This study evaluates the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the reproductive behavior of men and women during the most restrictive period of the pandemic in Czechia. At the end of this period, data was collected for the Czech GGS COVID Pilot-Follow-up Study (April 2021), which included additional questions on reproductive plans and perceptions of the pandemic related to fertility. The study focuses in detail on the evaluation of the favorability of fertility during this period by considering the impact of the pandemic on the lives of individuals in various life areas. It subsequently attempts to determine to what extent this evaluation and personal experiences of the pandemic affected reproductive behavior (the intended number of children, current attempts to conceive and short-term fertility intentions). In summary, in most cases the respondents considered the most severe period of the pandemic to be unfavorable in terms of childbirth. Women provided an overall negative assessment of the favorability of childbirth in this period, which was reflected in a reduction in the planned number of children, while the men who considered this period favorable declared a higher chance of short-term fertility intentions.

Department of Demography and Geodemography Prague Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Aburto JM, Schöley J, Kashnitsky I, Zhang L, Rahal C, Missov TI, et al.. Quantifying impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic through life-expectancy losses: a population-level study of 29 countries. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2022;51(1):63–74. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab207 PubMed DOI PMC

Aassve A, Cavalli N, Mencarini L, Plach S, Bacci ML. The COVID-19 pandemic and human fertility. Science. 2020;369(6502):370–371. doi: 10.1126/science.abc9520 PubMed DOI

Wilde J, Chen W, Lohmann S. COVID-19 and the future of US fertility: what can we learn from Google? IZA Discussion Paper. 2020; No.13776:1–36. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/dp13776.pdf?abstractid=3708638&mirid=1

Grasso M, Klicperová-Baker M, Koos S, Kosyakova Y, Petrillo A, Vlase I. The impact of the coronavirus crisis on European societies. What have we learnt and where do we go from here? Introduction to the COVID volume. European Societies. 2021;23(sup1),S2–S32. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1869283 DOI

Settersten RA, Bernardi L, Härkönen J, Antonucci TC, Dykstra PA, Heckhausen J, et al.. Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens. Advances in Life Course Research. 2020;1–45 (September 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360 PubMed DOI PMC

Slabá J. Vládní boj proti pandemii: Přehled opatření vydaných v souvislosti s pandemií onemocnění COVID-19 v Česku v letech 2020 a 2021 (The Government’s response to the pandemic: an overview of measures related to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic in 2020 and 2021). Demografie. 2020;64(2),175–196. doi: 10.54694/dem.0303 DOI

Vikat A, Spéder Z, Beets G, Billari F, Bühler C, Désesquelles A, et al.. Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course. Demographic Research. 2007;17:389–440. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.14 DOI

Gauthier AH, Cabaço S, Emery T. Generations and Gender Survey study profile. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies. 2018;9(4):456–465. doi: 10.14301/llcs.v9i4.500 DOI

Kreidl M, Šťastná A, Kocourková J, Dzúrová D, Hamanová J, Zvoníček T, et al. Czech GGS COVID Pilot—a Follow-up study. 2021. Data obtained from the GGP Data Archive.

van de Kaa DJ. Options and sequences: Europe’s demographic patterns. Journal of the Australian population association. 1997;4.1:1–29. doi: 10.1007/BF03029484 DOI

Lesthaeghe R. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and development review. 2010;36(2):211–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x PubMed DOI

Sobotka T, Zeman K, Kantorová V. Demographic shifts in the Czech Republic after 1989: A second demographic transition view. European Journal of Population. 2003;19(3):249–277. doi: 10.1023/A:1024913321935 DOI

Lindberg LD, Mueller J, Kirstein M, VandeVusse A. 2021. The continuing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: Findings from the 2021 Guttmacher Survey of Reproductive Health Experiences. New York: Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/continuing-impacts-covid-19-pandemic-findings-2021-guttmacher-survey-reproductive-health (Cited 2023-06-23).

EUROSTAT. 2022. Rise in EU population working from home. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20221108-1 (Cited 2023-06-23).

Scarpetta S, Carcillo S, Hijzen A. 2022. Riding the waves: Adjusting job retention schemes throught the COVID-19 crisis. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/riding-the-waves-adjusting-job-retention-schemes-through-the-covid-19-crisis-ae8f892f/

Voicu M, Bădoi D. Fertility and the COVID-19 crisis: do gender roles really matter? European Societies. 2021;23.sup1:S199–S214. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1822537 DOI

Dudová R, Křížková A. 2023. Czech Parents Under Lockdown: Different Positions, Different Temporalities. Sociological Research Online. doi: 10.1177/13607804231168249 DOI

Šťastná A. 2023. Parenting and Caring for Children during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Czechia in 2020 and 2021. Demografie, 65(1): 3–22.

Zamberlan A, Gioachin F, Gritti D. Work less, help out more? The persistence of gender inequality in housework and childcare during UK COVID-19. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2021;73:100583. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100583 DOI

Jessen J, Spiess CK, Waights S, Wrohlich K. Sharing the caring? The gender division of care work during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. IZA Discussion paper series. 2021;No.14457:1–24. https://docs.iza.org/dp14457.pdf

Williamson HC. Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on relationship satisfaction and attributions. Psychological Science. 2020;31(12):1479–1487. doi: 10.1177/0956797620972688 PubMed DOI PMC

Schmid L, Wörn J, Hank K, Sawatzki B, Walper S. Changes in employment and relationship satisfaction in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the German family Panel. European Societies. 2021;23(sup1):S743–S758. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1836385 DOI

Kohler HP, Billari FC, Ortega JA. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and development review. 2002;28(4):641–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x DOI

Billingsley S. The post-communist fertility puzzle. Population research and policy review. 2010;29(2):193–231. doi: 10.1007/s11113-009-9136-7 PubMed DOI PMC

Vignoli D, Bazzani G, Guetto R, Minello A, Pirani E. Uncertainty and Narratives of the Future: A Theoretical Framework for Contemporary Fertility. In: Schoen R. (ed.): Analyzing Contemporary Fertility. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis 51, 25–47. 2020.

Brauner-Otto SR, Geist C. Uncertainty, doubts, and delays: Economic circumstances and childbearing expectations among emerging adults. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 2018;39(1):88–102. doi: 10.1007/s10834-017-9548-1 DOI

Modena F, Rondinelli C, Sabatini F. Economic insecurity and fertility intentions: The case of Italy. Review of Income and Wealth. 2014;60:S233–S255. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12044 DOI

Fahlén S, Oláh L. Economic uncertainty and first-birth intentions in Europe. Demographic Research. 2018;39:795–834. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.28 DOI

Savalieva K, Jokela M, Rotkirch A. Reasons to Postpone Childbearing during Fertility Decline in Finland. Marriage & Family Review. 2022;1–24. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2022.2083283 DOI

Malicka I, Mynarska M, Świderska J. Perceived consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and childbearing intentions in Poland. Journal of Family Research. 2021;33(3):674–702. doi: 10.20377/jfr-666 DOI

Luppi F, Arpino B, Rosina A. The impact of COVID-19 on fertility plans in Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Demographic Research. 2020;43:1399–1412. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.47 DOI

Geist C, Simmons R, Gero A, Sanders J. Pregnancy Attitudes and Intentions in the Turbulent Times of COVID-19. Conference Pandemic Babies, on-line, 14th to 15th December 2021. https://www.demogr.mpg.de/mediacms/16202_main_geist%20et%20al%2012_10_21.pdf

Kreidl M, Šťastná A, Kocourková J, Hamanová J, Zvoníček T, Slabá J, et al. Czech Harmonized Generations and Gender Survey-II Pilot. 2021. Data obtained from the GGP Data Archive.

Kuchařová V, Barvínková J, Höhne S, Janurová K, Nešporová O, Paloncyová J, et al. Česká rodina na počátku 21. století. Životní podmínky, vztahy a potřeby. SLON, Praha, 300 p. 2019. ISBN: 978-80-7419-275-3

Sobotka T, Beaujouan É. Two is Best? The Persistence of a Two-Child Family Ideal in Europe. Population and Development Review. 2014;40(3):391–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x DOI

Kocourková J, Šťastná A. The realization of fertility intentions in the context of childbearing postponement: comparison of transitional and post-transitional populations. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2021;53(1),82–97. doi: 10.1017/S002193202000005X PubMed DOI

Kreyenfeld M, Andersson G. Socioeconomic differences in the unemployment and fertility nexus: Evidence from Denmark and Germany. Advances in Life Course Research. 2014;21:59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.007 PubMed DOI

Miettinen A; Jalovaara M. Unemployment delays first birth but not for all. Life stage and educational differences in the effects of employment uncertainty on first births. Advances in Life Course Research. 2020;43:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2019.100320 PubMed DOI