Nowadays, when we are facing several strict regulations, the question arises - does higher strictness lead to the desired results? This study addresses the fact that less research attention has focused on the effects of environmental policy stringency (EPS) on perceived health expressing quality of life, and on green international cooperation. In addition, previous research has provided rather mixed results on the impact of EPS on green innovation. Therefore, we fill an interesting research gap and help better understand the relationship between market-based and non-market-based EPS, perceived health, green innovations, and green international cooperation in OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. Using three complementary databases provided by OECD, Eurostat, and the World Bank and the classical linear regression model, we confirm hypotheses that strong market-based EPS and green international cooperation have positive effects on perceived health. Surprisingly, contrary to the findings of prior research, we do not confirm the positive effects of market-based and non-market-based EPS on green international cooperation. This study contributes to the literature on the Porter hypothesis, technological collaborations in green technological development, and environmental innovation theory. In addition, this study provides several practical implications for policymakers across OECD countries.

School of Business and Governance Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn Estonia

Science and Research Centre Faculty of Economics and Administration University of Pardubice Pardubice Czech Republic

The Faculty of Economics of the Technical University of Liberec The Department of Economic Statistics Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Campbell B.M., Hansen J., Rioux J., Stirling C.M., Twomlow S. Urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts (SDG 13): transforming agriculture and food systems. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2018;34:13–20.

Hojnik J., Prokop V., Stejskal J. R&D as bridge to sustainable development? Case of Czech Republic and Slovenia. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2022;29(1):146–160. doi: 10.1002/csr.2190. DOI

Šulyová D., Kubina M. Creating smart, sustainable cities: results from best practice smart cities and cities in Slovakia. Scient. Pap. Univer. Pard. Seri. D. Fac. Econ. Admin. 2022;30(3):1606. doi: 10.46585/sp30031606. DOI

Pecl G.T., Araújo M.B., Bell J.D., Blanchard J., Bonebrake T.C., Chen I.C.…Williams S.E. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science. 2017;355(6332) doi: 10.1126/science.aai9214. PubMed DOI

Lawrence J., Blackett P., Cradock-Henry N.A. Cascading climate change impacts and implications. Clim. Risk Manag. 2020;29 doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2020.100234. PubMed DOI PMC

Sisco M.R., Bosetti V., Weber E.U. When do extreme weather events generate attention to climate change? Climatic Change. 2017;143(1):227–241. doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-1984-2. DOI

Hilly G., Vojinovic Z., Weesakul S., Sanchez A., Hoang D.N., Djordjevic S.…Evans B. Methodological framework for analysing cascading effects from flood events: the case of sukhumvit area, bangkok, Thailand. Water. 2018;10(1):81. doi: 10.3390/w10010081. DOI

Zhang S., Zhu D. Have countries moved towards sustainable development or not? Definition, criteria, indicators and empirical analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121929. DOI

Korsakienė R., Raišienė A.G. Sustainability drivers of small and medium sized firms: a review and research agenda. Scient. Pap. Univer. Pard. Seri. D. Fac. Econ. Admin. 2022;30(1):1380. doi: 10.46585/sp30011380. DOI

Gunningham N., Sinclair D. Routledge; 2017. Leaders & Laggards: Next-Generation Environmental Regulation. DOI

Galeotti M., Salini S., Verdolini E. Measuring environmental policy stringency: approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Pol. 2020;136 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111052. DOI

Milani S. The impact of environmental policy stringency on industrial R&D conditional on pollution intensity and relocation costs. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2017;68(3):595–620. doi: 10.1007/s10640-016-0034-2. DOI

Ahmad M., Zheng J. Do innovation in environmental-related technologies cyclically and asymmetrically affect environmental sustainability in BRICS nations? Technol. Soc. 2021;67 doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101746. DOI

Shao S., Hu Z., Cao J., Yang L., Guan D. Environmental regulation and enterprise innovation: a review. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2020;29(3):1465–1478. doi: 10.1002/bse.2446. DOI

Herman K.S., Xiang J. Induced innovation in clean energy technologies from foreign environmental policy stringency? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2019;147:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.006. DOI

Porter M.E., Van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995;9(4):97–118.

Horbach J., Prokop V., Stejskal J. Business Strategy and the Environment; 2022. Determinants of Firms' Greenness towards Sustainable Development: A Multi-Country Analysis; pp. 1–14. DOI

Hassan M., Rousselière D. Does increasing environmental policy stringency lead to accelerated environmental innovation? A research note. Appl. Econ. 2021:1–10. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2021.1983146. DOI

De Santis R., Lasinio C.J. Environmental policies, innovation and productivity in the EU. Global Econ. J. 2016;16(4):615–635. doi: 10.1515/gej-2015-0060. DOI

Cohen B.L., Noone S., Muñoz-Furlong A., Sicherer S.H. Development of a questionnaire to measure quality of life in families with a child with food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004;114(5):1159–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.007. PubMed DOI

Jakobsson U. Using the 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) to measure quality of life among older people. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2007;19(6):457–464. doi: 10.1007/BF03324731. PubMed DOI

Colucci E., Nadeau S., Higgins J., Kehayia E., Poldma T., Saj A., De Guise E. COVID-19 lockdowns' effects on the quality of life, perceived health and well-being of healthy elderly individuals: a longitudinal comparison of pre-lockdown and lockdown states of well-being. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2022;99 PubMed PMC

Giusiano S., Peotta L., Iazzolino B., Mastro E., Arcari M., Palumbo F.…Vasta R. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caregiver burden and patients' quality of life during COVID-19 pandemic. Amyotroph. Later. Scler. Fron. Degener. 2022;23(1–2):146–148. PubMed

Li Y., Zhang Y., Lee C.C., Li J. Structural characteristics and determinants of an international green technological collaboration network. J. Clean. Prod. 2021;324 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129258. DOI

Hu G., Wang X., Wang Y. Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Econ. 2021;98

Horbach J. Empirical determinants of eco-innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2016;19:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.005. DOI

Prokop V., Gerstlberger W., Zapletal D., Striteska M.K. The double-edged role of firm environmental behaviour in the creation of product innovation in Central and Eastern European countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2022;331 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129989. DOI

Ahmed K. Environmental policy stringency, related technological change and emissions inventory in 20 OECD countries. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;274 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111209. PubMed DOI

Vrabcová P., Urbancová H. Approaches of selected organisations in the Czech Republic to promoting the concept of sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Agric. Econ. 2021;67(7):255–265. doi: 10.17221/8/2021-AGRICECON. DOI

Martínez-Zarzoso I., Bengochea-Morancho A., Morales-Lage R. Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries? Energy Pol. 2019;134 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110982. DOI

Baud I.S.A., Grafakos S., Hordijk M., Post J. Quality of life and alliances in solid waste management: contributions to urban sustainable development. Cities. 2001;18(1):3–12. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00049-4. DOI

Hedlund-de Witt A. Rethinking sustainable development: considering how different worldviews envision “development” and “quality of life”. Sustainability. 2014;6(11):8310–8328. doi: 10.3390/su6118310. DOI

De Guimarães J.C.F., Severo E.A., Júnior L.A.F., Da Costa W.P.L.B., Salmoria F.T. Governance and quality of life in smart cities: towards sustainable development goals. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;253 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119926. DOI

Dechezleprêtre A., Neumayer E., Perkins R. Environmental regulation and the cross-border diffusion of new technology: evidence from automobile patents. Res. Pol. 2015;44(1):244–257. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.017. DOI

Corrocher N., Mancusi M.L. International collaborations in green energy technologies: what is the role of distance in environmental policy stringency? Energy Pol. 2021;156 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112470. DOI

Beretta I. The social effects of eco-innovations in Italian smart cities. Cities. 2018;72:115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.010. DOI

Horbach J. Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources. Res. Pol. 2008;37(1):163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006. DOI

Wang X., Zhang T., Nathwani J., Yang F., Shao Q. Environmental regulation, technology innovation, and low carbon development: revisiting the EKC Hypothesis, Porter Hypothesis, and Jevons' Paradox in China's iron & steel industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2022;176

Johnstone N., Haščič I., Poirier J., Hemar M., Michel C. Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts. Appl. Econ. 2012;44(17):2157–2170. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2011.560110. DOI

Ramanathan R., He Q., Black A., Ghobadian A., Gallear D. Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: a revisit of the Porter hypothesis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017;155:79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.116. DOI

Dechezleprêtre A., Sato M. The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Rev. Environ. Econ. Pol. 2017;11(2):183–206. doi: 10.1093/reep/rex013. DOI

You C., Khattak S.I., Ahmad M. Do international collaborations in environmental-related technology development in the US pay off in combating carbon dioxide emissions? Role of domestic environmental innovation, renewable energy consumption, and trade openness. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 2021:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17146-6. PubMed DOI

Choi G., Cho S.H. Effect of market versus nonmarket environmental policy stringency on knowledge sourcing behavior for green technology: evidence from OECD countries. Rev. Int. Bus. Strategy. 2021 doi: 10.1108/RIBS-09-2020-0113. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. DOI

Fusillo F., Quatraro F., Usai S. Going green: the dynamics of green technological alliances. Econ. Innovat. N. Technol. 2020:1–25. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2020.1799143. DOI

Soewarno N., Tjahjadi B., Fithrianti F. Green innovation strategy and green innovation: the roles of green organizational identity and environmental organizational legitimacy. Manag. Decis. 2019;57(11):3061–3078. doi: 10.1108/MD-05-2018-0563. DOI

Niesten E., Jolink A., de Sousa Jabbour A.B.L., Chappin M., Lozano R. Sustainable collaboration: the impact of governance and institutions on sustainable performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2017;155:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.085. DOI

Aldieri L., Bruno B., Vinci C.P. Does environmental innovation make us happy? An empirical investigation. Soc. Econ. Plann. Sci. 2019;67:166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2018.10.008. DOI

Gustafson M., Gounopoulos D., Nguyen T. 2021. Warming Temperature and the Role of Environmental Policy in Protecting the US Quality of Life. Available at: SSRN 3956921.

Galindo-Martín M.A., Castaño-Martínez M.S., Méndez-Picazo M.T. The relationship between green innovation, social entrepreneurship, and sustainable development. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4467. doi: 10.3390/su12114467. DOI

Rübbelke D.T. International support of climate change policies in developing countries: strategic, moral and fairness aspects. Ecol. Econ. 2011;70(8):1470–1480. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.007. DOI

Bostrom A., O'Connor R.E., Böhm G., Hanss D., Bodi O., Ekström F.…Sælensminde I. Causal thinking and support for climate change policies: international survey findings. Global Environ. Change. 2012;22(1):210–222. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.012. DOI

Peñasco C., del Río P., Romero-Jordán D. Analysing the role of international drivers for eco-innovators. J. Int. Manag. 2017;23(1):56–71.

Hojnik J., Ruzzier M., Manolova T.S. Internationalization and economic performance: the mediating role of eco-innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;171:1312–1323.

Wolde-Rufael Y., Weldemeskel E.M. Do environmental taxes and environmental stringency policies reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from 7 emerging economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 2021;28(18):22392–22408. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11475-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Puertas R., Marti L., Guaita-Martinez J.M. Innovation, lifestyle, policy and socioeconomic factors: an analysis of European quality of life. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2020;160 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120209. DOI

Prokop V., Hajek P., Stejskal J. Configuration paths to efficient national innovation ecosystems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2021;168 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120787. DOI

Hanif I., Raza S.M.F., Gago-de-Santos P., Abbas Q. Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: some empirical evidence. Energy. 2019;171:493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.011. DOI

Wang Q., Qu J., Wang B., Wang P., Yang T. Green technology innovation development in China in 1990–2015. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;696 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134008. PubMed DOI

Liu Y., Gao C., Lu Y. The impact of urbanization on GHG emissions in China: the role of population density. J. Clean. Prod. 2017;157:299–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.138. DOI

Rawlings J.O., Pantula S.G., Dickey D.A. second ed. Springer; 1998. Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool.

Egondi T., Kyobutungi C., Ng N., Muindi K., Oti S., Vijver S.V.D.…Rocklöv J. Community perceptions of air pollution and related health risks in Nairobi slums. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2013;10(10):4851–4868. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10104851. PubMed DOI PMC

Van den Bosch M., Sang Å.O. Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health–A systematic review of reviews. Environ. Res. 2017;158:373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040. PubMed DOI

Roslund M.I., Puhakka R., Grönroos M., Nurminen N., Oikarinen S., Gazali A.M.…ADELE Research Group Biodiversity intervention enhances immune regulation and health-associated commensal microbiota among daycare children. Sci. Adv. 2020;6(42) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba2578. PubMed DOI PMC

Pritchard A., Richardson M., Sheffield D., McEwan K. The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: a meta-analysis. J. Happiness Stud. 2020;21:1145–1167. doi: 10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6. DOI

Cameron R.W., Brindley P., Mears M., McEwan K., Ferguson F., Sheffield D.…Richardson M. Where the wild things are! Do urban green spaces with greater avian biodiversity promote more positive emotions in humans? Urban Ecosyst. 2020;23:301–317. doi: 10.1007/s11252-020-00929-z. DOI

Shahzad U. Environmental taxes, energy consumption, and environmental quality: theoretical survey with policy implications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 2020;27(20):24848–24862. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4. PubMed DOI

Yirong Q. Does environmental policy stringency reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from high-polluted economies. J. Clean. Prod. 2022;341 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130648. DOI

McEvoy D.M., McGinty M. Negotiating a uniform emissions tax in international environmental agreements. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2018;90:217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.06.001. DOI

Hao L.N., Umar M., Khan Z., Ali W. Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: how critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Sci. Total Environ. 2021;752 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853. PubMed DOI

Karmaker S.C., Hosan S., Chapman A.J., Saha B.B. The role of environmental taxes on technological innovation. Energy. 2021;232 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121052. DOI

Li S., Samour A., Irfan M., Ali M. Role of renewable energy and fiscal policy on trade adjusted carbon emissions: evaluating the role of environmental policy stringency. Renew. Energy. 2023;196:1376–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.084. DOI

Kruse T., Dechezleprêtre A., Saffar R., Robert L. OECD Publishing; Paris: 2022. Measuring Environmental Policy Stringency in OECD Countries: an Update of the OECD Composite EPS Indicator; p. 1703. DOI

Tang M., Li X., Zhang Y., Wu Y., Wu B. From command-and-control to market-based environmental policies: optimal transition timing and China's heterogeneous environmental effectiveness. Econ. Modell. 2020;90:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136362. DOI

Ahmed K., Ahmed S. A predictive analysis of CO2 emissions, environmental policy stringency, and economic growth in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 2018;25(16):16091–16100. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1849-x. PubMed DOI

De Angelis E.M., Di Giacomo M., Vannoni D. Climate change and economic growth: the role of environmental policy stringency. Sustainability. 2019;11(8):2273. doi: 10.3390/su11082273. DOI

Sachs J.D., Schmidt-Traub G., Mazzucato M., Messner D., Nakicenovic N., Rockström J. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat. Sustain. 2019;2(9):805–814. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9. DOI

Cuiyun C., Chazhong G. Green development assessment for countries along the belt and road. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;263 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110344. PubMed DOI

Zhang J., Yu Z., Zhao B., Sun R., Vejre H. Links between green space and public health: a bibliometric review of global research trends and future prospects from 1901 to 2019. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020;15(6) doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7f64. DOI

Sarwar S., Streimikiene D., Waheed R., Mighri Z. Revisiting the empirical relationship among the main targets of sustainable development: growth, education, health and carbon emissions. Sustain. Dev. 2021;29(2):419–440. doi: 10.1002/sd.2156. DOI

Tan Z., Wu Y., Gu Y., Liu T., Wang W., Liu X. An overview on implementation of environmental tax and related economic instruments in typical countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2022;330 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129688. DOI

Farmer A., Kahn J.R., McDonald J.A., O'Neill R. Rethinking the optimal level of environmental quality: justifications for strict environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 2001;36(3):461–473. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00244-5. DOI

Zhang J., Liang G., Feng T., Yuan C., Jiang W. Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: how external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter? Bus. Strat. Environ. 2020;29(1):39–53. doi: 10.1002/bse.2349. DOI

Walsh P.P., Murphy E., Horan D. The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2020;154

Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F., Grigoroudis E. Helix trilogy: the triple, quadruple, and quintuple innovation helices from a theory, policy, and practice set of perspectives. J. Knowled. Econ. 2022;13(3):2272–2301.

European Commission . 2021. A European Green Deal.https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en Available online: accessed on.

Afshan S., Ozturk I., Yaqoob T. Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: evidence from MM-QR method. Renew. Energy. 2022;196:151–160. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.125. DOI

Tura N., Ojanen V. 2022. Sustainability-oriented Innovations in Smart Cities: A Systematic Review and Emerging Themes. Cities. DOI

Haščič I., Migotto M. Vol. 89. 2015. Measuring environmental innovation using patent data; p. 59. (OECD Environment Working Papers).