BACKGROUND: Evaluating the prognosis of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who may be at risk of poor outcomes using grading systems is one way to make a better decision on treatment for these patients. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), WFNS, and Hunt and Hess (H&H) Grading Scales in predicting the outcomes of patients with aSAH. METHODS: From August 2019 to June 2021, we conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study on adult patients with aSAH in three central hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam. The primary outcome was the 90-day poor outcome, measured by a score of 4 (moderately severe disability) to 6 (death) on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). We calculated the areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROCs) to determine how well the grading scales could predict patient prognosis upon admission. We also used ROC curve analysis to find the best cut-off value for each scale. We compared AUROCs using Z-statistics and compared 90-day mean mRS scores among intergrades using the pairwise multiple-comparison test. Finally, we used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the 90-day poor outcome. RESULTS: Of 415 patients, 32% had a 90-day poor outcome. The modified WFNS (AUROC: 0.839 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.795-0.883]; cut-off value≥2.50; PAUROC<0.001), WFNS (AUROC: 0.837 [95% CI: 0.793-0.881]; cut-off value≥3.5; PAUROC<0.001), and H&H scales (AUROC: 0.836 [95% CI: 0.791-0.881]; cut-off value≥3.5; PAUROC<0.001) were all good at predicting patient prognosis on day 90th after ictus. However, there were no significant differences between the AUROCs of these scales. Only grades IV and V of the modified WFNS (3.75 [standard deviation, SD: 2.46] vs 5.24 [SD: 1.68], p = 0.026, respectively), WFNS (3.75 [SD: 2.46] vs 5.24 [SD: 1.68], p = 0.026, respectively), and H&H scales (2.96 [SD: 2.60] vs 4.97 [SD: 1.87], p<0.001, respectively) showed a significant difference in the 90-day mean mRS scores. In multivariable models, with the same set of confounding variables, the modified WFNS grade of III to V (adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 9.090; 95% CI: 3.494-23.648; P<0.001) was more strongly associated with the increased risk of the 90-day poor outcome compared to the WFNS grade of IV to V (AOR: 6.383; 95% CI: 2.661-15.310; P<0.001) or the H&H grade of IV to V (AOR: 6.146; 95% CI: 2.584-14.620; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the modified WFNS, WFNS, and H&H scales all had good discriminatory abilities for the prognosis of patients with aSAH. Because of the better effect size in predicting poor outcomes, the modified WFNS scale seems preferable to the WFNS and H&H scales.

Center for Critical Care Medicine Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi Vietnam

Center for Emergency Medicine Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi Vietnam

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Hanoi Medical University Hanoi Vietnam

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy Thai Binh Vietnam

Department of Health Organization and Management Faculty of Public Health Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy Thai Binh Vietnam

Department of Neurosurgery 2 Neurosurgery Center Vietnam Germany Friendship Hospital Hanoi Vietnam

Department of Neurosurgery Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi Vietnam

Department of Nutrition and Food Safety Faculty of Public Health Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy Thai Binh Vietnam

Department of Radiology Hanoi Medical University Hanoi Vietnam

Department of Surgery Hanoi Medical University Hanoi Vietnam

Emergency and Critical Care Department Hanoi Medical University Hospital Hanoi Medical University Hanoi Vietnam

Emergency Department Agriculture General Hospital Hanoi Vietnam

Emergency Department Vietnam Czechoslovakia Friendship Hospital Hai Phong Vietnam

Faculty of Medicine University of Medicine and Pharmacy Vietnam National University Hanoi Vietnam

Radiology Centre Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi Vietnam

Stroke Center Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi Vietnam

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Lawton MT, Vates GE. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. The New England journal of medicine. 2017;377(3):257–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1605827 . PubMed DOI

Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2017;389(10069):655–66. Epub 2016/09/18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30668-7 . PubMed DOI

Suarez JI. Diagnosis and Management of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn). 2015;21(5 Neurocritical Care):1263–87. Epub 2015/10/02. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000217 . PubMed DOI

Connolly ES Jr., Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, Derdeyn CP, Dion J, Higashida RT, et al.. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2012;43(6):1711–37. Epub 05/03. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839 PubMed DOI

Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. Journal of neurosurgery. 1968;28(1):14–20. Epub 1968/01/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1968.28.1.0014 . PubMed DOI

The World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) Committee. Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. Journal of neurosurgery. 1988;68(6):985–6. Epub 1988/06/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.68.6.0985 . PubMed DOI

Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocritical care. 2005;2(2):110–8. Epub 2005/09/15. doi: 10.1385/NCC:2:2:110 . PubMed DOI

Lindsay KW, Teasdale GM, Knill-Jones RP. Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of neurosurgery. 1983;58(1):57–62. Epub 1983/01/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.1.0057 . PubMed DOI

Degen LA, Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Interobserver variability of grading scales for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2011;42(6):1546–9. Epub 2011/04/30. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601211 . PubMed DOI

Oshiro EM, Walter KA, Piantadosi S, Witham TF, Tamargo RJ. A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: a comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a clinical series. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(1):140–7; discussion 7–8. Epub 1997/07/01. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199707000-00029 . PubMed DOI

Hirai S, Ono J, Yamaura A. Clinical grading and outcome after early surgery in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1996;39(3):441–6; discussion 6–7. Epub 1996/09/01. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199609000-00002 . PubMed DOI

Proust F, Hannequin D, Langlois O, Freger P, Creissard P. Causes of morbidity and mortality after ruptured aneurysm surgery in a series of 230 patients. The importance of control angiography. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 1995;26(9):1553–7. Epub 1995/09/01. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.9.1553 . PubMed DOI

Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. A proposed comprehensive grading system to predict outcome for surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1998;42(5):959–68; discussion 68–70. Epub 1998/05/20. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199805000-00001 . PubMed DOI

Gotoh O, Tamura A, Yasui N, Suzuki A, Hadeishi H, Sano K. Glasgow Coma Scale in the prediction of outcome after early aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery. 1996;39(1):19–24; discussion -5. Epub 1996/07/01. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199607000-00005 . PubMed DOI

Sano H, Satoh A, Murayama Y, Kato Y, Origasa H, Inamasu J, et al.. Modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system. World neurosurgery. 2015;83(5):801–7. Epub 2014/12/24. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.032 . PubMed DOI

Asano T, Takakura K, Sano K, Kikuchi H, Nagai H, Saito I, et al.. Effects of a hydroxyl radical scavenger on delayed ischemic neurological deficits following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a multicenter, placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Journal of neurosurgery. 1996;84(5):792–803. Epub 1996/05/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.5.0792 . PubMed DOI

Auer LM. Acute operation and preventive nimodipine improve outcome in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1984;15(1):57–66. Epub 1984/07/01. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198407000-00011 . PubMed DOI

Bell BA, Miller JD, Neto NG, O’Neill P, Laughton LM. Effect of naloxone on deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1985;16(4):498–501. Epub 1985/04/01. . PubMed

Haley EC Jr., Kassell NF, Alves WM, Weir BK, Hansen CA. Phase II trial of tirilazad in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Journal of neurosurgery. 1995;82(5):786–90. Epub 1995/05/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.5.0786 . PubMed DOI

Ljunggren B, Brandt L, Säveland H, Nilsson PE, Cronqvist S, Andersson KE, et al.. Outcome in 60 consecutive patients treated with early aneurysm operation and intravenous nimodipine. Journal of neurosurgery. 1984;61(5):864–73. Epub 1984/11/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.5.0864 . PubMed DOI

Nibbelink DW, Torner JC, Henderson WG. Intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage. A cooperative study. Antifibrinolytic therapy in recent onset subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 1975;6(6):622–9. Epub 1975/11/01. doi: 10.1161/01.str.6.6.622 . PubMed DOI

Ohta T, Kikuchi H, Hashi K, Kudo Y. Nizofenone administration in the acute stage following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Results of a multi-center controlled double-blind clinical study. Journal of neurosurgery. 1986;64(3):420–6. Epub 1986/03/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1986.64.3.0420 . PubMed DOI

Säveland H, Ljunggren B, Brandt L, Messeter K. Delayed ischemic deterioration in patients with early aneurysm operation and intravenous nimodipine. Neurosurgery. 1986;18(2):146–50. Epub 1986/02/01. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198602000-00005 . PubMed DOI

Shibuya M, Suzuki Y, Sugita K, Saito I, Sasaki T, Takakura K, et al.. Effect of AT877 on cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Results of a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Journal of neurosurgery. 1992;76(4):571–7. Epub 1992/04/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1992.76.4.0571 . PubMed DOI

Takagi K, Tamura A, Nakagomi T, Nakayama H, Gotoh O, Kawai K, et al.. How should a subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale be determined? A combinatorial approach based solely on the Glasgow Coma Scale. Journal of neurosurgery. 1999;90(4):680–7. Epub 1999/04/08. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.4.0680 . PubMed DOI

Sano H, Inamasu J, Kato Y, Satoh A, Murayama Y, Diseases WC, et al.. Modified world federation of neurosurgical societies subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system. Surgical neurology international. 2016;7(Suppl 18):S502–S3. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.187491 . PubMed DOI PMC

Fung C, Inglin F, Murek M, Balmer M, Abu-Isa J, Z’Graggen WJ, et al.. Reconsidering the logic of World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grading in patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of neurosurgery. 2016;124(2):299–304. Epub 2015/09/19. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS14614 . PubMed DOI

Luong CQ, Ngo HM, Hoang HB, Pham DT, Nguyen TA, Tran TA, et al.. Clinical characteristics and factors relating to poor outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Vietnam: A multicenter prospective cohort study. PloS one. 2021;16(8):e0256150. Epub 2021/08/14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256150 PubMed DOI PMC

Nguyen TA, Vu LD, Mai TD, Dao CX, Ngo HM, Hoang HB, et al.. Predictive validity of the prognosis on admission aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage scale for the outcome of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Scientific reports. 2023;13(1):6721. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33798-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Nguyen TA, Mai TD, Vu LD, Dao CX, Ngo HM, Hoang HB, et al.. Factors related to intracerebral haematoma in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in Vietnam: a multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ open. 2023;13(4):e066186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066186 PubMed DOI PMC

van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 1988;19(5):604–7. Epub 1988/05/01. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 . PubMed DOI

Juvela S. Risk factors for impaired outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Archives of neurology. 1995;52(12):1193–200. Epub 1995/12/01. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540360071018 . PubMed DOI

Prasad K, Menon GR. Comparison of the three strategies of verbal scoring of the Glasgow Coma Scale in patients with stroke. Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 1998;8(2):79–85. Epub 1998/04/21. doi: 10.1159/000015822 . PubMed DOI

Luong CQ, Nguyen AD, Nguyen CV, Mai TD, Nguyen TA, Do SN, et al.. Effectiveness of Combined External Ventricular Drainage with Intraventricular Fibrinolysis for the Treatment of Intraventricular Haemorrhage with Acute Obstructive Hydrocephalus. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra. 2019;9(2):77–89. doi: 10.1159/000501530 PubMed DOI PMC

Gaberel T, Gakuba C, Fournel F, Le Blanc E, Gaillard C, Peyro-Saint-Paul L, et al.. FIVHeMA: Intraventricular fibrinolysis versus external ventricular drainage alone in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial. Neuro-Chirurgie. 2019;65(1):14–9. Epub 2019/01/15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2018.11.004 . PubMed DOI

Suarez JI, Sheikh MK, Macdonald RL, Amin-Hanjani S, Brown RD Jr., de Oliveira Manoel AL, et al.. Common Data Elements for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Clinical Research: A National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke and National Library of Medicine Project. Neurocritical care. 2019;30(Suppl 1):4–19. Epub 2019/05/16. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00723-6 . PubMed DOI

van Heuven AW, Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Validation of a prognostic subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale derived directly from the Glasgow Coma Scale. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2008;39(4):1347–8. Epub 2008/03/01. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498345 . PubMed DOI

Mackey J, Khoury JC, Alwell K, Moomaw CJ, Kissela BM, Flaherty ML, et al.. Stable incidence but declining case-fatality rates of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a population. Neurology. 2016;87(21):2192–7. Epub 2016/10/23. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003353 PubMed DOI PMC

Øie LR, Solheim O, Majewska P, Nordseth T, Müller TB, Carlsen SM, et al.. Incidence and case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted to hospital between 2008 and 2014 in Norway. Acta neurochirurgica. 2020;162(9):2251–9. Epub 2020/07/01. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04463-x PubMed DOI PMC

Picetti E, Barbanera A, Bernucci C, Bertuccio A, Bilotta F, Boccardi EP, et al.. Early management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a hospital with neurosurgical/neuroendovascular facilities: a consensus and clinical recommendations of the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)—part 2. Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care. 2022;2(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00049-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Do SN, Luong CQ, Pham DT, Nguyen CV, Ton TT, Pham TTN, et al.. Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Viet Nam: multicentre prospective cohort study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2021;99(1):50–61. Epub 10/28. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.269837 PubMed DOI PMC

Dengler NF, Sommerfeld J, Diesing D, Vajkoczy P, Wolf S. Prediction of cerebral infarction and patient outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of new and established radiographic, clinical and combined scores. European journal of neurology. 2018;25(1):111–9. Epub 2017/09/25. doi: 10.1111/ene.13471 . PubMed DOI

Giraldo EA, Mandrekar JN, Rubin MN, Dupont SA, Zhang Y, Lanzino G, et al.. Timing of clinical grade assessment and poor outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of neurosurgery. 2012;117(1):15–9. Epub 2012/05/01. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS11706 . PubMed DOI

Allison PD. Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups. Sociological Methods & Research. 1999;28(2):186–208. doi: 10.1177/0049124199028002003 DOI

Mood C. Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It. European Sociological Review. 2009;26(1):67–82. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp006 DOI

Gail MH, Wieand S, Piantadosi S. Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates. Biometrika. 1984;71(3):431–44. doi: 10.1093/biomet/71.3.431 DOI

Yatchew A, Griliches Z. Specification Error in Probit Models. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1985;67(1):134–9. doi: 10.2307/1928444 DOI

Mroz TA, Zayats YV. Arbitrarily Normalized Coefficients, Information Sets, and False Reports of “Biases” in Binary Outcome Models. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2008;90(3):406–13. doi: 10.1162/rest.90.3.406 DOI

Norton EC, Dowd BE. Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models. Health services research. 2018;53(2):859–78. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12712 PubMed DOI PMC

Nieuwkamp DJ, Setz LE, Algra A, Linn FHH, de Rooij NK, Rinkel GJE. Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. The Lancet Neurology. 2009;8(7):635–42. Epub 06/06. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70126-7 . PubMed DOI

Khan AU, Dulhanty L, Vail A, Tyrrell P, Galea J, Patel HC. Impact of specialist neurovascular care in subarachnoid haemorrhage. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2015;133:55–60. Epub 2015/04/04. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.03.006 . PubMed DOI

Pickard JD, Murray GD, Illingworth R, Shaw MD, Teasdale GM, Foy PM, et al.. Effect of oral nimodipine on cerebral infarction and outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage: British aneurysm nimodipine trial. Bmj. 1989;298(6674):636–42. Epub 1989/03/11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6674.636 PubMed DOI PMC

Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu L-M, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, et al.. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet (London, England). 2005;366(9488):809–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-5 . PubMed DOI

Lord AS, Fernandez L, Schmidt JM, Mayer SA, Claassen J, Lee K, et al.. Effect of rebleeding on the course and incidence of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2012;78(1):31–7. Epub 2011/12/16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823ed0a4 PubMed DOI PMC

Rosengart AJ, Schultheiss KE, Tolentino J, Macdonald RL. Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. 2007;38(8):2315–21. Epub 2007/06/16. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484360 . PubMed DOI

Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6(1):1–9. Epub 1980/01/01. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198001000-00001 . PubMed DOI