ESG investing and the financial performance: a panel data analysis of developed REIT markets
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37380853
DOI
10.1007/s11356-023-28376-1
PII: 10.1007/s11356-023-28376-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Corporate social performance, ESG investing, PVAR Granger causality test, REITs, Stakeholder theory of corporation, Trade-off hypothesis,
- MeSH
- finanční řízení * MeSH
- investice MeSH
- kapitálové financování * metody MeSH
- organizace MeSH
- sociální odpovědnost MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
This study investigates the empirical link between the social and financial performance of the Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) by utilizing the PVAR-Granger causality model and a fixed-effects panel data model with a rich dataset comprising 234 ESG-rated REITs across five developed economies from 2003 to 2019. The results suggest that investors pay attention to individual E/S/G metrics and price each component of ESG investing differently, with E-investing and S-investing practices being the significant financial performance factors of REITs. This study is the first attempt to test the social impact and risk mitigation hypotheses of the stakeholder theory of the corporation and the neoclassic trade-off argument to explore the association between corporate social responsibility and the market valuation of REITs. The full sample results strongly support the trade-off hypothesis, indicating that REITs' environmental policies involve high financial costs that may drain off capital and lead to decreasing market returns. On the contrary, investors have attached a higher value to S-investing performance, especially in the post-GFC period from 2011 to 2019. A positive premium for S-investing supports the stakeholder theory as the social impact could be monetarized into a higher return and a lower systematic risk and give rise to a competitive advantage.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Abrigo MR, Love I (2016) Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata. Stand Genomic Sci 16(3):778–804
Aroul RR, Sabherwal S, Villupuram SV (2022) ESG, operational efficiency and operational performance: evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. Manag Financ 48(8):1206–1220. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-12-2021-0593 DOI
Auer BR, Schuhmacher F (2016) Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. Q Rev Econ Finance 59:51–62 DOI
Barnea A, Rubin A (2010) Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. J Bus Ethics 97(1):71–86 DOI
Bauer R, Eichholtz PMA, Kok N (2010) Corporate governance and performance: the REIT effect. Real Estate Econ 36:1–29 DOI
Bianco C, Ghosh C, Sirmans CF (2007) The impact of corporate governance on the performance of REITs. J Portf Manag 33(5):175–191 DOI
Bouslah K, Kryzanowski L, M’Zali B (2013) The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. J Bank Finance 37:1258–1273 DOI
Brounen D, Marcato G (2018) Sustainable insights in public real estate performance: ESG scores and effects in REIT markets. Berkeley Lab, Berkeley
Brounen D, Marcato G, Op’t Veld H (2021) Pricing ESG equity ratings and underlying data in listed real estate securities. Sustainability 13(4):2037 DOI
Cajias M, Fuerst F, McAllister P, Nanda A (2014) Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers? Int J Strateg Prop Manag 18(1):11–27 DOI
Campbell RD, Ghosh C, Petrova M, Sirmans CF (2011) Corporate governance and performance in the market for corporate control: the case of REITs. J Real Estate Financ Econ 42(4):451–480 DOI
Chacon R, Feng Z, Wu Z (2022) Does investing in ESG pay off? Evidence from REITs around the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence from REITs around the COVID-19 pandemic (June 27, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4147749
Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20:249–272 DOI
Chollet P, Sandwidi BW (2018) CSR engagement and financial risk: a virtuous circle? International evidence. Glob Financ J 38:65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.03.004 DOI
Coën A, Lecomte P, Abdelmoula D (2018) The financial performance of green REITs revisited. J Real Estate Portf Manag 24(1):95–105 DOI
Derwall J, Koedijk K, Ter Horst J (2011) A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. J Bank Finance 35(8):2137–2147 DOI
Eichholtz P, Kok N, Yonder E (2012) Portfolio greenness and the financial performance of REITs. J Int Money Financ 31(7):1911–1929 DOI
Eichholtz P, Kok N, Quigley JM (2013) The economics of green building. Rev Econ Stat 95(1):50–63 DOI
Fan KY, Shen J, Hui ECM (2022) ESG Materiality and responsible investment: evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts. Available at: https://l24.im/RI5 (accessed on: 4 May 2023)
Feige EL, Pearce DK (1979) The casual causal relationship between money and income: Some caveats for time series analysis. Rev Econ Stat 521–533
Fleischman GM, Johnson EN, Walker KB, Valentine SR (2019) Ethics versus outcomes: managerial responses to incentive-driven and goal-induced employee behavior. J Bus Ethics 158(4):951–967 DOI
Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston
Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A (2015) ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J Sustain Financ Invest 5(4):210–233 DOI
Friedman M (1970) A friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine 13(1970):32–33
Frynas JG, Yamahaki C (2016) Corporate social responsibility: review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: a European Review 25(3):258–285 DOI
Fuerst F (2015) The financial rewards of sustainability: a global performance study of real estate investment trusts. Available at SSRN 2619434
Ghosh C, Petrova M (2021) The effect of legal environment and regulatory structure on performance: crosscountry evidence from REITs. J Real Estate Financ Econ 63:40–81
Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Acad Manag Rev 30:777–798 DOI
Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strateg Manag J 30:425–445 DOI
Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1:424–38
Guenster N, Bauer R, Derwall J, Koedijk K (2011) The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. Eur Financ Manag 17(4):679–704 DOI
Hartzell J, Sun L, Titman S (2006) The effect of corporate governance on investment: evidence from REITs. Real Estate Econ 34(3):343–376 DOI
Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1251–1271
Huang BN (1995) Do Asian stock market prices follow random walks? Evidence from the variance ratio test. Appl Financ Econ 5:251–256 DOI
Hurlin C, Mignon V (2007) Second generation panel unit root tests. HAL Id: halshs-00159842
IEA (2019) The 2019 Global status report for buildings and construction. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-status-report-for-buildings-and-construction-2019 (accessed on 12 April 2021)
Levin A, Lin CF (1992) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. University of California. San Diego, Discussion Paper, (92–93)
Levin A, Lin CF (1993) Unit root tests in panel data: new results. University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series
Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2009) The debate over doing good: corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. J Mark 73:198–213 DOI
Mariani M, Amoruso P, Caragnano A, Zito M (2018) Green real estate: does it create value? Financial and sustainability analysis on European green REITs. Int J Bus Manag 13:80–92
McGuire JB, Sundgren A, Schneeweis T (1988) Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Acad Manag J 31:854–872 DOI
Morri G, Anconetani R, Benfari L (2021) Greenness and financial performance of European REITs. J Eur Real Estate Res 14(1):40–61 DOI
NAREIT (2019) Nareit guide to ESG reporting frameworks. https://www.reit.com/sites/default/files/media/PDFs/Research/Nareit_Guide_to%20ESG_Reporting_2_21_19.pdf (accessed on 8 April 2021)
Newell G, Lin Lee C (2012) Influence of the corporate social responsibility factors and financial factors on REIT performance in Australia. J Prop Invest Financ 30(4):389–403 DOI
Newell G, Wen Peng H, Yam S (2011) Assessing the linkages between corporate social responsibility and A-Reit performance. Pac Rim Prop Res J 17(3):370–387
Oikonomou I, Brooks C, Pavelin S (2012) The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: a longitudinal analysis. Financ Manage 41:483–515 DOI
Ooi JT, Dung DD (2019) Finding superior returns in green portfolios: evidence from Singapore REITs. J Sustain Real Estate 11(1):191–215 DOI
Pedersen LH, Fitzgibbons S, Pomorski L (2021) Responsible investing: the ESG efficient frontier. J Financ Econ 142(2):572–597 DOI
Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Economet Rev 34(6–10):1089–1117 DOI
Preston LE, O’bannon DP (1997) The corporate social-financial performance relationship: a typology and analysis. Bus Soc 36(4):419–429 DOI
Qureshi MA, Akbar M, Akbar A, Poulova P (2021) Do ESG endeavors assist firms in achieving superior financial performance? A case of 100 best corporate citizens. SAGE Open 11(2):21582440211021600 DOI
Rassier DG, Earnhart D (2010) Does the porter hypothesis explain expected future financial performance? The effect of clean water regulation on chemical manufacturing firms. Environ Resource Econ 45(3):353–377 DOI
Salama A, Anderson K, Toms JS (2011) Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006. Business Ethics: A European Review 20(2):192–204 DOI
Salzmann AJ (2013) The integration of sustainability into the theory and practice of finance: an overview of the state of the art and outline of future developments. J Bus Econ 83(6):555–576
Sassen R, Hinze AK, Hardeck I (2016) Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. J Bus Econ 86(8):867–904
United Nations Environment Program (2019) 2019 Global status report for buildings and construction. https://wedocs.unep.org (accessed on 10 April 2023).
Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18(4):303–319 DOI
Wang Q, Dou J, Jia S (2016) A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: the moderating effect of contextual factors. Bus Soc 55(8):1083–1121 DOI
Westermann S, Niblock SJ, Kortt MA (2022) Does it pay to be responsible? Evidence on corporate social responsibility and the investment performance of Australian REITs. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 29(4):1102–1119