Choice, EE, Tufano, JJ, Jagger, KL, and Cochrane-Snyman, KC. Match-play external load and internal load in NCAA Division II women's soccer. J Strength Cond Res 37(12): e633-e639, 2023-The purpose of this study was to describe average match-play demands for NCAA DII women's soccer, including positional and time-specific differences, and relationships between variables. External load was assessed using total distance, relative distance, sprint distance, number of power plays, peak speed, and Player Load. Internal load was assessed using session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE). Mixed factor analysis of variance was used to assess time by position (midfielder, forward, or defender) for dependent measures. Correlations were assessed between separate pair groups. Average match-play demands included 9,463 ± 2,591 m total distance, 172 ± 48 m·min -1 relative distance, 531 ± 301 m sprint distance, peak speeds of 26 ± 1.6 kph, 46.71 ± 21.75 power plays, and 457.84 ± 121.78 AU Player Load. Significant ( p < 0.05) positional differences were found for total distance, Player Load, match load, and peak speed. Significant, moderate correlations were found between relative distance and match load, and sRPE and total distance, Player Load, and power plays (all p < 0.001). Results indicate there are positional differences within a women's DII soccer team, with midfielders accumulating the longest distances (10,509 ± 2,913 m) and greatest Player Load (527.79 ± 130.5 AU) and match load (576 ± 343 AU), forwards running the fastest peak speeds (26.8 ± 1.5 kph), and defenders maintaining most consistent performance. Match-play external and internal load data should be monitored by player position and half for DII women's soccer.

Charles University in the Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Prague Czech Republic; and

Concordia University of Chicago River Forest Illinois

Department of Health and Exercise Science School of Physical Therapy Regis University Denver Colorado

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Alexander R. Physical and Technical Demands of Women's Collegiate Soccer. PhD Dissertation. Johnson City, TN: East Tennessee State University, 2014.

Andersson HA, Randers MB, Heiner-Moller A, Krustrup P, Mohr M. Elite female soccer players perform more high-intensity running when playing in international games compared with domestic league games. J Strength Cond Res 24: 912–919, 2010.

Borg G. An Introduction to Borg's RPE-Scale. Movement Publications, 1985.

Bradley PS, Vescovi JD. Velocity thresholds for women's soccer matches: Sex specificity dictates high-speed-running and sprinting thresholds—female athletes in motion (FAiM). Int J Sports Physiol Perform 10: 112–116, 2015.

Casamichana D, Castellano J, Castagna C. Comparing the physical demands of friendly matches and small-sided games in semiprofessional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 26: 837–843, 2012.

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.

Corrales I. The Physical Demands of Women’s Collegiate Soccer Matches Assessed Using GPS Devices [master’s thesis]. Fullerton, CA: California State University; 2020.

Dalen T, Jørgen I, Gertjan E, Geir Havard H, Ulrik W. Player load, acceleration, and deceleration during forty-five competitive matches of elite soccer. J Strength Cond Res 30: 351–359, 2016.

Dupont G, Nedelec M, McCall A, et al. Effect of 2 soccer matches in a week on physical performance and injury rate. Am J Sports Med 38: 1752–1758, 2010.

Gentles JA, Coniglio CL, Besemer MM, Morgan JM, Mahnken MT. The demands of a women's college soccer season. Sports 6: 16, 2018.

Goulart KNO, Coimbra CC, Campos HO, et al. Fatigue and recovery time course after female soccer matches: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Open 8: 72–21, 2022.

Haff GG. Periodization. In: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (4th ed.). Haff GG, Triplett NT, eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2015.

Hamlin MJ, Wilkes D, Elliot CA, Lizamore CA, Kathiravel Y. Monitoring training loads and perceived stress in young elite university athletes. Front Physiol 10: 34, 2019.

Harkness-Armstrong A, Till K, Datson N, Myhill N, Emmonds S. A systematic review of match-play characteristics in women's soccer. PLoS One 17: e0268334, 2022.

Ishida A, Travis SK, Draper G, White JB, Stone MH. Player position affects relationship between internal and external training loads during Division I collegiate female soccer season. J Strength Cond Res 36: 513–517, 2021.

Izzo R, Giovannelli M. Session RPE and speed high intensity distance in meters: A valid method to analyze training load in soccer players. J Sports Sci 6: 159–164, 2018.

Jagim AR, Murphy J, Schaefer AQ, et al. Match demands of women's collegiate soccer. Sports 8: 87, 2020.

Johnston RJ, Watsford ML, Kelly SJ, Pine MJ, Spurrs RW. Validity and interunit reliability of 10 Hz and 15 Hz GPS units for assessing athlete movement demands. J Strength Cond Res 28: 1649–1655, 2014.

Kaya A. Decision making by coaches and athletes in sport. Proced Soc Behav Sci 152: 333–338, 2014.

Krustrup P, Mohr M, Ellingsgaard H, Bangsbo J. Physical demands during an elite female soccer game: Importance of training status. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: 1242–1248, 2005.

Lockie RG, Dawes JJ, Jones MT. Relationships between linear speed and lower-body power with change-of-direction speed in National Collegiate Athletic Association Divisions I and II women soccer athletes. Sports 6: 30, 2018.

McCormack WP, Stout JR, Wells AJ, et al. Predictors of high-intensity running capacity in collegiate women during a soccer game. J Strength Cond Res 28: 964–970, 2014.

McCormack WP, Hoffman JR, Pruna GJ, et al. Reduced high-intensity-running rate in college women's soccer when games are separated by 42 hours. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 10: 436–439, 2015.

McFadden BA, Walker AJ, Bozzini BN, Sanders DJ, Arent SM. Comparison of internal and external training loads in male and female collegiate soccer players during practices vs. games. J Strength Cond Res 34: 969–974, 2020.

McGahan J, Lacey S, Burns C, Gabbett T, O'Neill C. Variation in training load and markers of wellness across a season in an elite Gaelic football team. J Aust Strength Cond 27: 6–14, 2019.

McGuigan M. Administration, scoring, and interpretation of selected tests. In: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (4th ed.). Haff GG, Triplett NT. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2016. pp. 259–316.

Milanović Z, Sporiš G, James N, et al. Physiological demands, morphological characteristics, physical abilities and injuries of female soccer players. J Hum Kinet 60: 77–83, 2017.

Mohr M, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Match performance of high-standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. J Sports Sci 21: 519–528, 2003.

Mohr M, Krustrup P, Andersson H, Kirkendal D, Bangsbo J. Match activities of elite women soccer players at different performance levels. J Strength Cond Res 22: 341–349, 2008.

Nédélec M, McCall A, Carling C, et al. Recovery in soccer. Sports Med 42: 997–1015, 2012.

Nikolaidis PT, Clemente FM, Van der Linden CM, Rosemann T, Knechtle B. Validity and reliability of 10-Hz global positioning system to assess in-line movement and change of direction. Front Physiol 9: 228, 2018.

Rentz LE, Hornsby WG, Gawel WJ, et al. Contextual variation in external and internal workloads across the competitive season of a collegiate women's soccer team. Sports 9: 165, 2021.

Romero-Moraleda B, Nedergaard NJ, Morencos E, et al. External and internal loads during the competitive season in professional female soccer players according to their playing position: Differences between training and competition. Res Sports Med 29: 449–461, 2021.

Sausaman RW, Sams ML, Mizuguchi S, DeWeese BH, Stone MH. The physical demands of NCAA Division I women's college soccer. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 4: 73, 2019.

Scott MT, Scott TJ, Kelly VG. The validity and reliability of global positioning systems in team sport: A brief review. J Strength Cond Res 30: 1470–1490, 2016.

Smith R, Ford KR, Myer GD, et al. Biomechanical and performance differences between female soccer athletes in National Collegiate Athletic Association Divisions I and III. J Athl Train 42: 470–476, 2007.

Vanrenterghem J, Nedergaard NJ, Robinson MA, Drust B. Training load monitoring in team sports: A novel framework separating physiological and biomechanical load-adaptation pathways. Sports Med 47: 2135–2142, 2017.

Vescovi JD. Sprint profile of professional female soccer players during competitive matches: Female Athletes in Motion (FAiM) study. J Sports Sci 30: 1259–1265, 2012.

Vescovi JD, Favero TG. Motion characteristics of women's college soccer matches: Female Athletes in Motion (FAiM) study. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 9: 405–414, 2014.

Vescovi JD, Fernandes E, Klas A. Physical demands of women's soccer matches: A perspective across the developmental spectrum. Front Sports Act Living 3: 634696, 2021.

Wells AJ, Hoffman JR, Beyer KS, et al. Regular-and postseason comparisons of playing time and measures of running performance in NCAA Division I women soccer players. Appl Physiol Nutr Metabol 40: 907–917, 2015.