Adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

. 2024 Jan ; 31 (1) : 25-31. [epub] 20231015

Jazyk angličtina Země Austrálie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37840031

Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies have radically altered the treatment landscape for renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. However, studies have reported negative data regarding adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Thus, this study aimed to assess the role of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for both renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Multiple databases were searched for articles published as of February 2023. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated disease-free survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma receiving adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. In a network meta-analysis, pembrolizumab was shown to be the most effective regimen for patients with renal cell carcinoma, whereas nivolumab was found to be the most effective regimen for patients with urothelial carcinoma. Additionally, these results were consistently observed in a sub-analysis of the T stage. The present analysis provides findings that support the usefulness of adjuvant nivolumab therapy in urothelial carcinoma and adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy in renal cell carcinoma, in agreement with the currently available guidelines. However, the caveat is that the randomized controlled trials included in this analysis differed in important respects despite being similar in study design. Therefore, with these differences in mind, care needs to be taken when selecting patients for these immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies to maximize their benefits.

Department of Maternal Infant and Urological Sciences Sapienza University of Rome Policlinico Umberto 1 Hospital Rome Italy

Department of Medical Area Institute of Pathological Anatomy University of Udine Udine Italy

Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland

Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine S H Ho Urology Centre The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology La Croix du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France

Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

Department of Urology San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Department of Urology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Research Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

Urology Unit Department of Surgical Sciences Tor Vergata University Hospital University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bedke J, Capitanio U, Dabestani S, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update. Eur Urol. 2022;82:399-410.

Quhal F, Mori K, Bruchbacher A, Resch I, Mostafaei H, Pradere B, et al. First-line immunotherapy-based combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4:755-765.

Mori K, Pradere B, Moschini M, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, et al. First-line immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for chemotherapy-eligible patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2021;151:35-48.

Cathomas R, Lorch A, Bruins HM, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, Efstathiou JA, et al. The 2021 updated European Association of Urology guidelines on metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2022;81:95-103.

Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Yanagisawa T, Katayama S, Pradere B, Laukhtina E, et al. Reassessment of the efficacy of carboplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8:1687-1695.

Powles T, Bellmunt J, Comperat E, de Santis M, Huddart R, Loriot Y, et al. Bladder cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:244-258.

Tacconi EMC, Tuthill M, Protheroe A. Review of adjuvant therapies in renal cell carcinoma: evidence to date. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:12301-12316.

Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, Venugopal B, Ferguson T, Chang YH, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy in renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:683-694.

Powles T, Tomczak P, Park SH, Venugopal B, Ferguson T, Symeonides SN, et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as post-nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-564): 30-month follow-up analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:1133-1144.

Bajorin DF, Witjes JA, Gschwend JE, Schenker M, Valderrama BP, Tomita Y, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2102-2114.

Motzer RJ, Russo P, Grünwald V, Tomita Y, Zurawski B, Parikh O, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo for localised renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy (CheckMate 914): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401:821-832.

Pal SK, Uzzo R, Karam JA, Master VA, Donskov F, Suarez C, et al. Adjuvant atezolizumab versus placebo for patients with renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence following resection (IMmotion010): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1103-1116.

Bellmunt J, Hussain M, Gschwend JE, Albers P, Oudard S, Castellano D, et al. Adjuvant atezolizumab versus observation in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor010): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:525-537.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J. 2011;343:d5928.

van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3:285-299.

Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Ades AE. NICE decision support unit technical support documents. NICE DSU technical support document 2: a generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2014.

Woods BS, Hawkins N, Scott DA. Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: a tutorial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:54.

Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:58.

Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:163-171.

Donlon NE, Davern M, Hayes C, Power R, Sheppard AD, Donohoe CL, et al. The immune response to major gastrointestinal cancer surgery and potential implications for adjuvant immunotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;175:103729.

Sun Z, Mao A, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Chen J, Xu P, et al. Treatment with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody restored postoperative CD8+ T cell dysfunction by surgical stress. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;89:1235-1241.

Umemoto K, Togashi Y, Arai Y, Nakamura H, Takahashi S, Tanegashima T, et al. The potential application of PD-1 blockade therapy for early-stage biliary tract cancer. Int Immunol. 2020;32:273-281.

Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, Arén Frontera O, Melichar B, Choueiri TK, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1277-1290.

Duan J, Cui L, Zhao X, Bai H, Cai S, Wang G, et al. Use of immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 vs programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:375-384.

Mori K, Pradere B, Quhal F, Katayama S, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, et al. Differences in oncological and toxicity outcomes between programmed cell death-1 and programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021;99:102242.

Aggen DH, Drake CG, Rini BI. Targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 in metastatic kidney cancer: combination therapy in the first-line setting. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:2087-2095.

Khalil N, Sarkis J, Abi TG. Use of immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 vs programmed cell death ligand 1 in renal cell carcinoma: lessons from CheckMate 9ER and IMmotion 151. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021;27:266-267.

Chen L, Han X. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: past, present, and future. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3384-3391.

Poggio M, Hu T, Pai CC, Chu B, Belair CD, Chang A, et al. Suppression of Exosomal PD-L1 induces systemic anti-tumor immunity and memory. Cell. 2019;177:414-427.e13.

Daassi D, Mahoney KM, Freeman GJ. The importance of exosomal PDL1 in tumour immune evasion. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:209-215.

Gong B, Kiyotani K, Sakata S, Nagano S, Kumehara S, Baba S, et al. Secreted PD-L1 variants mediate resistance to PD-L1 blockade therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Exp Med. 2019;216:982-1000.

Patil G, Basu A. Emerging perioperative therapeutic approaches in muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ther Adv Urol. 2022;14:17562872221134389.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...