Effects of goal-directed fluid management guided by a non-invasive device on the incidence of postoperative complications in neurosurgery: a pilot and feasibility randomized controlled trial
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
37408018
PubMed Central
PMC10321006
DOI
10.1186/s13741-023-00321-3
PII: 10.1186/s13741-023-00321-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Complications, Goal-directed therapy, Hemodynamic monitoring, Neuro-anesthesia, Neurosurgery, Postoperative outcome,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: The positive effects of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) on patient-orientated outcomes have been demonstrated in various clinical scenarios; however, the effects of fluid management in neurosurgery remain unclear. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing the safety and feasibility of GDHT using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in elective neurosurgery. The incidence of postoperative complications was compared between GDHT and control groups. METHODS: We conducted a single-center randomized pilot study with an enrollment target of 34 adult patients scheduled for elective neurosurgery. We randomly assigned the patients equally into control and GDHT groups. The control group received standard therapy during surgery and postoperatively, whereas the GDHT group received therapy guided by an algorithm based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring. In the GDHT group, we aimed to achieve and sustain an optimal cardiac index by using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring and bolus administration of colloids and vasoactive drugs. The number of patients with adverse events, feasibility criteria, perioperative parameters, and incidence of postoperative complications was compared between groups. RESULTS: We successfully achieved all feasibility criteria. The GDHT protocol was safe, because no patients in either group had unsatisfactory brain tissue relaxation after surgery or brain edema requiring therapy during surgery or 24 h after surgery. Major complications occurred in two (11.8%) patients in the GDHT group and six (35.3%) patients in the control group (p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that a large randomized trial evaluating the effects of GDHT on the incidence of postoperative complications in elective neurosurgery should be safe and feasible. The rate of postoperative complications was comparable between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: ClininalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04754295, date of registration: February 15, 2021.
Department of Neurosurgery Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55:91–115. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301. PubMed DOI
Bellamy MC. Wet, dry or something else? Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:755–757. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael290. PubMed DOI
Benes J, Giglio M, Brienza N, Michard F. The effects of goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2014;18:584. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0584-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Benes J, Haidingerova L, Pouska J, et al. Fluid management guided by a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity after total knee and hip replacement. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:148. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0131-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Calvo-Vecino JM, Ripollés-Melchor J, Mythen MG, et al. Effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications in low-moderate risk surgical patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (FEDORA trial) Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:734–744. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.018. PubMed DOI
Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74:123–135. PubMed
Corcoran T, Rhodes JEJ, Clarke S, Myles PS, Ho KM. Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:640–651. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318240d6eb. PubMed DOI
Dencker EE, Bonde A, Troelsen A, Varadarajan KM, Sillesen M. Postoperative complications: an observational study of trends in the United States from 2012 to 2018. BMC Surg. 2021;21:393. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01392-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Dostal P, Dostalova V, Schreiberova J, et al. A comparison of equivolume, equiosmolar solutions of hypertonic saline and mannitol for brain relaxation in patients undergoing elective intracranial tumor surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015;27:51–56. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000091. PubMed DOI
Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. PubMed DOI PMC
Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:820–826. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00012. PubMed DOI
Grocott MP, Dushianthan A, Hamilton MA, Mythen MG, Harrison D, Rowan K. Perioperative increase in global blood flow to explicit defined goals and outcomes after surgery: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:535–548. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet155. PubMed DOI
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019;43:659–695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y. PubMed DOI
Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and metaanalysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392–1402. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5. PubMed DOI
Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTracTM and PiCCOplusTM system. Crit Care. 2008;12:R82. doi: 10.1186/cc6933. PubMed DOI PMC
Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:622–632. doi: 10.1093/bja/aef220. PubMed DOI
Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10:307–312. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x. PubMed DOI
Li J, Gelb AW, Flexman AM, Ji F, Meng L. Definition, evaluation, and management of brain relaxation during craniotomy. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:759–769. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew096. PubMed DOI
Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, Lemos IP, Auler JO, Michard F. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007;11:100. doi: 10.1186/cc6117. PubMed DOI PMC
Luo J, Xue J, Liu J, Liu B, Liu L, Chen G. Goal-directed fluid restriction during brain surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2017;7:16. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0239-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Manninen PH, Raman SK, Boyle K, el-Beheiry H. Early postoperative complications following neurosurgical procedures. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46:7–14. doi: 10.1007/BF03012507. PubMed DOI
Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172–178. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2331. PubMed DOI
Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, Röhm KD, Suttner S. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14:18. doi: 10.1186/cc8875. PubMed DOI PMC
Michard F, Biais M. Rational fluid management: dissecting facts from fiction. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:369–371. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer511. PubMed DOI
Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, et al. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:1052–1061. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000206. PubMed DOI
Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311:2181–2190. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5305. PubMed DOI
Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220–1235. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ee3130. PubMed DOI
Salzwedel C, Puig J, Carstens A, et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R191. doi: 10.1186/cc12885. PubMed DOI PMC
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group CONSORT statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;2010(340):c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332. PubMed DOI PMC
Sivakumar S, Lazaridis C. Bioreactance-based noninvasive fluid responsiveness and cardiac output monitoring: a pilot study in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and literature review. Crit Care Res Pract. 2020;2020:2748181. PubMed PMC
Tevis SE, Kennedy GD. Postoperative complications and implications on patient-centered outcomes. J Surg Res. 2013;181:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.032. PubMed DOI PMC
Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1726–1734. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208943. PubMed DOI
Vos JJ, Poterman M, Salm PP, et al. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62:1153–1160. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0464-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Wainwright TW, Gill M, McDonald DA, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop. 2020;91:3–19. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790. PubMed DOI PMC
Wong JM, Panchmatia JR, Ziewacz JE, et al. Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events: intracranial neoplasm surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:E16. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12183. PubMed DOI
Wu J, Ma Y, Wang T, Xu G, Fan L, Zhang Y. Goal-directed fluid management based on the auto-calibrated arterial pressure-derived stroke volume variation in patients undergoing supratentorial neoplasms surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10:3106–3114.
Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: a critical review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18:650. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0650-6. PubMed DOI PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04754295