In reply to "Bias assessment: mQ or RoB?"
Language English Country United States Media electronic
Document type Letter, Comment
PubMed
37282722
DOI
10.11124/jbies-23-00213
PII: 02174543-202306000-00016
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Research Design * MeSH
- Bias MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Letter MeSH
- Comment MeSH
Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
JBI Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia
See more in PubMed
Doi SAR. Bias assessment: mQ or RoB? JBI Evid Synth 2023;21(6):1344–1345.
Stone JC, Barker TH, Aromataris E, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Sears K, Klugar M, et al. From critical appraisal to RoB assessment: clarifying the terminology for study evaluation in JBI systematic reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2023;21(3):472–477.
Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Hasan S, Doi SA. Quality versus RoB assessment in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;129:172–175.
Boutron I, Page MJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Lundh A, Hróbjartsson A. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Chapter 7: Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.3 [internet]. Cochrane; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 28]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook .
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.3 [internet]. Cochrane; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 28]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook .