In reply to "Bias assessment: mQ or RoB?"
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu dopisy, komentáře
PubMed
37282722
DOI
10.11124/jbies-23-00213
PII: 02174543-202306000-00016
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- výzkumný projekt * MeSH
- zkreslení výsledků (epidemiologie) MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- dopisy MeSH
- komentáře MeSH
Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
JBI Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA Australia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Doi SAR. Bias assessment: mQ or RoB? JBI Evid Synth 2023;21(6):1344–1345.
Stone JC, Barker TH, Aromataris E, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Sears K, Klugar M, et al. From critical appraisal to RoB assessment: clarifying the terminology for study evaluation in JBI systematic reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2023;21(3):472–477.
Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Hasan S, Doi SA. Quality versus RoB assessment in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;129:172–175.
Boutron I, Page MJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Lundh A, Hróbjartsson A. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Chapter 7: Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.3 [internet]. Cochrane; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 28]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook .
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.3 [internet]. Cochrane; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 28]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook .