiographic, clinical and combined scores. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018;25:111–119. doi: 10.1111/ene.13471. PubMed DOI

Sano H, et al. Modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system. World Neurosurg. 2015;83:801–807. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.032. PubMed DOI

Gotoh O, et al. Glasgow Coma Scale in the prediction of outcome after early aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery. 1996;39:19–24. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199607000-00005. PubMed DOI

Allison PD. Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociol. Methods Res. 1999;28:186–208. doi: 10.1177/0049124199028002003. DOI

Mood C. Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 2009;26:67–82. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp006. DOI

Gail MH, Wieand S, Piantadosi S. Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates. Biometrika. 1984;71:431–444. doi: 10.1093/biomet/71.3.431. DOI

Yatchew A, Griliches Z. Specification error in probit models. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1985;67:134–139. doi: 10.2307/1928444. DOI

Mroz TA, Zayats YV. Arbitrarily normalized coefficients, information sets, and false reports of “biases” in binary outcome models. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2008;90:406–413. doi: 10.1162/rest.90.3.406. DOI

Norton EC, Dowd BE. Log odds and the interpretation of logit models. Health Serv. Res. 2018;53:859–878. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12712. PubMed DOI PMC

Nieuwkamp DJ, et al. Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: A meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:635–642. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70126-7. PubMed DOI

Khan AU, et al. Impact of specialist neurovascular care in subarachnoid haemorrhage. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2015;133:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.006. PubMed DOI

Pickard JD, et al. Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction and outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage: British aneurysm nimodipine trial. BMJ. 1989;298:636–642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6674.636. PubMed DOI PMC

Molyneux AJ, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet (London, England) 2005;366:809–817. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5. PubMed DOI

Lord AS, et al. Effect of rebleeding on the course and incidence of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2012;78:31–37. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823ed0a4. PubMed DOI PMC

Rosengart AJ, Schultheiss KE, Tolentino J, Macdonald RL. Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke J. Cereb. Circ. 2007;38:2315–2321. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.107.484360. PubMed DOI

Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6:1–9. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198001000-00001. PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace