In reply to "Bias assessment: mQ or RoB?"

. 2023 Jun 01 ; 21 (6) : 1346-1347. [epub] 20230601

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu dopisy, komentáře

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37282722
Odkazy

PubMed 37282722
DOI 10.11124/jbies-23-00213
PII: 02174543-202306000-00016
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Komentář

PubMed

Komentář

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Doi SAR. Bias assessment: mQ or RoB? JBI Evid Synth 2023;21(6):1344–1345.

Stone JC, Barker TH, Aromataris E, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Sears K, Klugar M, et al. From critical appraisal to RoB assessment: clarifying the terminology for study evaluation in JBI systematic reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2023;21(3):472–477.

Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Hasan S, Doi SA. Quality versus RoB assessment in clinical research. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;129:172–175.

Boutron I, Page MJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Lundh A, Hróbjartsson A. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Chapter 7: Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.3 [internet]. Cochrane; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 28]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook .

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.3 [internet]. Cochrane; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 28]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook .

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...