Carboplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Clinically Lymph Node-positive Bladder Cancer

. 2023 May ; 51 () : 39-46. [epub] 20230325

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37187719
Odkazy

PubMed 37187719
PubMed Central PMC10175724
DOI 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.014
PII: S2666-1683(23)00122-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: There are currently no guideline recommendations regarding the treatment of cisplatin-ineligible, clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the oncological efficacy of gemcitabine/carboplatin induction chemotherapy (IC) in comparison to cisplatin-based regimens in cN+ BCa. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an observational study of 369 patients with cT2-4 N1-3 M0 BCa. INTERVENTION: IC followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoints were the pathological objective response (pOR; ypT0/Ta/Tis/T1 N0) rate and the pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0N0) rate. We applied 3:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce selection bias. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared across groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between the treatment regimen and survival endpoints were tested in multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After PSM, a cohort of 216 patients was available for analysis, of whom 162 received cisplatin-based IC and 54 gemcitabine/carboplatin IC. At RC, 54 patients (25%) had a pOR and 36 (17%) had a pCR. The 2-yr CSS was 59.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.9-69%) for patients who received cisplatin-based IC versus 38.8% (95% CI 26-57.9%) for those who received gemcitabine/carboplatin. For the pOR (p = 0.8), ypN0 status at RC (p = 0.5), and cN1 BCa subgroups (p = 0.7), there was no difference in CSS between cisplatin-based IC and gemcitabine/carboplatin. In the cN1 subgroup, treatment with gemcitabine/carboplatin was not associated with shorter OS (p = 0.2) or CSS (p = 0.1) on multivariable Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin-based IC seems to be superior to gemcitabine/carboplatin and should be the standard for cisplatin-eligible patients with cN+ BCa. Gemcitabine/carboplatin may be an alternative treatment for selected cisplatin-ineligible patients with cN+ BCa. In particular, selected cisplatin-ineligible patients with cN1 disease may benefit from gemcitabine/carboplatin IC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this multicenter study, we found that selected patients with bladder cancer and clinical evidence of lymph node metastasis who cannot receive standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy before surgery to remove their bladder may benefit from chemotherapy with gemcitabine/carboplatin. Patients with a single lymph node metastasis may benefit the most.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit Division of Urology University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Canada

Department of Genitourinary Oncology H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USA

Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences Sapienza University of Rome Policlinico Umberto 1 Hospital Rome Italy

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Urology Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital AP HP Paris University Paris France

Department of Urology Caritas St Josef Medical Centre University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany

Department of Urology CHU Toulouse IUCT Oncopole Toulouse France

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Hospital Motol 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Urology Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France

Department of Urology Luzerner Kantonsspital Luzern Switzerland

Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

Department of Urology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology University Hospital Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg Austria

Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology Urological Research Institute Vita Salute San Raffaele Milan Italy

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

Division of Urology Department of Surgical Sciences San Giovanni Battista Hospital University of Studies of Torino Turin Italy

Division of Urology Molinette Hospital University of Studies of Torino Torino Italy

Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

S H Ho Urology Centre Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Institute of Urology University of Southern California Los Angeles CA USA

Vancouver Prostate Centre Department of Urologic Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. PubMed

Stein J.P., Lieskovsky G., Cote R., et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:666–675. PubMed

Shariat S.F., Karakiewicz P.I., Palapattu G.S., et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium. J Urol. 2006;176:2414–2422. PubMed

Lucca I., Rouprêt M., Kluth L., et al. Adjuvant cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy for lymph node (LN)-positive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC): a retrospective international study of >1500 patients. BJU Int. 2015;115:722–727. PubMed

Shariat S.F., Ehdaie B., Rink M., et al. Clinical nodal staging scores for bladder cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment. Eur Urol. 2012;61:237–242. PubMed

Shariat S.F., Palapattu G.S., Karakiewicz P.I., et al. Discrepancy between clinical and pathologic stage: impact on prognosis after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:137–149. PubMed

Aydh A., Abufaraj M., Mori K., et al. Performance of fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for lymph node staging in bladder and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review. Arab J Urol. 2021;19:59–66. PubMed PMC

Sherif A., Holmberg L., Rintala E., et al. Neoadjuvant cisplatinum based combination chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer: a combined analysis of two Nordic studies. Eur Urol. 2004;45:297–303. PubMed

Grossman H.B., Natale R.B., Tangen C.M., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:859–866. PubMed

Voskuilen C.S., Van G.EJ., Einerhand S.M.H., et al. Staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography changes treatment recommendation in invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022;5:366–369. PubMed

Hermans T.J.N., Fransen van de Putte E.E., Horenblas S., et al. Pathological downstaging and survival after induction chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for clinically node-positive bladder cancer—results of a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Cancer. 2016;69:1–8. PubMed

Al-Alao O., Mueller-Leonhard C., Kim S.P., et al. Clinically node-positive (cN+) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with chemotherapy and radical cystectomy: clinical outcomes and development of a postoperative risk stratification model. Urol Oncol. 2020;38:76.e19–76.e28. PubMed

Zargar-Shoshtari K., Zargar H., Lotan Y., et al. A multi-institutional analysis of outcomes of patients with clinically node positive urothelial bladder cancer treated with induction chemotherapy and radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2016;195:53–59. PubMed

Galsky M.D., Stensland K., Sfakianos J.P., et al. Comparative effectiveness of treatment strategies for bladder cancer with clinical evidence of regional lymph node involvement. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2627–2635. PubMed PMC

Dash A., Galsky M.D., Vickers A.J., et al. Impact of renal impairment on eligibility for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer. 2006;107:506–513. PubMed

De Santis M., Bellmunt J., Mead G., et al. Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:191–199. PubMed PMC

Bellmunt J., De W.R., Albanell J., Baselga J. A feasibility study of carboplatin with fixed dose of gemcitabine in ‘unfit’ patients with advanced bladder cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:2212–2215. PubMed

Dorfman E., Alpern B., Gross H., et al. Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology. 1991;180:319–322. PubMed

Petrioli R., Frediani B., Manganelli A., et al. Comparison between a cisplatin-containing regimen and a carboplatin-containing regimen for recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer patients. Cancer. 1996;77:344–351. PubMed

Bellmunt J., Ribas A., Eres N., et al. Chemotherapy in the treatment of surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma. Cancer. 1997;80:1966–1972. PubMed

Dreicer R., Manola J., Roth B.J., et al. Phase III trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium. Cancer. 2004;100:1639–1645. PubMed

Mori K., Schuettfort V.M., Yanagisawa T., et al. Reassessment of the efficacy of carboplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8:1687–1695. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.02.007. PubMed DOI

Ho P.L., Willis D.L., Patil J., et al. Outcome of patients with clinically node-positive bladder cancer undergoing consolidative surgery after preoperative chemotherapy: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Urol Oncol. 2016;34:59.e1–59.e8. PubMed

Zehnder P., Studer U.E., Daneshmand S., et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy alone in patients with lymph node-positive bladder cancer who are unfit for or who decline adjuvant chemotherapy. BJU Int. 2014;113:554–560. PubMed

Afferi L., Lonati C., Montorsi F., et al. Carboplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation after radical cystectomy in patients with pN1–3 urothelial bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2022;40:1489–1496. PubMed

von der Maase H., Sengelov L., Roberts J.T., et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4602–4608. PubMed

Herr H.W., Donat S.M., Bajorin D.F. Post-chemotherapy surgery in patients with unresectable or regionally metastatic bladder cancer. J Urol. 2001;165:811–814. PubMed

Mertens L.S., Meijer R.P., Kerst J.M., et al. Carboplatin based induction chemotherapy for nonorgan confined bladder cancer—a reasonable alternative for cisplatin unfit patients? J Urol. 2012;188:1108–1113. PubMed

Wei X.X., Werner L., Teo M.Y., et al. Sequencing of PD-1/L1 inhibitors and carboplatin based chemotherapy for cisplatin ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma. J Urol. 2021;205:414–419. PubMed PMC

Rouanne M., Bajorin D.F., Hannan R., et al. Rationale and outcomes for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3:728–738. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...