Phase 3 CLEAR study in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: outcomes in subgroups for the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and sunitinib arms

. 2023 ; 13 () : 1223282. [epub] 20230816

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37664025

Grantová podpora
P30 CA008748 NCI NIH HHS - United States

INTRODUCTION: The phase 3 CLEAR study demonstrated that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Prognostic features including presence and/or site of baseline metastases, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid features have been associated with disease and treatment success. This subsequent analysis explores outcomes in patients with or without specific prognostic features. METHODS: In CLEAR, patients with clear cell RCC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive either lenvatinib (20 mg/day) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (18 mg/day) plus everolimus (5 mg/day), or sunitinib alone (50 mg/day, 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). In this report, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were all assessed in the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab and the sunitinib arms, based on baseline features: lung metastases, bone metastases, liver metastases, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid histology. RESULTS: In all the assessed subgroups, median PFS was longer with lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab than with sunitinib treatment, notably among patients with baseline bone metastases (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.52) and patients with sarcomatoid features (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.84). Median OS favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib irrespective of metastatic lesions at baseline, prior nephrectomy, and sarcomatoid features. Of interest, among patients with baseline bone metastases the HR for survival was 0.50 (95% CI 0.30-0.83) and among patients with sarcomatoid features the HR for survival was 0.91 (95% CI 0.32-2.58); though for many groups, median OS was not reached. ORR also favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib across all subgroups; similarly, complete responses also followed this pattern. CONCLUSION: Efficacy outcomes improved following treatment with lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab versus sunitinib in patients with RCC-irrespective of the presence or absence of baseline lung metastases, baseline bone metastases, baseline liver metastases, prior nephrectomy, or sarcomatoid features. These findings corroborate those of the primary CLEAR study analysis in the overall population and support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a standard of care in 1L treatment for patients with advanced RCC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02811861.

Barts Cancer Institute and the Royal Free Hospital Queen Mary University of London London United Kingdom

Biostatistics Eisai Inc Nutley NJ United States

Clinic for Medical Oncology and Clinic for Urology University Hospital Essen Essen Germany

Clinical Research Eisai Inc Nutley NJ United States

Clinical Research Eisai Ltd Hatfield United Kingdom

Clinical Research Merck and Co Inc Rahway NJ United States

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology University of Bari 'A Moro' Bari Italy

Department of Internal Medicine Yonsei Cancer Center Yonsei University Health System Seoul Republic of Korea

Department of Medical Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States

Department of Medical Oncology Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain

Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY United States

Department of Oncology Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital Prague Czechia

Department of Oncology Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía Córdoba Spain

Department of Oncology University of Western Ontario London ON Canada

Department of Urology Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan

Department of Urology Seoul St Mary's Hospital The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Republic of Korea

Department of Urology Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan

Global Clinical Development Merck and Co Inc Rahway NJ United States

ICON Research South Brisbane and University of Queensland St Lucia QLD Australia

Medical Oncology Texas Oncology Dallas TX United States

State Institution of Healthcare Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary Omsk Russia

Erratum v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ. Systemic therapy for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med (2017) 376:354–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1601333 PubMed DOI

Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Porta C, Eto M, Powles T, et al. . Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med (2021) 384:1289–300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035716 PubMed DOI

Dudani S, de Velasco G, Wells JC, Gan CL, Donskov F, Porta C, et al. . Evaluation of clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma metastasis sites and association with survival. JAMA Netw Open (2021) 4:e2021869. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21869 PubMed DOI PMC

Wei H, Miao J, Cui J, Zheng W, Chen X, Zhang Q, et al. . The prognosis and clinicopathological features of different distant metastases patterns in renal cell carcinoma: analysis based on the SEER database. Sci Rep (2021) 11:17822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97365-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Hahn AW, Lebenthal J, Genovese G, Sircar K, Tannir NM, Msaouel P. The significance of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid dedifferentiation in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Res Commun (2022) 33:100640. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100640 PubMed DOI

Bianchi M, Sun M, Jeldres C, Shariat SF, Trinh QD, Briganti A, et al. . Distribution of metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis. Ann Oncol (2012) 23:973–80. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr362 PubMed DOI

National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) . Kidney Cancer. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/kidney.pdf (Accessed April 31, 2023).

Yue G, Deyu L, Lianyuan T, Fengmin S, Mei G, Yajun H, et al. . Clinical features and prognostic factors of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma stratified by age. Aging (Albany NY) (2021) 13:8290–305. doi: 10.18632/aging.202637 PubMed DOI PMC

Chen SC, Kuo PL. Bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci (2016) 17:987. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060987 PubMed DOI PMC

Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, Santini D, Chow E, Terpos E, et al. . Bone health in cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol (2020) 31:1650–63. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.019 PubMed DOI

Rathmell WK, Rumble RB, Van Veldhuizen PJ, Al-Ahmadie H, Emamekhoo H, Hauke RJ, et al. . Management of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol (2022) 40:2957–95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00868 PubMed DOI

Hamada S, Ito K, Kuroda K, Sato A, Asakuma J, Horiguchi A, et al. . Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma and liver metastasis. Mol Clin Oncol (2015) 3:63–8. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.432 PubMed DOI PMC

Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Frank I, Kwon ED, et al. . Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer (2003) 97:1663–71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11234 PubMed DOI

Bottiglieri A, Sepe P, Stellato M, Pircher C, Fotia G, Leone AG, et al. . Optimal choice of adjuvant treatment for renal cell carcinoma following nephrectomy. Cancer Manag Res (2022) 14:3071–81. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S360441 PubMed DOI PMC

Culp SH, Tannir NM, Abel EJ, Margulis V, Tamboli P, Matin SF, et al. . Can we better select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma for cytoreductive nephrectomy? Cancer (2010) 116:3378–88. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25046 PubMed DOI

Gong J, Maia MC, Dizman N, Govindarajan A, Pal SK. Metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: biology and implications for therapy. Asian J Urol (2016) 3:286–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.08.006 PubMed DOI PMC

Motzer RJ, Banchereau R, Hamidi H, Powles T, McDermott D, Atkins MB, et al. . Molecular subsets in renal cancer determine outcome to checkpoint and angiogenesis blockade. Cancer Cell (2020) 38:803–17.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.011 PubMed DOI PMC

Choueiri TK, Atkins MB, Bakouny Z, Carlo MI, Drake CG, Jonasch E, et al. . Summary from the first kidney cancer research summit, September 12-13, 2019: A focus on translational research. J Natl Cancer Inst (2021) 113:234–43. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa064 PubMed DOI PMC

Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M, Escudier B, Bourlon MT, Zurawski B, et al. . Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med (2021) 384:829–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026982 PubMed DOI PMC

Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, Arén Frontera O, Melichar B, Choueiri TK, et al. . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med (2018) 378:1277–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126 PubMed DOI PMC

Motzer RJ, Penkov K, Haanen J, Rini B, Albiges L, Campbell MT, et al. . Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med (2019) 380:1103–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816047 PubMed DOI PMC

Braun DA, Bakouny Z, Hirsch L, Flippot R, Van Allen EM, Wu CJ, et al. . Beyond conventional immune-checkpoint inhibition - novel immunotherapies for renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2021) 18:199–214. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00455-z PubMed DOI PMC

Van Allen EM, Choueiri TK. Dissecting the immunogenomic biology of cancer for biomarker development. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2021) 18:133–4. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00461-1 PubMed DOI

Burke JF, Sussman JB, Kent DM, Hayward RA. Three simple rules to ensure reasonably credible subgroup analyses. BMJ (2015) 351:h5651. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5651 PubMed DOI PMC

Ravi P, Bakouny Z, Schmidt A, Choueiri TK. Novel therapeutic approaches and the evolution of drug development in advanced kidney cancer. Cancer J (2020) 26:464–70. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000477 PubMed DOI

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02811861

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...