The objective of this study was to compare the distribution of stress in the maxillary bone, dental implants, and prosthetic components supporting implant-supported maxillary overdentures with partial palatal coverage, in both splinted and unsplinted designs. Two models of maxillary overdentures were designed using the Exocad Dental CAD program, which included cancellous and cortical bone. The complete denture design and abutments (locator abutments in the unsplinted and Hader bar with Vertix attachments placed distally in the splinted variant) were also designed. The denture material was PEEK (Polyetheretherketone), and the method used to analyze patient-specific 3D X-ray scans was 3D QCT/FEA (three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis). Loading was divided into three load cases, in the frontal region (both incisors of the denture) and distal region (both molars and first premolar of the denture). The forces applied were 150 N with an oblique component with a buccal inclination of 35° in the frontal region, and 600 N with a buccal inclination of 5° (molars) or solely vertical (premolar) in the distal region. The model with locator abutments showed higher stresses in all load cases in both analyzed implant variants and in the maxilla. The differences in stress distribution between the splinted and unsplinted variants were more significant in the distal region. According to the results of the present study, the amount of stress in bone tissue and dental implant parts was smaller in the splinted, bar-retained variant. The findings of this study can be useful in selecting the appropriate prosthetic design for implant-supported maxillary overdentures with partial palatal coverage.

Department of Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering Czech Technical University Prague 166 29 Prague Czech Republic

Department of Stomatology Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University 304 60 Pilsen Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Thalji G., Bryington M., De Kok I.J., Cooper L.F. Prosthodontic management of implant therapy. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2014;58:207–225. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.007. PubMed DOI

Sadowsky S.J. Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007;97:340–348. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60022-5. PubMed DOI

Mericske-Stern R.D., Taylor T.D., Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 2000;11:108–125. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x. PubMed DOI

Aldhohrah T., Mashrah M.A., Wang Y. Effect of 2-implant mandibular overdenture with different attachments and loading protocols on peri-implant health and prosthetic complications: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2022;127:832–844. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.016. PubMed DOI

Ceraulo S., Leonida A., Lauritano D., Baldoni A., Longoni S., Baldoni M., Caccianiga G. Proposal for a clinical approach to geriatric patients with anchor need on implant for removable denture: New technique. Prosthesis. 2020;2:185–195. doi: 10.3390/prosthesis2030016. DOI

Amornvit P., Rokaya D., Bajracharya S., Keawcharoen K., Supavanich W. Management of obstructive sleep apnea with implant retained mandibular advancement device. World J. Dent. 2014;5:184–189. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1285. DOI

Al Amri M.D. Crestal bone loss around submerged and nonsubmerged dental implants: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016;115:564–570. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.002. PubMed DOI

Trakas T., Michalakis K., Kang K., Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: A literature review. Implant Dent. 2006;15:24–34. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36. PubMed DOI

Heckmann S.M., Winter W., Meyer M., Weber H.P. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 2: A methodical study using five types of attachment. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:640–647. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120613.x. PubMed DOI

Elsyad M.A., Alokda M.M., Gebreel A.A., Hammouda N.I., Habib A.A. Effect of two designs of implant-supported overdentures on peri-implant and posterior mandibular bone resorptions: A 5-year prospective radiographic study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:184–192. doi: 10.1111/clr.12984. PubMed DOI

Martínez-Lage-Azorín J.F., Segura-Andrés G., Faus-López J., Agustín-Panadero R. Rehabilitation with implant-supported overdentures in total edentulous patients: A review. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2013;5:267–272. doi: 10.4317/jced.50817. PubMed DOI PMC

Barão V.A., Assunção W.G., Tabata L.F., de Sousa E.A.C., Rocha E.P. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;92:213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.07.009. PubMed DOI

Roccuzzo M., Bonino F., Gaudioso L., Zwahlen M., Meijer H.J. What is the optimal number of implants for removable reconstructions? A systematic review on implant-supported overdentures. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:229–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02544.x. PubMed DOI

Cavallaro J.S., Jr., Tarnow D.P. Unsplinted implants retaining maxillary overdentures with partial palatal coverage: Report of 5 consecutive cases. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2007;22:808–814. PubMed

Raghoebar G.M., Meijer H.J., Slot W., Slater J.J., Vissink A. A systematic review of implant-supported overdentures in the edentulous maxilla, compared to the mandible: How many implants? Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014;7:191–201. PubMed

Di Francesco F., De Marco G., Sommella A., Lanza A. Splinting vs Not Splinting Four Implants Supporting a Maxillary Overdenture: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2019;32:509–518. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6333. PubMed DOI

Jagota V., Sethi A.P.S., Kumar K. Finite Element Method: An Overview. Walailak J. Sci. Tech. 2013;10:1–8.

Geng J.P., Tan K.B., Liu G.R. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2001;85:585–598. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115251. PubMed DOI

Brunski J.B. Biomechanical Aspects of the Optimal Number of Implants to Carry a Cross-Arch Full Restoration. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2014;7:111–131. PubMed

Prado M., Khosla S., Chaput C., Giambini H. Opportunistic application of phantom-less calibration methods for fracture risk prediction using QCT/FEA. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:9428–9435. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08071-w. PubMed DOI PMC

Mechanical Finder. [(accessed on 4 May 2023)]. Available online: https://mechanical-finder.com/

Keyak J.H., Rossi S.A., Jones K.A., Skinner H.B. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J. Biomech. 1998;31:125–133. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00123-1. PubMed DOI

CoprApeek. [(accessed on 4 May 2023)]. Available online: https://www.white-peaks-dental.com/en/produkt-details/coprapeek.

Misch C.E. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 2nd ed. Mosby; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2014.

Bergkvist G., Simonsson K., Rydberg K., Johansson F., Dérand T. A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2008;10:40–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00059.x. PubMed DOI

Wang T.M., Leu L.J., Wang J., Lin L.D. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: A numeric analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2002;17:231–237. PubMed

Tabata L.F., Assunção W.G., Barão V.A., Gomes E.A., Delben J.A., de Sousa E.A.C., Rocha E.P. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: A two-dimensional finite element analysis. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2010;21:696–702. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d7f202. PubMed DOI

Vafaei F., Khoshhal M., Bayat-Movahed S., Ahangary A.H., Firooz F., Izady A., Rakhshan V. Comparative stress distribution of implant-retained mandibular ball-supported and bar-supported overlay dentures: A finite element analysis. J. Oral. Implantol. 2011;37:421–429. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00057. PubMed DOI

Jofre J., Cendoya P., Munoz P. Effect of splinting mini-implants on marginal bone loss: A biomechanical model and clinical randomized study with mandibular overdentures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:1137–1144. PubMed

Assunção W.G., Tabata L.F., Barão V.A., Rocha E.P. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA. J. Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:766–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01851.x. PubMed DOI

Barão V.A.R., Assunção W.G., Tabata L.F., Delben J.A., Gomes É.A., de Sousa E.A.C., Rocha E.P. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2009;20:1066–1071. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395. PubMed DOI

Menicucci G., Lorenzetti M., Pera P., Preti G. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: Finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 1998;13:369–376. PubMed

Geramy A., Habibzadeh S. Stress Distribution in Splinted and Unsplinted Implant-Supported Maxillary Overdentures: A 3D Finite Element Analysis. Implant Dent. 2018;27:56–62. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000708. PubMed DOI

Aquib J., Tarun K., Manjit K., Ajay B., Udey S.W. A Finite Element Analysis on Stress Distribution in Overdenture Implants and Implant Abutment Interface Using Different Attachment Systems: An In Vitro Study. Dent. J. Adv. Stud. 2020;8:22–31.

Kim M.J., Hong S.O. Finite element analysis on stress distribution of maxillary implant-retained overdentures depending on the Bar attachment design and palatal coverage. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2016;8:85–93. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.85. PubMed DOI PMC

Fernandez M.A., Subramanian N., Nawrocki M., Nawrocki A., Craighead J., Clark A., O’Neill E., Esquivel-Upshaw J. Finite element analysis (FEA) of palatal coverage on implant retained maxillary overdentures. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:6635. doi: 10.3390/app10196635. DOI

Slot W., Raghoebar G.M., Vissink A., Huddleston Slater J.J., Meijer H.J. A systematic review of implant-supporteded maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2010;37:98–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01493.x. PubMed DOI

Leão R.S., Moraes S.L.D., Vasconcelos B.C.E., Lemos C.A.A., Pellizzer E.P. Splinted and unsplinted overdenture attachment systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:647–656. doi: 10.1111/joor.12651. PubMed DOI

Ahmed K. Splinted versus unsplinted overdenture attachment systems—No difference in clinical outcomes. Evid. Based Dent. 2019;20:28–29. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0006-9. PubMed DOI

Stoumpis C., Kohal R.J. To splint or not to splint oral implants in the implant-supported overdenture therapy? A systematic literature review. J. Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:857–869. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02220.x. PubMed DOI

Chaware S.H., Thakkar S.T. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the attachments used in implant-supported overdentures. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2020;20:255–268. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_368_19. PubMed DOI PMC